Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:02, 25 December 2024 view sourceHappily888 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers18,506 edits Adding new report for ChasePlowman2014.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:08, 15 January 2025 view source TheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,380 edits →User:Boackandwhite reported by User:TheTimesAreAChanging (Result: ): + Diffs. 
(543 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}} {{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
{{pp-sock|small=yes}}
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ] <!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
{{pp-move|small=yes}} {{pp-move|small=yes}}
Line 5: Line 6:
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 490 |counter = 491
|algo = old(2d) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
Line 12: Line 13:
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. --> <!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinitely blocked) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br /> '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Olivia Rodrigo}}
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Slomzy0932}}
'''Previous version reverted to:'''

'''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff|oldid=1268642187|diff=1268970122|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}}
#
## {{diff2|1268969880|11:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
#
## {{diff2|1268970122|11:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
#
#


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''




'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead


Excessive and unsourced genres. Warning at ]. See also, which Twinkle isn't including: (initial edit), , , , and . Edit warring over multiple days. ''']''' • 11:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
*Indefinitely blocked.--] (]) 16:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
*:Left CTOPS notice on talk as article has been semi-protected since last November. ] (]) 20:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==
] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Indonesian cuisine}}
== ] reported by ] (Result: Both blocked 48 hours) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Robert de Quincy}} <br /> '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Malayologist}}
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Pipera}}


'''Previous version reverted to:''' '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269033903|18:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""These are all poorly sourced" sources are taken from the respective wiki pages for each dish. They are properly sourced. The Arab, Indian, and Chinese sections were not even sourced, and you're okay with that."
#
# {{diff2|1269021132|17:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Please note that there is more to the story than just Upin Ipin. I kindly request that you review the entire content before making any changes. Additionally, I would appreciate it if you could refrain from reverting the edits solely because of the inclusion of Upin Ipin, as it is only one aspect of the broader context."
#
# {{diff2|1269015313|16:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Sourced"
#
# {{diff2|1269004089|15:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Sourced: Ramly Burger and Roti John also popular"
#
#
#


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' '''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1269031551|18:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' , '''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
# {{diff2|1269033781|18:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Malaysian "influences" */ new section"
# {{diff2|1269033887|18:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Malaysian "influences" */"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] (]) 18:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 72 hours) ==
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Peace}}
Pipera has chosen to add grandchildren and great grandchildren to the Robert de Quincy article. I have stated on the article talk page this is unnecessary and off-topic to Robert de Quincy. They have also misrepresented what a source states, which I have also stated on the article talk page.


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|159.146.51.112}}
Even while filling out this report Pipera has reverted me twice, choosing to add back an unused 1790 source to the Sources section, and readding Robert's grandchildren and great grandchildren. This after being told by user:Ealdgyth(17 December 2024) that ]. Honestly, I don't think Pipera is here to build a community encyclopedia. --] (]) 23:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
{{hat|content user added to the article.--] (]) 00:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}}
:I have added the followi9ng:
:Robert married Orabilis, daughter of Nes fitz William, Lord of Leuchars. .
:Orabilis was married three times to Morggán, Earl of Mar and Adam of Fife, as stated in the links provided.
:They had:
:Saer de Quincy (died 1219), married Margaret de Beaumont, daughter of Robert de Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester
:Unknown (daughter) de Quincy married de St Andrew
:Sir Saer I de St Andrew of East Haddon married Matilda de Dyve daughter of Hugh Dyve and Agnes they had issue:
:Robert de St Andrew married Albreda
:James de St Andrew (1228)
:Ralph de St Andrew (1228 - 1278)
:William de St Andrew
:Laurence de St Andrew
:Saer II de St Andrew
:John de St Andrew
:Sir Roger de St Andrew (d before 1249)
:Orabilis and Robert divorced.
:Secondly, he married Eve of Galloway, who was previously married to Walter Barclay. .
:it is alright for the children of Saer de Quincy to be placed on his page here, and not for the children of his sis5ter not to be placed here.
:They are also the grandchildren of the said parents and deserve the right to be placed there as well as the marriages of Roberts first wife and her three husbands as well as the second marriage of Robert her husband.
{{hab}}
:I do not think I have broken any rules by adding this to his article supported by the external links provided. ] (]) 00:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I have posted to the talk page this is also incorrect. ] (]) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I am not in an edit war, I posted new information which is educationally correct and was removed without any academic argument it was gone. no pre talk on the talk page concerning what was supplied by the person deleting the information.
:They firstly need to raise and entry and then talk and resolve, ] (]) 00:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I am expanding these articles not rolling them back. I have been editing here since at least the year 2001, I was editing entries for the 9/11 project obituaries for the people that passed in 9/11. ] (]) 00:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:See
:User talk:Paramandyr: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Paramandyr&diff=prev&oldid=1264014635
:Latest revision as of 23:20, 19 December 2024 edit undo thank
:Paramandyr (talk | contribs)
:removed, stay off my talk page
:Tag: Undo ] (]) 00:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|bb|48 hours}}. ] (]) 00:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: Stale; content removed) ==


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Sigma Boy}} <br />
# {{diff2|1269051964|20:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2804:14C:BBE7:44CE:B8E5:FEDB:67F5:D84D}}
# {{diff2|1268989837|13:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1268792423|15:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
'''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
#


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


Already given multiple warnings ( and ) on ], yet behavior ongoing. ] (]) 20:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
*{{AN3|b|72 hours}}. ] (]) 21:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) ==
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
If the IP reverts one more time, could someone please block them and revert their nonsensical edit? (Okay, maybe it's not "nonsensical", but it's incorrect.) ] (]) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|s}}; content removed until a consensus is found ] (]) 13:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Scott Ritter}}
== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Lindy Li}} <br /> '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Luganchanka}}
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}}


'''Previous version reverted to:''' '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269047798|19:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Rollback to last version of this article approved by senior wikipedia editors, please go to talkpage and build consensus before further edits"
#
# {{diff2|1269046014|19:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) That is your opinion, take it to the talkpage to build consensus before any further reverts, and please remember Misplaced Pages policy on ]"
#
# {{diff2|1269040838|19:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) No ] please - take it to the talkpage to build consensus for your claim"
#
# {{diff2|1269040051|19:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) This will have to go to the talkpage, as at the moment it is looking like a concerted attempt by certain editors to whitewash a sexual offence. The current edit is absolutely ridiculous, making it look as if Ritter knew he was speaking to a police officer. To the talkpage."
#
# {{diff2|1268728980|06:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) No consensus reached on this on the talkpage, and this lead already approved by multiple senior editors"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
{{diff2|1269047181|19:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on Scott Ritter."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
# {{diff2|1268633627|19:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC) on Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard}} "/* Scott Ritter Biography - Noncompliance with MOS and BLP Guidelines */ new section"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}}. ] (]) 23:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


:Left CTOPS notice on talk page. ] (]) 20:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


== ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinitely pblocked from editing the article) ==
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch.


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Twelfth Night (holiday)}} <br />
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|RobinCarmody}}

'''Previous version reverted to:'''

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
#
#
#
# (added since this report was filed)


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> <u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Not a 3RR violation, but definitely slow-burn edit warning. RobinCarmody has repeatedly edited in redundant, clumsy and ] phrasing into the sentence. I have explained why I don't think it is necessary or valid on the talk page. He is free to disagree of course, but a resolution cannot be reached by avoiding the dsicussion. After 20 years on Misplaced Pages he should know the ropes by now. ] (]) 13:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
*Indefinitely pblocked. In addition to the edit-warring, the user's failure to discuss their edits on the article Talk page is concerning. Also, the user should use edit summaries, particularly when reverting other users. The user has some 16K edits, of which just a bit over 4% include edit summaries. Edit summaries are not required, but many unexplained edits are looked at with suspicion.--] (]) 16:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: blocked for 24 hours) ==
Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. ] • ] • ] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Murder_of_Wong_Chik_Yeok}}
:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? ] (]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::@]
::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand ] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. ] • ] • ] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. ] (]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. ] • ] • ] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). , for those curious. ] (]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] ] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Janessian}}
== ] and ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}}


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
'''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1269257936|20:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."

'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

User:Janessian is repeatedly removing the same images. By my count they have manually reverted 6 or 7 times. ] (]) 20:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I had in fact already decided to block before this report was filed. ] (]) 20:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: p-block) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|2010: The Year We Make Contact}}

'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Æ's old account wasn't working}}

'''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269290040|23:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Stop simping for Metacritic!"
#
# {{diff2|1269289340|23:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) That sentence is unsourced. Get over it."
#
# {{diff2|1269285767|23:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Stop."
#
# {{diff2|1269177396|11:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Don't start."
# (second IP)
# {{diff2|1269138638|06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Omitting the sentence entirely like what we have done with ] I feel might be the best strategy, seeing as both films have wildly differing RT and MC scores."


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1269289036|23:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
# {{diff2|1267674454|04:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC) on Talk:2010: The Year We Make Contact}} "/* Unsourced content in lead */ r"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>


This editor was banned last week for 7 days after 5 reverts about this same content (). They have now made 5 reverts again today, the first day that their block ended. They have barely contributed to the extensive talk page discussion, where other editors have been working towards a consensus. – ] (]) 23:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


:Yes, I will discuss the issue on the talk page. Getting a little impulsive with these reverts. ] (]) 23:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page
::You are already at 5 reverts on the day your block for making 5 reverts about the same content ended, and now you are also sending out 3RR notices to other editors such as me (despite me only reverting twice, as there were 2 other editors who also reverted you today). The talk page discussion has been ongoing for over a month, and I think your contribution there so far speak for themselves. – ] (]) 23:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
:::You only seem to focus on my contributions to reverting the changes, not my contributions to the talk page discussion. If you want this edit war to end, best you stop by on the talk page to do some civil discussion. ] (]) 00:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Æ, you made ] to the talk page discussion three minutes before writing this reply. You aren't really in a position to demands others "stop by on the talk page" when it took four reverts from three different editors before you did the same. <span class="nowrap">– ] ] <small>(])</small></span> 00:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::I guess my ADHD brain thinks reverting is better than discussion on the talk page. At this point I don't even know why I keep edit warring. Maybe I have inherited this "bludgeoning" from my father. Don't know anymore. I just don't.
:::::Help me. I don't think I can take it anymore. I have gone mentally insane. ] (]) 00:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::It's difficult to say why any of us edit war, but you're not alone in it. I think the best option is to just ]. Consider ] or finding another article to work on in the meantime; ], so keep doing that. Find something that ]. Just remember, ]. <span class="nowrap">– ] ] <small>(])</small></span> 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Problem is, all of my edits get reverted. I can't figure out why. I am stuck in a permanent edit war on every article I touch, whether I like it or not. HELP! ] (]) 00:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::All of them. On every article I edit. All of them get reverted. ] (]) 00:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::That's not entirely true; looking at ], I see many edits that were not reverted. In any case, you should consider reversions an opportunity to ]; ] and explain your edits. You may learn something to keep in mind for the future, or you might teach something to someone else. It's always better to respond to reversion ] than with ]. <span class="nowrap">– ] ] <small>(])</small></span> 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Understood. ] (]) 00:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Do you even take my edits into consideration? ] (]) 00:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
*Since Æ's old account wasn't working cannot keep himself from reverting on this article even after having been previously blocked from edit warring at the same article, I've partially blocked him from the article for a month. If he gets talk page consensus for the disputed edits prior to the block expiring let me know and I'll lift the block.-- ]<sup>]</sup> 00:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: /64 range blocked) ==
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2025}}
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a stating {{tq|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. ] | ] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2600:1001:B129:3A84:31C2:67F3:252:DDAA}}

'''Previous version reverted to:'''

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269301065|00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269301010|00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300981|00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300846|00:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300458|00:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300407|00:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300369|00:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300275|00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300228|00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300185|00:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269300108|00:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"

'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1269300306|00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Removal of content, blanking."

'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
*/64 range blocked by another admin.--] (]) 14:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Marc Benioff}} '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Scuderia Ferrari}}


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|99.98.190.59}} '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Baldoz}}


'''Previous version reverted to:''' '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269468204|21:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1265027253|18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269467160|20:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1265009969|16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1269462212|20:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Fixed discrepancies made by user Lobo151"
# {{diff2|1264902002|03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1264865734|23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
#
#


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' '''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1265024674|18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]." # {{diff2|1269466345|20:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Notice: Edit warring softer wording for newcomers ]"
# {{diff2|1265033023|18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule." # {{diff2|1269467260|20:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Notice: Edit warring stronger wording ]"


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' '''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

# {{diff2|1265024924|18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <u>'''Comments:'''</u>
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}} ] ] 21:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == == ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dune: Part Two}} '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Pudukkottai}}


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|ChasePlowman2014}} '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2409:408D:4DC2:2922:0:0:8388:6C0F}}


'''Previous version reverted to:''' '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1269501838|00:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265161751|12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=1268811016|diff=1269371545|label=Consecutive edits made from 09:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC) to 10:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}}
# {{diff2|1265079289|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1269370583|09:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265038799|19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1264974672|12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "" ## {{diff2|1269371545|10:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' '''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1265079184|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring." # {{diff2|1269502083|00:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."
# {{diff2|1265080757|00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' '''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

# {{diff2|1265080353|00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <u>'''Comments:'''</u>
:See also the history of ] ] 04:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:See link to my request to have the page protected ] and that request's denial ]

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Afghan mujahideen}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Boackandwhite}}

'''Previous version reverted to:''' ;

'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''

'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Boackandwhite, a new account with fewer than 100 edits, has already racked up an impressive record of disruption, even if this is more due to ] than bad faith. Boackandwhite's talk page is filled with warnings about and

At ], Boackandwhite reinstated unsourced material after it was challenged (primarily by myself, but also by other ) <u>five separate times in less than a month</u>, eventually merging a source that plainly fails ] to validate the proposed change (and that's excluding multiple IP edits that cannot be conclusively linked to Boackandwhite). In a talk page thread initiated by Boackandwhite, I attempted to explain why his edit had been contested: However, Boackandwhite stopped replying and instead resumed edit warring, apparently convinced that since the U.S., the most powerful member of the NATO alliance, clearly supported the Afghan mujahideen, that must also mean that NATO as a whole can be considered allied to the mujahideen—no sourcing or verification necessary.

Even though this can be considered a low-intensity edit war, Boackandwhite's to understand Misplaced Pages's sourcing/content policies and insistence on reverting to restore the perceived ] to our article, coupled with a break in communication from this user, has reached a point where some kind of administrative action may be warranted. Thank you for your consideration.] (]) 06:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:08, 15 January 2025

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.
    Click here to create a new report
    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358
    359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166
    1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481
    482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337
    338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347
    Other links

    User:Slomzy0932 reported by User:Amaury (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Olivia Rodrigo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Slomzy0932 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Consecutive edits made from 11:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
      1. 11:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC) ""
      2. 11:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Excessive and unsourced genres. Warning at User talk:Slomzy0932#January 2025. See also, which Twinkle isn't including: (initial edit), , , , and . Edit warring over multiple days. Amaury • 11:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:Malayologist reported by User:Austronesier (Result: Blocked 24h)

    Page: Indonesian cuisine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Malayologist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC) ""These are all poorly sourced" sources are taken from the respective wiki pages for each dish. They are properly sourced. The Arab, Indian, and Chinese sections were not even sourced, and you're okay with that."
    2. 17:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Please note that there is more to the story than just Upin Ipin. I kindly request that you review the entire content before making any changes. Additionally, I would appreciate it if you could refrain from reverting the edits solely because of the inclusion of Upin Ipin, as it is only one aspect of the broader context."
    3. 16:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Sourced"
    4. 15:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Sourced: Ramly Burger and Roti John also popular"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Indonesian cuisine."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 18:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Malaysian "influences" */ new section"
    2. 18:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Malaysian "influences" */"

    Comments:

    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:159.146.51.112 reported by User:Snowycats (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

    Page: Peace (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 159.146.51.112 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 20:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269002318 by NJZombie (talk)"
    2. 13:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1268644937 by Remsense (talk)"
    3. 15:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1268644937 by Remsense (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Already given multiple warnings ( and ) on WP:3RR, yet behavior ongoing. Snowycats (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:Luganchanka reported by User:Morbidthoughts (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

    Page: Scott Ritter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Luganchanka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 19:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Rollback to last version of this article approved by senior wikipedia editors, please go to talkpage and build consensus before further edits"
    2. 19:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269045641 by NatGertler (talk) That is your opinion, take it to the talkpage to build consensus before any further reverts, and please remember Misplaced Pages policy on WP:Edit warring"
    3. 19:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269040492 by NatGertler (talk) No WP:Edit warring please - take it to the talkpage to build consensus for your claim"
    4. 19:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269039619 by NatGertler (talk) This will have to go to the talkpage, as at the moment it is looking like a concerted attempt by certain editors to whitewash a sexual offence. The current edit is absolutely ridiculous, making it look as if Ritter knew he was speaking to a police officer. To the talkpage."
    5. 06:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1268635595 by Hemiauchenia (talk) No consensus reached on this on the talkpage, and this lead already approved by multiple senior editors"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: 19:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Scott Ritter."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 19:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC) on Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard "/* Scott Ritter Biography - Noncompliance with MOS and BLP Guidelines */ new section"

    Comments:

    Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:RobinCarmody reported by User:Betty Logan (Result: Indefinitely pblocked from editing the article)

    Page: Twelfth Night (holiday) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: RobinCarmody (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    5. (added since this report was filed)


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    Not a 3RR violation, but definitely slow-burn edit warning. RobinCarmody has repeatedly edited in redundant, clumsy and WP:POINTy phrasing into the sentence. I have explained why I don't think it is necessary or valid on the talk page. He is free to disagree of course, but a resolution cannot be reached by avoiding the dsicussion. After 20 years on Misplaced Pages he should know the ropes by now. Betty Logan (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    • Indefinitely pblocked. In addition to the edit-warring, the user's failure to discuss their edits on the article Talk page is concerning. Also, the user should use edit summaries, particularly when reverting other users. The user has some 16K edits, of which just a bit over 4% include edit summaries. Edit summaries are not required, but many unexplained edits are looked at with suspicion.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:Janessian reported by User:Insanityclown1 (Result: blocked for 24 hours)

    Page: Murder of Wong Chik Yeok (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Janessian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:


    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 20:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:Janessian is repeatedly removing the same images. By my count they have manually reverted 6 or 7 times. Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    I had in fact already decided to block before this report was filed. JBW (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:Æ's old account wasn't working reported by User:Notwally (Result: p-block)

    Page: 2010: The Year We Make Contact (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Æ's old account wasn't working (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 23:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269289591 by Notwally (talk) Stop simping for Metacritic!"
    2. 23:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269288727 by Notwally (talk) That sentence is unsourced. Get over it."
    3. 23:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269182473 by Barry Wom (talk) Stop."
    4. 11:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Don't start."
    5. 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Omitting the sentence entirely like what we have done with The NeverEnding Story I feel might be the best strategy, seeing as both films have wildly differing RT and MC scores."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 23:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on 2010: The Year We Make Contact."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 04:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC) on Talk:2010: The Year We Make Contact "/* Unsourced content in lead */ r"

    Comments:

    This editor was banned last week for 7 days after 5 reverts about this same content (link). They have now made 5 reverts again today, the first day that their block ended. They have barely contributed to the extensive talk page discussion, where other editors have been working towards a consensus. – notwally (talk) 23:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

    Yes, I will discuss the issue on the talk page. Getting a little impulsive with these reverts. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
    You are already at 5 reverts on the day your block for making 5 reverts about the same content ended, and now you are also sending out 3RR notices to other editors such as me (despite me only reverting twice, as there were 2 other editors who also reverted you today). The talk page discussion has been ongoing for over a month, and I think your contribution there so far speak for themselves. – notwally (talk) 23:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
    You only seem to focus on my contributions to reverting the changes, not my contributions to the talk page discussion. If you want this edit war to end, best you stop by on the talk page to do some civil discussion. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    Æ, you made your first contribution to the talk page discussion three minutes before writing this reply. You aren't really in a position to demands others "stop by on the talk page" when it took four reverts from three different editors before you did the same. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    I guess my ADHD brain thinks reverting is better than discussion on the talk page. At this point I don't even know why I keep edit warring. Maybe I have inherited this "bludgeoning" from my father. Don't know anymore. I just don't.
    Help me. I don't think I can take it anymore. I have gone mentally insane. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    It's difficult to say why any of us edit war, but you're not alone in it. I think the best option is to just keep going. Consider doing a different task or finding another article to work on in the meantime; you've made plenty of good contributions here, so keep doing that. Find something that makes you happy. Just remember, it's not the end of the world. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    Problem is, all of my edits get reverted. I can't figure out why. I am stuck in a permanent edit war on every article I touch, whether I like it or not. HELP! Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    All of them. On every article I edit. All of them get reverted. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    That's not entirely true; looking at your contributions, I see many edits that were not reverted. In any case, you should consider reversions an opportunity to build your knowledge; discuss on the talk page and explain your edits. You may learn something to keep in mind for the future, or you might teach something to someone else. It's always better to respond to reversion with discussion than with more reversion. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    Understood. Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    Do you even take my edits into consideration? Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Since Æ's old account wasn't working cannot keep himself from reverting on this article even after having been previously blocked from edit warring at the same article, I've partially blocked him from the article for a month. If he gets talk page consensus for the disputed edits prior to the block expiring let me know and I'll lift the block.-- Ponyo 00:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

    User:2600:1001:B129:3A84:31C2:67F3:252:DDAA reported by User:Unblock-un on hold (Result: /64 range blocked)

    Page: Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2600:1001:B129:3A84:31C2:67F3:252:DDAA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269301049 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    2. 00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300990 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    3. 00:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300962 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    4. 00:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300833 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    5. 00:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300443 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    6. 00:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300383 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    7. 00:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300328 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    8. 00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300251 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    9. 00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300207 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    10. 00:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300147 by Cyrobyte (talk)"
    11. 00:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269300072 by Cyrobyte (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 00:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Removal of content, blanking."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:Baldoz reported by User:Cerebral726 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

    Page: Scuderia Ferrari (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Baldoz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 21:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC) ""
    2. 20:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC) ""
    3. 20:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Fixed discrepancies made by user Lobo151"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 20:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Notice: Edit warring softer wording for newcomers (RW 16.1)"
    2. 20:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Notice: Edit warring stronger wording (RW 16.1)"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:2409:408D:4DC2:2922:0:0:8388:6C0F reported by User:Dawnseeker2000 (Result: )

    Page: Pudukkottai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2409:408D:4DC2:2922:0:0:8388:6C0F (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 00:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269446497 by Dawnseeker2000 (talk)"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 09:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC) to 10:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
      1. 09:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1268811016 by Dawnseeker2000 (talk)"
      2. 10:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 00:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Pudukkottai."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    See also the history of Pudukkottai Municipal Corporation Dawnseeker2000 04:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
    See link to my request to have the page protected Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive/2025/01#c-Dawnseeker2000-20250108183700-Pudukkottai and that request's denial Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive/2025/01#c-Daniel_Quinlan-20250108191600-Dawnseeker2000-20250108183700

    User:Boackandwhite reported by User:TheTimesAreAChanging (Result: )

    Page: Afghan mujahideen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Boackandwhite (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: Boackandwhite's initial bold edit; my revert to last stable version.

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. revert 1
    2. revert 2
    3. revert 3
    4. revert 4
    5. revert 5


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    Boackandwhite, a new account with fewer than 100 edits, has already racked up an impressive record of disruption, even if this is more due to lack of competence than bad faith. Boackandwhite's talk page is filled with warnings about adding unsourced or unverifiable content, removing speedy deletion tags out of process for a page created by Boackandwhite himself, uploading an image with no source or license information, and making edits that contravene Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style.

    At Afghan mujahideen, Boackandwhite reinstated unsourced material after it was challenged (primarily by myself, but also by other page-watchers) five separate times in less than a month, eventually merging a source that plainly fails verification to validate the proposed change (and that's excluding multiple IP edits that cannot be conclusively linked to Boackandwhite). In a talk page thread initiated by Boackandwhite, I attempted to explain why his edit had been contested: "Since your source does not directly state that NATO is an ally of the mujahideen, your edit failed verification and has been reverted. If you disagree, then please provide a page number and quote of the relevant excerpt that verifies the claim." However, Boackandwhite stopped replying and instead resumed edit warring, apparently convinced that since the U.S., the most powerful member of the NATO alliance, clearly supported the Afghan mujahideen, that must also mean that NATO as a whole can be considered allied to the mujahideen—no sourcing or verification necessary.

    Even though this can be considered a low-intensity edit war, Boackandwhite's seeming inability to understand Misplaced Pages's sourcing/content policies and insistence on reverting to restore the perceived "truth" to our article, coupled with a break in communication from this user, has reached a point where some kind of administrative action may be warranted. Thank you for your consideration.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

    Categories: