| Revision as of 19:44, 30 December 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,654 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:KylieTastic/Archive 2024) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:21, 6 January 2025 edit undoMaliner (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,084 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config|algo=old(7d)|archive=User talk:KylieTastic/Archive %(year)d|minthreadsleft=0|minthreadstoarchive=1}} | {{User:MiszaBot/config|algo=old(7d)|archive=User talk:KylieTastic/Archive %(year)d|minthreadsleft=0|minthreadstoarchive=1}} | ||
| Hello KylieTastic, | |||
| == Revoke TPA Joeypike2021 == | |||
| Thank you for reviewing my draft, , and for your helpful feedback regarding the need for more reliable, independent, and in-depth sources. I appreciate your guidance and want to ensure the draft meets Misplaced Pages’s notability criteria. | |||
| I don't really feel like edit warring trying to help with the removal of the disruption, and I had to do it twice. Can you revoke @]'s tpa access because I am tired as heck and I have a flight tomorrow. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 21:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| To improve the article, I’d like to ask for your advice on the following: | |||
| I now see that @] has done it, and would like to thank him, and also apologize to you for wasting your time. Have a good night.] (]) 21:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| - Are there any specific issues with the existing references that I should address (e.g., reliability, depth, or independence)? | |||
| :Hey @], I would have done if I was an admin but I'm not, no worries anyway your not wasting my time trying to shutdown idiots. Have a good flight and a good holidays. Cheers ] (]) 22:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| - What types of sources or examples would best establish the subject’s notability in this case? | |||
| ⚫ | == Happy |
||
| Your insights would be incredibly helpful as I work on revising the draft. Thank you for your time and assistance! | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
| ---- | |||
| '''Hello KylieTastic, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| Best regards, | |||
| ''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| ] (]) 14:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi ], all new articles on Misplaced Pages have to show the subject is notable (See ]) which in most cases requires significant coverage (]) in multiple independent (]) reliable sources (]). Your fist source does not appear to mention the subject, the second and third are basic listing for awards that are also just one in many. The stevie awards look more like PR and I note ] was deleted last year as not notable. Further to showing notability the rest of the content also needs to be sourced, most isn't. The content needs to match the sources not editorialise: for instance your article says "SearchUnifyGPT received a silver Stevie® award for technology excellence in the 2024 Stevie® Awards" but the source says Accela won a Gold award for "Best Use of Technology in Customer Service" using SearchUnify, and the source has no other hits for SearchUnify or "technology excellence". Lastly it does not read like an encyclopedic article but company marketing (brief history, product list and look we got some awards), which is not surprising as you have declared a ]. Regards ] (]) 17:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::@], Thank you for your detailed feedback on the draft. I now better understand the issues regarding notability, sourcing, and tone. I will work on replacing weak sources with independent, in-depth, and reliable references and revising the content to align with Misplaced Pages’s neutrality and encyclopedic standards. | |||
| ::If I have further questions while revising, I hope it’s okay to reach out again. Your guidance has been very helpful! | |||
| ::Best regards, | |||
| ⚫ | ::] (]) 18:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::] happy to help point you in the right direction.... do note the link on your talk page to the ] as there you can get help from lots of experienced editors and admins. Regards ] (]) 18:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Happy holidays! == | ||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:golden; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| '''Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025! ♦ ] (]) 02:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:21, 6 January 2025
|
If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Misplaced Pages:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here |
|
AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 1,815 pending submissions |
 Archives |
| 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello KylieTastic,
Thank you for reviewing my draft, , and for your helpful feedback regarding the need for more reliable, independent, and in-depth sources. I appreciate your guidance and want to ensure the draft meets Misplaced Pages’s notability criteria.
To improve the article, I’d like to ask for your advice on the following:
- Are there any specific issues with the existing references that I should address (e.g., reliability, depth, or independence)?
- What types of sources or examples would best establish the subject’s notability in this case?
Your insights would be incredibly helpful as I work on revising the draft. Thank you for your time and assistance!
Best regards, NitulSharma10 (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi NitulSharma10, all new articles on Misplaced Pages have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Your fist source does not appear to mention the subject, the second and third are basic listing for awards that are also just one in many. The stevie awards look more like PR and I note Stevie Awards was deleted last year as not notable. Further to showing notability the rest of the content also needs to be sourced, most isn't. The content needs to match the sources not editorialise: for instance your article says "SearchUnifyGPT received a silver Stevie® award for technology excellence in the 2024 Stevie® Awards" but the source says Accela won a Gold award for "Best Use of Technology in Customer Service" using SearchUnify, and the source has no other hits for SearchUnify or "technology excellence". Lastly it does not read like an encyclopedic article but company marketing (brief history, product list and look we got some awards), which is not surprising as you have declared a COI. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic, Thank you for your detailed feedback on the draft. I now better understand the issues regarding notability, sourcing, and tone. I will work on replacing weak sources with independent, in-depth, and reliable references and revising the content to align with Misplaced Pages’s neutrality and encyclopedic standards.
- If I have further questions while revising, I hope it’s okay to reach out again. Your guidance has been very helpful!
- Best regards,
- NitulSharma10 (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- NitulSharma10 happy to help point you in the right direction.... do note the link on your talk page to the Misplaced Pages:Teahouse as there you can get help from lots of experienced editors and admins. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025! ♦ Maliner (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)