Revision as of 18:16, 24 December 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,118 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Jclemens/Archive 15) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:37, 17 January 2025 edit undoJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,526 edits →Appealing against deletion?: r | ||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
== |
== Appealing against deletion? == | ||
Can I ask you for some advice? My was ]. (It was redirected, but in effect it was deleted.) You were the only person who voted to keep it. Is there anything I can do to appeal against the deletion? I don't think the process was very fair. Some of the votes were cast when the article was still a stub and before I had had a chance to expand it; other votes relied on arguments that are in my view questionable. It was also a non-admin closure (if that matters). ] (]) 12:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
:Hello again. I decided to request a deletion review: ]. ] (]) 19:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] (]) is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! <br /> | |||
::So, DRV isn't looking terribly positive, but I'd argue that a NAC DRV with no consensus should be overturned. If it's not, then feel free to find and add more content and unredirect. Unfortunately DRV is being rather stupid about not assessing the validity of arguments made lately--the notion that an RS has to mention a topic by name is improper, but no one is engaging with that critique. ] (]) 21:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
</div> | |||
<small>I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :)</small> ] (]) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:37, 17 January 2025
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
I'm no longer an administrator, so if you're looking for someone to undelete something I deleted, you'd be better off asking at WP:REFUND
Position Essays may help you understand my point of view with regard to...
Appealing against deletion?
Can I ask you for some advice? My article about Chokobsa was deleted today. (It was redirected, but in effect it was deleted.) You were the only person who voted to keep it. Is there anything I can do to appeal against the deletion? I don't think the process was very fair. Some of the votes were cast when the article was still a stub and before I had had a chance to expand it; other votes relied on arguments that are in my view questionable. It was also a non-admin closure (if that matters). Khiikiat (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello again. I decided to request a deletion review: Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2025 January 16#Chakobsa (Dune). Khiikiat (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- So, DRV isn't looking terribly positive, but I'd argue that a NAC DRV with no consensus should be overturned. If it's not, then feel free to find and add more content and unredirect. Unfortunately DRV is being rather stupid about not assessing the validity of arguments made lately--the notion that an RS has to mention a topic by name is improper, but no one is engaging with that critique. Jclemens (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)