| Revision as of 23:00, 4 May 2007 editVanished user 05 (talk | contribs)6,607 editsm →Your Email← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018 edit undoTheRealWeatherMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers728 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Glutamate permease. (TW) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| --- | |||
| ==Welcome!== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ''If you are interested in Russia-related themes'', you may want to check out the ], particularly the ] and ]. You may even want to add these boards to your ]. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 --> | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Again, welcome! ] 00:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Vladimir Putin, Quotations== | |||
| Hello, Biophys. I've removed one of your contribs and moved other (see history). But it's mostly technical, i.e. your work is appreciated. I've noticed some of your interest to Quotations -- let's work together to improve them. The thing is, the majority of the section was contributed once by me, and there was '''no one''' pro or contra voice. I would give B for the section, but not more. It still needs a large work of adding, removing, and refining. And, again, your work is valued. Remember one of basic principles of Misplaced Pages, be bold! Thank you. ] 13:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == You might be interested... == | |||
| I noticed your interests that you stated on your user page, and I just thought that you might be interested in the ]. If you like, drop by. I think that you may find it interesting. Cheers! – ]] 20:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * Welcome. :) – ]] 07:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Non-postulated relativity == | |||
| : Hi Biophys, I don't have the impression that his approach is really original. You may see that as a negative remark, but for Misplaced Pages it can actually work out positive, as such an approach (which I would call "Lorentzian") that was shared by a number of notable, even "authoritive" physicists is certainly more notable (= encyclopedic) than that of one physicist who is unknown in the west. | |||
| : Thus it may be worth writing a slightly more general article about it, if a respected journal article or book can be found that already discusses the subject (in order to avoid ]). Possibly either "]" or "]" could be sufficiently general as well as notable topics to which that book belongs. But probably you'd need help from other editors to make such a new article live up to its scope... ] 21:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Regards, ] 21:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If it's simply a new way of teaching SR, then there are two ways it could be included in Misplaced Pages: | |||
| :#It was a notable minority viewpoint among teachers of SR. | |||
| :#Our editors thought the pedagogical approach would be useful for our readers, and found it not to have any major philisophical differences from ordinary SR teaching. | |||
| :Is either of these things true? -- ] 17:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: I can answer for Biophys (Biophys where are you?). | |||
| :: Point 1: Yes, that is verified to be factual (Lorentz, Poincare, Langevin and several other teachers as well as a number of notable experimantal physicists such as Ives) | |||
| :: Point 2: Not clear what you mean. People such as Bell and of course the above Russian author, if I understand well, emphasized the pedagogical usefulness of the physical interpretation that we inherited from the stationary ether model, even if we don't explicitly use it. | |||
| :: Regards, ] 23:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == This month's winner is ]! == | |||
| {{MCB AID|current=proteasome|last=adenosine triphosphate}} – ]] 22:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Albumin == | |||
| I was wondering if I might pick your brain? Yesterday you wrote in ] that albumin can associate with lipid bilayers under certain experimental conditions in vitro. May I ask what conditions those might be, and what your source is? I ask because this behavior may be interfering with a set of experiments that I'm trying to perform. Many thanks! – ]] 17:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks! – ]] 03:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Peripheral membrane protein == | |||
| Did you notice that this article has been nominated for the ]? I see you've been putting alot of work into it, so you might want to add your vote to the stack: it's currently one of the front runners to be next month's collaboration. – ]] 18:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, Biophys: You left a note on the talk page of the defector Kokhlov and it is entirely possible that someone is pulling your chain. :::Parapsychology::: is the pseudo-science of the supernatural, especially ghosts and demons. Its possible that the U.S. government does study that sort of thing, but it isn't likely that a Soviet defector would be employed in such a potentially sensitive and embarrassing project. It is, however, quite likely that his wife and children may have spent time in gulag. ] 15:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Russian history== | |||
| Hi, i am historian, tell me more, what you specialize in, i love your edit on beria, i think we need to improve on some other bios too, can i send you suggestions? Nov 20 | |||
| ==Yuri Shchekochikhin and Sergei Yushenkov== | |||
| Hi, thank you for your hard work in developing ] and ]. If we can get them to a really good condition within five days, I am thinking of nominating one or both of these to appear on the Misplaced Pages front page in the "Did you know?" column of newest articles. Let me know if you have any suggestions for a good "Did you know" phrase for the page. Best wishes, ] 21:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Biophys, thanks for your further edits. I have nominated the articles, I think they are in good shape and should have a good chance at being on the front page this week! If you think of any other important facts feel free to add them. It might also help to make a short stub article for ] with anything you know about it. I have read that Yushenkov was assassinated just hours after registering Liberal Russia in the 2003 Duma elections , if this is true I think it's a very striking coincidence. ] 19:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> Well done Biophys. Top work, a double strike. Dryman was the kind nominator. Feel free to self-nominate, as the vast majority of entries are such. Thanks again, ''']''' (]) 07:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:Alexander Litvinenko == | |||
| Okay. You want to take a look at it and cleanup and stuff? Maybe it will be more effective that way? I'm not too familiar with the whole apartment bombing thing. ''']]''' 02:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Galina Starovoitova== | |||
| Ok, I'll try to take a look at it today. ] 18:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==RE:Communism and Nazism== | |||
| ''One interesting point I found there is that Soviet occupiers in East Europe were actually worse than Nazi occupiers.'' - Indeed, the Baltic States suffered considerably more from Communist repressions than under Nazi rule (Estonia/Latvia lost about 1/4 of population during the WW2 - mostly due to Communism). Hence the alleged pro-Nazi tendencies (?!) there. The number of victims of Communism of course exceeds that of Nazism , since Nazism was obvious evil and was quickly defeated, but commies managed to hold power for 70 yrs. ] - ] 08:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suvorov on Berlin wall== | |||
| Hi, I added Suvorov's citation on the wall & ] here. If you happen to take interest in it, you might improve the translation. The original text is here .] - ] 11:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == This month's winner is ]! == | |||
| {{MCB AID|current=RNA interference|last=proteasome}} | |||
| == Re:83.236.12.38 == | |||
| I think it was a good faith effort, but I reverted the user's massive changes. I'm leaving a note on his/her talk page about their edit. ''']]''' 20:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| I'm hoping that with your experitise in membrane proteins you might be able to help me with this one. My lab is working with a peripheral protein that we believe binds to the external side of the cell membrane by adhesion to mannan, and in order to investigate the possibility I would like to enzymatically digest the extracellular mannan from immobilized cells, but I can't seem to find an enzyme that preferentially digests mannan in literature or the Sigma catalogue. Would you happen to know anything offhand that I might be able to use? Many thanks in advance. – ]] 17:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == C2 domain == | |||
| Hello! A bot caught your creation of ] as a possible copyvio from . Usually, we delete them under a general speedy criteria (]), but in this case it is not entirely clear. In the terms of use the site the database is public for any purpose. Can you confirm this is right, and information copied from such database is not copyvio? You can either reply at my talk page or at ], as I will leave the entry listed there until this is confirmed. Thanks in advance. -- ] 04:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Glad to hear it was a false positive. As ] is likely to catch new additions if they are copied, could you please add a note in their talk pages either pointing to the WikiProject discussion, or to the C2 domain precedent? It will make things easier for us to remove them from the copyvio list as soon as they appear. Thanks again! -- ] 05:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Allow me == | |||
| ], award this "Exceptional newcomer" butterfly, in recognition of your excellent contributions to the articles on modern Russian history. We need more of them. ] 12:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| == Re: C2 domain, Pfam/Interpro summaries, and copyright == | |||
| Sorry for the long response time (I was on wikibreak). | |||
| As Misplaced Pages is under the ], and not the ], I am not sure if we can use their summaries. What do you think of the matter? | |||
| -- ] 00:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Novartis/GNF has contacted us to talk about collaboration and importing data. This could fit well with your use of Pfam. The talk page is . Thanks. ] 19:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You're right. If they gave permission, then it is fine. I was under the impression from the letter posted on the talk page that they only gave permission provided derivative works were distributed under the GPL though? I'm not sure. If you think you have permission, I will add the links to Wherebot's ignore list. -- ] 15:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Putin-chan's poem == | |||
| Sorry about the usage of "Putin-chan," as it is a joke between me and a friend--kind of a slip of the mind. I am not really sure if a satirical poem on Putin is appropriate. I would have to say it isn't that absurd when it comes to how Putin is perceived in Russian media, but I don't believe it is acceptable for the article. My suggestion is to remove it, and ask in the talk page what other people's thoughts are. :: <em>]</em> <font color="red">'''(])'''</font> 03:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edits == | |||
| Your edits in ] and ] are of polar quality. While the fist one is based on solid sources, the edits of the second one are your quite dubious interpretations and shaky sources. While you have some points there, I will come to it later. Meanwhile you please find sources for your two changes in ] in the intro and about ]. Why would you want to compare it with "propaganda" anyway? `'] 02:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :See ] talk page. I used another Encyclopedia as source. It has been compared already with "propaganda" prior to my edit.] | |||
| == Re: Vandalism == | |||
| I define spam as deliberately saturating Misplaced Pages entries with links from a particular source(s). You are clearly guilty of this. On the one hand, one may do this to a moderate degree if the intent is to provide sources for an article, but when it amounts to essentially "selling" a writer, a website, a book, etc., then it's spam. A good number of the books you listed in the Terrorism "Further Reading" section are irrelevant to the topic. Robert Spencer writes about terrorism, but that issue is not specific to all of his books. You simply decided to list a bibliography of books which share your view on the causes of terrorism, whether or not those books even relate to the issue. In the Emerson article, you shamelessly plugged in a FrontPageMag link. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a forum to propagate your views. | |||
| Also, don't "warn" me. You're not an administrator. Don't pretend to be some concerned neutral arbitrator. You are not.--] 08:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein! == | |||
| {{MCB AID|current=Peripheral membrane protein|last=RNA interference}} – ]] 18:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Adding to ]== | |||
| When you add article to this category make sure this category isn't a subcategory of another category the article belongs to - for an example some of the articles are already in the category ], so when you add the same article to ], which is subcategory of ] down the category tree, things get a little redundant. What you need to do is to remove the parent category. -- ] 05:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you! I will do it. ] 06:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD Nomination: ]== | |||
| An editor has nominated the article ] for deletion, under the ] process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see ] and ]). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing ]. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article ] during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. ] 13:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Hello! I'd just like to emphasize that you '''can''' add to the article during the deletion debate, especially if you think you can add independant sourcing. ] 17:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == MscL == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I saw your MscL article and i would like to ask you, please, write something about MscS too, and TREK, TRAAK etc! Please, please, please!!! | |||
| ==Shchekochikhin== | |||
| As you seem interested in his biography, could you please take a look at ] and edit it if necessary? I feel unable to deal with lengthy articles now. ] 18:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :O'K, I will take a look. But you know this subject much better than me. ] | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have filed a request concerning Vlad Fedorov's conduct. You could take part in the discussion at ]. ] 14:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the information. I will wait a little and see what happens before making a comment.] 17:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC/USER discussion concerning you ({{BASEPAGENAME}}) == | |||
| Hello, ]. Please be aware that a ] has been filed concerning your conduct on Misplaced Pages. The RFC entry can be found by your name in ], and the actual discussion can be found at ], where you may want to participate. {{{1|}}} -- ] 19:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:ConductDiscussion --> | |||
| :I would like to notify you that my request for comment on your stalking and harrassing behaviour was signed by Ellol.] 22:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I could not help but notice == | |||
| that your ] =====> "national phallus" addition to the ] article has been removed. This is the second time the same posting has been removed, both times by the same editor, ]. ] 02:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation Comment == | |||
| Comments have been made on the mediation page between you and Vlad fedorov at ]. ] 16:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==What was that all about?!== | |||
| Seems like you are the creator of 'Category:Victims of Russian political repressions'.Ok,I have only one question.What were you looking at?Check that category.Firstly,the demise of Dudayev can not be considered a 'political repression' because he wasn't a dissident,he was a warlord and a self-proclaimed President.Oh,and he was blown up during a war(xasualties always happen during wars).You can also find Litvinenko,Yushenkov,Yandarbiyev (note:the Kremlin's involvment in their deaths has not been proven).I'm surprised I didn't see Politkovskaya in that category.Until the Kremlin's involvment gets proven they canot be considered "victims of Russian political repressions".] 20:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please be cool and civil when the editorial conflict gets hot. Calling your opponents names never helped to anyone. was over the top. Happy editing ] 05:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :First, how can you call this "personal attack" if I did not name any specific "person" in my message? Second, I think that wikistalking case is obvious and proven, as follows from these comments: ] ]. This is not the case of good faith editing when negotiations can help. This can only go to mediation and arbitration. ] 15:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Enemy of Islam== | |||
| Hi, my dear friend, | |||
| Please pay attention to the sources of this article. I put comment in ] and described my reasons and you can find more in ] about the sources.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 05:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :O'K, maybe I was wrong. I have changed my vote.] 03:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Internet Trolls== | |||
| Hey. Good job with "trolls v2.0." Much better than before. As for removing my comments, I thank you for that, since that was dumb on my part. Hopefully you got my last message, and since what You Know Who said, it's possible that there's a double account. ] 03:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Agree.] 03:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I saw that the article was deleted, and it was the worst possible scenario. Go with my first suggestion, or just repost the article at a later date if you have it archived on your computer. ] 02:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem. I have the copy. But I have to think how to improve the article, make a better title (probably no "trolls"); maybe the subject should be a little bit different. It will take some time.] 03:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, I believe the vote against the Troll thing was canvassed by a certain someone. http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Vlad_fedorov#Thanks . I myself am pretty disgusted. ] 18:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Police Squad == | |||
| The ] is much different than the police squad. I suggest you look at it. | |||
| :Yes, I have looked. Yes, it is different, since the Chinese government prefers to simply block the unwanted web sites. However, they also seem to have "squads" that play a role of political police in the Internet and harass blogers, much like their colleagues in Russia. ] 19:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Re: the other user... file an RFC attempt either on the article or the user in question. Or ]. - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 19:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I did. That did not help: ] ] ] 19:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Take it to ] then. - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 19:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] report == | |||
| Hi there. I deleted your report there as there were no specific instances cited against that user, apart from mentioning a few articles. I note from the editor in question's talk page that he wasn't warned about his transgressions. Recommend trying to dialog with that user if he's engaging in vandalism/revert-warring/3rr or whatever. Right now, I can't see any issues - ]<sup>]</sup> 03:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Therefore that user has made personal attack on me.] 05:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Not quite so fast. You made a number of very questionable edits so far. You are involved in what looks like revert warring on a number of different articles while making disparaging comments in your edit history. Please work to resolve your differences with other editors rather than blindly reverting to your version. If you do that too many times, you ''will'' be blocked for ] violations - ]<sup>]</sup> 05:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop your uncivil behaviour and personal attacks. == | |||
| Please stop your uncivil behavior and personal attacks. Your naming of me as "vandal" is over the top.] 05:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| My apologies. I did not know there was a mediation case open on this article. It looks like mediation has stalled somewhat--perhaps you could kick-start it. Meanwhile I have re-protected the page for another 2 weeks. Please let me know if a longer protection period is required. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 21:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You could start a ], but I don't know if that would be a waste of time or not. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == internet police squads == | |||
| Very interestiing topic. I am quite sure that Russian secret services take this issue very seriously, even with paranoia. I don't have any sources, but I a have a similr experience, on a related issue. In early 1980s I was approached by KGB to make for them an expert's conclusion of the possibility that the computer viruses are in fact warfare of the West agains the Soviet Union. When I demonstrated them that viruses do immensely more economical harm in the West than to Soviets, after some thinking the KGB "experts" reformulated the question: is it possible that the computers the Soviet Union buys in the West are "pre-loaded" with software or microchips that may be activated by computer viruses to do some spywork. Later KGB elaborated the idea of "computer polygons", where a PC from the West would be placed into a mock network with simulated activity that may be of inrerest for Western spies, and all the transmissions (network, radio, UV, etc) of the suspect PC were to be monitored to "catch the spy" and figure out how it does this. I bet that good money was allocated for this. Unfortunately, when all this started I got a chance to work abroad, so I don't know how it ended. But I am sure that this kind of ideas didn't die, and with the proliferation of internet they got a new life. Good luck, `'] 18:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you! Could you help with any reliable sources on this subject?] 14:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Try . Don't know if it speaks much about the subject, but at least it is reliable source. ] 05:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Beslan memorial == | |||
| I have clarified my closing decision on the AFD subpage. If you disagree with my decision, I encourage you to open up a decision at ] which is designed to deal with disagreements such as this one. (])<sup>(])</sup> 17:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AfD for Internet brigades == | |||
| I have nominated your article ] for deletion, because it contains original research, misattribution, false translations, and is a POV fork of previously deletd article.] 05:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Though a supporter of the article, I think that the best course about Internet brigades is to build up articles about the individual incidents, get at least one non-Russian source for each, and not all out of the same book, and be prepared to srongly defend them. Then, in another 6 months with a few dozen solid articles and their sources, to try again.''']''' 08:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I do not think there is enough material here for several articles. One needs to consider a wider subject (e.g. "disinformation by Russian secret services" or "active measures on-line") to make several articles. But I would need some help and advice from other editors to do this job.] 13:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == re: Could you give me a piece of advice? == | |||
| Dear Fang Aili, could you please take a look at my struggle with ]. In my opinion, he repeatedly vandalizes articles ], ], ], ], ], and ]. He deletes large fragments of text supported by reliale references, without discussing anything. He does not recognize any sources, even such as Nature Reviews Genetics (in article ]). I warned him twice about his alleged vandalism, but he deleted my comments from his talk page. ] and me made a request for comments about him, but this did not help:] and ]. What would you recommend? I would highly appreciate your advice.] 03:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure what to tell you. I don't do a lot of conflict resolution (of other people's conflicts, that is). There is already a mediation case open involving you and Vlad (]), as well as the RfC. From looking over various links, it looks like both you and Vlad have certain opinions and are unwilling to compromise. One or both of you will need to step away from the articles in question, or continue until you are both blocked for 3RR. On Misplaced Pages, like life in general, you're going to run into people with whom you disagree and have no hope of compromise. Just let it go. Have a look at ], go outside, listen to the birds sing, and go on with life. This is the best advice I can give you. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you.] 15:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Unasked, let me also advise you, the same as Fang Aili did. Ignore personal attacks and work for a really solid article. please take a look at what I did with my edits on Internet brigades--I deliberately only went part way. Its the only way to compromise enough to keep a meaningful article. When you really disagree, its usually better to wait until the other guy makes a number of edits rather than jumping on each one. ''']''' 06:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you. As you can see, my English is not good enough, and yes, I do have a bias that comes from my personal experience. So, I would certainly appreciate your help with regard to this article and my other edits.] 13:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Interesting tool == | |||
| Use ]: .--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 16:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you. I will try.] 17:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Do you want some scholarly sources on Russian disinformatsia, active measures and propaganda? == | |||
| Biophys, I found your article on Internet Brigades via slashdot. Mate, your article on this form of propaganda is a brilliant synthesis. I can name several excellent sources on past Russian active measures, propaganda and disinformatsia that correspond exactly with the phenomenon you have described here. See here for most of the sources: http://intellit.muskingum.edu/russia_folder/russiad%26d_folder/russiadis%26dectoc.html | |||
| In particular you might want to look up the works of 'Dezinformatsia:The strategy of Soviet Disinformation' by Richard H Schultz and Roy Godson (Two highly regarded intelligence scholars). Ladislav Bittman's books 'The KGB and Soviet Disinformation: An insiders view' and 'The Deception Game'. Also see 'The New Image Makers: Soviet Propaganda and Disinformation Today' which is edited by Bittman and contains several scholarly articles by intelligence experts. Two other books which you might want to check out are 'Double Lives: Stalin, Willi Munzenberg and seduction of the intellectuals' by Stephen Koch and 'New Lies for Old: The communist strategy of deception and disinformation' by Anatoliy Golitsyn. These books are 10-20 years old. They don't describe current dezinformatsia operations but Godson and Schultz believe the same active measures infrastructure is there. So the Russians have probably kept the framework, they've just evolved the way the execute the operations. Which is historically how the Russians evolved their disinformation campaigns i.e they were always looking for new ways to propagate the disinfo and propaganda (see part three, especially chapter 9 'Soviet Manipulation of "Religious Circles" by J.A. Emerson Vermaat which describes how soviets moved to targeting international religious movements leading up to and beyond glasnost, which is part of 'The new image makers'). If you have any specific questions for research that might help you shoot me a list of questions here and I'll try help you out with the answers (plus with sources). I have all the books listed above a fair few other texts that might be helpful. ] 11:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks a lot! Unfortunately, I do not have these books with me and busy at work. Could you prepare some suggestions or text supported by references for inserting them in the article? Or you can go there and edit the article yourself. Most of these books are rather old and do not describe anything about secret services on-line activities. ] 17:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Eugenics in Showa Japan== | |||
| ] is a malignant venomous article on Japan. For instance, National Eugenic Law is a law that permits the artificial abortion for the maternity protection including economical reasons. Please write your detailed policy again. ]--] 15:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==IPN== | |||
| Please avoid massive deletion of other people's work. It is sometimes necessary but only under few exceptional circumstances. The edit you reverted may not be optimal but there are some suggestion at talk and none of them includes revert warring or wholesale deletion. Please try to promote a healthy climate of collegiality. Such edits certainly won't help. Yes, sometimes (only sometimes) deletions are unavoidable and I am not telling you they you should never do it. Just show some openness and flexibility as everyone's goal here should be the improvement of the articles by developing their informational content, reliance on sources and style. Thanks, --] 18:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :O'K. Understood.] 20:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::On the contrary, your contributions are appreciated in that article. Excessive, POVed and unrelated information has no room on Misplaced Pages, and it needs to be deleted. Hoping to see you around that article and others more often!--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 03:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would also like to express my appreciation for your patience, perseverance, erudition and sheer dogged determination in ensuring that various '''referenced''' viewpoints are reflected in encyclopaedic articles. Keep up the good work and don't let the various ] grind you down!...]]<sup><font color="brown"><small>(kiwiexile at DMOZ)</small></font></sup> • 18:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And this is especially hilarious, for it is exactly user Piotrus who wrote that Russian sources are not reliable just because they are Russian. So it's basically "look who's talking"! ] 05:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::May I clarify that my compliment was in regard to '''Biophys''' since this is '''his''' talk page. | |||
| :::::(Which is ''not'' to say that Piotrus is ''not'' a wonderful fellow too. And while I'm handing out plaudits may I also take this opportunity to confirm that you appear to be a pretty persevering, dogged sort of character in your editing history too, Vlad!) Enjoy the springtime! ...]]<sup><font color="brown"><small>(kiwiexile at DMOZ)</small></font></sup> • 12:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Need signature == | |||
| I need you to sign ] to indicate that you would agree to a formal mediation on the Boris Stomakhin issue. Thank you. ] 01:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for Mediation== | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:80%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | | |||
| |A ] to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, ]. | |||
| ::::::::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold">^</span>]<sup></span>]]</sup> | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account operated by the ] to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please ].</center></small> | |||
| |} | |||
| <div align="right">''This message delivered: 08:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)''.</div> | |||
| ==A couple of points== | |||
| Hi. Could I please have your opinion on:<br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| And on the recently-added last sentence in the article on Russia ("According to Mr. Alvaro Gil-Robles (former head of the Council of Europe human rights division), 'The fledgling Russian democracy is still, of course, far from perfect, but its existence and its successes cannot be denied.'")? I'm not sure this sentence really fits - at least we need a more critical view, but then again, there is already a section on politics, so I'm not sure it's needed at all. Anyway, thank you for your input. ] 23:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you. I agree with your second point and made some changes. First edit needed some sourcing. ] 23:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Great - I appreciate it. ] 01:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Block == | |||
| Hi Biophys, you have been reported for 3RR violation on ], and I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please take the time to review our ] rule, and hopefully you'll come back to edit in a collaborative fashion. Thanks, ] 22:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your Email == | |||
| Hey I got an email from you (the address used your alias, and I don't think you have a yahoo account), and it looks like it's handing out dirty code. Text is as follows: | |||
| "b______lga | |||
| X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000731-0, 06.04.2007), Outbound message | |||
| X-Antivirus-Status: Clean" | |||
| ] 21:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Have a read== | |||
| * ] (in Russian) ] 23:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018
---
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains
Template:Pfam domains has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Glutamate permease for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glutamate permease is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Glutamate permease until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)