Revision as of 20:45, 1 January 2025 editObjective3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,033 edits →The suspect was in contact with Thomas Matthew crooks 9 months ago??: hat← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:06, 8 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,698 editsm Archiving 5 discussion(s) to Talk:2025 New Orleans truck attack/Archive 2) (bot | ||
(455 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk page header}} | {{talk page header}} | ||
{{gs/talk notice|scwisil}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|collapsed=yes|1= | |||
{{old moves|date1=1 January 2025|destination1=2025 New Orleans attack|result1=not moved|link1=Special:Permalink/1266724111#Requested move 1 January 2025|date2=2 January 2025|destination2=2025 Bourbon Street massacre|result2=not moved|link2=Special:Permalink/1266839374#Requested move 2 January 2025|date3=2 January 2025|destination3=2025 New Orleans New Year's Day attack|result3=not moved|link3=Special:Permalink/1267083242#Requested move 2 January 2025 (2nd)}} | |||
{{ITN talk|1 January|2025|oldid=1266668898}} | |||
{{Not censored}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|blp=other|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=Low|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=Low}} | {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=Low|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Death|importance=low}} | {{WikiProject Death|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject United States|importance= |
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|LA=Yes|NOLA=yes}} | ||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 75K | |||
|counter = 2 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(2d) | |||
|archive = Talk:2025 New Orleans truck attack/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ITN talk|1 January|2025}} | |||
== "Terrorist attack" - hesitancy == | |||
The NOPD had a press conference this morning. The mayor of New Orleans claimed this was a "terrorist" attack. However the person from the FBI who is leading the investigation said that it is not a terrorist attack. So for now, I suggest we possibly refrain from using the term. ] (]) 12:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:The description is in my opinion quite clear that it was a terrorist attack. It was clearly done to maximize casualties, so the term should apply here. ] (]) 14:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::It doesn't matter one whit what your opinion is on whether it is terrorism or not. The only thing that matters is what ] reliable sources say. ] (]) 14:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:It's been massively covered as a TERRORIST attack at this point. "In a later update, the FBI confirmed the driver was dead and that the incident was being investigated as an "act of terrorism"."<-- '''BBC News''' | |||
"The FBI said in a news release that they are investigating it "as an act of terrorism." <-- '''CBS News''' ... it would appear Duncan got scorched for making such a misguided comment, and the White House has since directed a correction be made officially.] (]) 14:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:The Attorney General has described it as "terrorism". ] (]) 17:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Even without reliable sources, it is evident this is a terrorist attack. ] (]) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Title == | |||
I suggest to change the title in to "2025 New Orleans attack". This attack was also carried out by shooting, not just with a truck. ] (]) 13:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{agree}} <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> <small>(<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>)</small> 14:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Start an RM. ] (]) 16:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:How are similar events titled? I specifically feel like "New Years" might warrant a place in the title, and I possibly agree with not including "truck". ] (]) 17:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::I do not edit crime. However, I support “2025 New Year New Orleans Truck Attack”. A similar RM in the world of weather ended up not adding a relatively insignificant portion to the title, and I feel like the same would apply here. ] (]) 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::The move I am referring to is ]. ] (]) 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::See ]. ''Bonne année''. ] (]) 17:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Consider replacing New Orleans in the title with French Quarter or Bourban Street. New Orleans is too general for many readers. ] (]) 19:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Identifying information on the suspect? Age? == | |||
The name "Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar", or the same name without the hyphen, is now in multiple reputable sources. However, is he the "42-year-old Houston man" who was the owner of the truck? Or was the truck stolen? The owner of the truck may not be the named deceased suspect, based on the New York Times currently. ] (]) 17:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:According to the '''Events''' section, the "42-year-old Houston man" owned the truck, but he was renting it via ] to the suspect. 🪐 ] 🪐 ( ]]) 18:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::I don't see where any of the sources mention the age of the owner of the truck. Consider it an unlikely coincidence and possible error AND the truck owners age is really irrelevant that could be removed. ] (]) 20:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Done}} I don't see it in the sources either, though I'll check again. Even if I do find it again, I'll leave it out to avoid confusion. ] (]) 20:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Is Jabbar from inside Houston or outside Houston? == | |||
Is he from inside Houston or outside Houston? Multiple reports say that he's from Houston, but other sites say that he's from outside Houston. ] (]) 17:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Possible connection to air b-n-b fire == | |||
https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/bourbon-street-attack-airbnb/article_3b1a89c0-c851-11ef-b4d9-f333210ff2e7.amp.html ] (]) 18:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== New Misplaced Pages Redirect Article on Islamic Terrorism == | |||
it seems that every single terrorist attack in the world is caused by muslims, there should be a greater redirect to islamic terrorism and all affiliated at the top of related articles ] (]) 18:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Not true. Example: ] ] (]) 18:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Correction: ]. ] (]) 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Sounds slightly islamophobic but no, it should be domestic terrorism while the background focuses on Islam. ] (]) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:'''Comment''': This IP has made other disruptive and misinformation-ridden talk page edits on pages having to do with terrorism in the US. It seems that they have a clear agenda, specifically regarding Muslims, and are most likely not operating to improve articles in a neutral good faith manner. ] (]) 19:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Could a NOTHERE block be considered? ] (]) 19:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Two different IPS ] (]) 20:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Two different NOTHERE blocks ] (]) 20:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:This is a seriously bigoted statement with no foundation. ] (]) 19:37, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Number of deaths? == | |||
This article contradicts itself - some parts say 16, some parts say 11. The blurb on the main page says 11.] (]) 19:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:As it's an ongoing event, it'll take time for information to update and news sources to agree. It should be more up to date by the end of the day or this time tomorrow. You're welcome to update information yourself as well, as the article isn't currently protected. ] <span style="font-weight:bold">|</span> ] 19:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Jabbar's Life == | |||
Public records confirm that Jabbar attended ] and once resided in both ] and ]. Jabbar later briefly resided in ] around the time of the ]. His Texas voter registration has no party affiliation. A newspaper article sourced that he resided in Beaumont as far early as 2001. ] (]) 19:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Minor Correction == | |||
Article indicates the suspect's truck collided with a crane... the truck actually collided with a turreted boom lift, or aerial device with a basket for operators/workers on the end, like a ]. I use them all the time. The specific device hit operates at low speeds, typically in areas not affected by regular traffic, like a festival or some other special event.] (]) 19:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Update needed for FBI findings (part 2) == | |||
== Unconfirmed count: 11-16 == | |||
FBI's latest statements require updating paragraph about perpetrator identification. Multiple sources now confirm FBI's revised findings. | |||
From the press conference right now, it's confirmed 11 (including the murderer) were killed, but some news sources are announcing 16 (including the murderer) were killed, with 4 more dying at the hospital ] (]) 19:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Proposed revision: | |||
:'''UPDATE:'' NBC has changed its new banner from "At Least 15 Killed" to "At Least 10 Killed" ] (]) 20:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
"The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) identified the driver as Shamsud-Din Jabbar, an American-born resident of Houston, Texas. An Islamic State (ISIS) flag was found on the back of the truck. The FBI is investigating the attack as an act of terrorism and has confirmed the attacker acted alone. While a vehicle explosion occurred at Trump International Hotel Las Vegas on the same day, the FBI has found "no definitive link" between the incidents." | |||
Sources: | |||
== Multiple Suspects under ISIS == | |||
- AP News (January 2, 2025): "The FBI says that the New Orleans attacker acted alone. The agency also finds 'no definitive link' to the truck explosion in Las Vegas." | |||
- WDSU (Updated 11:31 AM CST Jan 2, 2025): "New Orleans terror attack suspect acted alone, FBI says" confirms FBI's findings that Jabbar acted alone and no connection exists to Las Vegas incident. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> | |||
:This is an older post that was unsigned by a now blocked user. There is nothing substantial here that isn't already covered or addressed in the article. Nothing to do here. ] ] 02:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== “Suspect” == | |||
According to the New Orleans Police Department, multiple suspects may have acted also with Jabbar in the killings which may be related to ISIS, though it is still unconfirmed currently. ] (]) 19:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Jabbar was the guy who did it so shouldn’t it be changed from suspect to perpetrator? ] (]) 10:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: |
:Assuming that it has been legally confirmed by multiple sources, then yes. (]) | (PS: Have a good day) 12:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
: |
:There is a ''presumption of innocence'' that prevails in these articles, until proven. ] ] ] 15:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with using "suspect" for a while because of ], which applies to the recently deceased. Usually I would expect "suspect" to give way to "convicted perpetrator", but in this case there won't be a trial for the deceased, so I am curious: What are the criteria in the case of a deceased suspect, and how do they officially become a perpetrator? ] (]) 19:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::An investigation will always look at whether there are multiple actors. But I haven't seen anything saying that there are "multiple suspects". ] (]) 19:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Whenever law enforcement calls him that and reliable sources report it, I think. ] (]) 22:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::It is possible it would transition to "attacker" or "assailant" or something similar. But for the most part it will follow what reliable sources are saying whenever that occurs in the process. That is largely driven by the investigation taking place. Among many reasons, some times things become discovered that a person identity was mistaken, or there was a bigger plot and this person was just a cog, or there are other suspicious circumstances where this person was essentially coerced into doing this act. I'm not making any assumptions about ''this'' incident, but rather commenting on examples that could drastically impact how this person is referred to in the future. ] ] 22:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::I'd say give it a month to let the dust settle and the fog of war clear before we stop extending standard ] protections to him as recently deceased. ] (]) 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::We might need to discuss that due to ]. --] (]) 10:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::::@]: What specific aspect of BDP are you asserting? ] ] 16:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Probably {{tq|six months, one year, two years at the outside}} - I said "give it a month" which is shorter than the timeframes supported by ]. To clarify my stance, I said a month mainly to suggest we should not be acting ''sooner'' than a month from now. I am entirely happy to follow ] guidance and say we should treat the suspect as a BLP for at least six months. ] (]) 16:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Simonm223 has pretty much already said what I would have. The only thing to emphasis is that this would be in line with the {{tpq|Such extensions would only apply particularly to contentious or questionable material about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends}} portion. --] (]) 05:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Exact path of pickup is incorrect == | ||
The current description of the actual attack is not correct. The pickup drove down Canal St-in traffic- and then quickly sped up and made a right onto Bourbon via the sidewalk, purposefully going around a police car that was parked on the street to block off Bourbon St. He then drove nearly 3 blocks down Bourdon - running down many pedestrians, then crashing into a crane. Then the shootout began. ] (]) 11:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{{requested move/dated|2025 New Orleans attack|protected=2025 New Orleans truck attack}} | |||
:Do you have a reliable source that you can provide for that statement? ] ] 02:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] → {{no redirect|2025 New Orleans attack}} – The attack combines shooting, pursuit and a ramming attack. ] (]) 19:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Reference to Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion == | |||
:Though it may be easier to know, the thing is that maybe their may be more attacks in New Orleans, so keep where it was originally. ] (]) 19:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose''' - per COMMONNAME. Other aspects not significant/impactful enough to be included IMO. Similar to the RM on ] ] (]) 19:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose'''. This attack is distinguished by the fact that the majority of the casualties were from people being run over. ] (]) 19:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Under "Investigation," the article currently states an outdated belief from January 1, 2025 that the Cybertruck explosion killed the driver. However, local authorities stated on January 2, 2025 that the driver shot himself prior to the explosion. The county coroner confirmed that the driver's Cause of Death was suicide by gunshot. ] (]) 16:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== The suspect was in contact with Thomas Matthew crooks 9 months ago?? == | |||
{{hat|1=Source is a joke website ] (]) 20:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
hello guys. i just saw a WorldGrayNews news article about this tradic incident, it says that according to the FBI, suspect of the attack had talked with ] (Donald trump assasin) 9 months ago thorough Discord... i think its fake, but if its true, it needs to be included in this article ASAP. ] (]) 19:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:I removed one sentence from the article, but there is no need to extensively cover it here except for basically a passing reference that it was investigated for being similar and that no connection was found. If the connection was still unknown then there might be cause for more detail. As it currently stands, it is accurate, and not outdated. ] ] 02:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:No it doesn't. Not without a source, What even is ]? Could you link to the original statement by the FBI? ] (]) 20:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::I agree that it does not need to be extensively covered because no connection was found. | |||
:Unless this has a ] backing it, it should not be included. ] (]) 20:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::However, it is '''not''' accurate to say "The same day, at approximately 8:39 a.m., a Tesla Cybertruck exploded and caught fire outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, killing the perpetrator and injuring seven other people," because the Tesla exploding did '''not''' kill the perpetrator --- he killed himself with a gunshot to the head prior to the explosion. | |||
:This is false, will be reported for banning. ] (]) 20:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: |
::The article should be simply corrected to: "The same day, at approximately 8:39 a.m., a Tesla Cybertruck exploded and caught fire outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, injuring seven other people. The perpetrator died from a self-inflicted gunshot prior to the explosion." ] (]) 17:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
I don't see why anything is said about this as there doesn't appear to be any connection. Doesn't even look like the LV thing was designed to kill anyone other than the driver; and there were over 16,000 actual murders in the US last year. ] (]) 17:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{{hab}} |
Latest revision as of 21:06, 8 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2025 New Orleans truck attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 days |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 2025 New Orleans truck attack, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
A news item involving 2025 New Orleans truck attack was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 January 2025. |
Misplaced Pages is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Update needed for FBI findings (part 2)
FBI's latest statements require updating paragraph about perpetrator identification. Multiple sources now confirm FBI's revised findings.
Proposed revision: "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) identified the driver as Shamsud-Din Jabbar, an American-born resident of Houston, Texas. An Islamic State (ISIS) flag was found on the back of the truck. The FBI is investigating the attack as an act of terrorism and has confirmed the attacker acted alone. While a vehicle explosion occurred at Trump International Hotel Las Vegas on the same day, the FBI has found "no definitive link" between the incidents."
Sources: - AP News (January 2, 2025): "The FBI says that the New Orleans attacker acted alone. The agency also finds 'no definitive link' to the truck explosion in Las Vegas." - WDSU (Updated 11:31 AM CST Jan 2, 2025): "New Orleans terror attack suspect acted alone, FBI says" confirms FBI's findings that Jabbar acted alone and no connection exists to Las Vegas incident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basaatw (talk • contribs)
- This is an older post that was unsigned by a now blocked user. There is nothing substantial here that isn't already covered or addressed in the article. Nothing to do here. TiggerJay (talk) 02:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
“Suspect”
Jabbar was the guy who did it so shouldn’t it be changed from suspect to perpetrator? 66.65.59.229 (talk) 10:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming that it has been legally confirmed by multiple sources, then yes. (3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 12:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is a presumption of innocence that prevails in these articles, until proven. WP:TOOSOON TiggerJay (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with using "suspect" for a while because of WP:BLP, which applies to the recently deceased. Usually I would expect "suspect" to give way to "convicted perpetrator", but in this case there won't be a trial for the deceased, so I am curious: What are the criteria in the case of a deceased suspect, and how do they officially become a perpetrator? Fluoborate (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Whenever law enforcement calls him that and reliable sources report it, I think. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is possible it would transition to "attacker" or "assailant" or something similar. But for the most part it will follow what reliable sources are saying whenever that occurs in the process. That is largely driven by the investigation taking place. Among many reasons, some times things become discovered that a person identity was mistaken, or there was a bigger plot and this person was just a cog, or there are other suspicious circumstances where this person was essentially coerced into doing this act. I'm not making any assumptions about this incident, but rather commenting on examples that could drastically impact how this person is referred to in the future. TiggerJay (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd say give it a month to let the dust settle and the fog of war clear before we stop extending standard WP:BLP protections to him as recently deceased. Simonm223 (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- We might need to discuss that due to WP:BDP. --Super Goku V (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Super Goku V: What specific aspect of BDP are you asserting? TiggerJay (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Probably
six months, one year, two years at the outside
- I said "give it a month" which is shorter than the timeframes supported by WP:BDP. To clarify my stance, I said a month mainly to suggest we should not be acting sooner than a month from now. I am entirely happy to follow WP:BDP guidance and say we should treat the suspect as a BLP for at least six months. Simonm223 (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC) - Simonm223 has pretty much already said what I would have. The only thing to emphasis is that this would be in line with the
Such extensions would only apply particularly to contentious or questionable material about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends
portion. --Super Goku V (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Probably
- @Super Goku V: What specific aspect of BDP are you asserting? TiggerJay (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- We might need to discuss that due to WP:BDP. --Super Goku V (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd say give it a month to let the dust settle and the fog of war clear before we stop extending standard WP:BLP protections to him as recently deceased. Simonm223 (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with using "suspect" for a while because of WP:BLP, which applies to the recently deceased. Usually I would expect "suspect" to give way to "convicted perpetrator", but in this case there won't be a trial for the deceased, so I am curious: What are the criteria in the case of a deceased suspect, and how do they officially become a perpetrator? Fluoborate (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Exact path of pickup is incorrect
The current description of the actual attack is not correct. The pickup drove down Canal St-in traffic- and then quickly sped up and made a right onto Bourbon via the sidewalk, purposefully going around a police car that was parked on the street to block off Bourbon St. He then drove nearly 3 blocks down Bourdon - running down many pedestrians, then crashing into a crane. Then the shootout began. 2601:645:C680:8A90:85FD:1ACD:D7E2:867B (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have a reliable source that you can provide for that statement? TiggerJay (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Reference to Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion
Under "Investigation," the article currently states an outdated belief from January 1, 2025 that the Cybertruck explosion killed the driver. However, local authorities stated on January 2, 2025 that the driver shot himself prior to the explosion. The county coroner confirmed that the driver's Cause of Death was suicide by gunshot. 2nucbom3ve (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- I removed one sentence from the article, but there is no need to extensively cover it here except for basically a passing reference that it was investigated for being similar and that no connection was found. If the connection was still unknown then there might be cause for more detail. As it currently stands, it is accurate, and not outdated. TiggerJay (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that it does not need to be extensively covered because no connection was found.
- However, it is not accurate to say "The same day, at approximately 8:39 a.m., a Tesla Cybertruck exploded and caught fire outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, killing the perpetrator and injuring seven other people," because the Tesla exploding did not kill the perpetrator --- he killed himself with a gunshot to the head prior to the explosion.
- The article should be simply corrected to: "The same day, at approximately 8:39 a.m., a Tesla Cybertruck exploded and caught fire outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, injuring seven other people. The perpetrator died from a self-inflicted gunshot prior to the explosion." 2nucbom3ve (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I don't see why anything is said about this as there doesn't appear to be any connection. Doesn't even look like the LV thing was designed to kill anyone other than the driver; and there were over 16,000 actual murders in the US last year. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- Misplaced Pages objectionable content
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- B-Class Serial killer-related articles
- Low-importance Serial killer-related articles
- Serial Killer task force
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Louisiana articles
- Unknown-importance Louisiana articles
- WikiProject Louisiana articles
- B-Class New Orleans articles
- Unknown-importance New Orleans articles
- WikiProject New Orleans articles
- WikiProject United States articles