| Revision as of 12:03, 5 January 2025 editDYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators249,681 edits Giving DYK credit for Tsybin Ts-25 on behalf of Premeditated Chaos← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:22, 9 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,607 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:The Bushranger/Archive38. (BOT) | ||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
| {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == JTG Daugherty Racing Page Move == | |||
| ==DYK for Beechcraft BQM-126== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the 1980s ''']''' target drone could be launched from aircraft based on aircraft carriers?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, a second ] to move JTG Daugherty Racing to Hyak Motorsports was added recently. I'm the only one that posted a response, so if you'd like to post one to speed up the discussion, then feel free to do so. Thanks, ] (]) 18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you so much == | |||
| == More socking from HiLux_duck / MrDavr == | |||
| Thank you so much for riding herd on BLP violations at that breaking news story. I've been all but begging people on article talk to respect ] but it's good to see an admin taking an active hand here where it'll definitely be needed. ] (]) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| Hi! A couple of days ago you blocked HiLux_duck as a sock of MrDavr. Astonishingly, they seem to have decided that their best approach is to create another sockpuppet, {{User links|WabbleQuackEgg}}. Note that this new account ] to the unblock discussion on HiLux_duck's talk page, then clumsily ] to make it appear that HiLux_duck had made the edit. The new account then went on to start editing automotive articles again. I suppose it's possible this is a Joe job, but if so it seems rather pointless. ] (]) 01:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == I == | |||
| ⚫ | :Good grief. Even if he actually wasn't socking before, he absolutely is now... - ] <sub>]</sub> 02:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| I reopened your ANI close at "TTTEMLPBrony and continued addition of unsourced/crufty material, zero communication" as I was in the middle of an edit when you closed it. The issue of ]'s very poor block duration that is completely outside of policy had not been dealt with. That said no one seems to have the gumption to actually discipline Admin's who ignore the rules and don't treat nubes they same way that admins are treated, so I've reclosed. ] (]) 06:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Indefinite is not infinite, and his block was entirely within standard procedures. - ] <sub>]</sub> 07:16, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Which procedure do you refer to? ] says ''Indefinite blocks are usually applied when there is significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy.''; which I think we can all agree wasn't the case. Perhaps there is a new policy I am unaware of? My concern (as always) is that being heavy-handed with new users alienates them, chasing away desperately need resources. Though now they trotted out good old ], I just look a bit of a fool for mentioning it - sigh. ] (]) 08:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::A failure to ] can be considered a form of ], and it's ] that "block until communicating" is a standard option. And don't worry, we all have those moments - ], after all. - ] <sub>]</sub> 08:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::In WP:COMMUNICATE the only mention of disruptive editing is "''Restoring your edits multiple times without consensus is a form of disruptive editing''". And as far as I can see, they weren't restoring stuff. The ANI complaint was days after the last incident. Consensus used to be start with escalating warning templates, then proceed to a short block to get people's attention. I don't see that the (and I certainly haven't checked them all) that edits in question were damaging - more content disputes; and not much of a dispute if there's not even a 1RR. If "block until communicating" is a generally agreed upon standard, then we should document it. ] (]) 08:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Tsybin Ts-25== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the military glider ''']''' was considered for use as a civilian airliner on routes including to ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ♠]♠ ] 12:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:22, 9 January 2025
 |
|
 | This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
 Archives |
|
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
JTG Daugherty Racing Page Move
Hi, a second requested move discussion to move JTG Daugherty Racing to Hyak Motorsports was added recently. I'm the only one that posted a response, so if you'd like to post one to speed up the discussion, then feel free to do so. Thanks, SteeledDock541 (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
More socking from HiLux_duck / MrDavr
Hi! A couple of days ago you blocked HiLux_duck as a sock of MrDavr. Astonishingly, they seem to have decided that their best approach is to create another sockpuppet, WabbleQuackEgg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Note that this new account added a comment to the unblock discussion on HiLux_duck's talk page, then clumsily edited the signature to make it appear that HiLux_duck had made the edit. The new account then went on to start editing automotive articles again. I suppose it's possible this is a Joe job, but if so it seems rather pointless. CodeTalker (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good grief. Even if he actually wasn't socking before, he absolutely is now... - The Bushranger One ping only 02:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)