Misplaced Pages

Second Münster War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 9 December 2024 editCitrusHemlock (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,246 edits Commenting on submission (AFCH)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:37, 14 January 2025 edit undoVidarVN (talk | contribs)454 editsm →The siege of Groningen 
(34 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AFC submission|r||u=VidarVN|ns=118|reviewer=CitrusHemlock|reviewts=20241209201816|ts=20241209155633}} <!-- Do not remove this line! -->

{{AFC comment|1=Great work, I'm impressed with how much you found given the lack of English language sources. This could very well be a B-class article if the grammar and prose are cleaned up a bit. ]] 20:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)}}

----

{{Short description|War between the Dutch Republic and Münster}} {{Short description|War between the Dutch Republic and Münster}}
{{Draft topics|western-europe|military-and-warfare}}
{{AfC topic|other}}


{{infobox military conflict {{infobox military conflict
| conflict = Second Münster War | conflict = Second Münster War
| image = Dirk_Maas_-_Siege_of_Groeningen_by_Christian_Bernard_von_Galen,_bishop_of_Munster_-_M.Ob.408_MNW_-_National_Museum_in_Warsaw.jpg | image = Dirk_Maas_-_Siege_of_Groeningen_by_Christian_Bernard_von_Galen,_bishop_of_Munster_-_M.Ob.408_MNW_-_National_Museum_in_Warsaw.jpg
| image size = 300 | image_size = 300
| caption = The ] was the most important conflict and the turning point of the war | caption = The ] was the most important conflict and the turning point of the war
| partof = the ] | partof = the ]
Line 21: Line 13:
* ] * ]
| combatant1 = {{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ] | combatant1 = {{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]
| combatant2 = {{flagicon|Prince-Bishopric of Münster}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Kingdom of France}} ]<br>{{flagicon image|Black St George's Cross.svg}} ] | combatant2 = {{flagicon|Prince-Bishopric of Münster}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Kingdom of France}} ]<br>{{flagicon image|Black St George's Cross.svg}} ]
| commander1 = {{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ] | commander1 = {{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]
| commander2 = {{flagicon|Prince-Bishopric of Münster}} ]<br>{{flagicon image|Black St George's Cross.svg}} ] | commander2 = {{flagicon|Prince-Bishopric of Münster}} ]<br>{{flagicon image|Black St George's Cross.svg}} ]
| strength1 = Unknown | strength1 = Unknown
| strength2 = 30.000{{sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=84}}}} | strength2 = 30.000{{sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=84}}}}
{{Campaignbox Franco-Dutch War}}


The '''Second Münster War''' was a 2 year long conflicted between the ], against the ], backed by the ] and ]. The '''second Münster war''' ({{langx|nl|'''tweede Münsterse oorlog'''}}) ({{langx|de|'''zweite Holländischer krieg'''}}) was a 2 year long conflict between the ] and the ], which was backed by the ] and ].


The war is mostly known for the failed attempt by ] to ], this event was a turning point of the war which eventually lead to a Dutch victory due to the troops lead by ] being expulsed from the ]. The ] earned Bernhard the nickname 'Bommen Berend' and is still celebrated as a holiday in the ]. The war is mostly known for the failed attempt by ] to ], this event was a turning point of the war which eventually lead to a Dutch victory due to the troops lead by ] being expulsed from the ]. The ] earned Bernhard the nickname 'Bommen Berend' and is still celebrated as a holiday in the ].
Line 33: Line 26:
==Background== ==Background==


] led a ] 7 years prior to this war, although it was not as major as the second war. But after the ], ] lost 300 of his men, he eventually was forced to accept the humiliating ], in which he had to reduce his army to 3.000 men, and promised 'eternal' peace between him and the ]. Although the war was considered as a 'minor incident', it did show that the ] had a lack of power and needed to be improved. ] led a ] 7 years prior to this war, although it was not as major as the second war. But after the ], ] lost 300 of his men, he eventually was forced to accept the humiliating ], in which he had to renounce his claim to ],{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=772}} to reduce his army to 3.000 men, and promised 'eternal' peace between him and the ]. Although the war was considered as a 'minor incident', it did show that the ] had a lack of power and needed to be improved.{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=80}}{{Sfn|Rommelse|2006|p=147}}


]]] ]]]


But the eternal peace promised in 1666 would not last as ] would become allied with ] to ] in 1672. Because on the 26th of may, 2 days after ] ] in 1672, Louis was able to bribe ] to become allies with him, even though Bernhard was officially neutral during the ].{{sfn|Roorda|1971|p=76}} But the eternal peace promised in 1666 would not last as ] would become allied with ] to ] in 1672. Because on the 26th of may, 2 days after ] ] in 1672, Louis was able to bribe ] to become allies with him, even though Bernhard was officially neutral during the ].{{sfn|Roorda|1971|p=76}}


The French began their offensives in early May 1672 by attacking Dutch outposts in the Rhine to bypass Dutch defenses in the south and the ], and under the command of ] or simply 'Luxembourg', took the cities of ] and ] by 5 June, And ] on 9 June due to the garrisons being undermanned and barely equipped, these cities which were occupied by Dutch forces after the ] were ceded ] after the war.{{sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=134}} The French began their offensives in early May 1672 by attacking Dutch outposts in the Rhine to bypass Dutch defenses in the south and the ], and under the command of ] or simply 'Luxembourg', took the cities of ], ], ], ], ] and ] in just under a week.{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=797}} This was due to the garrisons being undermanned and barely equipped, these cities which were occupied by Dutch forces after the ] were ceded back to ] after the war.{{sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=134}}


==Before the siege of Groningen== ==War==
===Before the siege of Groningen===
{{main|Siege of Groenlo (1672)|Siege of Bredevoort (1672)}}


With ] joining the ] on the side of ], he immediately took action and invaded the Eastern Provinces of the ], and with the support of ] and ], he was able to capture a lot of cities in the Eastern provinces and was able to quickly advance into the North. With ] joining the ] on the side of ], he immediately took action and invaded the Eastern Provinces of the ], and with the support of ] and ], he was able to capture a lot of cities in the Eastern provinces and was able to quickly advance into the North.
Line 48: Line 41:
The first skirmishes began on 1 June, in which ], with the help of ], invaded and took ] with an army of 30,000 men. ] would then capture ] which allowed him to invade ], afterwards, ] would capture ]. The first skirmishes began on 1 June, in which ], with the help of ], invaded and took ] with an army of 30,000 men. ] would then capture ] which allowed him to invade ], afterwards, ] would capture ].


After capturing ], ] would move towards ], in which he was able to ] with 100,000 soldiers against a garrison defended by 600 men. The siege began on 3 June and ended on 9 June.{{Sfn|van Weduwen|2024|p=282}} The cities of ] and ] would then also be captured by the French forces, led by ] and ], ] would then take action himself and ] with an army of 2000 men against a garrison of 500 men, which surrendered after 6 days of fighting.{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=154}} After capturing ], ] would move towards ] to help the French, in which he was able to ] with 100,000 soldiers against a garrison defended by 600 men. The siege began on 3 June and ended on 9 June.{{Sfn|van Weduwen|2024|p=282}}{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=797}} ] would then take action himself and ] with an army of 2000 men against a garrison of 500 men, which surrendered after 6 days of fighting.{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=154}}
Afterwards, the Dutch and French would fight a short ] in which the Dutch lost 1.500 men.{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=797}}{{Sfn|Knoop|1861|p=209}} After the battle, the States of ] and the ] had to completely abandon the Ijssel line in order to shift its focus on defending ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=797}} Although the battle resulted in a French victory, the French commander ] was wounded in action, which meant that ] took over his role as supreme commander of the French forces. ] would split the French army into two and capture ] and ] afterwards after two separate sieges, along with a part of ]. {{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=807}}


These two sieges allowed ] to further invade ], and as a consequence captured many cities, including ] which fell on 21 June, and ] which fell one day later. The capture and subsequent looting and sacking of the cities that were captured by invading forces caused a lot of civilians to flee their homes to parts of the country that had not yet been occupied. And the cities of ] and ] were captured on 26 June. These two sieges allowed ] to further invade ], and as a consequence captured many cities, including ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=145-146}}{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=161}} Around the same time ] would fall after a ] on 21 June, and ] which fell one day later. The capture and subsequent looting and sacking of the cities that were captured by invading forces caused a lot of civilians to flee their homes to parts of the country that had not yet been occupied. And the cities of ] and ] were captured on 26 June.


], which was ]]] ], which was ]]]


Even though ]'s forces saw huge success in the east, he was not allowed to make further advances westward because this would offend his French allies. ] gained rights to the city of ], but Bernhard and Maximilian's forces had to retreat to the rear of the ] and had to lay their focus on the Northern provinces.{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=145-146}}{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=201-202}} Even though ]'s forces saw huge success in the east, he was not allowed to make further advances westward because this would offend his French allies. ] gained rights to the city of ], but Bernhard and Maximilian's forces had to retreat to the rear of the ] and had to lay their focus on the Northern provinces.{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=145-146}}{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=201-202}} After plundering ] for the second time, ] would move towards the ] in order to capture it, the ] was defended by a garrison that consisted of 150 musketeers and 55 pikemen. But after spotting ]'s march towards the ], they subsequently fled towards ], and the ] would be captured without a fight. Shortly after, the states of ] proclaimed ] as ] on 4 July.


Quickly after capturing the Ommerschans, ] would start the ], the siege began on 1 July, and after 11 days of fighting, the city surrendered. Due to the strategic position of ], the capture would made it possible for Benrhard to overrun the rest of ] and large parts of ]. And also opened up a possible invasion of Friesland, which by this point, had not yet been invaded by French or Münsterite forces.{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=167}}{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=807}} To make further conquests, ] would have to capture the strategic ], but that failed after a unsuccessful siege which had started on 11 July.{{Sfn|Seward|2006|p=23}} Afterwards, ] would move towards ] to start a siege, the city was well prepared in comparison to the other cities that he had besieged or captured, and was defended by ].
After plundering ] for the second time, ] would move towards the ] in order to capture, the ] was defended by a garrison that consisted of 150 musketeers and 55 pikemen. But after spotting ]'s march towards ], they subsequently fled towards ], and the ] would be captured without a fight. And shortly after, the states of ] proclaimed ] as ] on 4 July.


⚫ ===The siege of Groningen===
Quickly after capturing the Ommerschans, ] would start the ], the siege began on 1 July, and after 11 days of fighting, the city surrendered. Due to its strategic position, this opened up the provinces of ] and ] for an invasion.{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=167}}

To make further conquests, ] would have to capture the strategic ], but that attempt to capture the city failed after a siege which had started on 11 July.{{Sfn|Seward|2006|p=23}} Afterwards, ] would move towards ] to start a siege, the city was well prepared and defended by ].

⚫ ==The siege of Groningen==
{{main|Siege of Groningen (1672)}} {{main|Siege of Groningen (1672)}}


Line 69: Line 59:
]]] ]]]


The siege started on 21 July, the city was well prepared compared to the other cities that Bernhard previously captured. The city was defended by a garrison of 2.500 men under ].{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=280}}{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=283}} On 26 July, the Münsterite forces carried out their first bombardments of the city, these bombardment would earn Bernhard the nickname 'Bommen Berend'.{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=286}} For weeks, the Münsterite forces tried to unsuccessfully bombard the city, but to no avail. Eventually, on the 27th of August, Bernhard hard to retreat due to their men starving and a guerilla campaign in ] carried out by ] against their supplies.{{Sfn|Nimwegen|2020|p=121}}{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=286}}
The siege itself lasted for 4 weeks, which saw ] giving up the siege, which meant that ] was successfully defended. The ] is considered as the most important conflict of the war and the turning point. Since the siege meant that ] could not advance further North into the ], which saved ] and the rest of ] of an invasion by ].


And because ] was saved after the siege, this would also mean that that the trade route of ] would subsequently also be saved, because if ] fell into the hands of ], that would mean that the trade route would be endangered, because it revolved around the ].<ref>{{Cite web|ref=Historiek.net|website=Historiek.net|title=Groningens Ontzet en Bommen Berend (1672)|url=https://historiek.net/gronings-ontzet-1672/8866/}}</ref> And because ] was saved after the siege, this would also mean that that the trade route of ] would also be saved. Because if ] were to fall into the hands of ], that would mean that the trade route would be endangered. Because it revolved around the ].<ref>{{Cite web|ref=Historiek.net|website=Historiek.net|title=Groningens Ontzet en Bommen Berend (1672)|date=28 August 2024 |url=https://historiek.net/gronings-ontzet-1672/8866/}}</ref>


==After the siege of Groningen== ===After the siege of Groningen===


Shortly after the ], ] would try attack and capture the occupied fort of ] with 1200 soldiers and armed civilians, but that failed. ] would later launch an attack on ] in ], which would be defended by ], ], ] and ]. Between 8 to 9 September he would launch 3 offensives towards ]. All of them resulted in a failure for the Bishop's troops. Shortly after the ], ] would try attack and capture the occupied fort of ] with 1200 soldiers and armed civilians, but that failed. ] would later launch an attack on ] in ], which was defended by the now elderly ], ], ] and ]. Between 8 and 9 September he would launch 3 offensives towards ]. All of them resulted in a failure for the Bishop's troops, which meant that ] was secured from Münsterite occupation.{{Sfn|van der Aa|1852|p=449}}


Around the same time, ] would be recaptured by 8 September, and ] by 27 October by ]. And would ] shortly after with the help of ].{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=326-327}} Around the same time, ] would be recaptured by 8 September, and ] by 27 October by ]. And would ] shortly after with the help of ].{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=326-327}} The recapture of ] would also be a major event during this war, since the siege meant that the position of the war would shift towards the favour of the ].{{Sfn|Nimwegen|2020|p=127}} In January 1673, ] sacked and plundered ] and ] and met with ] near ]. Shortly after ] would start the negotiations with the Bishop in order to start their own conflict against ] and her allies. Meanwhile ] and ] would defeat the Münsterite forces after ], and would attack ] shortly after, but that resulted in a failure.{{Sfn|Potgieter|1851|p=445}}


On 22 July 1673, ] would be reconquered by ] after a lengthy blockade, and would try to reconquer ] afterwards, though that ended in a failure. A few months later in October, ] would appear before ] again to try to recapture it, this attack ended in a failure along with him losing 1400 men. A few months later, in November. Dutch and German troops under ] and ] besieged and ] which lasted 7 days, this cut off the French supply lines which meant they could no longer supply their war in the ] and had to retreat.{{Sfn|Nimwegen|2020|p=134}}{{Sfn|Fruin|1972|p=337}}{{Sfn|Panhuysen|2009|p=395}} In March 1674, ] would plunder ] and the surrounding areas again, and would launch a final attack on ] on 22 March. Shortly before the peace was finalized, ] invaded the territories of the ] and captured ] with 3000 men on 1 April and ] on 7 April. But had to retreat due to the peace treaty being signed between both parties.{{Sfn|Knoop|1862|p=104}}{{Sfn|van der Aa|1874|p=22}}
In January 1673, ] would sack and plunder ] and ] and met with ] near ]. Shortly after ] would start the negotiations with the Bishop in order to fight against ]. Meanwhile ] and ] would defeat the Münsterite forces after ], and would attack ] shortly after, but that resulted in a failure.{{Sfn|Potgieter|1851|p=445}}

On 22 July 1673, ] would be reconquered by ] after a lenghty blockade, and would try to reconquer ] afterwards, though that ended in a failure. A few months later in October, ] would appear before ] again to try to recapture it, this attack ended in a failure along with him losing 1400 men.

In march 1674, ] would plunder ] and the surrounding areas again, and would launch a final attack on ] on 22 March. Shortly before the peace would be finalized, ] would invade the territories of the ] and capture ] with 3000 men on 1 April and ] on 7 April, but eventually retreated due to the peace treaty being signed between both parties.{{Sfn|Knoop|1862|p=104}}{{Sfn|van der Aa|1874|p=22}}


==Aftermath== ==Aftermath==


The second Münster War would be the last of Münsterite attempts of invading the ], along with ] renouncing all claims in the Dutch Republic along with the ], who also left the war.{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=813}}{{Efn|] claimed the Dutch held cities of ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=813}}}} This also meant that ] lost two important allies that had helped them bypass the ] and Dutch outposts in the south. This, along with ] and the ] joining the ], meant that the French army had to retreat out of the ], leaving only ] under French occupation.<ref>{{Citeweb|ref=Encyclopaedia Britannica|website=Encyclopaedia Britannica|title=Dutch War, 1672–1678|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Dutch-War}}</ref> The second Münster War would be the last of Münsterite attempts of invading the ], along with ] renouncing all claims in the Dutch Republic, along with the ], who also left the war.{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=813}}{{Efn|] claimed the Dutch held cities of ], ] and ], but also ], ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Israel|1995|p=813}}}} This also meant that ] lost two important allies that had helped them bypass the ] and Dutch outposts in the south. This, along with ] and the ] joining the ], meant that the French army had to retreat out of the ], leaving only ] under French occupation.<ref>{{Cite web|ref=Encyclopaedia Britannica|website=Encyclopaedia Britannica|title=Dutch War, 1672–1678|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Dutch-War}}</ref>


] would also betray his former French ally after leaving the war due to him fighting for coalition forces against ] during the ].{{Efn|See ].}} The second Münster war also lead to the ] regarding ], since ] used many chemical weapons during the ], a few examples being ] and ] and poisoned bullets.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ekbDCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT102|title=The Book of Gun Trivia: Essential Firepower Facts|last=Rottman|first=Gordon L.|date=2013-10-20|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|isbn=9781782006206|language=en}}</ref> ] would also betray his former French ally after leaving the war due to him fighting for coalition forces against ] during the ].{{Efn|See ].}} The second Münster war also lead to the ] regarding ], since ] used many chemical weapons during the ], a few examples being ] and ] and poisoned bullets.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ekbDCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT102|title=The Book of Gun Trivia: Essential Firepower Facts|last=Rottman|first=Gordon L.|date=2013-10-20|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|isbn=9781782006206|language=en}}</ref>
Line 106: Line 92:
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


==Sources== ===Sources===
*{{Cite book|last=Panhuysen|first=Luc|title=Rampjaar 1672: Hoe de Republiek aan de ondergang ontsnapte|publisher=Uitgeverij Atlas|year=2009|isbn= 9789045013282}} *{{Cite book|last=Panhuysen|first=Luc|title=Rampjaar 1672: Hoe de Republiek aan de ondergang ontsnapte|publisher=Uitgeverij Atlas|year=2009|isbn= 9789045013282}}
*{{Cite book|last=Roorda|first=D.J|title=Het rampjaar 1672|publisher=Fibula-Van Dishoeck, Bussum|year=1971|isbn=9022830640}} *{{Cite book|last=Roorda|first=D.J|title=Het rampjaar 1672|publisher=Fibula-Van Dishoeck, Bussum|year=1971|isbn=9022830640}}
*{{Cite book|last=van Weduwen|first=Arthur|title=State Communication and Public Politics in the Dutch Golden Age|publisher=OUP/British Academy|year=2024|edition=E-book|url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/State_Communication_and_Public_Politics/KI4FEQAAQBAJ?hl=nl&gbpv=1&dq=groenlo+1672+100000&pg=PA282&printsec=frontcover|isbn=9780198926627}} *{{Cite book|last=van Weduwen|first=Arthur|title=State Communication and Public Politics in the Dutch Golden Age|publisher=OUP/British Academy|year=2024|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KI4FEQAAQBAJ&dq=groenlo+1672+100000&pg=PA282|isbn=9780198926627}}
*{{Cite book|last=Fruin|first=Robert|title=De oorlog van 1672|publisher=Wolters-Noordhof|year=1972|edition=E-book|url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/De_oorlog_van_1672/Et6OusPk-SUC?hl=nl&gbpv=1|isbn=9789001324155}} *{{Cite book|last=Fruin|first=Robert|title=De oorlog van 1672|publisher=Wolters-Noordhof|year=1972|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Et6OusPk-SUC|isbn=9789001324155}}
*{{Cite book|last=Israel|first=Jonathan|title=The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806|year=1995|publisher=Oxford: Clarendon Press|isbn=9780198207344}} *{{Cite book|last=Israel|first=Jonathan|title=The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806|year=1995|publisher=Oxford: Clarendon Press|isbn=9780198207344}}
*{{Cite book|last=Seward|first=Pat|title=Netherlands|year=2006|publisher=Marshall Cavendish|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Wx-gaNZORsC&dq=Bourtange&pg=PA23&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Bourtange&f=false|isbn=9780761420521}} *{{Cite book|last=Seward|first=Pat|title=Netherlands|year=2006|publisher=Marshall Cavendish|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Wx-gaNZORsC&dq=Bourtange&pg=PA23|isbn=9780761420521}}
* {{Cite book|last=Potgieter|first=Everhardus Johannes|title=De gids: nieuwe vaderlandsche letteroefeningen, Volume 15,Deel 2;Volume 30|publisher=G.J.A. Beijerinck|year=1851|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LwZVAAAAcAAJ&dq=staphorst+1673&pg=PA445}} * {{Cite book|last=Potgieter|first=Everhardus Johannes|title=De gids: nieuwe vaderlandsche letteroefeningen, Volume 15,Deel 2;Volume 30|publisher=G.J.A. Beijerinck|year=1851|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LwZVAAAAcAAJ&dq=staphorst+1673&pg=PA445}}
*{{Cite book|last=Knoop|first=Willem Jan|title= *{{Cite book|last=Knoop|first=Willem Jan|title=
Krijgs- en geschiedkundige geschriften, Volume 3|year=1862|publisher=H. A. M. Roelants|edition=E-book|url=https://www.google.nl/books/edition/Krijgs_en_geschiedkundige_geschriften/sRlLAAAAMAAJ?hl=nl&gbpv=1&dq=noordhoorn+1674&pg=PA104&printsec=frontcover}} Krijgs- en geschiedkundige geschriften, Volume 1|year=1861|publisher=H. A. M. Roelants|edition=E-book|url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Krijgs_en_geschiedkundige_geschriften/cJ47AAAAcAAJ?hl=nl&gbpv=1&dq=krijg+en+geschiedkundige+schriften+knoop+1861&pg=PP11&printsec=frontcover}}
*{{Cite book|last=Knoop|first=Willem Jan|title=
Krijgs- en geschiedkundige geschriften, Volume 3|year=1862|publisher=H. A. M. Roelants|edition=E-book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sRlLAAAAMAAJ&dq=noordhoorn+1674&pg=PA104}}
*{{Cite book|last=van der Aa|first=A.J|title=Rabenhaupt (Karel), Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederlanden, Vol. 16|year=1874|publisher=Brederode|edition=E-book|url=https://resources.huygens.knaw.nl/retroboeken/vdaa/#source=aa__001biog19_01.xml&page=18&view=imagePane}} *{{Cite book|last=van der Aa|first=A.J|title=Rabenhaupt (Karel), Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederlanden, Vol. 16|year=1874|publisher=Brederode|edition=E-book|url=https://resources.huygens.knaw.nl/retroboeken/vdaa/#source=aa__001biog19_01.xml&page=18&view=imagePane}}
* {{Cite book|last1=van der Aa|first1=Abraham Jacob|year=1852|title=Hans Willem van Aylva, Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden. Deel 1|url=https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/aa__001biog01_01/aa__001biog01_01_0587.php|edition=E-book}}
*{{Cite book|last=Nimwegen|first=Olaf. van|title=De Veertigjarige Oorlog 1672-1712, De strijd van de Nederlanders tegen de Zonnekoning|year=2020|publisher=Prometheus|isbn=9044638718}}
*{{Cite book|last=Rommelse|first=G.|title=The Second Anglo-Dutch War (1665-1667)|year=2006|publisher=Verloren|isbn=9789065509079}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Second Munster War}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 18:37, 14 January 2025

War between the Dutch Republic and Münster
Second Münster War
Part of the Franco-Dutch War

The Siege of Groningen was the most important conflict and the turning point of the war
Date1672-1674
LocationThe Eastern and the Northern Netherlands
Result

Dutch victory

Belligerents
Dutch Republic Dutch Republic Prince-Bishopric of Münster Bishopric of Münster
Kingdom of France Kingdom of France
Electorate of Cologne
Commanders and leaders
Dutch Republic Carl von Rabenhaupt
Dutch Republic Hans Willem van Aylva
Dutch Republic Nassau-Siegen
Dutch Republic Henry Casimir II		 Prince-Bishopric of Münster Bernhard von Galen
Maximilian Henry
Strength
Unknown 30.000
Franco-Dutch War
Low Countries and Lower Rhine

Upper Rhine

France

Southern Italy

North Germany and Scandinavia

Pyrenees

Americas

Naval battles

The second Münster war (Dutch: tweede Münsterse oorlog) (German: zweite Holländischer krieg) was a 2 year long conflict between the Dutch Republic and the Prince-Bishopric of Münster, which was backed by the Electorate of Cologne and France.

The war is mostly known for the failed attempt by Bernhard von Galen to capture Groningen, this event was a turning point of the war which eventually lead to a Dutch victory due to the troops lead by Bernhard von Galen being expulsed from the Dutch Republic. The siege of Groningen earned Bernhard the nickname 'Bommen Berend' and is still celebrated as a holiday in the Netherlands.

Background

Bernhard von Galen led a invasion of the Dutch Republic 7 years prior to this war, although it was not as major as the second war. But after the Battle of Jipsinghuizen, Bernhard von Galen lost 300 of his men, he eventually was forced to accept the humiliating treaty of Kleve, in which he had to renounce his claim to Borculo, to reduce his army to 3.000 men, and promised 'eternal' peace between him and the Dutch Republic. Although the war was considered as a 'minor incident', it did show that the Dutch States Army had a lack of power and needed to be improved.

Portrait of Christoph Bernhard von Galen

But the eternal peace promised in 1666 would not last as Bernhard von Galen would become allied with Louis XIV to invade the Dutch Republic in 1672. Because on the 26th of may, 2 days after Louis XIV attacked Maastricht in 1672, Louis was able to bribe Bernhard von Galen to become allies with him, even though Bernhard was officially neutral during the war of Devolution.

The French began their offensives in early May 1672 by attacking Dutch outposts in the Rhine to bypass Dutch defenses in the south and the Spanish Netherlands, and under the command of François-Henri de Montmorency or simply 'Luxembourg', took the cities of Kleve, Rheinberg, Orsoy, Emmerich, Rees and Wesel in just under a week. This was due to the garrisons being undermanned and barely equipped, these cities which were occupied by Dutch forces after the Thirty Years' War were ceded back to Brandenburg-Prussia after the war.

War

Before the siege of Groningen

With Bernhard von Galen joining the Franco-Dutch War on the side of Louis XIV, he immediately took action and invaded the Eastern Provinces of the Dutch Republic, and with the support of France and Cologne, he was able to capture a lot of cities in the Eastern provinces and was able to quickly advance into the North.

The first skirmishes began on 1 June, in which Bernhard von Galen, with the help of Maximilian Henry, invaded and took Lingen with an army of 30,000 men. Bernhard von Galen would then capture Overdinkel which allowed him to invade Twente, afterwards, Bernhard von Galen would capture Enschede.

After capturing Enschede, Bernhard von Galen would move towards Groenlo to help the French, in which he was able to capture the city with 100,000 soldiers against a garrison defended by 600 men. The siege began on 3 June and ended on 9 June. Bernhard von Galen would then take action himself and besiege and capture Bredevoort with an army of 2000 men against a garrison of 500 men, which surrendered after 6 days of fighting. Afterwards, the Dutch and French would fight a short battle near Lobith in which the Dutch lost 1.500 men. After the battle, the States of Holland and the States General had to completely abandon the Ijssel line in order to shift its focus on defending Holland, Zeeland and Utrecht. Although the battle resulted in a French victory, the French commander Condé was wounded in action, which meant that Turenne took over his role as supreme commander of the French forces. Turenne would split the French army into two and capture Doesburg and Nijmegen afterwards after two separate sieges, along with a part of North Brabant.

These two sieges allowed Bernhard von Galen to further invade Overijssel, and as a consequence captured many cities, including Hattem, Lochem and Harderwijk. Around the same time Deventer would fall after a siege on 21 June, and Zwolle which fell one day later. The capture and subsequent looting and sacking of the cities that were captured by invading forces caused a lot of civilians to flee their homes to parts of the country that had not yet been occupied. And the cities of Steenwijk and Kuinre were captured on 26 June.

Depiction of Deventer, which was besieged by von Galen

Even though Bernhard von Galen's forces saw huge success in the east, he was not allowed to make further advances westward because this would offend his French allies. Maximilian Henry gained rights to the city of Deventer, but Bernhard and Maximilian's forces had to retreat to the rear of the Ijssel and had to lay their focus on the Northern provinces. After plundering Rijssen for the second time, Bernhard von Galen would move towards the Ommerschans in order to capture it, the Ommerschans was defended by a garrison that consisted of 150 musketeers and 55 pikemen. But after spotting Bernhard von Galen's march towards the Ommerschans, they subsequently fled towards Groningen, and the Ommerschans would be captured without a fight. Shortly after, the states of Holland proclaimed William III of Orange as Stadtholder on 4 July.

Quickly after capturing the Ommerschans, Bernhard von Galen would start the siege of Coevorden, the siege began on 1 July, and after 11 days of fighting, the city surrendered. Due to the strategic position of Coevorden, the capture would made it possible for Benrhard to overrun the rest of Drenthe and large parts of Groningen (province). And also opened up a possible invasion of Friesland, which by this point, had not yet been invaded by French or Münsterite forces. To make further conquests, Bernhard von Galen would have to capture the strategic Fort Bourtange, but that failed after a unsuccessful siege which had started on 11 July. Afterwards, Bernhard von Galen would move towards Groningen to start a siege, the city was well prepared in comparison to the other cities that he had besieged or captured, and was defended by Carl von Rabenhaupt.

The siege of Groningen

Main article: Siege of Groningen (1672)

On 21 July, Bernhard von Galen arrived before the city of Groningen. The soldiers who defended the city, led by Carl von Rabenhaupt and Hans Willem van Aylva were also backed by refugees who fled from Drenthe after it was conquered by Münster.

Depiction of the siege of Groningen

The siege started on 21 July, the city was well prepared compared to the other cities that Bernhard previously captured. The city was defended by a garrison of 2.500 men under Carl von Rabenhaupt. On 26 July, the Münsterite forces carried out their first bombardments of the city, these bombardment would earn Bernhard the nickname 'Bommen Berend'. For weeks, the Münsterite forces tried to unsuccessfully bombard the city, but to no avail. Eventually, on the 27th of August, Bernhard hard to retreat due to their men starving and a guerilla campaign in Friesland carried out by Hans Willem van Aylva against their supplies.

And because Friesland was saved after the siege, this would also mean that that the trade route of Amsterdam would also be saved. Because if Friesland were to fall into the hands of Bernhard von Galen, that would mean that the trade route would be endangered. Because it revolved around the Zuiderzee.

After the siege of Groningen

Shortly after the siege of Groningen, Hans Willem van Aylva would try attack and capture the occupied fort of Kuinre with 1200 soldiers and armed civilians, but that failed. Bernhard von Galen would later launch an attack on Heerenveen in Friesland, which was defended by the now elderly John Maurice of Nassau-Siegen, Hans Willem van Aylva, Carl von Rabenhaupt and Henry Casimir II. Between 8 and 9 September he would launch 3 offensives towards Heerenveen. All of them resulted in a failure for the Bishop's troops, which meant that Friesland was secured from Münsterite occupation.

Around the same time, Wedde would be recaptured by 8 September, and Oudeschans by 27 October by Carl von Rabenhaupt. And would recapture Coevorden shortly after with the help of Mijndert van der Thijnen. The recapture of Coevorden would also be a major event during this war, since the siege meant that the position of the war would shift towards the favour of the Dutch Republic. In January 1673, Bernhard von Galen sacked and plundered Cleves and Mark and met with Turenne near Wesel. Shortly after Raimondo Montecuccoli would start the negotiations with the Bishop in order to start their own conflict against France and her allies. Meanwhile John Maurice of Nassau-Siegen and Hans Willem van Aylva would defeat the Münsterite forces after an engagement near Staphorst, and would attack Zwartsluis shortly after, but that resulted in a failure.

On 22 July 1673, Nieuweschans would be reconquered by Carl von Rabenhaupt after a lengthy blockade, and would try to reconquer Steenwijk afterwards, though that ended in a failure. A few months later in October, Bernhard von Galen would appear before Coevorden again to try to recapture it, this attack ended in a failure along with him losing 1400 men. A few months later, in November. Dutch and German troops under Menno van Coehoorn and Raimondo Montecuccoli besieged and captured Bonn which lasted 7 days, this cut off the French supply lines which meant they could no longer supply their war in the Dutch Republic and had to retreat. In March 1674, Bernhard von Galen would plunder Windschoten and the surrounding areas again, and would launch a final attack on Groningen on 22 March. Shortly before the peace was finalized, Carl von Rabenhaupt invaded the territories of the Bishopric of Münster and captured Nordhorn with 3000 men on 1 April and Neuenhaus on 7 April. But had to retreat due to the peace treaty being signed between both parties.

Aftermath

The second Münster War would be the last of Münsterite attempts of invading the Dutch Republic, along with Bernhard von Galen renouncing all claims in the Dutch Republic, along with the Electorate of Cologne, who also left the war. This also meant that France lost two important allies that had helped them bypass the Spanish Netherlands and Dutch outposts in the south. This, along with Spain and the Holy Roman Empire joining the war against France, meant that the French army had to retreat out of the Dutch Republic, leaving only Maastricht under French occupation.

Bernhard von Galen would also betray his former French ally after leaving the war due to him fighting for coalition forces against Sweden during the Scanian War. The second Münster war also lead to the first international agreement regarding Chemical weapons, since Bernhard von Galen used many chemical weapons during the siege of Groningen, a few examples being Stink bombs and Grenades and poisoned bullets.

Gallery

Notes

  1. Bernhard von Galen claimed the Dutch held cities of Lingen, Bredevoort and Groenlo, but also Lichtenvoorde, Borculo, Westerwolde and Lingen.
  2. See Bremen-Verden campaign.

References

  1. ^ Israel 1995, p. 813.
  2. Panhuysen 2009, p. 84.
  3. Israel 1995, p. 772.
  4. Panhuysen 2009, p. 80.
  5. Rommelse 2006, p. 147.
  6. Roorda 1971, p. 76.
  7. ^ Israel 1995, p. 797.
  8. Panhuysen 2009, p. 134.
  9. van Weduwen 2024, p. 282.
  10. Fruin 1972, p. 154.
  11. Knoop 1861, p. 209.
  12. ^ Israel 1995, p. 807.
  13. ^ Panhuysen 2009, p. 145-146.
  14. Fruin 1972, p. 161.
  15. Panhuysen 2009, p. 201-202.
  16. Fruin 1972, p. 167.
  17. Seward 2006, p. 23.
  18. Fruin 1972, p. 280.
  19. Fruin 1972, p. 283.
  20. ^ Fruin 1972, p. 286.
  21. Nimwegen 2020, p. 121.
  22. "Groningens Ontzet en Bommen Berend (1672)". Historiek.net. 28 August 2024.
  23. van der Aa 1852, p. 449.
  24. Fruin 1972, p. 326-327.
  25. Nimwegen 2020, p. 127.
  26. Potgieter 1851, p. 445.
  27. Nimwegen 2020, p. 134.
  28. Fruin 1972, p. 337.
  29. Panhuysen 2009, p. 395.
  30. Knoop 1862, p. 104.
  31. van der Aa 1874, p. 22.
  32. "Dutch War, 1672–1678". Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  33. Rottman, Gordon L. (2013-10-20). The Book of Gun Trivia: Essential Firepower Facts. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9781782006206.

Sources

Categories: