Misplaced Pages

Talk:Anti-Hindu sentiment: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:39, 9 January 2025 editToddy1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,764 edits Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024: {{talk-ref}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:12, 9 January 2025 edit undoBarrelProof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers107,491 edits Requested move 9 January 2025: {{reflist-talk}} 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:


{{ref-talk}} {{ref-talk}}

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2024 ==
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}}
Can this be added in the examples section: The police took a group photo on the sacred steps of the Sabarimala with no respect for the traditions and the ADGP ordered a probe.<ref>https://www.indiatoday.in/india/kerala/story/police-group-photo-sabarimala-sacred-steps-pathinettampadi-controversy-adgp-orders-probe-2640492-2024-11-26</ref>-] (]) 13:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{re|Toddy1}} please respond to this also-] (]) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
:If you read the sources you cited, they are far more nuanced than the text you proposed. For example, the source you cited mentions that {{tq| standing with their backs to the ‘sanctum sanctorum’ was viewed as a serious breach of tradition.}} However, you are using terms like ''''no respect.'''' " Misplaced Pages articles are expected to be written from a ], which your proposed text fails to comply with. Additionally, the ADGP ordered an '''inquiry,''' not a probe. ] (]) 08:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
{{rlt}}


== Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024 == == Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024 ==
Line 61: Line 54:


== Requested move 9 January 2025 == == Requested move 9 January 2025 ==
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #efe); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color: var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] '''after''' discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''


The result of the move request was: '''Withdrawn''' by the proposer at 13:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC) as recorded below. <small>(])</small> —⁠ ⁠] (]) 16:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
{{requested move/dated|Hinduphobia}}
----


] → {{no redirect|Hinduphobia}} – The title should be ]. ] → {{no redirect|Hinduphobia}} – The title should be ].
Line 73: Line 69:
*::Rajiv Malhotra is a Hindutva ideologue and not a scholar. You should read ]. - ] (]) 11:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC) *::Rajiv Malhotra is a Hindutva ideologue and not a scholar. You should read ]. - ] (]) 11:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - Hinduphobia and Anti-Hindu sentiment are vastly different concepts. "Hinduphobia" is a neologism invented by the Hindutva right wing to limit the academic discourse on many topics and has been rejected by scholars as being both ahistorical and inappropriate. <ref>{{cite web | title=Bad Faith Bias Claims | website=Hindutva Harassment Field Manual | date=2021-06-09 | url=https://www.hindutvaharassmentfieldmanual.org/badfaith | access-date=2025-01-09}}</ref> The sources cited by OP are a testament to this as most of them are from hindu pressure groups or Hindu nationalist aligned ]. - ] (]) 11:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' - Hinduphobia and Anti-Hindu sentiment are vastly different concepts. "Hinduphobia" is a neologism invented by the Hindutva right wing to limit the academic discourse on many topics and has been rejected by scholars as being both ahistorical and inappropriate. <ref>{{cite web | title=Bad Faith Bias Claims | website=Hindutva Harassment Field Manual | date=2021-06-09 | url=https://www.hindutvaharassmentfieldmanual.org/badfaith | access-date=2025-01-09}}</ref> The sources cited by OP are a testament to this as most of them are from hindu pressure groups or Hindu nationalist aligned ]. - ] (]) 11:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
*'''Oppose''' - I do not think that Ngrams really do support "Hinduphobia", if you compare "anti-Hindu" with "Hinduphobia" it is clear that "Hinduphobia" is a rare term in English; a more common term is "anti-Hindu".<sup></sup> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--] ]</span> 12:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' - I do not think that Ngrams really do support "Hinduphobia", if you compare "anti-Hindu" with "Hinduphobia" it is clear that "Hinduphobia" and "Hinduphobic" are rare terms in English; a more common term is "anti-Hindu".<sup></sup> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--] ]</span> 12:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
*:@] Hmm, I agree with you. Your ngram results are better. Thanks !
*:*We would need some good years for this term to be popularized. This was just in the mainstream news , so I thought it would be good. @] Not all news portals are ], are ?
*:*I take my proposal back, any editor can close this discussion.
*:] (]) 13:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
*::I said "most" not "all". - ] (]) 13:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
*:::Moreover, You must know that even ] is a term coined by the leftists. I neither support lefts,not the rights. I support only truth. @], Let's not escalate it further ] (]) 13:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from ] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div>

Latest revision as of 16:12, 9 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-Hindu sentiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 16, 2006Articles for deletionKept
March 7, 2014Articles for deletionKept
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHinduism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Reverts

El C, I edit Misplaced Pages occassionally. Please let me know what is wrong with the first paragraph you removed by this edit. The source used does say that.

Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2021

Please change X (no info) to "Several thousand supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam’s leader Mamunul Haque in Bangladesh attacked a Hindu village in March 2021, which resulted in the ransacking and looting of many houses and the vandalization of 70-80 houses."

References

  1. "Extremist Islamist group's supporters attack 70-80 Hindu houses in Bangladesh: Police". India Today. 20 March 2021.

Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add this in the Bangladesh section: Hindus are fleeing Bangladesh localities due to being attacked and vandalism of temples. 2406:7400:90:9B1A:C9B8:5A21:12EC:1FBC (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: These sources have a lot of information that deserve to be in the article, what you have suggested reduces this significantly. I think more information from the sources should be included. Ultraodan (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. Mishra, Ashutosh (2024-11-29). "Hindus flee Bangladesh locality after temples attacked, cops turn blind eye". India Today. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
  2. Three Hindu temples in Bangladesh's Chattogram vandalised, 2024-11-29, ISSN 0013-0389, retrieved 2024-11-30

Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add this to the Bangladesh section: Another temple burnt in Bangladesh-Hindus attacked citing this reference https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/attack-on-iskcon-centre-burnt-in-bangladesh-hindus-attacked-muhammed-yunus-2646443-2024-12-07 49.205.129.82 (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This needs more information to be included. Ultraodan (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 9 January 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by the proposer at 13:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC) as recorded below. (closed by non-admin page mover) —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)


Anti-Hindu sentimentHinduphobia – The title should be WP:CONCISE.

References

  1. "Bad Faith Bias Claims". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2025-01-09.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Categories: