Revision as of 05:16, 26 December 2024 editSangdeboeuf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users53,541 edits →top: Chapter URL← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:51, 3 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Antifeminism/Archive 8) (bot | ||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}} | }} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Excessive United States perspective == | |||
I've just removed several references to US antifeminism for UNDUE. Looking through this article, I think it definitely skews to a US-centric perspective, although feminism is a global issue. <span style="color:#ef5224">]</span> (]) 12:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Men's rights movement == | == Men's rights movement == | ||
Line 46: | Line 42: | ||
:I believe that "Opposition to feminism" is bolded not because it is a section header but because it redirects to Antifeminism. Compare to the infobox on <nowiki>]</nowiki> ] ] 17:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | :I believe that "Opposition to feminism" is bolded not because it is a section header but because it redirects to Antifeminism. Compare to the infobox on <nowiki>]</nowiki> ] ] 17:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Recent additions == | |||
{{re|Johnnybgood999}} creating a list of authors who have for criticizing feminism necessitates ] saying as much. The cited sources are all ] for the authors' opinions, making the addition ] if not ]. —] (]) —] (]) 18:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you very much for the suggestion. Secondary sources and third-party publications have been added, emphasizing the prominence and relevance of the authors cited (regarding antifeminism). By the way, I suggest making precise editions next time instead of completely reverting the changes, as this would significantly affect the article's quality. Best regards. ] (]) 19:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:51, 3 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antifeminism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about antifeminism, feminism, antifeminists or feminists. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about antifeminism, feminism, antifeminists or feminists at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Men's rights movement
This has been inserted and removed and re-inserted in the lead; it probably should be covered in the article body, if only in a summary-style section linking to Men's rights movement, but it currently isn't. It'd be easy enough to cover - just a little bit summarizing Men's_rights_movement#Antifeminism, with a toplink to that article. But where should it be placed in this article's structure? As a top-level subsection? Or does it fit into one of the existing subsections? -- Aquillion (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- The men's rights movement was placed in the 21st century section so it is in the body, although I'm also not sure exactly where it should go because it originated in the 20th century. —Panamitsu (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we could always move it to the 20th century. If we did that we might add a sentence about how it started in the 70's as a generally pro-feminist men's liberation movement and then split into pro- and anti-feminist strands (which is covered in the history section of its own article.) --Aquillion (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yep that sounds like a good idea. —Panamitsu (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we could always move it to the 20th century. If we did that we might add a sentence about how it started in the 70's as a generally pro-feminist men's liberation movement and then split into pro- and anti-feminist strands (which is covered in the history section of its own article.) --Aquillion (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Feminism infobox
In the feminism infobox in this article, in the sub-section "Opposition to feminism", I believe the "Pro-feminism" and "Protofeminism" do not belong there. Those are clearly pro feminist topics and not about opposition to the movement. I would edit it myself, but wanted to check first here if I'm missing something. I also don't know how to edit the infobox! It somehow appears fully empty for me. DuxCoverture (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that "Opposition to feminism" is bolded not because it is a section header but because it redirects to Antifeminism. Compare to the infobox on ] EvergreenFir (talk) 17:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Recent additions
@Johnnybgood999: creating a list of authors who have "gained notoriety" for criticizing feminism necessitates independent, published sources saying as much. The cited sources here are all primary sources for the authors' opinions, making the addition unduly weighted if not improper synthesis. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the suggestion. Secondary sources and third-party publications have been added, emphasizing the prominence and relevance of the authors cited (regarding antifeminism). By the way, I suggest making precise editions next time instead of completely reverting the changes, as this would significantly affect the article's quality. Best regards. Johnnybgood999 (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- Mid-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- B-Class Feminism articles
- Mid-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class Anthropology articles
- Mid-importance Anthropology articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles