| Revision as of 16:31, 3 January 2025 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,312,047 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/Archive 16) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:53, 23 January 2025 edit undoAsukite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,714 edits Notifying of requested move using Move+ | ||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ⚫ | == RfC ongoing at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| ⚫ | There is a RfC ongoing at ], an article within the scope of this WikiProject. All editors are invited to participate. '''] ]''' 18:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| Would appreciate some eyes on this. Pasting what I wrote there for context: | |||
| {{Talk quote block|This article needs pruning, but I am unsure of where to begin, or what the end result should ultimately look like. If there is a policy for what "Political positions of ______" pages should look like, I am unaware of it (and would appreciate a link to). However, I think we can all agree that there is no reason why the article on Jeb Bush's political positions should be 605.99% larger than ]. | |||
| ⚫ | My concern is that every single man on this list is in fact a traitor, and treason has reasons to source. Please fix this issue. ] (]) 11:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| Jeb Bush hasn't been in a position to directly influence American policy since leaving gubernatorial office in 2007. Since then, he had an infamously unsuccessful presidential campaign in 2016, has been involved with a number of ] (e.g. ], ], the ]), and occasionally contributes to media outlets as an op-ed columnist. This article gives ] weight to his stated positions on the 2016 campaign trail; eight years down the line and three presidential elections later, it is safe to say that they ultimately fail the ]. | |||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| By the end of this discussion, I'd like to set up an outline for how the article should be restructured and discuss what should or should not remain. My immediate thoughts: | |||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * I'd like to avoid splitting the article into sub-subsections unless absolutely necessary to avoid ]. | |||
| * I believe the most weight should be given to his political positions during his tenure as governor, followed by his post-gubernatorial career as a lobbyist and op-ed columnist, followed by comments made on the 2016 campaign trail. | |||
| * Anything that did not influence public policy probably does not deserve a section unto itself. For example, his opinion on the Confederate flag, the name of the Washington Commanders (né Redskins), or his comments about the "French workweek" seem particularly superfluous. | |||
| Discuss.|id=c-Kodiak Blackjack-20241109205200-UTC}} | |||
| — <span style="font-family:Oxygen">] (]) • (])</span> 00:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| :These seem like sound principles, although I don't think the size vis a vis his brother is that important. I found the International relations section the most unneeded, it seems mostly news-style reporting of specific statements. For what it's worth there is one relevant GA, ]. ] (]) 00:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == |
== Reliable sources for US political articles == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| ⚫ | There is an interesting discussion regarding reliable sources for US political articles at ] --] (]) 14:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == A problem with politics articles, especially senator articles == | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. |
||
| ]: "A member of the Democratic Party, he has been the '''senior''' U.S. senator from Arizona since 2020". This isn't actually true. He's been in the Senate since 2020, but he only just became the senior senator. I think similar statements appear in a number of articles. ] (]) 07:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] |
||
| :Correct. It's a problem that people care about shoehorning in whether they are the junior or senior senator without regard for sentence flow. Please edit those articles to fix it or at least tell us which ones do this. I'll fix Kelly. – ] (]) 15:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Discussion on the renaming of the article ] == | |||
| == Order in the 'President of the Continental Congress' is fucked == | |||
| Please see ] for a discussion about renaming ] to ]. ] (]) 17:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| In the infobox of each ] holder, the order is self-contradictory with one another. Some of them are ordered based on the name of the office (ie. 1st President of the First Continental Congress v 1st President of the Confederation Congress) or ordered based on all previous titles combined. These also contradict the NavBox at the bottom of each page. Can someone who better knows the topic let me know which order is best? ] (]) 05:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] |
||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 19:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == New Hampshire infobox == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| More input would be appreciated at ], concerning New Hampshire's infobox content. ] (]) 23:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == RfC ongoing at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | There is a RfC ongoing at ], an article within the scope of this WikiProject. All editors are invited to participate. '''] ]''' 18:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Need Help Writing & Checking Already Written Summaries == | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 02:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I have been working on ] for several weeks, and I have a lot of summaries already written, but still a lot to write. The lead is still incomplete, but it is on the docket to do at the very end (to help clearly define the scope and such). The scope will eventually be any attack or overall campaign (like the ]) which is against the U.S.. Large scope, I know, but my vision for the article will make it extremely good and extremely useful. | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 02:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Anyway, if anyone wants to help me write some summaries (1942 to 2025) or do some accuracy and grammatical checks on the already written summaries (1776 to 1941), feel free to help out. I started it in November 2024, so probably only a couple more months of work to do on it to get it ready for mainspace. '''The ]''' (] 01:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | My concern is that every single man on this list is in fact a traitor, and treason has reasons to source. Please fix this issue. ] (]) 11:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 15:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == People's March == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Project members are invited to help expand the new article ''']'''. Thanks! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 15:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== New seal for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| DEA has announced a new seal for the agency; see . The current seal shown on the article is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Seal_of_the_United_States_Drug_Enforcement_Administration.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Seal_of_the_United_States_Drug_Enforcement_Administration.svg. | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure what the process is for changing the image, but I wanted to bring this to the project's attention. Thanks. ]<b><sup style="font-family:Century Gothic">]</sup></b> 00:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 20:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Reliable sources for US political articles == | |||
| ⚫ | There is an interesting discussion regarding reliable sources for US political articles at ] --] (]) 14:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 19:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 23 January 2025
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| Main page | Talk | Embassy | Requested Articles | Members | Portal | Recognized content | To do | Help |
|
|
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 |
|
Old U.S. notice board archives: National, Southern, Northern |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. | |
 |
|
 | WikiProject United States was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 4 July 2011. |
 | Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs was nominated for deletion on 19 July 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
RfC ongoing at Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies#RFC: What Went Wrong in Ohio
There is a RfC ongoing at Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies#RFC: What Went Wrong in Ohio, an article within the scope of this WikiProject. All editors are invited to participate. Toa Nidhiki05 18:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
List of Confederate States senators
My concern is that every single man on this list is in fact a traitor, and treason has reasons to source. Please fix this issue. Bearian (talk) 11:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 2017 World Series
2017 World Series has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for American Horror Story
American Horror Story has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Reliable sources for US political articles
There is an interesting discussion regarding reliable sources for US political articles at WT:RS#This is curious... --Magnolia677 (talk) 14:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wings (1927 film)
Wings (1927 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
A problem with politics articles, especially senator articles
Mark Kelly: "A member of the Democratic Party, he has been the senior U.S. senator from Arizona since 2020". This isn't actually true. He's been in the Senate since 2020, but he only just became the senior senator. I think similar statements appear in a number of articles. 174.160.82.127 (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Correct. It's a problem that people care about shoehorning in whether they are the junior or senior senator without regard for sentence flow. Please edit those articles to fix it or at least tell us which ones do this. I'll fix Kelly. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Benny Friedman#Requested move 4 January 2025
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Benny Friedman#Requested move 4 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Yeshivish613 (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Order in the 'President of the Continental Congress' is fucked
In the infobox of each President of the Continental Congress holder, the order is self-contradictory with one another. Some of them are ordered based on the name of the office (ie. 1st President of the First Continental Congress v 1st President of the Confederation Congress) or ordered based on all previous titles combined. These also contradict the NavBox at the bottom of each page. Can someone who better knows the topic let me know which order is best? GGOTCC (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for History of Indiana
History of Indiana has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Little Orphant Annie
Little Orphant Annie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Ed Jew
Ed Jew has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
New Hampshire infobox
More input would be appreciated at this discussion, concerning New Hampshire's infobox content. GoodDay (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Providence College
Providence College has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Need Help Writing & Checking Already Written Summaries
I have been working on Draft:List of attacks on the United States for several weeks, and I have a lot of summaries already written, but still a lot to write. The lead is still incomplete, but it is on the docket to do at the very end (to help clearly define the scope and such). The scope will eventually be any attack or overall campaign (like the Gettysburg campaign) which is against the U.S.. Large scope, I know, but my vision for the article will make it extremely good and extremely useful.
Anyway, if anyone wants to help me write some summaries (1942 to 2025) or do some accuracy and grammatical checks on the already written summaries (1776 to 1941), feel free to help out. I started it in November 2024, so probably only a couple more months of work to do on it to get it ready for mainspace. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:History of the Jews in the United States#Requested move 1 January 2025
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:History of the Jews in the United States#Requested move 1 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
People's March
Project members are invited to help expand the new article People's March. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
New seal for Drug Enforcement Administration
DEA has announced a new seal for the agency; see DEA Unveils New Seal to Reflect Mission and Renewed Commitment. The current seal shown on the article is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Seal_of_the_United_States_Drug_Enforcement_Administration.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Seal_of_the_United_States_Drug_Enforcement_Administration.svg.
I'm not sure what the process is for changing the image, but I wanted to bring this to the project's attention. Thanks. Puzzledvegetable 00:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for White Mountain art
White Mountain art has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 19:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: