Misplaced Pages

Digg: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:34, 2 May 2007 edit63.210.97.50 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:17, 19 December 2024 edit undo86.12.18.92 (talk)No edit summary 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Social media/news aggregator website}}
{{Redirect|Diggit|the television series|Diggit (TV series)}}
{{about|the website|the place in Scotland|Digg, Skye}}
{{Infobox Website
{{update|date=June 2015}}
| name = Digg
{{use mdy dates|date=November 2023}}
| logo = ]
{{Infobox website
| screenshot = ]
| caption = Digg main page as of May 1st, 2007 | name = Digg, Inc.
| logo = ]
| url = http://www.digg.com/
| screenshot =
| commercial = Yes
| caption =
| type = Social content website
| company_type =
| registration = Free
| foundation = {{start date and age|2004|11}}
| owner = Digg, Inc.
| founder = ]<ref>{{citation|url=http://allthingsd.com/20120530/kevin-roses-next-move-partner-at-google-ventures/|title=Kevin Rose's Next Move: Partner at Google Ventures|access-date=2012-08-02|archive-date=2012-08-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120805030628/http://allthingsd.com/20120530/kevin-roses-next-move-partner-at-google-ventures/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| author = ]
| area_served = Worldwide
| launch date = November 2004
| location_city = ], United States<ref>{{citation|url=http://digg.com/about|title=About|publisher=Digg.com|access-date=2009-02-28|archive-date=2018-11-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181129025504/http://digg.com/about|url-status=live}}</ref>
| current version = v4.0
| location_country =
| revenue =
| key_people = Michael O'Connor (CEO) <ref>{{cite web | url=http://accelentinc.com/accelent_news/accelent-fills-ceo-position-digg/ | title=Accelent fills CEO position for Digg | date=5 April 2017 | access-date=2018-01-13 | archive-date=2018-09-21 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921120602/https://accelentinc.com/accelent_news/accelent-fills-ceo-position-digg/ | url-status=live }}</ref>
| employees = 18
| num_employees = 25 (2018)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://digg.com/faq|title=FAQ|publisher=Digg.com|access-date=2020-10-19|archive-date=2020-10-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201019003210/https://digg.com/faq|url-status=live}}</ref>
| fight the power: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
| url = {{url|digg.com}}
| programming_language = ]<ref>{{cite web| url=http://digg.com/jobs| title=Jobs| publisher=Digg.com| access-date=2016-11-23| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181128123547/http://digg.com/jobs| archive-date=2018-11-28| url-status=dead}}</ref>
| registration = Optional
| launch_date = {{Start date and age|2004|12|05}}
| current_status = Active
| language = ]
| advertising = None
| website_type = Social news
| owner = BuySellAds.com, Inc.<ref>{{cite web |title=Digg Inc.: Private Company Information |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=24526784 |website=] |access-date=23 September 2018 |archive-date=23 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923123911/https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=24526784 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| revenue = Unknown
}} }}


'''Digg''' (stylized in lowercase as '''digg''') is an American ] with a curated front page, aiming to select articles specifically for the Internet audience such as science, trending political issues, and ] Internet issues. It was launched in its current form on July 31, 2012, with support for sharing content to other social platforms such as ] and ].
'''Digg''' is a community-based popularity website with an emphasis on ] and science articles, recently expanding to a broader range of categories such as politics and entertainment. It combines ], ]ging, and ] with a form of non-hierarchical, ] editorial control.


Digg was formerly a popular ] ], allowing people to vote user-generated and web content up or down, called ''digging'' and ''burying'', respectively. In 2012, ] estimated Digg's monthly U.S. unique visits at 3.8 million.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.quantcast.com/digg.com |title=digg.com – Quantcast Audience Profile |publisher=Quantcast.com |date=July 16, 2012 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |archive-date=June 24, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120624191824/http://www.quantcast.com/digg.com |url-status=live }}</ref> Digg's popularity prompted the creation of similar sites such as ].<ref>{{cite web |first=Pat |last=McCarthy |url=http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/09/10/revisiting-top-10-web-predictions-of-2006/ |title=Revisiting Top 10 Web Predictions of 2006 |publisher=Conversionrater.com |date=September 10, 2006 |access-date=February 27, 2009 |archive-date=October 7, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007082426/http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/09/10/revisiting-top-10-web-predictions-of-2006 |url-status=live }}</ref>
News stories and websites are submitted by users, and then promoted to the front page through a user-based ranking system. This differs from the hierarchical editorial system that many other news sites employ.

In July 2008, the former company took part in advanced acquisition talks with Google for a reported $200 million price tag, but the deal ultimately fell through. After a controversial 2010 redesign and the departure of co-founders ] and ], in July 2012 Digg was sold in three parts: the Digg brand, website, and technology were sold to ] for an estimated $500,000;<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-big-digg-lesson-a-social-network-is-worth-precisely-as-much-as-its-community/259770/|title=The Big Digg Lesson: A Social Network Is Worth Precisely as Much as Its Community|last=Madrigal|first=Alexis C.|work=The Atlantic|access-date=2018-03-21|language=en-US|archive-date=2018-03-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180322015203/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-big-digg-lesson-a-social-network-is-worth-precisely-as-much-as-its-community/259770/|url-status=live}}</ref> 15 staff were transferred to ]{{'}}s "SocialCode" for a reported $12 million; and a suite of ]s was sold to ] for about $4 million.<ref name="Wall Street Journal">{{cite news |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304373804577523181002565776 |title=Once a Social Media Star, Digg Sells for $500,000 |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=July 13, 2012 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=Joseph |last1=Walker |first2=Spencer E. |last2=Ante |archive-date=December 15, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141215204009/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304373804577523181002565776 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Washington Post">{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/socialcode-hires-15-employees-from-diggcom/2012/05/10/gIQAP2xBFU_story.html |title=SocialCode hires 15 employees from Digg.com |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=May 10, 2012 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=Hayley |last1=Tsukayama |archive-date=May 19, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120519090842/http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/socialcode-hires-15-employees-from-diggcom/2012/05/10/gIQAP2xBFU_story.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="slashgear">{{cite web |url=http://www.slashgear.com/digg-sale-splits-the-company-three-ways-for-16m-total-13238530/ |title=Digg sale splits the company three ways for $16m total |publisher=Slashgear |date=July 13, 2012 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=Chris |last1=Burns |archive-date=July 15, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120715194903/http://www.slashgear.com/digg-sale-splits-the-company-three-ways-for-16m-total-13238530/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

In April 2018, Digg was purchased by BuySellAds, an advertising company, for an undisclosed amount.<ref>{{cite web |title=The beloved Digg, once the chief rival to Reddit, was just sold to an advertising tech company |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/digg-sells-to-buysellads-an-ad-tech-company-2018-4 |website=Business Insider |access-date=23 September 2018 |date=April 25, 2018 |archive-date=23 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923085609/https://www.businessinsider.com/digg-sells-to-buysellads-an-ad-tech-company-2018-4 |url-status=live }}</ref>

It is rumoured that ] has purchased Digg back and is relaunching it in 2025. Their Twitter account teases the date March 8, 2025 as "3825" is used in multiple images uploaded in December. <ref>https://x.com/digg/status/1865195680823939540</ref>


==History== ==History==
]
Digg started out as an experiment in November ] by ], ], ], and ] (who serves as CEO), all of whom currently play an active role in the management of the site.
Digg started as an experiment in November 2004 by collaborators ], Owen Byrne, Ron Gorodetzky, and ]. The original design by Dan Ries was free of advertisements. To monetize, the company originally used Google ] but switched to ] in 2007.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://about.digg.com/blog/digg-new-ad-provider |title=Digg: New ad provider |date=July 25, 2007 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=Kevin |last1=Rose |archive-date=July 19, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100719115822/http://about.digg.com/blog/digg-new-ad-provider |url-status=live }}</ref>
]
"We started working on developing the site back in October 2004," Kevin Rose told ]<ref>{{ cite web | url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/index.php?p=108 | title=Interview with Digg founder Kevin Rose, Part 1 | accessdate=2006-07-15 | last=MacManus | first=Richard | date=2006-02-01 | publisher=ZDNet }}</ref> "We started toying around with the idea a couple of months prior to that, but it was early October when we actually started creating what would become the beta version of digg. The site launched to the world on December 5th 2004."


The site's main function was to let users discover, share and recommend web content. Members of the community could submit a webpage for general consideration. Other members could vote that page up ("digg") or down ("bury"). Although voting took place on digg.com, many websites added "digg" buttons to their pages, allowing users to vote as they browsed the web. The end product was a series of wide-ranging, constantly updated lists of popular and trending content from around the Internet, aggregated by a social network.
Kevin Rose's friend ] (], ]) originally wanted to call the site “Diggnation”, but Kevin wanted a simpler name. He chose the name "Digg", because users are able to "dig" stories, out of those submitted, up to the front page. The site was called “Digg” instead of “Dig” because the domain name “dig.com” was previously registered. “]” would eventually be used as the title of Kevin Rose and ]'s weekly podcast.


The original design was free of advertisements, and was designed by Dan Ries. As Digg became more popular, Google ] was added to the website. In July 2005, the site was updated to "Version 2.0". The new "version" featured a friends list, the ability to "digg" a story without being redirected to a "success" page, and a new interface designed by web design company Silverorange . The site developers have stated that in future versions a more minimalist design will likely be employed. On Monday June 26, 2006 version 3 of Digg was released with specific categories for Technology, Science, World & Business, Videos, Entertainment and Gaming as well as a View All section where all categories are merged. Additions and improvements were made throughout the website's first years. Digg v2 was released in July 2005, with a new interface by web design company silverorange. New features included a friends list, and the ability to "digg" a story without being redirected to a success page. One year later, as part of Digg v3, the website added specific categories for technology, science, world and business, videos, entertainment, and gaming, as well as a "view all" section that merged all categories. Further interface adjustments were made in August 2007.


By 2008, Digg's homepage was attracting over 236 million visitors annually, according to a ] survey.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digg.com?metric=uv |title=Compete.com |publisher=Siteanalytics.compete.com |access-date=November 7, 2010 |archive-date=January 9, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110109194432/http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digg.com/?metric=uv |url-status=live }}</ref> Digg had grown large enough that it was thought to affect the traffic of submitted web pages. Some pages experienced a sudden increase in traffic shortly after being submitted; some Digg users refer to this as the "]".
Digg has grown large enough that submissions sometimes create a sudden increase of traffic to the "dugg" website. This is referred to by some Digg users as the "]" and by some others as the site being "dugg to death". However, in many cases stories are linked simultaneously on several popular bookmarking sites. In such cases, the impact of the "digg effect" is difficult to isolate and assess.


==Functionality== ===Redesign===
CEO Jay Adelson said in 2010 that the site would go through some major changes. In the interview with ] magazine, Adelson said that "Every single THING has changed" and that "the entire website has been rewritten."<ref name="Wired Interview">{{cite news |url=https://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/03/digg-redesign-social-web/ |title=Wired Interview |publisher=Wired |date=March 15, 2010 |access-date=March 15, 2010 |first1=Michael |last1=Calore |archive-date=March 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100317132902/http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/03/digg-redesign-social-web/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The company changed from ] to ], a distributed database system; in a blog post, VP Engineering John Quinn said that the move was "bold".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://about.digg.com/node/564 |title=Cassandra Switch |publisher=Digg |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=John |last1=Quinn |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120307033743/http://about.digg.com/node/564 |archive-date=March 7, 2012 }}</ref> Adelson summed up the new Digg by saying, "We've got a new backend, a new infrastructure layer, a new services layer, new machines—everything."<ref name="Wired Interview" />
Readers can view all of the stories that have been submitted by fellow users in the "digg/News/Upcoming" section of the site. Once a story has received enough "diggs", it appears on Digg's front page. Should the story not receive enough diggs, or if enough users report a problem with the submission, the story will remain in the "digg all" area, where it may eventually be removed.


Adelson stepped down as CEO on April 5, 2010, to explore entrepreneurial opportunities, months before the launch date of Digg v4.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://about.digg.com/blog/update-jay |title=Update from Jay |publisher=Digg |date=April 4, 2010 |access-date=July 16, 2012 |first1=Jay |last1=Adelson |archive-date=September 20, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110920090518/http://about.digg.com/blog/update-jay |url-status=live }}</ref> He had been the company's CEO since its inception. Kevin Rose, another original founder, stepped in temporarily as CEO and Chairman.
Articles are short summaries of stories on other websites with links to the stories, and provisions for readers to comment on the story. All content and access to the site is free, but registration is compulsory for certain elements, such as promoting ("digging") stories, submitting stories and commenting on stories. Digg also allows for stories to be posted to a user's ] automatically when he or she diggs a story.


Digg's v4 release on August 25, 2010, was marred by site-wide bugs and glitches. Digg users reacted with hostile verbal opposition. Beyond the release, Digg faced problems due to so-called "power users" who would manipulate the article recommendation features to only support one another's postings, flooding the site with articles only from these users and making it impossible to have genuine content from non-power users appear on the front page.{{Citation needed|date=February 2021}} Frustrations with the system led to dwindling web traffic, exacerbated by heavy competition from Facebook, ]s started to appear on websites next to Digg's.<ref>{{cite news |first=Caroline |last=McCarthy |title=Changing the rules of the Digg game |date=June 21, 2010 |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20008223-36.html |publisher=CNET News |access-date=July 16, 2012 |archive-date=July 30, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730054335/http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20008223-36.html |url-status=live }}</ref> High staff turnover included the departure of head of business development Matt Van Horn, shortly after v4's release.<ref>{{cite news |first=Caroline |last=McCarthy |title=Digg's Matt Van Horn leaving for start-up |date=August 26, 2010 |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20014852-36.html |publisher=CNET News |access-date=September 2, 2010 |archive-date=August 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100827160052/http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20014852-36.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
Originally, stories could be submitted in fifteen different categories which include: ''deals, gaming, links, mods, music, robots, security, technology, Apple, design, hardware, Linux/Unix, movies, programming, science and software''. With the release of Digg 3.0 on ], ], the categories became divided into 6 containers: ''Technology, Science, World & Business, Sports, Entertainment, Gaming'', with sub-categories.


On September 1, 2010, ] took over as CEO, ending Rose's troubled tenure as interim chief executive.
== Criticism ==
Digg has sometimes come under criticism in for varying reasons. Most complaints are centered on the site's form of user-moderation: some feel the users have too much control over content, allowing sensationalism and misinformation to thrive.<ref>http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/01/digging_the_madness_of_crowds.html</ref><ref>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/2/14/131127/709</ref>. The site has also suffered the risk of companies paying for stories submitted to the site<ref>http://news.com.com/Digg+continues+to+battle+phony+stories/2100-1025_3-6144652.html</ref><ref>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/paying-users-for-creating-content/</ref><ref>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/18/the-power-of-digg/</ref>, similar to the phenomenon of company-attempted ]. In the same domain, the site has come under criticism for "Search Engine Gaming" and "cluttering Google search results"<ref>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/2/14/131127/709</ref> (a ]).


In 2013, Andrew McLaughlin took over as CEO after Digg was sold to BetaWorks and re-launched.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/23/digg-ceo-gary-liu-joining-scmp/|title=Digg CEO Gary Liu is leaving to head up Alibaba-owned newspaper SCMP – TechCrunch|website=techcrunch.com|date=23 November 2016 |language=en-US|access-date=2018-03-21|archive-date=2018-03-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180322015144/https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/23/digg-ceo-gary-liu-joining-scmp/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Others feel that the site's operators may exercise too much control over which articles appear on the front page as well as the comments on Digg's forums<ref>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/25/a-brief-history-of-digg-controversy/</ref><ref>http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/what_happened_to_digg</ref>. Some users complain that they have been blocked from posting, and their accounts disabled, for making comments in the user-moderated forums that conflict with the personal interests of Digg's operators.<ref>http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1761697,00.html</ref> The existence of the "bury" option has also been criticised as undemocratic and due to its anonymous nature, unaccountable<ref>http://www.starttherevolution.org/archives/2006/200611/IsDiggCloserToExtinctionThanWeRealise.htm</ref><ref>http://bigdavediode.googlepages.com/diggfixexposed</ref>. Another criticism in this area has been<ref>http://mashable.com/2006/01/10/digg-and-the-so-called-wisdom-of-mobs/</ref> how a faulty or misleading article can reach many users quickly, blowing out of proportion the unsupported claims or accusations (a ]).


In 2015, Gary Liu took over as Digg CEO.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/23/digg-ceo-gary-liu-joining-scmp/|title=Digg CEO Gary Liu is leaving to head up Alibaba-owned newspaper SCMP – TechCrunch|website=techcrunch.com|date=23 November 2016 |language=en-US|access-date=2018-03-26|archive-date=2018-03-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180322015144/https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/23/digg-ceo-gary-liu-joining-scmp/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Certain Digg users have been accused of operating a "Bury Brigade" that tags articles with which they disagree as ].<ref>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/2/14/131127/709</ref><ref>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/12/09/zdnet-not-immune-to-the-bury-brigade/</ref>, thus attempting to bury stories critical of Digg. One commentator states that one of the site's major problems:


In 2016, Joshua Auerbach took over as interim CEO.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://digg.com/2016/new-year-more-digg|title=We've Got Some Very Digg News To Share|last=Auerbach|first=Joshua|access-date=2018-03-21|language=en|archive-date=2017-06-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623132534/http://digg.com/2016/new-year-more-digg|url-status=live}}</ref>
:...is the ability of a small number of users to "bury" stories without accountability. Burying news is meant to help separate spam and inaccurate stories from the general morass of ordinary, viable stuff. But there's long been the suspicion that plenty of users use it to get rid of stories about things they don't like (eg political parties or corporates) - since burying a story is much more powerful than simply voting against it.<ref>http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2007/02/28/watching_diggs_bury_brigade.html</ref>


In September 2016, Digg announced that it would begin a data partnership with ]. The "seven figure" investment would give Gannett access to real-time trend analysis of Digg's 7.5 million pieces of content.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Alpert|first1=Lukas I.|title=Gannett Leads Investment Round in Social Media Pioneer Digg|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/gannett-leads-investment-round-in-social-media-pioneer-digg-1473778803|website=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=11 October 2016|date=13 September 2016|archive-date=10 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010235442/http://www.wsj.com/articles/gannett-leads-investment-round-in-social-media-pioneer-digg-1473778803|url-status=live}}</ref>
It has been reported that the top 100 Digg users controlled 56% of Digg's frontpage content, and that a niche group of just twenty individuals had submitted 25% of the frontpage content.<ref>http://www.seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1228</ref><ref>http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2006/08/25/a-brief-history-of-digg-controversy/</ref>. A few sites<ref>http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/is_digg_rigged</ref><ref>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/2/14/131127/709</ref> have raised the problem of ] and the possibility that the site is being "manipulated", so to speak. In response to this question, the site's founder Kevin Rose has announced an upcoming change to the site's ]<ref>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/06/digg-to-tweak-its-algorithm/</ref>:


In 2017, Michael O'Connor took over as CEO, and continues as CEO today.
<blockquote>While we don't disclose exactly how story promotion works (to prevent gaming the system), I can say that a key update is coming soon. This algorithm update will look at the unique digging diversity of the individuals digging the story. Users that follow a gaming pattern will have less promotion weight. This doesn't mean that the story won't be promoted, it just means that a more diverse pool of individuals will be need to deem the story homepage-worthy.
</blockquote><ref>http://diggtheblog.blogspot.com/2006/09/digg-friends.html</ref>


=== Sale and relaunch===
Other popular news sites have reported similar cases of ], including Digg users being banned for criticizing sponsors<ref>http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/20/1538256</ref><ref>http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Censors_Stories_That_Offend_Sponsors</ref><ref>http://forevergeek.com/geek_articles/digg_army_right_in_line.php</ref>, or the banning of entire domain names<ref>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/the-hypocrisy-of-digg-and-spam</ref>. In response, Rose has stated that:
In July 2012, Digg was sold in three parts:


# the Digg brand, website, and technology were sold to Betaworks for $500,000;<ref name="Wall Street Journal" />
<blockquote>Once a story has received enough user reports it is automatically removed from the digg queue or homepage (depending on where the story is living at that time). The number of reports required varies depending on how many diggs the story has. This system is going to change in the near future. Soon, reported stories will fall into a 'buried stories' bin. Users will have the ability to pick through this story bin and vote to have a story reinstated should they believe it was falsely reported.</blockquote><ref>http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Censors_Stories_That_Offend_Sponsors</ref>
# 15 staff were transferred to '']''{{'}}s ] project for $12 million;<ref name="Washington Post" />
# the patent portfolio was sold to ] for approximately $4 million.<ref name="slashgear"/>


There were reports that Digg had been trying to sell itself to a larger company since 2006.<ref>{{cite news |last=Arrington |first=Michael |url=https://techcrunch.com/2007/11/07/just-sell-digg-already-jay/ |title=Just Sell Digg Already, Jay |publisher=Techcrunch.com |date=November 7, 2007 |access-date=February 27, 2009 |archive-date=March 2, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090302205611/http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/07/just-sell-digg-already-jay/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The most notable attempt took place in July 2008, when Google entered talks to buy Digg for around $200 million. Google walked away from negotiations during the deal's ] phase, informing Digg on July 25 that it was no longer interested in the purchase.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/26/AR2008072601421.html |title=Google Walks Away From Digg Deal |work=washingtonpost.com |access-date=February 27, 2009 |first=Michael |last=Arrington |date=July 26, 2008 |archive-date=October 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010112405/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/26/AR2008072601421.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Digg subsequently accepted further venture capital funding, receiving $28.7 million in September 2008 from investors such as ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/09/24/digg-digs-up-287-million/ |title=Digg digs up $28.7 Million |publisher=CNNMoney |date=November 24, 2008 |access-date=March 15, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708170943/http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/09/24/digg-digs-up-287-million/ |archive-date=July 8, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref> to move headquarters and add staff.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.digg.com/?p=256 |title=Big News: Expanding & Growing Digg |publisher=blog.digg.com |date=September 24, 2008 |access-date=February 27, 2009 |archive-date=March 15, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090315001819/http://blog.digg.com/?p=256 |url-status=live }}</ref> Several months later, CEO Jay Adelson said Digg was no longer for sale.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc2008121_004686.htm |title=Digg: Not For Sale |access-date=December 9, 2008 |last=Ante |first=Spencer E. |date=December 2008 |archive-date=December 12, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081212135717/http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc2008121_004686.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>
A more recent issue of censorship on Digg occurred on May 1, 2007 when stories relating to the recent leak of a ] encryption code began to disappear from the social networking website. In response, a number of users posted stories to notify the rest of the Digg community to the censorship. Minutes later, these stories were no longer available and the stories' submitter's had their accounts deleted and their IP address banned from the site.


On July 20, 2012, new owners ] announced via ] that they were rebuilding Digg from scratch, "turning back into a start-up".<ref name="Rethink Digg Twitter Announcement">{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/digg/status/226356830966784001 |title=Rethink Digg Twitter Announcement |access-date=July 20, 2012 |date=July 2012 |archive-date=April 9, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160409160111/https://twitter.com/digg/status/226356830966784001 |url-status=live }}</ref> Betaworks gave the project a six-week deadline. Surveys of existing users, collected through the website ReThinkDigg.com,<ref name="Rethink Digg">{{cite web |url=http://rethinkdigg.com/ |title=Rethink Digg |access-date=July 20, 2012 |archive-date=July 21, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120721031358/http://rethinkdigg.com/ |url-status=live }}</ref> were used to inform the development of a new user interface and user experience.<ref name="The New Digg">{{cite web |url=http://silicon-news.com/news/2012/07/20/the-new-rethink-digg-review/ |title=The New Digg |access-date=July 20, 2012 <!-- |first=Chris --> |date=July 2012 |archive-date=February 2, 2013 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130202194656/http://silicon-news.com/news/2012/07/20/the-new-rethink-digg-review/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Murphey 2012">{{cite web |url=http://mashable.com/2012/07/20/digg-rebuild/ |title=Rebuilding Digg |access-date=July 20, 2012 |last=Murphey |first=Samantha |website=] |date=July 2012 |archive-date=July 21, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120721053513/http://mashable.com/2012/07/20/digg-rebuild/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
] An article on ]<ref>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/2/14/131127/709</ref><!-- The author states that the document is in the public domain --> proposes some solutions to these problems:


The "rethought" Digg reset its version number and launched as ''Digg v1'' a day prior to the Betaworks project deadline, on July 31, 2012. It featured an editorially driven front page, more images, and top, popular and upcoming stories. Users could access a new scoring system. There was increased support for sharing content to other social platforms such as ] and ]. Digg's front page content was selected by editors, instead of users on other communities like ].
<blockquote>
1. Open the Digg algorithm to independent study and criticism <br />
2. Make it possible to see who's burying which comments and stories <br />
3. Stop using Search Engine Gaming to abuse search engines and pollute their results <br />
4. Rein in the 'social' features to reduce internecine fighting and people posting just to be fawned over <br />
</blockquote>


Until its sale to BuySellAds.com in 2018, its offices were located at 50 Eldridge Street in New York City's Chinatown.
Tom Taylor<ref>http://www.tomtaylor.co.uk/blog/2006/12/06/the-downfall-of-digg/</ref> has said that:


==Features==
<blockquote>...the problem lies with either the community or the editorial process. By tackling one of those, you can make your difference.<br /><br />
=== Digg Reader ===
Metafilter (which predates Digg by a long way) tackles it at the community level. It’s a community weblog, perhaps similar to Digg, but with less emphasis on technology and more on culture, art and those in-between areas. They keep the riff-raff out by charging $5 (one off) for a login, but it’s free to view. It’s a small sum, but guarantees that people who want to get involved are dedicated to it, and it also makes it easier to remove trouble makers. It seems to work - I like MeFi a lot.
{{Main|Digg Reader}}
</blockquote>
In response to the announced shutdown of ], Digg announced on March 14, 2013 that it was working on its own ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/3/14/4104618/digg-will-build-its-own-version-of-google-reader |title=Digg Reader is Live! |publisher=Digg.com |date=2013-03-14 |access-date=June 28, 2013 |archive-date=2013-07-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703063728/http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/14/4104618/digg-will-build-its-own-version-of-google-reader |url-status=live }}</ref> Digg Reader launched on June 28, 2013 as a web and iOS application. An Android app was released on August 29, 2013. Digg announced that it would shut down Digg Reader on March 26, 2018.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://digg.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000678608 |title=Goodbye to Digg Reader |access-date=2018-03-14 |archive-date=2018-03-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180314210133/https://digg.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000678608 |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Issues relating to former Digg website ==
As a result of Digg's popularity, other such social networking sites have appeared<ref>http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/09/10/revisiting-top-10-web-predictions-of-2006/</ref>. One commentator has even made a list of these sites' individual features that, if incorporated, might improve Digg<ref>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/16/whos-taking-on-digg/</ref>.
<!-- this section is largely obsolete and should be re-written and condensed or maybe just deleted -->


=== Organized promotion and censorship by users ===
==See also==
{{Main|Digg Patriots}}
* ]
It was possible for users to have disproportionate influence on Digg, either by themselves or in teams. These users were sometimes motivated to promote or bury pages for political or financial reasons.
* ]

* ]
Serious attempts by users to game the site began in 2006.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/digg_corrupted_editors_playground_not_userdriven_website/ |title=Digg Corrupted: Editor's Playground, not User-Driven Website |author=Dave |date=April 20, 2006 |publisher=Forevergeek |access-date=August 4, 2010 |archive-date=July 21, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100721174600/http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/digg_corrupted_editors_playground_not_userdriven_website/ |url-status=live }}</ref> A top user was banned after agreeing to promote a story for cash to an undercover Digg sting operation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.cnet.com/Digg-continues-to-battle-phony-stories/2100-1025_3-6144652.html |title=Digg continues to battle phony stories |first1=Greg |last1=Sandoval |date=December 18, 2006 |publisher=CNET News |access-date=August 4, 2010 |archive-date=May 10, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110510073035/http://news.cnet.com/Digg-continues-to-battle-phony-stories/2100-1025_3-6144652.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Another group of users openly formed a 'Bury Brigade' to remove "spam" articles about US politician ]; critics accused the group of attempting to stifle any mention of Ron Paul on Digg.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://message2paulspammers.blogspot.com/2007/12/diggs-ron-paul-bury-brigade-exposed.html |title=Digg's Ron Paul 'Bury Brigade' exposed |author=Adam |date=December 23, 2007 |access-date=August 4, 2010 |archive-date=May 14, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514082915/http://message2paulspammers.blogspot.com/2007/12/diggs-ron-paul-bury-brigade-exposed.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Digg hired computer scientist Anton Kast to develop a diversity algorithm that would prevent special interest groups from dominating Digg. During a ], Digg executives responded to criticism by removing some features that gave superusers extra weight, but declined to make "buries" transparent.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://bloggingexperiment.com/archives/diggs-20-questions-a-town-hall-recap.php |title=Digg's 20 Questions: a Town Hall Recap |author=Ben |date=February 26, 2008 |publisher=Bloggingexperiment |access-date=August 4, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123110643/http://bloggingexperiment.com/archives/diggs-20-questions-a-town-hall-recap.php |archive-date=November 23, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

However, later that year ] increased its page rank for Digg. Shortly afterwards, many 'pay for Diggs' startups were created to profit from the opportunity. According to ], one top user charged $700 per story, with a $500 bonus if the story reached the front page.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://techcrunch.com/2008/09/03/want-on-the-digg-home-page-thatll-be-1300/ |title=Want On The Digg Home Page? That'll Be $1,200. |first1=Michael |last1=Arrington |date=September 3, 2008 |publisher=Techcruch |access-date=August 4, 2010 |archive-date=July 22, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100722001039/http://techcrunch.com/2008/09/03/want-on-the-digg-home-page-thatll-be-1300/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

] was a conservative ] mailing list, with an associated page on coRank, accused of coordinated, politically motivated behavior on Digg. Progressive blogger Ole Ole Olson wrote in August 2010 that Digg Patriots undertook a year-long effort of organized burying of seemingly liberal articles from Digg's Upcoming module. He also accused leading members of vexatiously reporting liberal users for banning (and those who seemed liberal), and creating "sleeper" accounts in the event of administrators banning their accounts. These and other actions would violate Digg's terms of usage.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.alternet.org/oleoleolson/2010/08/05/massive-censorship-of-digg-uncovered |title=Massive Censorship of Digg Uncovered « OOO |access-date=2010-08-07 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130508085136/http://blogs.alternet.org/oleoleolson/2010/08/05/massive-censorship-of-digg-uncovered |archive-date=May 8, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/8121/rigging-of-digg-covert-mob-conservatives/ |title = The Rigging Of Digg: How A Covert Mob Of Conservatives Hijacked The Web's Top Social News Site |first = Ole Ole |last = Olson |publisher = The Public Record |date = August 5, 2010 |access-date = August 7, 2010 |archive-date = August 26, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210826103101/https://www.pubrecord.org/ |url-status = live }}</ref> Olson's post was immediately followed by the disbanding and closure of the DiggPatriots list, and an investigation into the matter by Digg.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/aug/06/digg-investigates-claims-conservative-censorship |title = Digg investigates claims of conservative 'censorship' |first1 = Josh |last1 = Halliday |date = August 6, 2010 |work = The Guardian |access-date = December 17, 2016 |archive-date = November 15, 2016 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161115235612/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/aug/06/digg-investigates-claims-conservative-censorship |url-status = live }}</ref>

=== AACS encryption key controversy ===
<!--

Please DO NOT insert the publicly disclosed HD-DVD key into this article for the time being.

Before editing this article or commenting on this article's talk page please read the

Electronic Frontier Foundation's legal primer on this issue:
* https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005229.php

The general consensus currently held by administrators:
* ]

Thanks, ] (Misplaced Pages Administrator) (with amendments from ]).

-->
{{Main|AACS encryption key controversy}}
{{Wikinews|Digg.com suffers user revolt; Founder will not fight}}

On May 1, 2007, an article appeared on Digg's homepage that contained the ] for the ] ] protection of ] and ]. Then Digg, "acting on the advice of its lawyers", removed posting submissions about the secret number from its database and banned several users for submitting it. The removals were seen by many Digg users as a capitulation to ] and an assault on free speech.<ref>{{cite news | last = Stone | first = Brad | title = In Web Uproar, Antipiracy Code Spreads Wildly | work = ] | date = 2007-05-03 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/technology/03code.html | access-date = 2007-07-02 | archive-date = 2008-12-11 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081211105021/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/technology/03code.html | url-status = live }}</ref> A statement by ] attributed the article's take-down to an attempt to comply with ] letters from the ] consortium and cited Digg's ] as justification for taking down the article.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.digg.com/?p=73|title=Digg the Blog: What's Happening with HD-DVD Stories?|first=Jay|last=Adelson|access-date=2007-05-02|archive-date=2012-10-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017103512/http://blog.digg.com/?p=73|url-status=live}}</ref> Although some users defended Digg's actions,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31859/97/ |title=Cease and desist letters backfire horribly against AACS |publisher=TGdaily |date=2007-05-01 |access-date=2009-02-27 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070504015619/http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31859/97/ |archive-date=2007-05-04 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/archives/2007/05/digg_losing_con.html |title=Digg losing control of their site |publisher=Weblog.infoworld.com |access-date=2009-02-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222071122/http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/archives/2007/05/digg_losing_con.html |archive-date=2008-12-22 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Sanders |first=Tom |url=http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2188970/drm-lobby-tries-hd-dvd-genie |title=DRM lobby tries to get HD DVD genie back into the bottle |publisher=Computing.co.uk |access-date=2009-02-27 |archive-date=2009-02-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219193526/http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2188970/drm-lobby-tries-hd-dvd-genie |url-status=live }}</ref> as a whole the community staged a widespread revolt with numerous articles and comments made using the encryption key.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7129|title=DailyTech: AACS Key Censorship Leads to First Internet Riot|first=Marcus|last=Yam|access-date=2007-05-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070504012441/http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7129|archive-date=2007-05-04|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6615047.stm|title=BBC News: DVD DRM row sparks user rebellion|access-date=2007-05-02|date=2007-05-02|archive-date=2007-05-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070516215800/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6615047.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> The scope of the user response was so great that one of the Digg users referred to it as a "digital ]".<ref>, Digg's DRM Revolt</ref> The response was also directly responsible for Digg reversing the policy and stating: "But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you've made it clear. You'd rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won't delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be."<ref>{{cite web | url =http://blog.digg.com/?p=74 | title =Digg This: 09 F9 <nowiki></nowiki> | access-date =2007-05-02 | first =Kevin | last =Rose | author-link =Kevin Rose | date =2007-05-01 | work =Digg the Blog | publisher =Digg Inc | archive-date =2019-04-22 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20190422090815/https://blog.digg.com/?p=74 | url-status =live }}</ref>

=== Digg v4 ===
Digg's version 4 release was initially unstable. The site was unreachable or unstable for weeks after its launch on August 25, 2010. Many users, upon finally reaching the site, complained about the new design and the removal of many features (such as bury, favorites, friends submissions, upcoming pages, subcategories, videos and history search).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://gigaom.com/2010/08/26/digg-redesign-met-with-a-thumbs-down/ |title=Digg Redesign Met with a Thumbs Down |first1=Mathew |last1=Ingram |date=August 26, 2010 |access-date=August 29, 2010 |archive-date=August 28, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100828214002/http://gigaom.com/2010/08/26/digg-redesign-met-with-a-thumbs-down/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Kevin Rose replied to complaints on his blog, promising to fix the algorithm and restore some features.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2010/8/27/digg-v4-release-iterate-repeat.html |title=Digg v4: release, iterate, repeat. |first1=Kevin |last1=Rose |date=August 27, 2010 |access-date=August 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100829120320/http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2010/8/27/digg-v4-release-iterate-repeat.html |archive-date=August 29, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

], founder of rival site ], said in an open letter to Rose:

{{Quote|this new version of digg reeks of ] meddling. It's cobbling together features from more popular sites and departing from the core of digg, which was to "give the power back to the people."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://alexisohanian.com/an-open-letter-to-kevin-rose |title=An open letter to Kevin Rose |first1=Alexis |last1=Ohanian |date=May 28, 2010 |access-date=August 29, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100601092755/http://alexisohanian.com/an-open-letter-to-kevin-rose |archive-date=June 1, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref>}}

Disgruntled users declared a "quit Digg day" on August 30, 2010, and used Digg's own auto-submit feature to fill the front page with content from Reddit.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_user_rebellion_reddit_on_front_page.php |title=Digg User Rebellion Continues: Reddit Now Rules the Front Page |publisher=ReadWriteWeb |first1=Frederic |last1=Lardinois |access-date=August 31, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100831122556/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_user_rebellion_reddit_on_front_page.php |archive-date=August 31, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://newsfeed.time.com/2010/08/30/digg-users-lash-out-at-new-format-join-forces-with-reddit/ |title=Digg Users Lash Out At New Format, Join Forces with Reddit |magazine=] |access-date=August 31, 2010 |date=August 30, 2010 |first1=Megan |last1=Friedman |archive-date=August 30, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100830191918/http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/08/30/digg-users-lash-out-at-new-format-join-forces-with-reddit/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20015042-36.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120713183757/http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20015042-36.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20 |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 13, 2012 |title=Angry Digg users flood home page with Reddit links |publisher=CNet News |first1=Caroline |last1=McCarthy |access-date=August 31, 2010 }}</ref> Reddit also temporarily added the Digg shovel to their logo to welcome fleeing Digg users.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/30/reddit-digg-rivalry-heats_n_699225.html |title=Angry Users SLAM Digg With Links From Rival Reddit |work=The Huffington Post |access-date=August 31, 2010 |first=Craig |last=Kanalley |date=August 30, 2010 |archive-date=September 1, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100901170530/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/30/reddit-digg-rivalry-heats_n_699225.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Digg's traffic dropped significantly after the launch of version 4,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/09/23/diggs-traffic-is-collapsing-at-home-and-abroad/ |title=Digg's traffic is collapsing at home and abroad |publisher=The Next Web |access-date=October 20, 2010 |first1=Alex |last1=Wilhelm |date=23 September 2010 |archive-date=September 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100927170006/http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/09/23/diggs-traffic-is-collapsing-at-home-and-abroad/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and publishers reported a drop in direct referrals from stories on Digg's front page.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://socialkeith.com/the-digg-effect-v4/ |title=The Digg Effect v4 |publisher=Social Keith |access-date=October 20, 2010 |first1=Keith |last1=Plocek |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101022060115/http://socialkeith.com/the-digg-effect-v4/ |archive-date=October 22, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref> New CEO Matt Williams attempted to address some of the users' concerns in a blog post on October 12, 2010, promising to reinstate many of the features that had been removed.

== Timeline ==
{{update section|date=March 2020}}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Timeline of Digg history
! Date !! Event
|-
|October 2004 || Development on digg.com begins<ref>{{cite web | url =https://www.zdnet.com/article/interview-with-digg-founder-kevin-rose-part-1/ | title =Interview with Digg founder Kevin Rose | access-date =2010-08-02 | first =Richard | last =MacManus | date =2006-02-01 | work =Web 2.0 Explorer | publisher =ZDNet | archive-date =2010-08-08 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100808221754/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/web2explorer/interview-with-digg-founder-kevin-rose-part-1/108 | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|December 1, 2004 || Kevin Rose creates the first profile
|-
|December 3, 2004 || The first story is submitted to Digg<ref>{{cite web | url =http://services.digg.com/story/001?appkey=http://wikipedia.com/ | title =API query for story #01 | access-date =2010-08-02 | work =API | publisher =Digg }}{{Dead link|date=July 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
|-
|December 5, 2004 || Digg is open to public
|-
|December 13, 2004 || Kevin Rose shows off Digg on '']''<ref>{{cite web | url =https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1_YoG7lqI4 | title =Kevin Rose shows off Digg on The Screen Savers | access-date =2010-08-02 | work =The Screen Savers | publisher =TechTV | archive-date =2021-08-26 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20210826103058/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1_YoG7lqI4 | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|January 2, 2005 || Comment section introduced for stories
|-
|February 28, 2005 || Digg 1.6: duplicate story detection
|-
|March 19, 2005 || Profile page now includes comment histories and sort by category
|-
|May 9, 2005 || Digg spy is released
|-
|May 27, 2005 || Digg 2.0 is released. Friends feature, ajax buttons for Digg/bury, and a non-linear promotion algorithm are implemented.
|-
|July 2, 2005 || Diggnation podcast begins with Alex and Kevin<ref>{{cite web | url =http://revision3.com/diggnation/2005-07-01 | title =Digg Podcast #001 Released | access-date =2010-08-02 | work =Diggnation | publisher =Revision3 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100726050927/http://revision3.com/diggnation/2005-07-01 | archive-date =2010-07-26 | url-status =dead }}</ref>
|-
|October 2005 || Raises $2.8 million in venture capital
|-
|December 2005 || Digg Spy 2.0 released
|-
|December 2005 || KoolAidGuy saga results in anti-spam tools being introduced<ref>{{cite web | url =https://www.zdnet.com/article/gaming-digg-the-koolaidguy-saga/ | title =Gaming Digg: the KoolAidGuy saga | access-date =2010-08-02 | first =Richard | last =MacManus | date =2005-12-27 | work =Web 2.0 Explorer | publisher =ZDNet | archive-date =2010-07-17 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100717141843/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/web2explorer/gaming-digg-the-koolaidguy-saga/90 | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|January 17, 2006 || Top user Albertpacino resigns after accusations of him being on Digg payroll<ref>{{cite web| url =http://digg.com/tech_news/Dan_Huard_is_digg_user_AlbertPacino | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20080120235857/http://digg.com/tech_news/Dan_Huard_is_digg_user_AlbertPacino | archive-date =2008-01-20 | title =Dan Huard is digg user AlbertPacino | access-date =2010-08-02 | publisher =wehatetech }}</ref>
|-
|January 18, 2006 || Digg Clouds is introduced, search is improved
|-
|January 25, 2006 || Acquisition rumors begins
|-
|February 2, 2006 || Report stories as 'inaccurate' and profanity filters are introduced
|-
|February 15, 2006 || Digg widget for blogs and share by email is released
|-
|March 1, 2006 || New Digg comment system released, threaded and Diggable comments
|-
|April 20, 2006 || Digg Army Saga: after an exposé by forevergeek.com Kevin bans dozens of top users<ref>{{cite web | url =http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/digg_army_right_in_line/ | title =Digg Army: Right in Line | access-date =2010-08-02 | author =Macgyver | date =2006-04-19 | publisher =Forever Geek | archive-date =2010-08-14 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100814212519/http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/04/digg_army_right_in_line/ | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|June 26, 2006 || Digg v3 rolled out, site redesign, shouts, new categories: politics and sports
|-
|July 24, 2006 || Digg Labs launches
|-
|August 15, 2006 || Thumbnails added
|-
|August 27, 2006 || Digg begins enforcing trademark rights
|-
|September 6, 2006 || User rebellion against Friends System and vote rigging results in promises about the diversity algorithms and other tools that were never implemented. Top user p9 resigns.
|-
|September 8, 2006 || diggriver.com is launched for mobile devices
|-
|September 12, 2006 || #1 Story feature added later renamed as favorites
|-
|December 18, 2006 || New features: Podcast, Videos, Top 10 sidebar, wide-screen support and friends page
|-
|December 28, 2006 || Raises $8.5 million in venture capital
|-
|February 2, 2007 || Top Diggers list removed after user complaints<ref>{{cite web | url =http://about.digg.com/blog/couple-updates%E2%80%A6 | title =A couple updates&nbsp;... | access-date =2010-08-02 | first =Kevin | last =Rose | date =2007-02-01 | publisher =Digg blog | archive-date =2010-07-21 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100721192726/http://about.digg.com/blog/couple-updates%E2%80%A6 | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|February 2, 2007 || Big Spy launched
|-
|February 26, 2007 || The new US elections 2008 section creates much buzz
|-
|March 1, 2007 || Blog post leads to concern about 'bury brigades'. Digg investigates and find no evidence for these allegations
|-
|April 19, 2007 || Digg API is made public, contest launched for best app using the API
|-
|May 1, 2007 || HD-DVD saga regarding the censorship of the leaked encryption key, Kevin yield to users and ends the censorship
|-
|June 4, 2007 || Facebook app is launched
|-
|June 21, 2007 || New Comment System – Joe Stump edition. Instant backlash from community after slow loading.
|-
|July 10, 2007 || iPhone app beta launched
|-
|July 25, 2007 || Ad partnership with Microsoft
|-
|August 27, 2007 || Customizable homepage options. Images and videos now back to homepage.
|-
|{{nowrap|September 19, 2007}} || New Digg profiles, story suggestion, email alerts
|-
|November 20, 2007 || Digg the Candidates: presidential candidates get their Digg accounts
|-
|February 1, 2008 || Digg town halls
|-
|May 15, 2008 || New comments system is released
|-
|June 30, 2008 || Recommendation engine is released
|-
|July 23, 2008 || Facebook minifeeds of Digg stories
|-
|July 31, 2008 || m.digg.com – mobile site is released
|-
|August 6, 2008 || Firefox extension released
|-
|August 25, 2008 || Digg Dialogg
|-
|September 8, 2008 || Digg warns users against script for auto digging friends stories.
|-
|September 24, 2008 || $28.7 million capital raised with Highland Capital Partners.
|-
|October 3, 2008 || A small number of power users are banned after they fail to follow guidelines against script digging.<ref>{{cite web | url =http://about.digg.com/blog/digg-update-script-abuse | title =Update on Script Abuse | access-date =2010-08-02 | first =Jen | last =Burton | date =2008-10-03 | work =Community blog | publisher =Digg | archive-date =2010-07-19 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20100719050233/http://about.digg.com/blog/digg-update-script-abuse | url-status =live }}</ref>
|-
|October 9, 2008 || Digg Spy and podcasts discontinued
|-
|December 18, 2008 || Related stories and "People who Dugg this also Dugg" boxes added to individual stories
|-
|April 2, 2009 || DiggBar and short url launched
|-
|April 9, 2009 || New search
|-
|May 6, 2009 || Facebook Connect
|-
|May 26, 2009 || Shouts feature is removed
|-
|August 6, 2009 || Diggable ads implemented
|-
|October 16, 2009 || Partners with WeFollow for categorizing user in the upcoming version 4 release
|-
|November 4, 2009 || Digg Trends launched
|-
|January 17, 2010 || Chrome extension launched
|-
|March 23, 2010 || iPhone app is launched
|-
|April 1, 2010 || Android app is launched
|-
|April 5, 2010 || Jay Adelson steps down as CEO, Kevin Rose becomes interim CEO
|-
|July 2, 2010 || Digg version 4 alpha testing begins
|-
|August 3, 2010 || Digg takes down new user registration in preparation for Digg 4.0<ref>{{cite web | url = https://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/08/03/the-new-digg-cometh/ | title = The New Digg Cometh? | access-date = 2014-01-30 | date = 2010-08-03 | last = Alex | first = Wilhelm | archive-date = 2013-10-05 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131005020901/http://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/08/03/the-new-digg-cometh/ | url-status = live }}</ref>
|-
|August 25, 2010 || Digg v4 is released: My News and Publisher Streams launched
|-
|September 1, 2010 || Matt Williams replaces Kevin Rose as CEO
|-
|October 27, 2010 || Digg lays off 37% of its staff along with refocusing the service<ref>{{cite web |first=Michael |last=Arrington |url=https://techcrunch.com/2010/10/25/digg-to-lay-off-37-percentof-staff/ |title=Digg To Layoff 37% Of Staff, Product Refocus Imminent |publisher=Techcrunch.com |date=2010-10-25 |access-date=2010-11-07 |archive-date=2010-11-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101106135535/http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/25/digg-to-lay-off-37-percentof-staff/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|March 18, 2011 || Kevin Rose resigns from his role in the company<ref>Christina Warren, mashable.com. . {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110320024259/http://mashable.com/2011/03/18/kevin-rose-resigns-from-digg-report/ |date=2011-03-20 }} March 18, 2011. Retrieved March 18, 2011.</ref>
|-
|August 9, 2011 || Newswire is launched.
|-
|September 20, 2011 || Newsroom is launched
|-
|December 22, 2011 || Digg ] is introduced.
|-
|March 6, 2012 || Digg Mobile is now in a relationship with Digg Social Reader.
|-
|July 12, 2012 || Digg announced its sale to Betaworks for $500,000.<ref>{{cite web|first1=Joseph|last1=Walker|first2=Spencer E.|last2=Ante|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304373804577523181002565776|title=Once a Social Media Star, Digg Sells for $500,000|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=2012-07-12|access-date=2012-07-13|archive-date=2014-12-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141215204009/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304373804577523181002565776|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|July 20, 2012 || Digg announces new site redesign in progress, "rebooting" the site back to v1 as a "startup", slated for release on August 1, 2012.<ref name="Rethink Digg Twitter Announcement" /><ref name="The New Digg" /><ref name="Rethink Digg" /><ref name="Murphey 2012" />
|-
|August 1, 2012 || Digg releases v1 site reboot<ref>{{citation |url=https://www.theverge.com/2012/8/1/3212627/digg-relaunch-betaworks-video |title=Digg's resurrection: can Betaworks revive the once-loved site? |publisher=TheVerge.com |date=2012-08-01 |access-date=2012-08-02 |archive-date=2012-08-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120803002205/http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/1/3212627/digg-relaunch-betaworks-video |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|June 28, 2013 || Digg Reader launches<ref>{{citation |url=http://blog.digg.com/post/54149272160/digg-reader-is-live |title=Digg Reader is Live! |publisher=Digg Blog |date=2013-06-28 |access-date=2013-06-28 |archive-date=2013-06-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130629145843/http://blog.digg.com/post/54149272160/digg-reader-is-live |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|March 17, 2017 || Michael O'Connor replaces Gary Liu as the CEO of Digg<ref>{{citation |url=https://medium.com/@thedooofroo/digging-in-6820df6a8b30 |title=Digging In |publisher=Medium |date=2017-03-17 |access-date=2017-03-17 |archive-date=2018-01-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180114020705/https://medium.com/@thedooofroo/digging-in-6820df6a8b30 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|}

== See also ==
{{Portal|Internet}}
{{colbegin|colwidth=30em}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{colend}}


==References== == References ==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{reflist|2}}


==External links== == External links ==
{{commons category|Digg (website)|Digg}}
<!-- The primary focus of this section is to list any links that are directly related to digg.com - Links will be deleted that are unrelated. -->
<!-- The primary focus of this section is to list any links that are directly related to digg.com – Links will be deleted that are unrelated. -->
*
* {{Official website|https://digg.com/}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:17, 19 December 2024

Social media/news aggregator website This article is about the website. For the place in Scotland, see Digg, Skye.
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (June 2015)

Digg, Inc.
Digg logo
Type of siteSocial news
Available inEnglish
FoundedNovember 2004; 20 years ago (2004-11)
HeadquartersNew York City, United States
Area servedWorldwide
OwnerBuySellAds.com, Inc.
Founder(s)Kevin Rose
Key peopleMichael O'Connor (CEO)
RevenueUnknown
Employees25 (2018)
URLdigg.com
AdvertisingNone
RegistrationOptional
LaunchedDecember 5, 2004; 20 years ago (2004-12-05)
Current statusActive
Written inPython

Digg (stylized in lowercase as digg) is an American news aggregator with a curated front page, aiming to select articles specifically for the Internet audience such as science, trending political issues, and viral Internet issues. It was launched in its current form on July 31, 2012, with support for sharing content to other social platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.

Digg was formerly a popular social news website, allowing people to vote user-generated and web content up or down, called digging and burying, respectively. In 2012, Quantcast estimated Digg's monthly U.S. unique visits at 3.8 million. Digg's popularity prompted the creation of similar sites such as Reddit.

In July 2008, the former company took part in advanced acquisition talks with Google for a reported $200 million price tag, but the deal ultimately fell through. After a controversial 2010 redesign and the departure of co-founders Jay Adelson and Kevin Rose, in July 2012 Digg was sold in three parts: the Digg brand, website, and technology were sold to Betaworks for an estimated $500,000; 15 staff were transferred to The Washington Post Company's "SocialCode" for a reported $12 million; and a suite of patents was sold to LinkedIn for about $4 million.

In April 2018, Digg was purchased by BuySellAds, an advertising company, for an undisclosed amount.

It is rumoured that Kevin Rose has purchased Digg back and is relaunching it in 2025. Their Twitter account teases the date March 8, 2025 as "3825" is used in multiple images uploaded in December.

History

Digg, version 1.6

Digg started as an experiment in November 2004 by collaborators Kevin Rose, Owen Byrne, Ron Gorodetzky, and Jay Adelson. The original design by Dan Ries was free of advertisements. To monetize, the company originally used Google AdSense but switched to MSN adCenter in 2007.

The site's main function was to let users discover, share and recommend web content. Members of the community could submit a webpage for general consideration. Other members could vote that page up ("digg") or down ("bury"). Although voting took place on digg.com, many websites added "digg" buttons to their pages, allowing users to vote as they browsed the web. The end product was a series of wide-ranging, constantly updated lists of popular and trending content from around the Internet, aggregated by a social network.

Additions and improvements were made throughout the website's first years. Digg v2 was released in July 2005, with a new interface by web design company silverorange. New features included a friends list, and the ability to "digg" a story without being redirected to a success page. One year later, as part of Digg v3, the website added specific categories for technology, science, world and business, videos, entertainment, and gaming, as well as a "view all" section that merged all categories. Further interface adjustments were made in August 2007.

By 2008, Digg's homepage was attracting over 236 million visitors annually, according to a Compete.com survey. Digg had grown large enough that it was thought to affect the traffic of submitted web pages. Some pages experienced a sudden increase in traffic shortly after being submitted; some Digg users refer to this as the "Digg effect".

Redesign

CEO Jay Adelson said in 2010 that the site would go through some major changes. In the interview with Wired magazine, Adelson said that "Every single THING has changed" and that "the entire website has been rewritten." The company changed from MySQL to Cassandra, a distributed database system; in a blog post, VP Engineering John Quinn said that the move was "bold". Adelson summed up the new Digg by saying, "We've got a new backend, a new infrastructure layer, a new services layer, new machines—everything."

Adelson stepped down as CEO on April 5, 2010, to explore entrepreneurial opportunities, months before the launch date of Digg v4. He had been the company's CEO since its inception. Kevin Rose, another original founder, stepped in temporarily as CEO and Chairman.

Digg's v4 release on August 25, 2010, was marred by site-wide bugs and glitches. Digg users reacted with hostile verbal opposition. Beyond the release, Digg faced problems due to so-called "power users" who would manipulate the article recommendation features to only support one another's postings, flooding the site with articles only from these users and making it impossible to have genuine content from non-power users appear on the front page. Frustrations with the system led to dwindling web traffic, exacerbated by heavy competition from Facebook, whose like buttons started to appear on websites next to Digg's. High staff turnover included the departure of head of business development Matt Van Horn, shortly after v4's release.

On September 1, 2010, Matt Williams took over as CEO, ending Rose's troubled tenure as interim chief executive.

In 2013, Andrew McLaughlin took over as CEO after Digg was sold to BetaWorks and re-launched.

In 2015, Gary Liu took over as Digg CEO.

In 2016, Joshua Auerbach took over as interim CEO.

In September 2016, Digg announced that it would begin a data partnership with Gannett. The "seven figure" investment would give Gannett access to real-time trend analysis of Digg's 7.5 million pieces of content.

In 2017, Michael O'Connor took over as CEO, and continues as CEO today.

Sale and relaunch

In July 2012, Digg was sold in three parts:

  1. the Digg brand, website, and technology were sold to Betaworks for $500,000;
  2. 15 staff were transferred to The Washington Post's Code3 project for $12 million;
  3. the patent portfolio was sold to LinkedIn for approximately $4 million.

There were reports that Digg had been trying to sell itself to a larger company since 2006. The most notable attempt took place in July 2008, when Google entered talks to buy Digg for around $200 million. Google walked away from negotiations during the deal's due diligence phase, informing Digg on July 25 that it was no longer interested in the purchase. Digg subsequently accepted further venture capital funding, receiving $28.7 million in September 2008 from investors such as Highland Capital Partners to move headquarters and add staff. Several months later, CEO Jay Adelson said Digg was no longer for sale.

On July 20, 2012, new owners Betaworks announced via Twitter that they were rebuilding Digg from scratch, "turning back into a start-up". Betaworks gave the project a six-week deadline. Surveys of existing users, collected through the website ReThinkDigg.com, were used to inform the development of a new user interface and user experience.

The "rethought" Digg reset its version number and launched as Digg v1 a day prior to the Betaworks project deadline, on July 31, 2012. It featured an editorially driven front page, more images, and top, popular and upcoming stories. Users could access a new scoring system. There was increased support for sharing content to other social platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Digg's front page content was selected by editors, instead of users on other communities like Reddit.

Until its sale to BuySellAds.com in 2018, its offices were located at 50 Eldridge Street in New York City's Chinatown.

Features

Digg Reader

Main article: Digg Reader

In response to the announced shutdown of Google Reader, Digg announced on March 14, 2013 that it was working on its own RSS reader. Digg Reader launched on June 28, 2013 as a web and iOS application. An Android app was released on August 29, 2013. Digg announced that it would shut down Digg Reader on March 26, 2018.

Issues relating to former Digg website

Organized promotion and censorship by users

Main article: Digg Patriots

It was possible for users to have disproportionate influence on Digg, either by themselves or in teams. These users were sometimes motivated to promote or bury pages for political or financial reasons.

Serious attempts by users to game the site began in 2006. A top user was banned after agreeing to promote a story for cash to an undercover Digg sting operation. Another group of users openly formed a 'Bury Brigade' to remove "spam" articles about US politician Ron Paul; critics accused the group of attempting to stifle any mention of Ron Paul on Digg.

Digg hired computer scientist Anton Kast to develop a diversity algorithm that would prevent special interest groups from dominating Digg. During a town hall meeting, Digg executives responded to criticism by removing some features that gave superusers extra weight, but declined to make "buries" transparent.

However, later that year Google increased its page rank for Digg. Shortly afterwards, many 'pay for Diggs' startups were created to profit from the opportunity. According to TechCrunch, one top user charged $700 per story, with a $500 bonus if the story reached the front page.

Digg Patriots was a conservative Yahoo! Groups mailing list, with an associated page on coRank, accused of coordinated, politically motivated behavior on Digg. Progressive blogger Ole Ole Olson wrote in August 2010 that Digg Patriots undertook a year-long effort of organized burying of seemingly liberal articles from Digg's Upcoming module. He also accused leading members of vexatiously reporting liberal users for banning (and those who seemed liberal), and creating "sleeper" accounts in the event of administrators banning their accounts. These and other actions would violate Digg's terms of usage. Olson's post was immediately followed by the disbanding and closure of the DiggPatriots list, and an investigation into the matter by Digg.

AACS encryption key controversy

Main article: AACS encryption key controversy

On May 1, 2007, an article appeared on Digg's homepage that contained the encryption key for the AACS digital rights management protection of HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc. Then Digg, "acting on the advice of its lawyers", removed posting submissions about the secret number from its database and banned several users for submitting it. The removals were seen by many Digg users as a capitulation to corporate interests and an assault on free speech. A statement by Jay Adelson attributed the article's take-down to an attempt to comply with cease and desist letters from the Advanced Access Content System consortium and cited Digg's Terms of Use as justification for taking down the article. Although some users defended Digg's actions, as a whole the community staged a widespread revolt with numerous articles and comments made using the encryption key. The scope of the user response was so great that one of the Digg users referred to it as a "digital Boston Tea Party". The response was also directly responsible for Digg reversing the policy and stating: "But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you've made it clear. You'd rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won't delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be."

Digg v4

Digg's version 4 release was initially unstable. The site was unreachable or unstable for weeks after its launch on August 25, 2010. Many users, upon finally reaching the site, complained about the new design and the removal of many features (such as bury, favorites, friends submissions, upcoming pages, subcategories, videos and history search). Kevin Rose replied to complaints on his blog, promising to fix the algorithm and restore some features.

Alexis Ohanian, founder of rival site Reddit, said in an open letter to Rose:

this new version of digg reeks of VC meddling. It's cobbling together features from more popular sites and departing from the core of digg, which was to "give the power back to the people."

Disgruntled users declared a "quit Digg day" on August 30, 2010, and used Digg's own auto-submit feature to fill the front page with content from Reddit. Reddit also temporarily added the Digg shovel to their logo to welcome fleeing Digg users.

Digg's traffic dropped significantly after the launch of version 4, and publishers reported a drop in direct referrals from stories on Digg's front page. New CEO Matt Williams attempted to address some of the users' concerns in a blog post on October 12, 2010, promising to reinstate many of the features that had been removed.

Timeline

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (March 2020)
Timeline of Digg history
Date Event
October 2004 Development on digg.com begins
December 1, 2004 Kevin Rose creates the first profile
December 3, 2004 The first story is submitted to Digg
December 5, 2004 Digg is open to public
December 13, 2004 Kevin Rose shows off Digg on The Screen Savers
January 2, 2005 Comment section introduced for stories
February 28, 2005 Digg 1.6: duplicate story detection
March 19, 2005 Profile page now includes comment histories and sort by category
May 9, 2005 Digg spy is released
May 27, 2005 Digg 2.0 is released. Friends feature, ajax buttons for Digg/bury, and a non-linear promotion algorithm are implemented.
July 2, 2005 Diggnation podcast begins with Alex and Kevin
October 2005 Raises $2.8 million in venture capital
December 2005 Digg Spy 2.0 released
December 2005 KoolAidGuy saga results in anti-spam tools being introduced
January 17, 2006 Top user Albertpacino resigns after accusations of him being on Digg payroll
January 18, 2006 Digg Clouds is introduced, search is improved
January 25, 2006 Acquisition rumors begins
February 2, 2006 Report stories as 'inaccurate' and profanity filters are introduced
February 15, 2006 Digg widget for blogs and share by email is released
March 1, 2006 New Digg comment system released, threaded and Diggable comments
April 20, 2006 Digg Army Saga: after an exposé by forevergeek.com Kevin bans dozens of top users
June 26, 2006 Digg v3 rolled out, site redesign, shouts, new categories: politics and sports
July 24, 2006 Digg Labs launches
August 15, 2006 Thumbnails added
August 27, 2006 Digg begins enforcing trademark rights
September 6, 2006 User rebellion against Friends System and vote rigging results in promises about the diversity algorithms and other tools that were never implemented. Top user p9 resigns.
September 8, 2006 diggriver.com is launched for mobile devices
September 12, 2006 #1 Story feature added later renamed as favorites
December 18, 2006 New features: Podcast, Videos, Top 10 sidebar, wide-screen support and friends page
December 28, 2006 Raises $8.5 million in venture capital
February 2, 2007 Top Diggers list removed after user complaints
February 2, 2007 Big Spy launched
February 26, 2007 The new US elections 2008 section creates much buzz
March 1, 2007 Blog post leads to concern about 'bury brigades'. Digg investigates and find no evidence for these allegations
April 19, 2007 Digg API is made public, contest launched for best app using the API
May 1, 2007 HD-DVD saga regarding the censorship of the leaked encryption key, Kevin yield to users and ends the censorship
June 4, 2007 Facebook app is launched
June 21, 2007 New Comment System – Joe Stump edition. Instant backlash from community after slow loading.
July 10, 2007 iPhone app beta launched
July 25, 2007 Ad partnership with Microsoft
August 27, 2007 Customizable homepage options. Images and videos now back to homepage.
September 19, 2007 New Digg profiles, story suggestion, email alerts
November 20, 2007 Digg the Candidates: presidential candidates get their Digg accounts
February 1, 2008 Digg town halls
May 15, 2008 New comments system is released
June 30, 2008 Recommendation engine is released
July 23, 2008 Facebook minifeeds of Digg stories
July 31, 2008 m.digg.com – mobile site is released
August 6, 2008 Firefox extension released
August 25, 2008 Digg Dialogg
September 8, 2008 Digg warns users against script for auto digging friends stories.
September 24, 2008 $28.7 million capital raised with Highland Capital Partners.
October 3, 2008 A small number of power users are banned after they fail to follow guidelines against script digging.
October 9, 2008 Digg Spy and podcasts discontinued
December 18, 2008 Related stories and "People who Dugg this also Dugg" boxes added to individual stories
April 2, 2009 DiggBar and short url launched
April 9, 2009 New search
May 6, 2009 Facebook Connect
May 26, 2009 Shouts feature is removed
August 6, 2009 Diggable ads implemented
October 16, 2009 Partners with WeFollow for categorizing user in the upcoming version 4 release
November 4, 2009 Digg Trends launched
January 17, 2010 Chrome extension launched
March 23, 2010 iPhone app is launched
April 1, 2010 Android app is launched
April 5, 2010 Jay Adelson steps down as CEO, Kevin Rose becomes interim CEO
July 2, 2010 Digg version 4 alpha testing begins
August 3, 2010 Digg takes down new user registration in preparation for Digg 4.0
August 25, 2010 Digg v4 is released: My News and Publisher Streams launched
September 1, 2010 Matt Williams replaces Kevin Rose as CEO
October 27, 2010 Digg lays off 37% of its staff along with refocusing the service
March 18, 2011 Kevin Rose resigns from his role in the company
August 9, 2011 Newswire is launched.
September 20, 2011 Newsroom is launched
December 22, 2011 Digg Social Reader is introduced.
March 6, 2012 Digg Mobile is now in a relationship with Digg Social Reader.
July 12, 2012 Digg announced its sale to Betaworks for $500,000.
July 20, 2012 Digg announces new site redesign in progress, "rebooting" the site back to v1 as a "startup", slated for release on August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012 Digg releases v1 site reboot
June 28, 2013 Digg Reader launches
March 17, 2017 Michael O'Connor replaces Gary Liu as the CEO of Digg

See also

References

  1. About, Digg.com, archived from the original on November 29, 2018, retrieved February 28, 2009
  2. "Digg Inc.: Private Company Information". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on September 23, 2018. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  3. Kevin Rose's Next Move: Partner at Google Ventures, archived from the original on August 5, 2012, retrieved August 2, 2012
  4. "Accelent fills CEO position for Digg". April 5, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018.
  5. "FAQ". Digg.com. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  6. "Jobs". Digg.com. Archived from the original on November 28, 2018. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
  7. "digg.com – Quantcast Audience Profile". Quantcast.com. July 16, 2012. Archived from the original on June 24, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  8. McCarthy, Pat (September 10, 2006). "Revisiting Top 10 Web Predictions of 2006". Conversionrater.com. Archived from the original on October 7, 2008. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  9. Madrigal, Alexis C. "The Big Digg Lesson: A Social Network Is Worth Precisely as Much as Its Community". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  10. ^ Walker, Joseph; Ante, Spencer E. (July 13, 2012). "Once a Social Media Star, Digg Sells for $500,000". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 15, 2014. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  11. ^ Tsukayama, Hayley (May 10, 2012). "SocialCode hires 15 employees from Digg.com". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 19, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  12. ^ Burns, Chris (July 13, 2012). "Digg sale splits the company three ways for $16m total". Slashgear. Archived from the original on July 15, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  13. "The beloved Digg, once the chief rival to Reddit, was just sold to an advertising tech company". Business Insider. April 25, 2018. Archived from the original on September 23, 2018. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  14. https://x.com/digg/status/1865195680823939540
  15. Rose, Kevin (July 25, 2007). "Digg: New ad provider". Archived from the original on July 19, 2010. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  16. "Compete.com". Siteanalytics.compete.com. Archived from the original on January 9, 2011. Retrieved November 7, 2010.
  17. ^ Calore, Michael (March 15, 2010). "Wired Interview". Wired. Archived from the original on March 17, 2010. Retrieved March 15, 2010.
  18. Quinn, John. "Cassandra Switch". Digg. Archived from the original on March 7, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  19. Adelson, Jay (April 4, 2010). "Update from Jay". Digg. Archived from the original on September 20, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  20. McCarthy, Caroline (June 21, 2010). "Changing the rules of the Digg game". CNET News. Archived from the original on July 30, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  21. McCarthy, Caroline (August 26, 2010). "Digg's Matt Van Horn leaving for start-up". CNET News. Archived from the original on August 27, 2010. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
  22. "Digg CEO Gary Liu is leaving to head up Alibaba-owned newspaper SCMP – TechCrunch". techcrunch.com. November 23, 2016. Archived from the original on March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  23. "Digg CEO Gary Liu is leaving to head up Alibaba-owned newspaper SCMP – TechCrunch". techcrunch.com. November 23, 2016. Archived from the original on March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
  24. Auerbach, Joshua. "We've Got Some Very Digg News To Share". Archived from the original on June 23, 2017. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  25. Alpert, Lukas I. (September 13, 2016). "Gannett Leads Investment Round in Social Media Pioneer Digg". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 10, 2016. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
  26. Arrington, Michael (November 7, 2007). "Just Sell Digg Already, Jay". Techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on March 2, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  27. Arrington, Michael (July 26, 2008). "Google Walks Away From Digg Deal". washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on October 10, 2012. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  28. "Digg digs up $28.7 Million". CNNMoney. November 24, 2008. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  29. "Big News: Expanding & Growing Digg". blog.digg.com. September 24, 2008. Archived from the original on March 15, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  30. Ante, Spencer E. (December 2008). "Digg: Not For Sale". Archived from the original on December 12, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
  31. ^ "Rethink Digg Twitter Announcement". July 2012. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  32. ^ "Rethink Digg". Archived from the original on July 21, 2012. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  33. ^ "The New Digg". July 2012. Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  34. ^ Murphey, Samantha (July 2012). "Rebuilding Digg". Mashable. Archived from the original on July 21, 2012. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  35. "Digg Reader is Live!". Digg.com. March 14, 2013. Archived from the original on July 3, 2013. Retrieved June 28, 2013.
  36. "Goodbye to Digg Reader". Archived from the original on March 14, 2018. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  37. Dave (April 20, 2006). "Digg Corrupted: Editor's Playground, not User-Driven Website". Forevergeek. Archived from the original on July 21, 2010. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  38. Sandoval, Greg (December 18, 2006). "Digg continues to battle phony stories". CNET News. Archived from the original on May 10, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  39. Adam (December 23, 2007). "Digg's Ron Paul 'Bury Brigade' exposed". Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  40. Ben (February 26, 2008). "Digg's 20 Questions: a Town Hall Recap". Bloggingexperiment. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  41. Arrington, Michael (September 3, 2008). "Want On The Digg Home Page? That'll Be $1,200". Techcruch. Archived from the original on July 22, 2010. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  42. "Massive Censorship of Digg Uncovered « OOO". Archived from the original on May 8, 2013. Retrieved August 7, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  43. Olson, Ole Ole (August 5, 2010). "The Rigging Of Digg: How A Covert Mob Of Conservatives Hijacked The Web's Top Social News Site". The Public Record. Archived from the original on August 26, 2021. Retrieved August 7, 2010.
  44. Halliday, Josh (August 6, 2010). "Digg investigates claims of conservative 'censorship'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 15, 2016. Retrieved December 17, 2016.
  45. Stone, Brad (May 3, 2007). "In Web Uproar, Antipiracy Code Spreads Wildly". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved July 2, 2007.
  46. Adelson, Jay. "Digg the Blog: What's Happening with HD-DVD Stories?". Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved May 2, 2007.
  47. "Cease and desist letters backfire horribly against AACS". TGdaily. May 1, 2007. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  48. "Digg losing control of their site". Weblog.infoworld.com. Archived from the original on December 22, 2008. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  49. Sanders, Tom. "DRM lobby tries to get HD DVD genie back into the bottle". Computing.co.uk. Archived from the original on February 19, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  50. Yam, Marcus. "DailyTech: AACS Key Censorship Leads to First Internet Riot". Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 2, 2007.
  51. "BBC News: DVD DRM row sparks user rebellion". May 2, 2007. Archived from the original on May 16, 2007. Retrieved May 2, 2007.
  52. Forbes.com, Digg's DRM Revolt
  53. Rose, Kevin (May 1, 2007). "Digg This: 09 F9 ". Digg the Blog. Digg Inc. Archived from the original on April 22, 2019. Retrieved May 2, 2007.
  54. Ingram, Mathew (August 26, 2010). "Digg Redesign Met with a Thumbs Down". Archived from the original on August 28, 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
  55. Rose, Kevin (August 27, 2010). "Digg v4: release, iterate, repeat". Archived from the original on August 29, 2010. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  56. Ohanian, Alexis (May 28, 2010). "An open letter to Kevin Rose". Archived from the original on June 1, 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
  57. Lardinois, Frederic. "Digg User Rebellion Continues: Reddit Now Rules the Front Page". ReadWriteWeb. Archived from the original on August 31, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
  58. Friedman, Megan (August 30, 2010). "Digg Users Lash Out At New Format, Join Forces with Reddit". Time. Archived from the original on August 30, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
  59. McCarthy, Caroline. "Angry Digg users flood home page with Reddit links". CNet News. Archived from the original on July 13, 2012. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
  60. Kanalley, Craig (August 30, 2010). "Angry Users SLAM Digg With Links From Rival Reddit". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on September 1, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
  61. Wilhelm, Alex (September 23, 2010). "Digg's traffic is collapsing at home and abroad". The Next Web. Archived from the original on September 27, 2010. Retrieved October 20, 2010.
  62. Plocek, Keith. "The Digg Effect v4". Social Keith. Archived from the original on October 22, 2010. Retrieved October 20, 2010.
  63. MacManus, Richard (February 1, 2006). "Interview with Digg founder Kevin Rose". Web 2.0 Explorer. ZDNet. Archived from the original on August 8, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  64. "API query for story #01". API. Digg. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  65. "Kevin Rose shows off Digg on The Screen Savers". The Screen Savers. TechTV. Archived from the original on August 26, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  66. "Digg Podcast #001 Released". Diggnation. Revision3. Archived from the original on July 26, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  67. MacManus, Richard (December 27, 2005). "Gaming Digg: the KoolAidGuy saga". Web 2.0 Explorer. ZDNet. Archived from the original on July 17, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  68. "Dan Huard is digg user AlbertPacino". wehatetech. Archived from the original on January 20, 2008. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  69. Macgyver (April 19, 2006). "Digg Army: Right in Line". Forever Geek. Archived from the original on August 14, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  70. Rose, Kevin (February 1, 2007). "A couple updates ..." Digg blog. Archived from the original on July 21, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  71. Burton, Jen (October 3, 2008). "Update on Script Abuse". Community blog. Digg. Archived from the original on July 19, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
  72. Alex, Wilhelm (August 3, 2010). "The New Digg Cometh?". Archived from the original on October 5, 2013. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  73. Arrington, Michael (October 25, 2010). "Digg To Layoff 37% Of Staff, Product Refocus Imminent". Techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved November 7, 2010.
  74. Christina Warren, mashable.com. "Kevin Rose Resigns from Digg [Report]". Archived 2011-03-20 at the Wayback Machine March 18, 2011. Retrieved March 18, 2011.
  75. Walker, Joseph; Ante, Spencer E. (July 12, 2012). "Once a Social Media Star, Digg Sells for $500,000". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 15, 2014. Retrieved July 13, 2012.
  76. Digg's resurrection: can Betaworks revive the once-loved site?, TheVerge.com, August 1, 2012, archived from the original on August 3, 2012, retrieved August 2, 2012
  77. Digg Reader is Live!, Digg Blog, June 28, 2013, archived from the original on June 29, 2013, retrieved June 28, 2013
  78. Digging In, Medium, March 17, 2017, archived from the original on January 14, 2018, retrieved March 17, 2017

External links

Categories: