| Revision as of 23:22, 30 April 2007 editKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →NPA ("No Personal Attack") concerns, indeed...: comments and suggestions← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:04, 21 October 2024 edit undoIzno (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Interface administrators, Administrators115,251 edits Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Til Eulenspiegel (using spihelper.js) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WMF-legal banned user}} | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| == File:State doctrines.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> | |||
| '''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| --]<sup>]</sup> 22:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked for sockpuppetry == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ] per the evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], but '''not for '']'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be ] or ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. ] (]) 20:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> | |||
| == Responding to months old comments on talk pages == | |||
| Doing so is fairly useless and will not be seen by anyone. If you wish to bring up a new issue, start a new section. —]→] • 18:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == NPA ("No Personal Attack") concerns, indeed... (moved from Talk:Noah's Ark by User:KillerChihuahua)== | |||
| #With , User:Orange Marlin referred to me as "some highly POV editor" without exactly knowing what my private views are, because I had restored the statement detailing what religions the belief in Noah's Ark is found in. | |||
| #With , User:Filll wrote: ''If an <u>obscure minority extremist</u> religion like the "Mormons" venerates the Ark story and declares it to be "true", this proves nothing, and some might take it as a very serious strike against its veracity, given the Mormon track record on many other issues.'' (Underscoring mine.) This is a reportable violation of Misplaced Pages policy, and betrays open hostility. | |||
| #With , User Filll wrote: '':It is too bad that you are incomprehensible. Oh well. I guess I did not expect much else.'' This is also an ad hominem personal attack. In the same edit he added: ''gallons and gallons of blood have been spilt by people with your kind of viewpoint.'' Without even exactly knowing what religion I belong to, if any, he feels confident enough to spread accusatory, reportable slander against my person, in default of any kind of logical argument. | |||
| #He continued the blatant ad hominem with where he stated: ''Hmm...And I guess that assuming you subscribe to a religion is some sort of terrible slander against you, equivalent to spitting on you. In such case, it is best that I leave you alone in your reveries and fantasies.'' | |||
| #Not to be outdone, User:Orange Marlin, in denying that User:Filll had made apersonal attack against me, then referred to me as "pathetic" in this edit: | |||
| #Orange Marlin then made , stating: ''It's amusing that their faith is so weak that any challenge to their view of the universe, obviously means their faith has no meaning. Well, obviously their faith was weak to begin with.'' This is very strange, because as I have never revealed whether I have any faith and if so, that would be strictly private and none of your business, just as whatever faith you choose is none of my business. But the remarks clearly reveal some kind of innate hostility against those in the world who do profess some sort of faith, or an express desire to weaken or deride that faith. | |||
| #I, Til Eulenspiegel, having noted all of these and also several other comments of theirs, fairly made the observation at ] that these editors do not hide their hostility against people of faith. And just for that, you come in as if with authority of judge, jury and executioner all in one, and inform me that ''I'' am in violation of NPA. This is truly a sad day in hypocrisy, wikipedians. ] 23:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have moved this here as article talk pages are not the best place for ] concerning anything but content of the article itself. Neither is the LDS Wikiproject. I am certain you saw that I admonished the other editors as well (and you may find reassuance in the knowledge that on at least one previous occasion, I removed one of OrangeMarlin's posts, without even moving it anywhere for discussion.) Personal attacks and incivility are best handled through other venues; counter-attacks and escalation serve neither the injured editor nor the project as whole. While I understand your frustration, I suggest you take a little time to consider what your primary goals here are. If you are here to promote a particular point of view, you are in the wrong place. I suggest one of the Christian Wikis instead. If you are here to become mired in flame wars, UseNet will be a more tolerant venue. If you are here to help write an encyclopedia and ensure accuracy and neutrality of the content, you are not going to acheive those goals by sinking into mud-slinging and ad hom wars, nor cries of censorship, suppresion, or complaints of executioners. Please let me know if I can help you in any way here. | |||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 21 October 2024
 | Consistent with the Terms of Use, Til Eulenspiegel has been banned indefinitely by the Wikimedia Foundation from editing all Wikimedia sites. Please direct any questions to ca  wikimedia.org.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
File:State doctrines.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:State doctrines.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 20:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Category: