Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 21:36, 5 January 2025

• WP:RM/TR
• WP:RMTR

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place. If this is your first article and you want your draft article moved to the mainspace, please submit it for review at Articles for creation, by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft or user sandbox page instead of listing it here. Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself. If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Misplaced Pages:Requested moves.

• To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
• If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

• Reginaldo Ramires (footballer) → Reginaldo Ramires (currently a redirect back to Reginaldo Ramires (footballer)) (move · discuss) – Only person on English Misplaced Pages with this name. Ortizesp (talk) 21:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Thiruvananthapuram Corporation → Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation (currently a redirect back to Thiruvananthapuram Corporation) (move · discuss) – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONSISTENT with other municipal articles. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 07:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  I'm seeing just as many sources listing it as "Thiruvananthapuram Corporation" as "Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation". All other things being equal, the shorter name is preferred.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Belagavi Mahanagara Palike → Belagavi Municipal Corporation (currently a redirect back to Belagavi Mahanagara Palike) (move · discuss) – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONSISTENT with other municipal articles. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 07:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Budapest Aircraft Service → BASe Airlines (move · discuss) – This airline has been officially renamed and no longer uses its former brand on its official website 2001:A61:1209:4001:F480:594C:9BE1:F00A (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  We'd need to see some evidence that the stipulations of WP:NAMECHANGES are met for this one. It isn't just a qwuestion of what the official website does, we need sourcing evidence too. Also, "BASe Airlines" is not terribly recognizable.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Neolissochilus bovanicus → Barbodes bovanicus (currently a redirect back to Neolissochilus bovanicus) (move · discuss) – In October 2024 WP:Fishes decided to use Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes as its source for taxonomy below the level of order, see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy, ECoF classifies this species in Barbodes Quetzal1964 (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Puntius sealei → Barbodes sealei (currently a redirect back to Puntius sealei) (move · discuss) – In October 2024 WP:Fishes decided to use Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes as its source for taxonomy below the level of order, see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy, ECoF classifies this species in Barbodes Quetzal1964 (talk) 16:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Barbodes wynaadensis → Neolissochilus wynaadensis (currently a redirect back to Barbodes wynaadensis) (move · discuss) – In October 2024 WP:Fishes decided to use Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes as its source for taxonomy below the level of order, see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy, ECoF classifies this species in Neolissochilus Quetzal1964 (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Draft:PADMANABHA REDDY CHAGARI (currently a redirect to Draft:Chagari Padmanabha Reddy) → Draft:Chagari Padmanabha Reddy (move · discuss) – MOS:CAPS Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Mvcg66b3r You are able to move pages yourself. Cremastra (u — c) 18:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Canadian Forces Station Ladner → CFS Ladner (currently a redirect back to Canadian Forces Station Ladner) (move) – Consistency with other articles on Canadian Forces Bases and Stations that use the "CFB" and "CFS" initials in article title (see Category:Former Canadian Forces bases in Canada and subcategories of Category:Canadian Forces bases in Canada by province or territory) RA0808 _contribs 20:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Canadian Forces Base Portage la Prairie → CFB Portage la Prairie (currently a redirect back to Canadian Forces Base Portage la Prairie) (move) – Consistency with other articles on Canadian Forces Bases and Stations that use the "CFB" and "CFS" initials in article title (see Category:Former Canadian Forces bases in Canada and subcategories of Category:Canadian Forces bases in Canada by province or territory) RA0808 _contribs 20:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Canadian Forces Base Lahr → CFB Lahr (currently a redirect back to Canadian Forces Base Lahr) (move · discuss) – Consistency with other articles on Canadian Forces Bases and Stations that use the "CFB" and "CFS" initials in article title (see Category:Former Canadian Forces bases in Canada and subcategories of Category:Canadian Forces bases in Canada by province or territory) RA0808 _contribs 20:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

• Niihau → Niʻihau (currently a redirect back to Niihau) (move · discuss) – Official and WP:COMMONNAME place name for the island, per Hawaii government sources. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Molokai → Molokaʻi (currently a redirect back to Molokai) (move · discuss) – Official and WP:COMMONNAME place name for the island, per Hawaii government sources. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Lanai → Lānaʻi (currently a redirect back to Lanai) (move · discuss) – Official and WP:COMMONNAME place name for the island, per Hawaii government sources. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Hawaii (island) → Hawaiʻi (island) (currently a redirect back to Hawaii (island)) (move · discuss) – Official and WP:COMMONNAME place name for the island, per Hawaii government sources. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oahu → Oʻahu (currently a redirect back to Oahu) (move · discuss) – Official and WP:COMMONNAME place name for the island, per Hawaii government sources. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 13:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Kauai → Kauaʻi (currently a redirect back to Kauai) (move · discuss) – The official place name includes the letter (not diacritic) dropped from the title and is in common use in both English and Hawaiian. The article was long ago updated to reflect the actual spelling but the existence of the redirect prevents an article name change. This is already reflected in other geographic articles. This seems to be an artifact of Wikipedians and mainland journalists (which resulted in a large discussion on the Maui Wildfires articles that mainland news organizations cannot be considered WP:RS for the spelling of place names in Hawaiʻi) assuming that the consonant that is represented by the ʻokina is a diacritic, rather than a consonant. See also the infobox for Hawaiian place names, which includes the official names "Hawaiʻi, Kahoʻolawe, Kauaʻi, Lānaʻi, Maui, Molokaʻi, Niʻihau, Oʻahu", all of which should be noncontroversial moves as well Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 13:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think any of these are uncontroversial. Common usage takes precedence over official names. older ≠ wiser 15:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  Common usage is the correct orthography, actually. There are no WP:RS passing sources that would indicate the actual name is the mispelled version I am aware of, and the directory of official place names from the Hawaiian government is listed in each move request. In several cases the articles very consistently use the correct spelling throughout, with only the article name wrong (and only I rewrote Waikiki in that way, the rest were others), though I'll take this through a discussion process. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 15:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  Many, perhaps even most reliable sources do not routinely use the okina. , , , , , , and so on. older ≠ wiser 19:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  Again, whole thing on the Hawaiʻi wikiproject on this going back quite a while, feel free to come over there. Keep in mind several Hawaiian newspapers and magazines use the correct orthography in print but not in online publications as it messes with Google indexing/ranking. That’s why this is uncontroversial among Wikipedians from the area (the actual people who know WP:COMMONNAME), though we’re trying to make and cite this case rather than going “trust us”. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 19:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  A set of nearly identical moves was rejected less than two years ago, so in any case these moves are in no way uncontroversial. older ≠ wiser 19:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Mouse-gray flycatcher → Mouse-grey flycatcher (currently a redirect back to Mouse-gray flycatcher) (move · discuss) – to conform to Misplaced Pages standard of using IOC bird names Craigthebirder (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Don't WP:ENGVAR and MOS:RETAIN apply? Minor spelling variations are not really different names. Note that Gray hawk does not use the IOC's spelling. See prior discussions at Talk:Gray hawk. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• United States amusement park accidents → Amusement park accident (move · discuss) – WP:SINGULAR, article not supposed to cover only accidents in the US and contains lists that include global incidents, Template:Globalize placed to address the potential issue –Tobias (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

It's been at its current title for almost two years which IMO is a bit late to revert a previously undiscussed WP:BOLDMOVE. Unsure a case for globalization should be made here given the article currently only covers US amusement part incidents and Incidents at European amusement parks already exists in a much more advanced state. Note there is a previous version of the article that had much more thorough coverage of US incidents here before it was gutted in 2022; perhaps that could be fixed up.Further discussion would probably help here. RachelTensions (talk) 04:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tobiasi0 your move request has been contested. If you wish to continue, please open a full requested move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link next to your request. RachelTensions (talk) 02:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

• Venkateswara → Venkateshwara (currently a redirect back to Venkateswara) (move · discuss) – Correct spelling as per Hunterian transliteration Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Tstcikhthys1 Warrants a discussion. "Venkateswara" appears much more common according to ngrams. C F A 02:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  Ngrams can't be the only source used; this is a typo that needs to be fixed. Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

  You can start a requested-move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link next to your request. C F A 18:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

• Theodore Roosevelt III → Theodore Roosevelt IV (currently a redirect instead to Theodore Roosevelt V) (move · discuss) – To avoid current confusion: President Roosevelt's father was Theodore Roosevelt Sr., and while the same-named son did not commonly use a "Jr." name suffix, his same-named son, grandson, and great-grandson count Theodore Roosevelt Sr. as the first in the name order, not the President. Mrn5768 (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  This is a complicated rationale and definitely would require a full requested move discussion. In addition, there are previous requested moves here and here which make this move ineligible for a bold, undiscussed move per the requirements at WP:RMUM. You can start a full requested move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link next to your request. RachelTensions (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Mrn5768 your move request has been contested. If you wish to continue, please open a full requested move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link next to your request. RachelTensions (talk) 02:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

• Hemipenthes alba → Hemipenthes albus (currently a redirect back to Hemipenthes alba) (move · discuss) – H. albus remains the valid spelling (see http://www.diptera.org/Nomenclator/Details/205521) until and unless it is corrected in a peer-reviewed journal. Nomenclatural changes should not be performed in a Misplaced Pages article. Moreover, from what I can tell, πένθος (pénthos) is neuter, so I do not believe an emendation to the name is warranted. I cannot perform the move because of the redirect Shawnbrescia (talk) 04:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

@Shawnbrescia Search shows that current name is also commonly used. Full RM might be needed ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Where are you seeing H. alba used? The only case I can find is BioLib, which changed the page after the Misplaced Pages page for H. alba was created. Also, even if H. alba is used by secondary sources, the rules of scientific nomenclature forbid renaming of species unless it is done in a peer-reviewed journal, which I can find no evidence of. Shawnbrescia (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Better do a full RM ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav: would you be willing to move the page first, then if you are still concerned about sourcing, do an RM from albus back to alba? My strong concerns about potential WP:circular reporting (as implied in Shawnbrescia's reply to you) compel me to ask for this deviation from standard procedure. The sources in the article itself suggest alba is WP:OR: the ICZN source cited says nothing about H. albus itself. My own searches on Google Scholar found the one source cited, Ávalos-Hernández 2009, for albus but absolutely nothing for alba. Thank you, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 08:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your arguments and the nom is fine, but I'm still not that confident about the move. Feel free to move it to the above discussion if you think another PM can take care of it. Or just simply start an RM, that will have comments from many more editors about the confusion in sources. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav Why? I don't see any real problems here. BioLib can be ignored as potential citogenesis and isn't super reliable anyway. alba gets zero (0) hits on Google Scholar Cremastra (u — c) 18:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

In that case, I ask a pagemover please move to albus before opening a RM discussion back to alba if pagemover still has concerns about sourcing. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Rotideypoc41352: That’s not how this page works. We don’t move an article and then request to move it back. A page mover has already contested the request. If you are interested in moving the page, you are free to request it on the talk page. cyberdog958 15:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I intentionally invoked WP:IAR this one time for reasons I already outlined above; this specific set of circumstances should (in its imperative mood) not be used to set any sort of precedent. I do not oppose moving this to article talk. Cheers, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@Rotideypoc41352: I think a full RM would be required. There you can present your reasonings to other editors more familiar with the topic area. We can’t control what others do with the information coming from Misplaced Pages. I don’t see WP:CIRCULAR as a compelling enough reason to IAR and hasten the process outside the normal procedure. cyberdog958 17:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't think this case of IAR really helps anything. The discussion is relatively unlikely to end as a no consensus close, and regardless of where the article is before the move, the last stable title is the current one; no consensus closes default back to the last stable title. This should either be handled here (which by now, enough discussion has occurred where it really shouldn't be) or in a full RM beginning at the current title. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@Shawnbrescia your technical move has been contested and you will have to open a full RM to proceed with the move; you can do so by using the "discuss" link above. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I apologize if I’m misunderstanding, as I’m relatively new to editing Misplaced Pages. Could you please clarify why the move can’t be performed? I’m unclear on what basis my move request has been contested. I’ve provided evidence that the name being used is erroneous and fabricated, and no counterargument has been provided. Bunnypranav initially contested, but did not provide specifics when I asked, and in their final comment they seem to have withdrawn. Subsequent comments have concerned Misplaced Pages protocols rather than the move request itself. So what is actually being contested here?

I’m concerned that because this article is about an obscure species of fly, if I were to start an RM I’m wondering how long it would sit without a single person seeing it, while perpetuating the error. I can’t even frame an argument on the RM without knowing what the actual issue is with the move. Shawnbrescia (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Looks like the requested move was contested because some aren't confident that the proposed name is actually inaccurate and/or not the WP:COMMONNAME. In your full requested move discussion, present evidence that the current name of the article is incorrect and/or the new one is more appropriate. The request will sit open for at least a week; if nobody presents further opposition the move will likely occur shortly after. RachelTensions (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Dracunculus medinensis → Guinea worm (currently a redirect back to Dracunculus medinensis) (move · discuss) – WP:COMMONNAME. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 01:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  Any evidence for this? C F A 02:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  Courtesy pinging @Closed Limelike Curves. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  Trends – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  Trends collects data on search terms, not sources. Ngrams, on the other hand, collates hits in sources and also backs up this COMMONNAME trend. Toadspike 21:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  Contesting as controversial since a previous RM was unsuccessful. Feel free to start another discussion, Closed Limelike Curves. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

• William H. Natcher Parkway → Natcher Parkway (currently a redirect back to William H. Natcher Parkway) (move · discuss) – The shorthand form of the name was and continues to be the common name for the roadway, even after its official decommissioning, per local news reporting. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 10:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@OrdinaryScarlett Quick search shows that sources are using the long name as well. Full RM might be needed to due no clear common name. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

• Rana (2012 film) → Rana (film) (currently a redirect instead to Rana) (move · discuss) – Both the 1998 and cancelled film lack articles. Kochadaiiyaan is a prequel to the unreleased film Rana as per the article. DareshMohan (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@DareshMohan There seems to be no primary between the two films. @Wbm1058: recently moved an article away from this title. So this is not uncontroversial, full RM is required ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

• WNYT (TV) → WNYT (move · discuss) – Primary topic; WP:SMALLDETAILS; no terrestrial radio station with this call sign; WNYT (internet radio) just got AFDed Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  • WNYT → WNYT (disambiguation)

@Mvcg66b3r You yourself just filed the AfD on WNYT (internet radio) three minutes before requesting the move here. I suggest to wait until the AfD is closed before we start moving the pages around. cyberdog958 05:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

• Alternate reality → Alternative reality (currently a redirect back to Alternate reality) (move · discuss) – MOS:COMMONALITY. The word "alternate" means "every other", not "something other than the current". The latter meaning is only used in US English, while the former is used in all Englishes. Also, "alternative" means the latter meaning in every English, so "alternative" should be used. Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Alternate reality game → Alternative reality game (currently a redirect back to Alternate reality game) (move · discuss) – MOS:COMMONALITY. The word "alternate" means "every other", not "something other than the current". The latter meaning is only used in US English, while the former is used in all Englishes. Also, "alternative" means the latter meaning in every English, so "alternative" should be used. Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Alternate history → Alternative history (currently a redirect back to Alternate history) (move · discuss) – MOS:COMMONALITY. The word "alternate" means "every other", not "something other than the current". The latter meaning for the word is only used in US English, while the former is used in all Englishes. Also, "alternative" means the latter meaning in every English, so "alternative" should be used. Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Alternate ending → Alternative ending (currently a redirect back to Alternate ending) (move · discuss) – MOS:COMMONALITY. The word "alternate" means "every other", not "something other than the current". The latter meaning is only used in US English, while the former is used in all Englishes. Also, "alternative" means the latter meaning in every English, so "alternative" should be used. Tstcikhthys1 (talk) 11:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Tstcikhthys1 I am contesting all of these "alternate" to "alternative" moves, as they are not uncontroversial and should go through a full move discussion to determine the COMMONNAME of their subjects. Toadspike 13:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

See for instance the third footnote of Alternate history, which reads Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction (Oxford University Press, 2007) notes the preferred usage is "Alternate History", which was coined in 1954; "Alternative History" was first used in 1977, pp. 4–5. This directly contradicts the claim that British sources prefer "alternative". Toadspike 13:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages has dealt with this terminology issue in the past. At Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Albums there have been several flips over the years about what to call an extra album cover used in other countries and the like. Sometimes it was "Alternate cover" but it is currently "Alternative cover" (see Template:Infobox album). The earliest such discussion I can find was way back in 2009 at Template talk:Infobox album/Archive 5#Mistake, and note the dictionary definitions like those brought up by the requester here. So no matter how messy they may be, these requests have some precedents. All will be controversial, regardless. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

• Mộc Châu town → Mộc Châu (currently a redirect back to Mộc Châu town) (move · discuss) – Pages about Vietnamese towns typically do not include the suffix "town" at the end of their names. Khanh Nguyen (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@Khanh Nguyen Same as above, (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Operation Kilshon → Operation Pitchfork (currently a redirect back to Operation Kilshon) (move · discuss) – Move to common name in English, as abundant in sources – https://www.google.com/search?udm=36&q=%22operation+pitchfork%22 – and away from the current wiki-invented bilingual mash-up of a title Iskandar323 (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Iskandar323 Both names seem to be used in books, but news articles and general google searches show results for Kilshon, not Pitchfork. Full RM might be needed for more comments. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis → R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (currently a redirect back to R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis) (move · discuss) – Unnecessary abbreviation. Hairy Dude (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Hairy Dude This page has a fairly lengthy move history; the most recent move summary was "since case is post-2000, this is indeed the correct format per OSCOLA". I'm going to contest this and suggest you go through a full move discussion if you still think this move should happen. Toadspike 18:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chyah airstrike → 2006 Shiyyah airstrike (currently a redirect back to Chyah airstrike) (move · discuss) – Dating title per WP:NCWWW and defaulting place name spelling to both common usage and the standardised in-wiki style for Arabic transliteration Iskandar323 (talk) 13:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Iskandar323 While I agree with the spelling change based on the sources cited in the article, this page has been moved nine times already, including from "2006 Shiyyah airstrike" to "Shiyyah airstrike" (with the reason "per convention of removing year") and then to "Chyah airstrike". This means this request is not uncontroversial and must go through a full move discussion. Toadspike 18:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

  Ok, didn't realise. Just checked the talk and saw no discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Muwatta Imam Malik → Al-Muwatta (currently a redirect back to Muwatta Imam Malik) (move · discuss) – The work has a shorter, just as precise colloquial and more common form that is actually more likely to be recognised as the name of a work, rather than potentially be confused with the name of an individual. I went to move this myself, but was inhibited for some technical reason. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Iskandar323 Not uncontroversial, previously moved in opposite direction . Toadspike 18:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Mahe district → Mahé district (currently a redirect back to Mahe district) (move · discuss) – WP:CONSISTENT eponymous to the city Mahé, India, itself named after Mahé River. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 06:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Hemant Dabral WP:COMMONNAME seems to be without the accent, all sources in article use it without the acccent. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• Pasunuri Dayakar → Pasunoori Dayakar (currently a redirect back to Pasunuri Dayakar) (move · discuss) – As per the Lok Sabha website {{{sig}}}Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME seems to be Pasunuri, sources say so. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator needed