| Revision as of 09:01, 28 December 2024 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,717 edits Added: Talk:Bob Barker.Tags: Manual revert Reverted← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:01, 21 January 2025 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,717 edits Maintenance. |
| (26 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
</noinclude> |
|
</noinclude> |
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
As per above, which of the following images should be used for Turing's infobox? |
|
|
|
|
|
<gallery mode=packed heights=200px> |
|
|
Alan Turing Aged 16.jpg|'''A''' |
|
|
Alan Turing (1912-1954) in 1936 at Princeton University (cropped).jpg|'''B''' ''(current)'' |
|
|
Alan Turing (1951).jpg|'''C''' |
|
⚫ |
</gallery> ] (]) 09:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
It is a common convention for presidential articles to include portraits from the president's tenure. This is consistent across basically all U.S. presidential articles. However, the image used for ] is from two decades after his presidency ended. Which of the following images should be the portrait in the infobox? |
|
|
<gallery mode=packed heights=200px> |
|
|
File:Head and shoulders crop of Portrait of John Quincy Adams (1828) by Gilbert Stuart and Thomas Sully (Harvard University Collection H187).jpg|'''Option 1''' |
|
|
|
|
|
File:John Quincy Adams 1828 (cropped).jpg|'''Option 2''' |
|
|
|
|
|
File:JQA Photo Crop (cropped).jpg|'''Option 3 (Current Image)'''</gallery> ] (]) 09:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
⚫ |
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the page describe Musk as a supporter of international far-right political parties, activists, and causes? ] (]) 01:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
⚫ |
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the first sentence of this article be changed to include Uğur Şahin's Turkish ethnicity/background, rather than simply calling him "German"? ] (]) 22:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The current single sentence on Gaza in the lede is as follows: {{green|During the Israel–Hamas war, Biden condemned the actions of Hamas as terrorism and sent military aid to Israel, as well as humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip.}} The sentence is regularly modified, including the word "limited" which keeps being added/removed in front of "humanitarian aid". I started ] on this topic a while ago; it didn't get a lot of input and didn't lead to a consensus. I thought this RfC could generate a larger discussion and settle a few related questions at once: |
|
|
* Should the "military aid" and "humanitarian aid" be mentioned side by side as is? |
|
|
* Should we mention that the amount of military aid sent to Israel is ? |
|
|
* Next to the mention of military aid, should there be a mention of allegations of war crimes against Israel? |
|
|
Feel free to expand the discussion to other questions. My hope is that we can workshop a sentence that has a consensus behind it. Thanks! ] (]) 13:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the list include former chief executive officers? ] (]) 09:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should this article's Filmography section include the web series ''Battle for Dream Island''? ] (]) 19:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the first sentence in the lead be rewritten: (red to be removed; green to add) "Ronald Wilson Reagan (February 6, 1911 – June 5, 2004) was <del style="color: #8B0000;">an American politician and actor who served as</del> the 40th president of the United States<ins style="color: #008560;">, serving</ins> from 1981 to 1989"? ] (]) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The following genealogy sources are currently considered ] at ] (A), or in repeated inquiries at ] (B and C): |
|
|
* '''A: Geni.com''' |
|
|
* '''B: Medieval Lands / MedLands by Charles Cawley''' |
|
|
* '''C: genealogy.eu / genealogy.euweb.cz by Marek Miroslav''' |
|
|
:Long after being listed / labelled generally unreliable, these unreliable sources are still being (re-)added to hundreds to tens of thousands of articles. |
|
|
:They should be: |
|
|
* '''Option 1: listed as ]''' (change nothing to A; add B and C at ] as such) |
|
|
* '''Option 2: ]''' (list them as such at ]) |
|
|
* '''Option 3: ]''' (not mutually exclusive with option 1 or 2) |
|
⚫ |
] (]) 23:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should we remove "A member of the wealthy South African Musk family" |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Yes or No ] (]) 19:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
It's been three years since the ] in regards to the infobox image. As I believed so back then, the current image (which was reached by consensus albeit) is unflattering and as one user noted above, it's a bit creepy. I created a ] so you can see what I'm talking about. Her eyes are half-open, quality isn't the best and if this is truly the 'best' picture that captures what she's known for (as stated in the last discussion three years ago in terms of her outfits), then perhaps it's best to asses an infobox image based on quality over what she's 'known' for. If this is the best picture that shows her during her 'comeback' (as stated in last discussion), then once again, I must emphasize the quality of the picture (awkward lighting, unflattering eye pose, not the best in quality). These are the current images at commons that are best suited for an infobox image. As noted in other talk page discussions, when the subject of an article passes away, their infobox image is also replaced with a black and white picture ''or'' of one that captures them in their 'prime' so to speak. Although (as of now) Marcos is still alive, I feel that Option B is in better quality than the current picture, shows her as her time as First Lady (much like other first lady articles) and will depict her in her prime when she passes away (not a huge factor now, but worth thinking about). Pinging previous contributors to the discussion three years ago for good measure: {{ping|Chieharumachi}}, {{ping|Crisantom}}, {{ping|Object404}}, {{ping|Unilimited247}}, {{ping|Lochglasgowstrathyre}} ] (]) 20:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
It's been three years since the ] in regards to the infobox image. As I believed so back then, the current image (which was reached by consensus albeit) is unflattering and as one user noted above, it's a bit creepy. I created a ] so you can see what I'm talking about. Her eyes are half-open, quality isn't the best and if this is truly the 'best' picture that captures what she's known for (as stated in the last discussion three years ago in terms of her outfits), then perhaps it's best to asses an infobox image based on quality over what she's 'known' for. If this is the best picture that shows her during her 'comeback' (as stated in last discussion), then once again, I must emphasize the quality of the picture (awkward lighting, unflattering eye pose, not the best in quality). These are the current images at commons that are best suited for an infobox image. As noted in other talk page discussions, when the subject of an article passes away, their infobox image is also replaced with a black and white picture ''or'' of one that captures them in their 'prime' so to speak. Although (as of now) Marcos is still alive, I feel that Option B is in better quality than the current picture, shows her as her time as First Lady (much like other first lady articles) and will depict her in her prime when she passes away (not a huge factor now, but worth thinking about). Pinging previous contributors to the discussion three years ago for good measure: {{ping|Chieharumachi}}, {{ping|Crisantom}}, {{ping|Object404}}, {{ping|Unilimited247}}, {{ping|Lochglasgowstrathyre}} ] (]) 20:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
| Line 27: |
Line 84: |
|
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) |
|
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) |
|
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Squad be described in the article as "far left?" ] (]) 22:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
''']''' |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
| Line 41: |
Line 95: |
|
Does this addition have any support? Are there any other suggestions? (Some editors have argued that Musk should directly be referred to as an oligarch in the lead. I now agree with those that oppose doing so per ].) |
|
Does this addition have any support? Are there any other suggestions? (Some editors have argued that Musk should directly be referred to as an oligarch in the lead. I now agree with those that oppose doing so per ].) |
|
] (]) 08:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
] (]) 08:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
| ⚫ |
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What is the appropriate due coverage of the comments Lorenz made about the murder of Brian Thompson and the controversy surrounding them? See details and sources in the previous discussion ]. {{ordered list |list_style_type=upper-alpha |
|
|
| Whole section (2+ paragraphs) |
|
|
| Whole paragraph (3-6 sentences) |
|
|
| Short mention (1-2 sentences) |
|
|
| No mention }} |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
] (]) 19:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article include the guard’s actions (grabbing the camera lens and touching Hersant’s shoulder) and the court’s findings regarding Sewell’s claims on racial motivation and self-defence? |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
] (]) 15:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
| ⚫ |
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The current lead contains a simple mention of Trumpism. Should a brief description be added to this mention? A proposed wording for the added text, which is also up for debate here: {{tq|characterized by ], "]" nationalism, and economic ].}} — ] (]) 04:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article about the ] contain a section about the "Association to Tulsi Gabbard and her family"?<br>Should it say that "Tulsi Gabbard has since distanced herself from SIF"? |
|
|
|
|
|
* '''A:''' Yes to both |
|
|
* '''B:''' Yes to the first question, no to the second one |
|
|
* '''C:''' No to both |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
] (]) 01:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article on ] include the following infobox? |
|
|
] (]) 15:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
| ⚫ |
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should Masha Amini be referred to as Kurdish-Iranian in the first sentence of the lead? |
|
|
|
|
|
This has previously been discussed at ], ] and ]. '']''<sup>]</sup> 02:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|bio|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
|
{{RFC list footer|bio|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
_in_1936_at_Princeton_University_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
_by_Gilbert_Stuart_and_Thomas_Sully_(Harvard_University_Collection_H187).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}