| Revision as of 22:50, 3 January 2025 editArjayay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers627,757 edits →Can you not change my edit? It's correct.: Nürburgring has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:40, 8 January 2025 edit undoDaniel Quinlan (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators17,673 edits please use more caution with rollbackTag: New topic | ||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Marion High School, SC == | |||
| Hello Arjayjay, you changed the picture that a put on the article named Marion High School, South Carolina, you reformat it but I noticed that I can't see the picture ] (]) 23:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ::alright I'll check on that ] (]) 01:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::its ok now, I checked it 2 days ago ] (]) 21:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | == A barnstar for you! == | ||
| Line 71: | Line 64: | ||
| ::Thanks ], and ] - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.<br>I remind myself of these when someone is telling me I am "the most hated editor on Misplaced Pages", or similar phrases, usually because I am reverting their deliberate errors or self-promotion.<br>Thanks again - and here's to next year ! - ] (]) 15:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ::Thanks ], and ] - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.<br>I remind myself of these when someone is telling me I am "the most hated editor on Misplaced Pages", or similar phrases, usually because I am reverting their deliberate errors or self-promotion.<br>Thanks again - and here's to next year ! - ] (]) 15:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::Not only were you first; you were the ] of thanks - the #2 person wasn't even close! Congrats. ] (]) 23:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | == Nomination of ] for deletion == | ||
| Line 83: | Line 77: | ||
| I saw you changing my edit for "Nurburgring". Please don't. It's the correct information. If you look up Nurburgring Nordschieliefe lap record, it will say 5:19.546 set by Neel Jani. Please stop undoing my edits. ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | I saw you changing my edit for "Nurburgring". Please don't. It's the correct information. If you look up Nurburgring Nordschieliefe lap record, it will say 5:19.546 set by Neel Jani. Please stop undoing my edits. ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :Your edit has been reverted again and ] has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim, which is contrary to the consensus in the discussion at ] - ] (]) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | :Your edit has been reverted again and ] has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim, which is contrary to the consensus in the discussion at ] - If you disagree, please discuss this at that talk page - ] (]) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Greetings == | |||
| This is my first day here and I really don’t want to mess things up. I made new edits on Carnivora and Rodent pages. Did I do them okay? Am I good enough? ] (]) 16:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi ], I have no idea why you should choose to approach me, but I am afraid I know almost nothing about taxonomy. I suggest you look at the page histories of those articles, and choose an editor who edits such articles. Best wishes - ] (]) 17:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::ok ] (]) 21:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Reverted. == | |||
| ] Actor photo deleted in wiki article, page is empty without file due to some user change img, its deleted by vopyright isuuses, Can you please reverted restore the old darshan image last by edit users. | |||
| Sincerely request | |||
| @] ] (]) 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :] {{done}} - You only had to copy and paste the previous title and caption - ] (]) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks. ] (]) 09:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Rollback == | |||
| Hello {{u|Arjayay}}. I appreciate the extensive and helpful work you do on Misplaced Pages, but I'm concerned about how you are using rollback. There are many instances where you are using rollback without providing any explanation (either in edit summaries or on user talk pages) in situations that are not {{tpq|obvious vandalism}} or another case listed at ]. | |||
| For example, I noticed a {{diff2|1266924364|rollback}} on ] that was inappropriate for rollback. I then reviewed your five most recent rollbacks, and while your edits are appropriate, you're using rollback too broadly and too often without an explanation: | |||
| * {{diff2|1268238755}}: While this is clearly a bad edit, the edit history for {{ip|2A02:2F0C:C00A:6200::/64}} doesn't indicate a vandalism-only editor and some explanation is warranted. | |||
| * {{diff2|1268238571}}: The misleading edit summary and unsourced change clearly warrant a warning. (I ''might'' have used rollback here, but with a warning.) | |||
| * {{diff2|1268238439}}: This isn't obvious vandalism and needs to be explained. A warning for making unsourced edits would be appropriate as well. | |||
| * {{diff2|1268236577}}: This appears to be a good faith edit and undoing it needs to be explained. | |||
| * {{diff2|1268238306}}: I'm on the fence between vandalism and unsourced edit here, but it's not so obviously vandalism that I would do it without an explanation. (I ''might'' have used rollback here as well, but with a warning.) | |||
| Please try to use rollback in a way that is consistent with ] going forward. Also, warning disruptive editors about policies and guidelines more often would benefit the project. Thank you. ] (]) 22:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 8 January 2025
 Archives |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
E-mails
You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.
Broadcasted
The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Misplaced Pages:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Misplaced Pages tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
A May 2023 search for Broadcast gave over 234,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 99.
Of these, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| Thanks thanks for for being being a a great great WikiGnome WikiGnome and and removing removing all all those those duplicate duplicate words words. ~delta 19:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
Hi
How are you? @Arjayay i would ask you if you can help me to create page abou this topic Qatarijournalist (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Qatarijournalist, I don't know why you came to me to make your first two edits, but I don't have enough time to create articles on subjects I am interested in.
Furthermore, I can't read Turkish or Arabic, so I couldn't really help even if I wanted to. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)- This is a blocked LTA. OhNoitsJamie 16:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Qatarijournalist, I don't know why you came to me to make your first two edits, but I don't have enough time to create articles on subjects I am interested in.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Happy New Year, Arjayay! In 2024, other editors thanked you 2390 times using the thanks tool on the English Misplaced Pages. This made you the #1 most thanked Wikipedian in 2024. Congratulations and, well, thank you for all that you do for Misplaced Pages. Here's to 2025! Mz7 (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
- that's awesome. well done, @Arjayay!! Sm8900 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Mz7, and Sm8900 - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.
I remind myself of these when someone is telling me I am "the most hated editor on Misplaced Pages", or similar phrases, usually because I am reverting their deliberate errors or self-promotion.
Thanks again - and here's to next year ! - Arjayay (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- Not only were you first; you were the Wayne Gretzky of thanks - the #2 person wasn't even close! Congrats. Diannaa (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Mz7, and Sm8900 - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.
Nomination of 2020s in history for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020s in history is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Decades in history until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sm8900 (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you not change my edit? It's correct.
I saw you changing my edit for "Nurburgring". Please don't. It's the correct information. If you look up Nurburgring Nordschieliefe lap record, it will say 5:19.546 set by Neel Jani. Please stop undoing my edits. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your edit has been reverted again and Nürburgring has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim, which is contrary to the consensus in the discussion at Talk:Nürburgring - If you disagree, please discuss this at that talk page - Arjayay (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Greetings
This is my first day here and I really don’t want to mess things up. I made new edits on Carnivora and Rodent pages. Did I do them okay? Am I good enough? Helpinghamster (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Helpinghamster, I have no idea why you should choose to approach me, but I am afraid I know almost nothing about taxonomy. I suggest you look at the page histories of those articles, and choose an editor who edits such articles. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reverted.
Darshan (Kannada actor) Actor photo deleted in wiki article, page is empty without file due to some user change img, its deleted by vopyright isuuses, Can you please reverted restore the old darshan image last by edit users. Sincerely request @Arjayay Musamar (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Musamar
Done - You only had to copy and paste the previous title and caption - Arjayay (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Musamar (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello Arjayay. I appreciate the extensive and helpful work you do on Misplaced Pages, but I'm concerned about how you are using rollback. There are many instances where you are using rollback without providing any explanation (either in edit summaries or on user talk pages) in situations that are not obvious vandalism
or another case listed at WP:ROLLBACKUSE.
For example, I noticed a rollback on Darts that was inappropriate for rollback. I then reviewed your five most recent rollbacks, and while your edits are appropriate, you're using rollback too broadly and too often without an explanation:
- : While this is clearly a bad edit, the edit history for 2A02:2F0C:C00A:6200::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) doesn't indicate a vandalism-only editor and some explanation is warranted.
- : The misleading edit summary and unsourced change clearly warrant a warning. (I might have used rollback here, but with a warning.)
- : This isn't obvious vandalism and needs to be explained. A warning for making unsourced edits would be appropriate as well.
- : This appears to be a good faith edit and undoing it needs to be explained.
- : I'm on the fence between vandalism and unsourced edit here, but it's not so obviously vandalism that I would do it without an explanation. (I might have used rollback here as well, but with a warning.)
Please try to use rollback in a way that is consistent with WP:ROLLBACK going forward. Also, warning disruptive editors about policies and guidelines more often would benefit the project. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)