Revision as of 00:03, 2 January 2025 editDYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators250,219 edits Giving DYK credit for Beechcraft BQM-126 on behalf of AirshipJungleman29← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:03, 19 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,386,361 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:The Bushranger/Archive38. (BOT) | ||
(55 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
{{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
== |
== A goat for you! == | ||
] | |||
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found ''']'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can ''']''' and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the ]. | |||
Thank you for taking care of IntrepidContributor. I ended up needing to help my neighbor for much of the afternoon and didn't get to look at ANI. And thank you to {{u|Objective3000}} and other folks for being patient. I'm a firm believer in ] and if you can give a user that last chance then no one can complain. | |||
] ] 06:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented ] to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive ] at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round. | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
:I try to keep things good instead of baaaa-aaaad. Thanks! - ] <sub>]</sub> 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== About Janessian == | |||
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from ].</small> ] (]) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1266471891 --> | |||
@], its Nelson. I would want to thank you for the matter. I am glad that you and the others helped out in this case; the matter had been affecting me personally. Still, I have a concern that he might retaliate again despite the block and might go further on. | |||
== Editor experience invitation == | |||
I had not responded to him directly because I do not wish to make enemies or increase the conflict, and even gave him chances. I am shocked and saddened that he would be going after me for the photo issue when it could be easily resolved in another, perhaps an even better way and somehow, I was singled out. It was my interest in crime that made me come here years ago and he said a lot of things, whether indirect or direct, and yeah it affected me for the week throughout. ] (]) 04:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Hi The Bushranger. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 08:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: |
:Alas, some people just are that way. If they evade the block, the socks will be instablocked from here out. - ] <sub>]</sub> 04:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::@]. Maybe you are right. One thing about the murder victim photos, is that at one point, he believed I used female murder victims for some purpose, but it is not true. It can't be helped but one coincidence is that a majority of the murder victims I covered happen to be female, plus I also got photos of male murder victims and yet he at first did not go after me for them before he went on to say all the murder victim photos should be taken down, and involved everyone else who wrote crime like me. Honestly, I do not mind taking down the photos on the ], where his first of edits began (and they formed his reason behind the arguments), but I cannot find a legitimate or explainable reason about taking down the other images (and I took into account the disagreements of the other guys who commented on the issue). | |||
::That's alright. It's always there if you ever change your mind. ] ] 22:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::He also said that articles must not follow the newspaper facts and said they are not true and the truth must be verified by the police or to go interview the victims' families. But many wiki crime editors used newspapers as reference and there would have been Sanctions on the papers if the facts reported were not true, so the argument frankly did not hold. ] (]) 04:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==DYK for Beechcraft BQM-126== | |||
::@] Should Janessian's sock also have TPA revoked? ] (]) 04:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox | |||
:::Good call, thanks. - ] <sub>]</sub> 04:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
|imagesize=40px | |||
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the 1980s ''']''' target drone could be launched from aircraft based on aircraft carriers?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:03, 19 January 2025
|
This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
Archives |
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
A goat for you!
Thank you for taking care of IntrepidContributor. I ended up needing to help my neighbor for much of the afternoon and didn't get to look at ANI. And thank you to Objective3000 and other folks for being patient. I'm a firm believer in WP:ROPE and if you can give a user that last chance then no one can complain.
EvergreenFir (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I try to keep things good instead of baaaa-aaaad. Thanks! - The Bushranger One ping only 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
About Janessian
@The Bushranger, its Nelson. I would want to thank you for the matter. I am glad that you and the others helped out in this case; the matter had been affecting me personally. Still, I have a concern that he might retaliate again despite the block and might go further on.
I had not responded to him directly because I do not wish to make enemies or increase the conflict, and even gave him chances. I am shocked and saddened that he would be going after me for the photo issue when it could be easily resolved in another, perhaps an even better way and somehow, I was singled out. It was my interest in crime that made me come here years ago and he said a lot of things, whether indirect or direct, and yeah it affected me for the week throughout. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Alas, some people just are that way. If they evade the block, the socks will be instablocked from here out. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger. Maybe you are right. One thing about the murder victim photos, is that at one point, he believed I used female murder victims for some purpose, but it is not true. It can't be helped but one coincidence is that a majority of the murder victims I covered happen to be female, plus I also got photos of male murder victims and yet he at first did not go after me for them before he went on to say all the murder victim photos should be taken down, and involved everyone else who wrote crime like me. Honestly, I do not mind taking down the photos on the Killing of Wong Chik Yeok, where his first of edits began (and they formed his reason behind the arguments), but I cannot find a legitimate or explainable reason about taking down the other images (and I took into account the disagreements of the other guys who commented on the issue).
- He also said that articles must not follow the newspaper facts and said they are not true and the truth must be verified by the police or to go interview the victims' families. But many wiki crime editors used newspapers as reference and there would have been Sanctions on the papers if the facts reported were not true, so the argument frankly did not hold. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger Should Janessian's sock also have TPA revoked? Insanityclown1 (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good call, thanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)