Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bbb23: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:41, 2 January 2025 view sourceलॉस एंजिल्स लेखक (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users718 edits →Joaquim Nero: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:14, 9 January 2025 view source Bbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,868 edits →User Ayohama SPI: tx 
(21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
{{clear}} {{clear}}


== You've got mail ==
==Notice of noticeboard discussion==
{{Atop|This discussion is closed.--] (]) 15:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}}
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an action which you performed.&nbsp;The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:XRV-notice--> ] (]) 16:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


{{You've got mail|sig=] (]) 15:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)}}
:{{Ping|Bbb23}} Hi, sorry to bother you. Could you clarify what "refactoring" were you referring to, and how that meets the requirements at ]: {{tqq|continued abuse of their user talk page, or when the user has engaged in serious threats, accusations, or attempts at outing that must be prevented from re-occurring}}? Thanks. ] (]) 12:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
::IIRC, the trigger for revoking TPA was when the user altered a declined unblock request.--] (]) 13:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
::I explained what occurred on my talk page under the "Refactoring" section, but basically I replied to Asilvering's rejection of the unblock request, but I couldn't use reply buttons while I was blocked so I didn't know replying directly to the rejection reason was not normally allowed.


] from the past month (December 2024).
::https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Isonomia01#c-Isonomia01-20241222071600-Fourth_Third_Unblock_Request_(last_one_was_incorrectly_formatted)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
::] (]) 15:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
{{Abot}}


] '''Administrator changes'''
== Ask for clarification on deleted page of Geert Claessens ==
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
Dear Sir,
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
I noticed that the page Geert Claessens was deleted. I was still editing it in my sandbox and was in the process of adding external references to the text to underpin what was written. Kindly ask why it was already deleted. Thank you for your clarifications. ] (]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
:{{tpw}}The link is ]. ] (]) 22:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:I deleted it because it was blatantly promotional. Looks like you have a ] with the subject. What is your relationship to him?--] (]) 13:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
|]
::Dear Sir, always ready to take advice on how to write this. I am his younger brother, but wanted clearly to add all the necessary references and have it as factual page. He (Geert) died 2 years ago and i wanted to get a digital trace of him and his carreer as a classical guitar player, no itention to have a promotional page. I also have newspaper articles on him, but they are dating from a while back and so they need to be scaned. How can i include them as a reference ? Thank you for your opinion and time. Kr, Kris. ] (]) 16:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
|]
:::First, you need to declare your conflict of interest following the procedures in ]. Second, the problem isn't your "intention" but the language you use in drafting a page for your brother; it must be neutral and encyclopedic. Many people who have no experience with Misplaced Pages have trouble drafting new articles that comply with our guidelines. Third, you would be better writing an article in ], not your sandbox, and using ]. You will then get feedback from experienced users. As far as citing newspaper articles, please ask about that and any other things I've mentioned at the ]. As an administrator, my primary job is to prevent disruption, even if unintentional, to Misplaced Pages, not to mentor new editors. Good luck.--] (]) 17:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


</div>
==Renewed edit warring==
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
You blocked Rueben lys for edit warring in July 2024. He has now returned to Misplaced Pages and his only edit is to resume that edit war. ] (]) 05:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
:That's a very long gap. If they revert again, let me know.--] (]) 13:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
==CU request==
] '''Technical news'''
Hi. Sorry, I'm not familiar with the procedures. Shouldn't be considered a potential block evasion and warrant another CU request ? I'm also wondering if the main account has also been blocked or just the IP. Thanks. ] (]) 16:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
:The named account has not been blocked. I blocked an IP range. I reverted your edits to the report for several reasons. First, you repeated the range I'd already blocked. Second, you incorrectly added a new report or you attempted to edit an already-closed report. If you want to add a new report, you must follow the instructions at SPI to do so. Third, do not request a CU when you are reporting IPs; connecting a named account with IPs is a violation of privacy and will not be run. Finally, don't bother adding the single IP in a new report. One edit a few days ago is not worth bothering with.--] (]) 16:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
::Ok, fine, as I said above I'm not familiar with these things. Thanks, ] (]) 16:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)


] '''Arbitration'''
== A barnstar for you! ==
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Happy New Year, Bbb23! In 2024, other editors thanked you using the ] on the English Misplaced Pages. This made you the '''#8 most thanked Wikipedian in 2024'''. Congratulations and, well, ''thank you'' for all that you do for Misplaced Pages. Here's to 2025! ] (]) 19:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
|}
:Umm, I had no idea. I have notifications for Thanks turned off globally. I should also add that I'm surprised. I ''do'' appreciate your thanks, though, and a Happy New Year to you, too. Be safe tonight.--] (]) 19:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
::It only stops you from ''receiving'' thanks; it doesn't stop people from thanking you. But they won't know that you didn't see the thanks. See . --] &#x1F98C; (]) 01:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I know that. I just don't think of myself as an editor who would get thanked a lot. I ''do'' have one question: is there any way to look now and see what edit an editor thanked me for? I don't see any way to do that on the thank log. I'm just curious.--] (]) 01:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::It's not in the thank log; it's only in the "in-tray" or "TV set" icon at the top (to the right of the bell icon). But that only shows the 25 most recent events that come within that icon; most will be thanks, but some will be other actions - such as when you ] somebody. So for myself, the list shows 25 events in the last 6 days of which 13 are mentions and 12 are where somebody else thanked me. If I click on one of those 12, I can see which edit (or loggable action, such as a block, delete or protection) that I was being thanked for, but once they are pushed out of the 25 by more recent events, the information is no longer retrievable. So checking out 1150 thanks is a long way from being possible. --] &#x1F98C; (]) 02:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Heh, I wasn't going to check all 1150 entries, god help me, just a few out of curiosity, but it looks to me like even the recent thanks listed in the log don't show up when I click on the TV set icon; maybe that works only if you have thanks notifications turned on.--] (]) 02:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


----
== Qubetics ==
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->


== Thanks ==
Would you mind draftifying or moving the contents of the recently deleted ] article into my userspace? I'm not the original author, but started looking into it a bit when I encountered it on NPP. It doesn't seem to have notability yet, but I'd like to have it on my list to keep an eye on for the future. Thanks.] (]) 02:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} - see ]. I retained the infobox and the refs but took out the promotional language.--] (]) 15:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


{{Thank}} for banning the disruptive IP address {{userlinks|203.30.15.99}} Appreciate it. (]) &#124; (PS: Have a good day) 20:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
== Lawrence bishnoi ==


== Check user ==
Can I use the official chargesheets filed by ] against the Bishnoi for reference? like my sandbox ] (]) 14:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:The link to the report doesn't work.--] (]) 15:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::and other reference mentioned along? ] (]) 15:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::Because 80% of Lawrence Bishnoi's references are like this. ] (]) 15:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:::The other ref works, but you can't add material based on a report without providing a working link to the report.--] (]) 15:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::::okay thank you for your guidance i will keep that in mind ] (]) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


Hi. Can you please check if is a potential sock of . Thanks. ] (]) 08:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
=="Best know for" IP==
:I am not a CheckUser. There is not enough behavior for me to block. And even if I were a CheckUser, the suspected master account is stale.--] (]) 11:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Does {{noping|62.3.99.94}} look like the BKFIP, or is is just me? Looking at their edit summaries ("biased and really barely intelligible", "removed pointless waffling", "first paragraph was basically garbage, unintelligible due to poor language skills on the part of whoever added the text, and poor reading skills by everyone who edited it subsequently", etc) it certainly fits their ''modus operandi''. - ] (]) 16:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::The master account has indef block and TP block – not much more the original account can do, so it's obviously going to go stale. The new account has gone straight to a page that the master account edited heavily, including adding the blank sections that the new account has now "filled". Is it worth me asking a CheckUser? ] (]) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:A bit, yes, but not enough for me to block. What do you think, {{U|Favonian}}?--] (]) 17:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:::No, as I said, the master account is stale, so the CU will not be able to compare the data of the suspected sock with the master. You can, if you wish, file a report at ], seeking a behavioral block. I don't think there's enough for it, but someone else may feel differently. You might wait to see if they continue to edit.--] (]) 12:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
::Oh yes, that's him. Blocked for 3 days. Expect a fulminating unblock request, followed by a revocation talk page privileges. Happy New Year! ] (]) 17:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:::The expert has spoken! --] (]) 17:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Many thanks to you both. I was going to note that a few of their edits are removing things along the lines of 'best known for' phrasing, including , , and , but that seems a bit superfluous now! - ] (]) 17:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


== Joaquim Nero == == User Ayohama SPI ==


Hi Bbb23, you recently interacted with user Ayohama on ] and last month blocked user Amber hurt as a sockpuppet on the page. I have opened an SPI against Ayohama, which you may be interested in: ]. I have also requested a checkuser there. – ] (]) 21:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello Bbb23, I have noticed you often resolve things when I post in ] so I thought I would tell you directly here. Please tell me if that is not okay and I won't do it again. I noticed this user ] after a page he created ] was added to ]. It looks like many articles he has created have problems. Could you take a look please? ]] 18:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:Good job.--] (]) 23:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:14, 9 January 2025


Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39
Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42
Archive 43Archive 44Archive 45
Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48
Archive 49Archive 50Archive 51
Archive 52Archive 53Archive 54
Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57
Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60
Archive 61Archive 62Archive 63

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

You've got mail

Hello, Bbb23. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Skynxnex (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

 Thanks for banning the disruptive IP address 203.30.15.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Appreciate it. (3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 20:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Check user

Hi. Can you please check if this user is a potential sock of this indef blocked user. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I am not a CheckUser. There is not enough behavior for me to block. And even if I were a CheckUser, the suspected master account is stale.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
The master account has indef block and TP block – not much more the original account can do, so it's obviously going to go stale. The new account has gone straight to a page that the master account edited heavily, including adding the blank sections that the new account has now "filled". Is it worth me asking a CheckUser? DaHuzyBru (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
No, as I said, the master account is stale, so the CU will not be able to compare the data of the suspected sock with the master. You can, if you wish, file a report at WP:SPI, seeking a behavioral block. I don't think there's enough for it, but someone else may feel differently. You might wait to see if they continue to edit.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User Ayohama SPI

Hi Bbb23, you recently interacted with user Ayohama on Mark Karpelès and last month blocked user Amber hurt as a sockpuppet on the page. I have opened an SPI against Ayohama, which you may be interested in: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lustigermutiger21. I have also requested a checkuser there. – notwally (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Good job.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)