| Revision as of 16:01, 26 December 2024 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,443 edits Added: Talk:Jesus.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:01, 5 January 2025 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,443 edits Removed: Talk:Germany–Iran relations. |
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
</noinclude> |
|
</noinclude> |
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
'''Question'''. Should this article include allegations of sexual violence and torture that were documented in the broader conflict after the Hamas-led incursion? |
|
i suggest the current image be replaced by this https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Jesus_de_Nazare.jpg it's clearer, and is easier to look at. ] (]) 15:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
*'''A'''. '''No''' - These should be covered in parent articles (e.g., ]) and in dedicated articles (e.g., ]) |
| ⚫ |
''']''' |
|
|
|
*'''B'''. '''Yes, in aftermath''' - Include them in a brief Aftermath section (the current {{alink|Israeli counterattack}} section or a new one) with links to more detailed coverage in other articles. |
|
|
*'''C'''. '''Yes, in main content''', either: '''1. as in current version''' (see {{alink||Reported atrocities}}), or '''2. elsewhere''' (please specify). |
|
|
]<sub>]</sub> 11:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Yom Kippur War be characterized in any of the following ways in the infobox ]: |
| ⚫ |
I'd like to understand why we don't keep than the old-fashioned image montage in the article at the moment. Besides, is obviously better in terms of framing and resolution, as well as showing the exact moment when the second plane crashed into the WTC. ] (]) 21:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
# Do not characterize the war in the infobox, but write "See aftermath." |
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
# Israeli victory |
|
|
# Stalemate |
|
|
# Egyptian victory |
|
|
''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 23:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should ] specify the start of a century or millennium as a year ending in 1 (e.g. the 20th century as 1901–2000), as a year ending in 0 (e.g. the 20th century as 1900–1999), or treat both as acceptable options with the use of hatnotes for clarity in the case of ambiguity in articles? See the discussion above. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 14:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
Should the article’s infobox reflect EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6? This question stems from the fact the infobox inputs can only accept a single set of values (i.e. EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6, not both). The EF2/T4 rating comes from a peer reviewed paper by ] and Stuart Robinson with the Haag Engineering Co. in the ] in August 2006. The F3/T5-6 rating comes from the ] (TORRO), the creators of the ], T-scale, . |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
There have been several discussions opened in the past regarding this article's content and overall scope. Several wars have a list of military engagements and battles. Examples include: ], ], ], ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is no different with this article. However, unlike all the other list of military engagement articles, this article has a ton of clean-up templates including lack of sourcing, MOS, and scope issues. |
|
Since the infobox can only contain one set of the ratings, this discussion more or less needs to determine which source (Haag Engineering Co. or TORRO) should be the infobox source. |
|
|
*'''Option 1''' — EF2/T4 using the Haag Engineering Co. paper. |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' — F3/T5-6 using the ] paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''The ]''' (] 03:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
So, with all that background, let's have a discussion on what the '''''scope''''' of this article should include, or more specifically, '''what is a "]" during the Israel-Hamas war?''' Are ''"Battle of ...."'' engagements? Are airstrikes engagements? Should the article's scope be redefined away from "military engagements" to just "engagements"? Ect... '''The ]''' (] 17:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
⚫ |
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
⚫ |
I'd like to understand why we don't keep than the image montage in the article at the moment. The is obviously better in terms of framing and resolution, as well as showing the exact moment when the second plane crashed into the WTC. ] (]) 21:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
_-_B6019~11.jpg){kind=link}