Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bbb23: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:27, 29 December 2024 view sourcePsychloppos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,711 edits →CU request← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:14, 9 January 2025 view source Bbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,868 edits →User Ayohama SPI: tx 
(48 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
{{clear}} {{clear}}


== Joeypike2021 == == You've got mail ==


{{You've got mail|sig=] (]) 15:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)}}
Hey, Joeypike2021 you blocked but they are using their talk page inappropriately afterwards so may need a talk page revoke. Cheers ] (]) 21:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
:I did so about 8 minutes before your post here. I was eating lunch during all the "excitement".--] (]) 22:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks anyway, and thanks for all your help ]ing all the 'problems' this year. Happy holidays to you and yours. ] (]) 23:49, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You as well. Honestly, I think your work is harder, and you're very good at it.--] (]) 23:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
== Happy Holidays ==


] from the past month (December 2024).
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello Bbb23, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br />
] (]) 23:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
|} ] (]) 23:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


] '''Administrator changes'''
== Socking at Moorgate tube crash ==
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
At I see only one user - {{useranon|81.111.22.107}} - expunging the term "motorman", but one revert by yourself with the edit summary "revert sock". Who are they a sockpuppet of? --] &#x1F98C; (]) 09:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:It says who in the block log.--] (]) 14:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
== Possible sock? ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
Not sure if this would be prefer to have a new SPI page created or not, but I've stumbled across the account '' which (at least to me) appears to be similarly-named to the blocked account ''. Along with that, both have a similar, "I am ______ and joined Misplaced Pages on _______" opening intro, Harold's on the userpage and Jake's on their talk page. It also that Harold attempted editing Untamed1910's talk page, which Jake has previously edited.
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


</div>
I also decided to report it here rather than make an SPI page as I see Jake's block is for sockpuppetry, but from what I'm seeing, it's not to avoid a block on another account (unless I'm missing something). Thanks. ] (]) 10:22, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
:Also looking a bit more into it, there appears to be both a '' and '' account. Also not 100% sure here, but looks a bit similar to ... so maybe it is a possible block evasion case altogether? Unless my mind is playing tricks on me at 5am, lol. ] (]) 10:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
::If you haven't already, you should look at that tortured conversation I had with Jake on his Talk page. I've blocked Harold as a sock of Jake, but I see no point in blocking the other accounts, even if they're obvious socks, who haven't edited in a while - that would include the two Knowledgeseeker accounts. However, if you're interested in finding more, you could file an SPI and request a CU. It's highly unlikely I'll find them on my own because I don't pay any attention to the articles they edit. Feel free to come here, though, if you see a new one. Thanks! --] (]) 15:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
==Notice of noticeboard discussion==
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.
{{Atop|This discussion is closed.--] (]) 15:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}}
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an action which you performed.&nbsp;The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:XRV-notice--> ] (]) 16:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


] '''Miscellaneous'''
:{{Ping|Bbb23}} Hi, sorry to bother you. Could you clarify what "refactoring" were you referring to, and how that meets the requirements at ]: {{tqq|continued abuse of their user talk page, or when the user has engaged in serious threats, accusations, or attempts at outing that must be prevented from re-occurring}}? Thanks. ] (]) 12:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]
::IIRC, the trigger for revoking TPA was when the user altered a declined unblock request.--] (]) 13:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)


----
::I explained what occurred on my talk page under the "Refactoring" section, but basically I replied to Asilvering's rejection of the unblock request, but I couldn't use reply buttons while I was blocked so I didn't know replying directly to the rejection reason was not normally allowed.
{{center|{{flatlist|

* ]
::https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Isonomia01#c-Isonomia01-20241222071600-Fourth_Third_Unblock_Request_(last_one_was_incorrectly_formatted)
* ]

* ]
::] (]) 15:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Abot}} }}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->


== Thanks ==
== Ask for clarification on deleted page of Geert Claessens ==


{{Thank}} for banning the disruptive IP address {{userlinks|203.30.15.99}} Appreciate it. (]) &#124; (PS: Have a good day) 20:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Dear Sir,


== Check user ==
I noticed that the page Geert Claessens was deleted. I was still editing it in my sandbox and was in the process of adding external references to the text to underpin what was written. Kindly ask why it was already deleted. Thank you for your clarifications. ] (]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


Hi. Can you please check if is a potential sock of . Thanks. ] (]) 08:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{tpw}}The link is ]. ] (]) 22:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:I deleted it because it was blatantly promotional. Looks like you have a ] with the subject. What is your relationship to him?--] (]) 13:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC) :I am not a CheckUser. There is not enough behavior for me to block. And even if I were a CheckUser, the suspected master account is stale.--] (]) 11:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
::The master account has indef block and TP block – not much more the original account can do, so it's obviously going to go stale. The new account has gone straight to a page that the master account edited heavily, including adding the blank sections that the new account has now "filled". Is it worth me asking a CheckUser? ] (]) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:::No, as I said, the master account is stale, so the CU will not be able to compare the data of the suspected sock with the master. You can, if you wish, file a report at ], seeking a behavioral block. I don't think there's enough for it, but someone else may feel differently. You might wait to see if they continue to edit.--] (]) 12:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)


== User Ayohama SPI ==
==Renewed edit warring==


Hi Bbb23, you recently interacted with user Ayohama on ] and last month blocked user Amber hurt as a sockpuppet on the page. I have opened an SPI against Ayohama, which you may be interested in: ]. I have also requested a checkuser there. – ] (]) 21:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
You blocked Rueben lys for edit warring in July 2024. He has now returned to Misplaced Pages and his only edit is to resume that edit war. ] (]) 05:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:That's a very long gap. If they revert again, let me know.--] (]) 13:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC) :Good job.--] (]) 23:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
==CU request==
Hi. Sorry, I'm not familiar with the procedures. Shouldn't be considered a potential block evasion and warrant another CU request ? I'm also wondering if the main account has also been blocked or just the IP. Thanks. ] (]) 16:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
:The named account has not been blocked. I blocked an IP range. I reverted your edits to the report for several reasons. First, you repeated the range I'd already blocked. Second, you incorrectly added a new report or you attempted to edit an already-closed report. If you want to add a new report, you must follow the instructions at SPI to do so. Third, do not request a CU when you are reporting IPs; connecting a named account with IPs is a violation of privacy and will not be run. Finally, don't bother adding the single IP in a new report. One edit a few days ago is not worth bothering with.--] (]) 16:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
::Ok, fine, as I said above I'm not familiar with these things. Thanks, ] (]) 16:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:14, 9 January 2025


Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39
Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42
Archive 43Archive 44Archive 45
Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48
Archive 49Archive 50Archive 51
Archive 52Archive 53Archive 54
Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57
Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60
Archive 61Archive 62Archive 63

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

You've got mail

Hello, Bbb23. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Skynxnex (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

 Thanks for banning the disruptive IP address 203.30.15.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Appreciate it. (3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 20:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Check user

Hi. Can you please check if this user is a potential sock of this indef blocked user. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I am not a CheckUser. There is not enough behavior for me to block. And even if I were a CheckUser, the suspected master account is stale.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
The master account has indef block and TP block – not much more the original account can do, so it's obviously going to go stale. The new account has gone straight to a page that the master account edited heavily, including adding the blank sections that the new account has now "filled". Is it worth me asking a CheckUser? DaHuzyBru (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
No, as I said, the master account is stale, so the CU will not be able to compare the data of the suspected sock with the master. You can, if you wish, file a report at WP:SPI, seeking a behavioral block. I don't think there's enough for it, but someone else may feel differently. You might wait to see if they continue to edit.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User Ayohama SPI

Hi Bbb23, you recently interacted with user Ayohama on Mark Karpelès and last month blocked user Amber hurt as a sockpuppet on the page. I have opened an SPI against Ayohama, which you may be interested in: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lustigermutiger21. I have also requested a checkuser there. – notwally (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Good job.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)