Misplaced Pages

User:Lardlegwarmers: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:23, 14 January 2025 editLardlegwarmers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users511 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:54, 14 January 2025 edit undoTamzin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators69,405 edits rm topic ban violation. this is about COVID 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Misplaced Pages Community — consensus is more important than reasons. Misplaced Pages articles on contentious topics are merely propaganda if you make extraordinary claims using original research and faulty citations, and then ban anyone who doesn’t let it slide. You end up with a population of people that are all comfortable with bad sources since they like the claim and don’t mind. Consensus only works to create a quality resource if you tolerate people with a wide range of views, which you do not.
Misplaced Pages co-founder ] on the current state of Misplaced Pages:


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Academic_studies_about_Wikipedia#Power_plays
“If you look at the articles that Misplaced Pages has, you can just see how they are simply mouthing the view of the World Economic Council or World Economic Forum, and the World Health Organisation, the CDC and various other establishment mouthpieces like Fauci — they take their cues from them…There’s a global enforcement of a certain point of view, which is amazing to me amazing to a libertarian, or a liberty-loving conservative.”<ref>https://unherd.com/newsroom/wikipedia-co-founder-i-no-longer-trust-the-website-i-created/</ref>

Latest revision as of 08:54, 14 January 2025

The Misplaced Pages Community — consensus is more important than reasons. Misplaced Pages articles on contentious topics are merely propaganda if you make extraordinary claims using original research and faulty citations, and then ban anyone who doesn’t let it slide. You end up with a population of people that are all comfortable with bad sources since they like the claim and don’t mind. Consensus only works to create a quality resource if you tolerate people with a wide range of views, which you do not.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Academic_studies_about_Wikipedia#Power_plays