Revision as of 10:31, 9 May 2007 editMiskin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,409 edits updating with reliable sources, according to the article Battle of the Persian Gate (Irannica's estimate of 700 has no ground in western scholarship)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:53, 15 October 2024 edit undoRchard2scout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,929 edits Undid revision 1251271762 by 2001:EE0:52EE:89D0:8CD:3BAF:6A63:BDA4 (talk) rm non-english additionsTag: Undo | ||
(965 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Situation in which a military unit holds against overwhelming odds}} | |||
:''For the film of a similar name, see ].'' | |||
{{other uses|Last stand (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{Unreferenced|date=May 2007}} | |||
{{OR}} | |||
{{POV}} | |||
'''''Last stand''''' is a loose ] term used to describe a body of ] holding a defensive position in the face of overwhelming odds. The defensive force usually takes very heavy casualties, on occasion is completely destroyed, and is invariably ultimately defeated. | |||
], depicts ] wielding his rifle as a club against Mexican troops in the ] in ] in 1836.]] | |||
The situation can arise in one of two ways. Sometimes, perhaps because of geography or lack of supplies or support, the troops in question cannot retreat from their position without being instantly destroyed by the enemy. At other times, the troops in question are forced to follow orders and cannot consider retreat, even though the moral choice is open to them. In both cases, surrender to the enemy is an option but either the group as a whole, or their commanding officer, decides instead to "go down fighting". In some cases the soldiers may consider that ] may also result in their deaths, and that to fight to their death is a better choice in the circumstances. | |||
], 1814. This painting is a juxtaposition of various historical and legendary elements from the ] in ] in 480 BC.]] | |||
] in July, 1539. Defense of a 4,000-man garrison in the service of ], against a 50,000-strong Ottoman assault force, resulting in a last stand. Painting by Pierre Mortier.]] | |||
] at ]'' in ] in ], painted by ]]] | |||
A '''last stand''' is a ] situation in which a body of ] holds a defensive position in the face of overwhelming and virtually insurmountable odds.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/last_stand|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180404200842/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/last_stand|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 4, 2018|title=last stand - Definition of last stand in English by Oxford Dictionaries|website=Oxford Dictionaries - English}}</ref> Troops may make a last stand due to a sense of duty; because they are defending a tactically crucial point; to buy time to enable a trapped army, person, or group of people to escape; due to fear of execution if captured; or to protect their ruler or leader. Last stands loom large in history, as the heroism and sacrifice of the defenders exert a large pull on the public's imagination. Some last stands have become a celebrated part of a fighting force's or a country's history, especially if the defenders accomplished their goals (or, in rare cases, defeated their attackers). | |||
A ] will often lead to a last stand by the defenders of the besieged ]. However, while sieges are generally characterised by a lengthy engagement, last stands are generally brief and decisive. | |||
==Tactical significance== | |||
==Some famous last stands== | |||
A "last stand" is a last resort tactic, and is chosen because the defending force realizes or believes the benefits of fighting outweigh the benefits of retreat or surrender. This usually arises from strategic or moral considerations, such as staying and fighting to buy time for wounded soldiers or civilians to get to a safe place, leading defenders to conclude that their sacrifice is essential to the greater success of their campaign or cause, as happened at the end of the ].<ref>{{cite book |first=Charles |last=Rollin |author-link=Charles Rollin |year=1804 |title=The ancient history of the Egyptians, Carthaginians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes and Persians, Macedonians, and Grecians |volume=3 |edition=10 |publisher=Printed for W. J. & J. Richardson |page=}}</ref><ref name="auto">Hamm, Jean Shepherd. ''Term Paper Resource Guide to Medieval History''. Greenwood (November 25, 2009). pp. 88-90. {{ISBN|978-0313359675}}</ref> The situation can arise in several ways. One situation is that retreat by the defending force would lead to immediate defeat, usually due to the surrounding geography or shortage of supplies or support, as happened to the Royalist infantry on Wadborough Hill after the ].<ref>David Plant {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080509100109/http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/military/1645-leicester-naseby.htm |date=2008-05-09 }}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629235641/http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/military/1645-leicester-naseby.htm |date=2017-06-29 }} , Retrieved 2009-05-24</ref><ref>Martin Marix Evans, Graham Turner. ''Naseby 1645: The Triumph of the New Model Army'',, Osprey Publishing, 2007 {{ISBN|1-84603-078-1}}, {{ISBN|978-1-84603-078-9}}. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161137/https://books.google.com/books?id=gNobvgAACAAJ&dq=Wadborough+Hill++%22last+stand%22&pg=PA76 |date=2023-08-17 }}</ref> | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
] (1566) -- ]'s charge from the fortress of ] (painting by ], 1825)]] | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
] in the ], ] in 1876 as depicted in a painting by ].]] | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
] -- The last stand of Major Allan Wilson, Matabeleland, 4 December 1893.'']] | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|-<!--1ST HEADING--> | |||
| colspan="6" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.2em; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | | |||
|-<!--1ST ROW 1ST COLUMN--> | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|300 ] and 6,700 other ] | |||
|150,000-200,000 ] (modern estimates)<ref>"The Greek and Persian Wars, 499-386 BC" - Philip De Souza, p. 41</ref><br>800,000 - 2,100,000 ] (ancient sources - exaggerated)<br><br> | |||
|1:100 according to ]<ref>Histories VII</ref> | |||
|King ] and his Spartan bodyguards, accompanied by a force of allied Greek city states, hold back a Persian force under ] several times its number for several days in one of the most memorable and eulogized last stands in ].<br>*Historical ranges vary (see ]). | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|25,000-40,000 ] | |||
|17,000 ] | |||
|1:24 | |||
] led the Persian resistance at the ] and managed to kill many Greek troops in an ambush melee attack. Despite his skillful tactics, Alexander defeats him and conquers ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|22,000 ] | |||
|41,000-135,000 ]ian army | |||
|1:2 to 1:6 | |||
|]' smaller ] ] army falls against ]'s large army near the ] in ], where Alexander's army suffered up to 12,000 casualties in another ]. Alexander was impressed and spared Porus' life. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|Catiline Conspiracy | |||
|] | |||
|Unknown | |||
|Unknown | |||
|Unknown | |||
|] and his army are annihilated at Pistoria (now ]). "eave to your enemies a bloody and mournful victory." | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|1,000 Jews | |||
|15,000 Romans | |||
|1:15 | |||
|Jewish ] commit mass suicide rather than face the prospect of surrender to the Roman army at ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|313 ] | |||
|1,000 ] | |||
|roughly 1:3 | |||
|The ] of ] defeat the ] of ] in one of the most important early battles of ]. | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|73 | |||
|30,000+ | |||
|1:410 | |||
|]'s grandson ]- (Husayn, Son of Ali) with 71 men, and a military detachment from the forces of ], the ] ], numbering in the thousands, fought in ], in which Husayn and all his men died. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|] and his warriors fighting to the last man against the ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|approximately 200 Anglo-Saxons | |||
|2000-4000 Vikings | |||
|1:10 to 1:20 | |||
|A handful of Anglo-Saxon warriors lead by ] fought and were eventually overwhelmed by a force of 2,000 - 4,000 ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|50,000 ]is | |||
|120,000 ] army | |||
|1:2 to 1:3 | |||
|The defending army of ] under ] makes a last stand against ]'s large invading army. The destruction of Baghdad brings an end to the ] and the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|10,000 | |||
|30,000+ | |||
|1:3 | |||
|After having agreed to an armistice, Basarab's guides lead the 30,000-strong Hungarian army into an ambush; the Hungarians are slaughtered by the 10,000-strong Wallachian army led by ] himself. When the Hungarian king ] sees his knights being killed, he gives his royal insignia to one of his captains (who is killed subsequently) and fights his way back to Hungary in disguise. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The army of Tamerlane is stopped by Ilyaas Awaan, the military commander of Meerut fort. Tamerlane's experinced army vastly outnumbered Awaan's small defending force but Awaan stopped Tamerlane for two months. It was only after the death of Awaan that Tamerlane's army was able to take the fort. Tamerlane developed great respect for Awaan and openely praised his bravery and courage. He latter mentioned Awaan in his memoirs as the opponent who gave him the fiercest resistance with an extremely small force. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|1,500 Albanians | |||
|150,000 Ottomans | |||
|1:100 | |||
|After leaving a protective ] of 1,500 men under his trusted lieutenant ] (also known as ]), ] harassed the Ottoman camps around ] and attacked the supply caravans of ]'s army. By September the Ottoman camp was in disarray as morale sank and disease ran rampant. The Ottoman army acknowledged that the ] of Krujë would not fall by strength of arms, and lifted the siege and made their way to ]. Soon thereafter in the winter of ]-], Murad died in Edirne and was succeeded by his son ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|6-9,000 English | |||
|12-36,000 French | |||
|2:3 to 1:6<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/Battle_of_Agincourt#The_battle</ref> | |||
|The English army, with no means of retreat but with technological superiority, defeated the numerically superior French army. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May ] | |||
|7,000 ] and some ] allies | |||
|80-200,000 Ottomans<ref>''Edwin Pears,'' The Destruction of the Greek Empire and the Story of the Capture of Constantinople by the Turks</ref> | |||
|1:11 to 1:21 | |||
|Fall of the Byzantine Empire: Constantinople captured by Turks under Mehmed II. Death of Emperor ] in battle. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|189 Swiss Guard | |||
|20,000 Regular Infantry under Charles V | |||
|1:150 | |||
|The Swiss Guard stood their ground on the steps of St Peter's Basillica against hordes of regular troops in order to allow the Pope time to escape. Only 42 Guardsmen survived, but their sacrifice saved the life of the Pope. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|], ] | |||
|168 Spanish Conquistadores | |||
|80,000 soldiers of Atahuallpa's personal army | |||
|1:476 | |||
|The Spaniards managed to defeat the Inca's warriors and capture him | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|August ] | |||
|2,300 Croats | |||
|90,000 Turks | |||
|1:39 | |||
|Capture of Szigetvár by the Ottomans: All but 7 defenders were killed or captured, while the Turks suffered up to 25,000 killed.{{Fact|date=March 2007}} | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|13 Korean ] battleships | |||
|333 Japanese fleet | |||
|1:25 | |||
|During the ], Korean admiral ] held off a fleet of 333 Japanese ships with only 13 ships using cannons and ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1660 | |||
|150 Marathas under ] | |||
|Bijapuri Army (15,000+) | |||
|1:100 | |||
|] defended Pavan Khind, a small pass & huge cliffs between ] and ] with 150 men against the Bijapur army for more than 14 hours allowing ] to escape to a safer place. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
Some military thinkers have cautioned against putting an opposing force into a last stand situation, recognising that trapped men will fight harder. ] wrote: ]. Similarly, they have sometimes suggested deliberately putting their own forces in such a situation, for example by burning boats or bridges that could tempt them to retreat.<ref>{{cite book|first=Tzu|last=Sun|author-link=Sun Tzu|title=The Art of War, Chapter XI 23-25|url=http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html|access-date=2019-05-09|archive-date=2018-03-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180308153259/http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|5,400 Jacobites | |||
|9,000 British troops | |||
|roughly 1:2 | |||
|The last battle between the Jacobite forces under Prince ] (aka "Bonnie Prince Charlie") and the forces of the ] sovereign ], ending the Rising of the '45. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May 2 ] | |||
|37 Spanish soldiers | |||
|Hundreds of French soldiers | |||
|? | |||
|Pedro Velarde y Santillán leads the defence of the artillery barracks in Madrid during the spontaneous popular uprising against Napoleon. Hundreds are killed as are Velarde and nearly all his troops. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|March ] | |||
|183-250 defenders | |||
|1,400-1,600 Mexican assaulters | |||
|1:6 to 1:7 | |||
|The ] during the ]. It was the first and last stand for the Coahuila y Tejas, The Texans held out for 12 days. On the 12th day every single armed defender was killed in the battle. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|470 Voortrekkers defenders | |||
|10-20,000 Zulu attackers | |||
|1:21 to 1:43 | |||
|470 Boer ] successfully defend an impromptu ] of wagons against 10,000 ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|] - Six Mexican cadets fight to the last man, after ] ordered them to fall back during the ]; one of the last events of the ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|65 Legionnaires | |||
|1600 Mexican attackers | |||
|1:25 | |||
|The ]'s stand at ], ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May 23-July 9 ] | |||
|4,652-6,800 CS troops | |||
|30-40,000 US troops | |||
|1:6 | |||
|Last Confederate bastion on the mighty Mississippi River. CSA Maj General ] defended against two major attacks by the ] commanded by Maj General ] and heavy bombardment by Union flotilla led by Admiral ]. Longest siege in US military history. Highest casualty rate suffered by Union Army during the Civil War. Union flotilla severly damaged. Worst defeat suffered by Farragut during the war. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|10-20,000 CS troops | |||
|30-60,000 US troops | |||
|1:3 | |||
|The division of Confederate Major General ] held the pass of ] Gap in Northwest ] to cover the retreat of the ] ] against the entire ] Corps of ] of the ], taking approximately the same number of casualties as their enemy while outnumbered 3:1. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|6,000 mostly children | |||
|20,000+ Brazilian troops | |||
|1:3 | |||
|During the Triple Alliance War, while retreating from Asuncion, a paraguayan army of mostly children hold back a Brazilian regiment, until being massacred. During the war up to 90% of paraguay's male population was killed. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|650 Americans | |||
|950-1200 Lakota | |||
|roughly 1:2 | |||
|]'s last stand at ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|5000 Russian soldiers and Bulgarian ] | |||
|30,000 Turkish soldiers | |||
|1:6 | |||
|5000 Russian soldiers and Bulgarian ] lead by General Darozhinsky repel 30,000 troops commanded by ] at the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|300-400 samurai under Satsuma | |||
|300,000 troops of the Imperial Japanese Army | |||
|1:750 to 1:1000 | |||
|300 ] against 300,000 troops of the ] at the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|1,400 British soldiers | |||
|22,000 Zulu troops | |||
|1:16 | |||
|British force of 1,400 men overwhelmed by a 22,000 strong ] army at the ], leaving over 1300 British dead. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|139 British infantry | |||
|4-5,000 Zulu warriors | |||
|1:29 to 1:36 | |||
|150 British soldiers, primarily of the ]'s 1st battalion of the 24th Regiment of Foot (later the ]), successfully defend the supply station at ] against 4,000 ] warriors. This engagement results in the largest number of ] ever awarded a regiment in a single battle. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The last Battle of the ], the ], the 100 serrano riflemen stood against 1200 Federal troops for 7 days in the Tomochic forest and finally in the town itself | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ] ] | |||
|34 British South Africa Police | |||
|3,000 Matabele warriors | |||
|1:88 | |||
|The Shangani Patrol was a group of white ] settlers killed in battle on the Shangani River in ]. The incident achieved a lasting, prominent place in Rhodesian colonial history as part of the mythology of white conquest. The remains of the Patrol members were eventually interred next to the bodies of ] at World's View in the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|21 Sikhs | |||
|10,000 Afghan and Orakazais troops | |||
|1:476 | |||
|The ] was fought between 21 Sikhs of the 4th Battalion (then 36th Sikhs) of the Sikh Regiment of India, defending an army post, and 10,000 Afghan and Orakazais tribe. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|July 1, 1898 | |||
|800 Spanish | |||
|15,000 Americans, 4,000 Cubans | |||
|1:24 | |||
|The Americans suffered almost three times as many losses as the Spaniards had | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|July 1, 1898 | |||
|500 Spanish | |||
|8,500 Americans, 1,000 Cubans | |||
|1:19 | |||
|The Spanish army holds off the more heavily armed Americans for 12 hours while waiting in vain for reinforcements. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|The Surround of Baler | |||
|- | |||
|50 Spaniards | |||
|Between 300 and 2,000 filipinos grossing as the siege advanced | |||
|1:6 to 1:40 | |||
|Fifty Spanish soldiers and four officers defended this site surrounded for one whole year not knowing that the Filipino-Spanish war was over. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|60 Filipino troops | |||
|500 American soldiers | |||
|1:8 | |||
|The stand of 60 Filipino soldiers under General ] to cover the retreat of ] ] during the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|American battalion under Major ] holds out in the Argonne Forrest. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|414 Chinese | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The defense conducted by 414 Chinese soldiers of the Sihang Warehouse against Japanese forces. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] 1939 | |||
|182 Polish soldiers 25 civilians | |||
|3,500 German soldiers plus | |||
47-70 Stuka dive bombers | |||
|1:18 | |||
|German soldiers were engaged in action against the 205 strong Polish garrison. The exact number of German losses remains unknown or undisclosed, but are estimated to be in range of several hundred. Polish casualties were much lower - 15 killed and 53 wounded. An additional victim, Sergeant Kazimierz Rasinski, the radio telephone operator, was murdered after the capitulation after refusing to give in the radio codes to the Germans. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|October 1941 - January 1942 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|Defense of the ] 316th Rifle Division under command of general ] at ] near ] during the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
The historian ] suggests that although the majority of last stands throughout history have seen the defending force overwhelmed, on rare occasions the outnumbered defenders succeed in their desperate endeavours and live to fight another day, and he lists the ] and the ] as such engagements.<ref>Bryan Perrett. ''Last Stand!: Famous Battles Against the Odds''. p. 9</ref> | |||
|Defence of ] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|3,500-4,000 Soviet soldiers | |||
|30,000-40,000 German soldiers | |||
|roughly 1:10 | |||
|Defenders were cut off from the outside world and ran out of food, water and ammunition, but still fought and counter-attacked until the very last minute. The Germans deployed tanks, tear gas and flame throwers but could not break Soviet resistance. After the Germans had taken most of the ruined fortifications, taking heavy casualties, bloody fighting continued underground. Even after the fortress was officially taken, the few surviving defenders continued to hide in the basements and to harass the Germans for several months. One of the signs on the wall of ]: "I'm dying, but I would not surrender. Farewell, Motherland. 20.VII.41" | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|1,400 Malay, British, Indian and Australian soldiers | |||
|13,000 Japanese troops | |||
|1:9 | |||
|Soldiers from the ], ], the British 2nd Loyals Regiment, the 44th Indian Brigade and the 22nd Australian Brigade made a futile attempt to stop the advancing Japanese towards the city centre of ]. In the final hours of battle, a Malay soldier, 2nd Lt. ], led a paltry 42-man platoon against thousands of invaders, leaving them with no survivors except one. The Japanese suffered a disproportionately high number of casualties, and they tortured 2nd Lt. Adnan before executing him. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
===Fear of execution=== | |||
Troops may fight a last stand if they believe that they will be executed if they surrender. | |||
In ], at the end of the battle, the extent of the soldiers' resistance to the Lakota and Cheyenne warriors indicated they had few doubts about their prospects for survival if they surrendered. In the end, the hilltop where ]'s remaining troops made their last stand made it impossible for Custer's men to secure a defensive position. Nevertheless, the soldiers put up their most dogged defence, and died fighting. | |||
During the ], by the end of 1942, the Jews trapped in the ] learned that the deportations were part of an ], as the deportees were sent to ]. Many of the remaining Jews decided to revolt.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005188 | title=Warsaw Ghetto Uprising | publisher=United States Holocaust Memorial Museum | access-date=18 May 2014 | archive-date=19 January 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119021035/http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005188 | url-status=live }}</ref> The first armed resistance in the ghetto occurred in January 1943.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/resistance.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|title=January 1943: The First Armed Resistance in the Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem|website=www.yadvashem.org|access-date=2017-05-13|archive-date=2019-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401015208/https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/resistance.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|url-status=live}}</ref> On 19 April 1943, Passover eve, the Nazis entered the ghetto. The remaining Jews knew that the Nazis would murder them all and they decided to resist the Nazis to the last, rather than surrender.<ref name="yadvashem.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/fighters.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|title=Fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem|website=www.yadvashem.org|access-date=2017-05-13|archive-date=2019-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401030742/https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/fighters.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|13,000 American and Filipino soldiers | |||
|75,000 Japanese troops | |||
|1:6 | |||
|The ] falls under the advance of the ]'s ] at the Battle of Corregidor after due to the enemy assault and of the onset of disease such as malaria and cholera. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] 1942 – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|]ese defence of the Papuan beachheads at the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] 1944 | |||
|1,260 Japanese Troops | |||
|50,000 Chinese (Nationalist) Troops | |||
|1:40 | |||
|One Japanese regiment against five Chinese divisions in South China, near Burma. Three Japanese were ordered by Maj. Kanemitsu, the officer commanding, to retreated to the head quarter to report after their position fell and became the only survivors. There was no air cover or supply. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|]. | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|1,400 Japanese Troops | |||
|15,000 American Troops | |||
|1:10 | |||
|The Japanese defense of ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|]. | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|22,000 Japanese Troops | |||
|110,000 American Troops | |||
|1:5 | |||
|The Japanese defense of ] against a combined land, sea, and air assault by the United States. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|Last stand of the ] army against invading ] and ] forces into ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|25 police & auxilliary police personnel | |||
|200 Communist Terrorists | |||
|1:8 | |||
|] near ], ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ] 1950 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The ] at the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|10,800 French | |||
|63,000 Vietnamese | |||
|1:5 | |||
|Final battle of the ] between French colonial forces and ] revolutionary forces under General ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The 13th Battalion, ] at ] ('']''). | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The 1st Battalion/], the 2nd Battalion/7th Cavalry, and the 1st Battalion/] at the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|Australian Army (108) | |||
|North Vietnamese Army, Viet Cong (1500-2650) | |||
|1:15 | |||
|The Battle of Long Tần is arguably the most famous battle fought by the Australian Army during the Vietnam War. It was fought in a rubber plantation near the village of Long Tần, about 4 km north-east of Vung Tau, South Vietnam on August 18–19, 1966. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|1 Indian Company (120) | |||
|1 Pakistani Armoured Brigade (3000) | |||
|1:20 | |||
|The Indian 'A' company of 120 odd soldiers of the 23rd Bn, Punjab Regiment, managed to hold a 2000-3000 strong assault force of the 51st Infantry Brigade of the Pakistani Army- backed by the 22nd Armoured Regiment- before the Indian Air Force flew in. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|6000 Marines | |||
|20000 North Vietnamese | |||
|roughly 1:3 | |||
|6,000 U.S. forces, primarily Marines, successfully defend this base against 20,000 North Vietnamese forces. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|The ] defending the southern ] during the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|6000 ARVN soldiers | |||
|40000 North Vietnamese | |||
|1:7 | |||
|During last major battle of the ], the ], the vastly outnumbered ] 18th Division stood and fought at Xuan Loc. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] and ], ] | |||
|2000 ] | |||
|36000 Mixture of verious Serb forces | |||
|1:18 | |||
|see ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] and ], ] | |||
|160 ] and ] | |||
|2000+ ] - affiliated militias | |||
|1:13 | |||
|see ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|85 ] | |||
|~2,000 Chechen ] | |||
|~1:24 | |||
|During one of the last major battles of the ], a vastly outnumbered company of Russian airborne troops stood and fought against an assault by Chechen rebels on Hill 776 near Ulus-Kert in the ]. All but one of the 85 Russians died - 400 rebels were killed. | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
] ] (left) and ] ] (right)]] | |||
== References== | |||
Another example of a famous last stand was during the ], where two US ] snipers, ] ] and ] ], protected the crash site of helicopter "Super 6-4" and injured pilot ], whom they feared would be executed by a crowd of deadly rioters. The two snipers killed 25 and wounded dozens more before they ran out of ammunition and were killed. Their defense, however, allowed Mike Durant to survive long enough for one of the local warlords to take him prisoner. The US was ultimately able to arrange for his release and he was returned home. For their actions, MSG Gordon and SFC Shughart were ] awarded the ]. | |||
<references/> | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Battle_of_Saragarhi | |||
===Fear of mistreatment=== | |||
== See also == | |||
People may fight to the death due to the belief that if they surrender they will be tortured or enslaved. At the ], the inhabitants refused to surrender to the Romans because they were unwilling to become slaves. ] were told by their superiors that they would be tortured if captured. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Protecting leader=== | |||
{{listdev}} | |||
In some cases, troops will make a last stand to protect their ruler or leader or commander. | |||
] | |||
In the ] in 1066, ] battled the Norman ], who invaded with 7,000 men. After most of the English were killed in the battle, "Harold and his ] bodyguard...fought on until an arrow struck the king in the eye." After Harold died, the housecarl bodyguard made a last stand and "...fought to the death around the body of their dead king."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://listverse.com/2009/08/28/10-heroic-last-stands-from-military-history/|title=10 Heroic Last Stands from Military History - Listverse|date=28 August 2009|website=listverse.com|access-date=30 December 2015|archive-date=27 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181027174351/http://listverse.com/2009/08/28/10-heroic-last-stands-from-military-history/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
When ] by the army of the Holy Roman Empire under ], over 20,000 troops stormed the city. The 189 ]s made a last stand against the massive army by forming a square around ] to give ] time to escape through ]s, and held the doors until Clement could escape. | |||
At the 1795 ], where the Persian army led by ] defeated the ], the ] – a detachment of the highlanders from the ] – loyally fought and died in order to enable the escape of King ], for which they are remembered as national heroes and were canonized by the Georgian Church. | |||
The ] involved a rearguard last stand. It took place on July 13, 1660, at a mountain pass in the vicinity of fort Vishalgad, near the city of Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India between the ] warrior ] and Siddi Masud of ]. 300 Marathas in a rearguard action, held off an attacking force of 10,000 Bijapuris, allowing their king ] to escape to a nearby fort. Ultimately the battle ended with the destruction of the rearguard Maratha forces, and a tactical victory for the Adil Shahi Sultanate, but failed to achieve its strategic objective of capturing the Maratha king Shivaji. | |||
The ] occurred in 1704 when the tenth ], ], and a small force of 40 ], was attacked by a much larger force of ] soldiers at ] for his refusal to convert to ]. The forty Sikhs fought to their death, allowing enough time for the Guru to escape the fort and live another day.<ref name=fenechmcleod218>{{cite book|author1=Louis E. Fenech|author2=W. H. McLeod|title=Historical Dictionary of Sikhism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xajcAwAAQBAJ|year=2014|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-1-4422-3601-1|pages=218|access-date=2020-12-04|archive-date=2023-08-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161136/https://books.google.com/books?id=xajcAwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Defending tactically crucial point=== | |||
During the ] the Greeks hoped to use the narrow pass of ] to prevent the vastly large army of the Persians from outflanking them. A Greek force of 7,000 men marched north to block the pass in the middle of 480 BC. The Persian army, ranging between about 100,000 and 150,000,<ref>{{cite book|last=Sacks|first=Kenneth|title=Understanding Emerson: "The American scholar" and his struggle for self-reliance |year=2003|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-09982-8|url=https://archive.org/details/understandingeme0000sack|url-access=registration|page=}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Cassin-Scott|first=Jack|title=The Greek and Persian Wars 500-323 B.C.|year=1977|publisher=Osprey|isbn=978-0-85045-271-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=geWUfjew_PEC&pg=PA11|page=11}}{{Dead link|date=August 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> arrived at the pass in late August or early September. During the ], the vastly outnumbered Greeks held off the Persians for seven days (including three of battle) before the rear-guard was annihilated in one of history's most famous last stands. During two full days of battle, the small force led by Leonidas blocked the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass. When Leonidas became aware that his force was being outflanked, he dismissed the bulk of the Greek army and remained to guard their retreat with 300 ], 700 ], 400 ], fighting to the death. Although the Greeks lost the battle, it did check the advance of the Persian army and the delay helped the Greeks prepare a successful defence and ultimately win the war.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cummins |first=Joseph |year=2011 |title=History's Greatest Wars: The Epic Conflicts that Shaped the Modern World|publisher=Fair Winds Press|isbn=978-1-59233-471-1|page=}}</ref> | |||
An ], with reversed roles, would be fought 150 years later, during the ] by ]: Persians, led by ], tried desperately to stop the ] offensive towards the capital city ], blocking the ] pass.<ref name="Robinson1929">{{cite book |last=Robinson |first=Cyril Edward |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.183571 |title=A History of Greece |publisher=Methuen & Company Limited |year=1929 |access-date=7 April 2013}}</ref> | |||
A similar action to Thermopylae occurred in April 1951 at the ] when strategic Hill 677 was held by the 700 men of the Canadian 2 PPCLI against two attacking Chinese PVA divisions, encircled and outnumbered by more than 10 to 1 in the immediate battle area, and by about 30 to 1 on the larger battlefield. The PPCLI were exhausted of ammunition and supplies, but the commander Lt. Col. ] ordered "no retreat, no surrender", and called in artillery fire on his own positions when they were overrun. The PVA divisions eventually withdrew with about 5,000 dead and a large number wounded. | |||
===Buying time=== | |||
Sometimes, rather than face annihilation at the hands of a pursuing victorious army, a rearguard will be tasked by the commander of the defeated army with hindering the advance of the victorious army. Even if the rearguard is destroyed in a last stand, its sacrifice may buy their commander time to disengage without losing the majority of his army as happened during the ] (778), ] (1899), the ] (1947) which proved to be critical to preventing the fall of Srinagar to tribal lashkars.<ref name="Slender">{{cite book |title=Slender Was the Thread: Kashmir Confrontation 1947-48 |last=Sen |first=Maj Gen L. P. |year=1969 |publisher=Orient Longman |location=New Delhi |isbn=0-86131-692-4 |pages=308 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PkDRAAAAMAAJ |access-date=16 August 2021 |archive-date=17 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161138/https://books.google.com/books?id=PkDRAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Perceived duty=== | |||
A last stand may also be the last ] of a war where the position of the defending force is hopeless but the defending force considers it their duty not to surrender until forced to do so, as happened to the last Royalist field army of the ] at the ] in 1646.<ref>], ''et al.'', ''The dictionary of English history'', Cassell and company, 1928. "At the battle of Naseby ] commanded the infantry, and in 1646 he made a last stand at Stow-on-the-Wold against the Parliament."</ref> | |||
At the ] in 1897, the British Indian contingent consisting of 21 Sikh soldiers of the ], when faced with insurmountable opposition of 10,000 Afghans, decided to make a last stand in accordance with their traditional and religious belief that duty is above all convictions. All 21 Sikhs were killed, together with approximately 600 Afghans.<ref name="bbcn">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16027179|publisher=bbc.co.uk|work=British Broadcasting Corporation|title=India polo match honours Sikhs' 1897 Saragarhi battle|author=Pandey, Geeta|date=5 December 2011|access-date=19 July 2012|archive-date=7 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507113438/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16027179|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
During the ], the Imperial Japanese Navy battleship '']'' sailed from the Japanese home islands to ], in which she would have been hopelessly outgunned. As a last ditch effort she would have beached herself on the shore, her crew joining the troops on the island and using her as a stationary gun battery. ''Yamato'' was sunk on her approach with the loss of some 3,055 crew of her complement of 3,332 after coming under attack from a large strike force of carrier borne aircraft. Given the tactical situation, one battleship accompanied by several smaller vessels with no air support against a fleet of aircraft carriers, the outcome was predictable to military leaders, and ultimately one born out of shame at being questioned by the Emperor over their lack of contribution to the ongoing defensive war effort when the Japanese Army was slowly being annihilated and while air crews were performing suicidal kamikaze missions.<ref name=cfrecord>{{Cite web | url = http://combinedfleet.com/yamato.htm | title = Combined Fleet – tabular history of ''Yamato'' | access-date = 1 April 2010 | publisher = Parshall, Jon; Bob Hackett, Sander Kingsepp, & Allyn Nevitt | year = 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101129040009/http://www.combinedfleet.com/yamato.htm | archive-date = 29 November 2010 | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
==At the end of a siege== | |||
Before the 20th century, "]" if a besieged garrison had refused any offered terms of surrender prior to the attackers breaching the defences, so a last stand was part of the end of many sieges, such as the ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Gunderson |first=Cory Gideon |year=2004 |title=The battle of the Alamo |publisher=ABDO |isbn=1-59197-278-7 |page=}}</ref> | |||
However, since the 1907 ] it is unlawful for an attacking force to kill a garrison if they attempt to surrender, even if it is during the final assault on a fortified position. It is also forbidden to declare that "no quarter will be given".<ref>]. ''The Laws and Customs of War on Land'' October 18, 1907. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110703002254/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague04.asp#art23 |date=2011-07-03 }}</ref> | |||
==Historical significance== | |||
Last stands loom large in history due to the pull on popular imagination. Historian ] argues: | |||
{{blockquote|Long before Custer died at the Little Bighorn, the myth of the Last Stand already had a strong pull on human emotions, and on the way we like to remember history. The variations are endless — from the three hundred Spartans at ] to ] at the Alamo—but they all tell the story of a brave and intractable hero leading his tiny band against a numberless foe. Even though the odds are overwhelming, the hero and his followers fight on nobly to the end and are slaughtered to a man. In defeat the hero of the Last Stand achieves the greatest of victories, since he will be remembered for all time.<ref>Philbrick, Nathaniel. ''The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn.'' New York: Viking Books, 2010, p. xvii.</ref>}} | |||
During ], the expression to fight "with one's back to the wall" became a widely-known way to refer to making a last stand. The London ''Times'' reported on April 13, 1918, that General ] ordered British troops that "Every position must be held to the last man...With our backs to the wall...each one of us must fight on to the end".<ref>Ammer, Christine. ''The Fact on File Dictionary of Cliches''. Checkmark Books, 2001. p. 16</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Last Stand}} | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 08:53, 15 October 2024
Situation in which a military unit holds against overwhelming odds For other uses, see Last stand (disambiguation).A last stand is a military situation in which a body of troops holds a defensive position in the face of overwhelming and virtually insurmountable odds. Troops may make a last stand due to a sense of duty; because they are defending a tactically crucial point; to buy time to enable a trapped army, person, or group of people to escape; due to fear of execution if captured; or to protect their ruler or leader. Last stands loom large in history, as the heroism and sacrifice of the defenders exert a large pull on the public's imagination. Some last stands have become a celebrated part of a fighting force's or a country's history, especially if the defenders accomplished their goals (or, in rare cases, defeated their attackers).
Tactical significance
A "last stand" is a last resort tactic, and is chosen because the defending force realizes or believes the benefits of fighting outweigh the benefits of retreat or surrender. This usually arises from strategic or moral considerations, such as staying and fighting to buy time for wounded soldiers or civilians to get to a safe place, leading defenders to conclude that their sacrifice is essential to the greater success of their campaign or cause, as happened at the end of the Battle of Saragarhi. The situation can arise in several ways. One situation is that retreat by the defending force would lead to immediate defeat, usually due to the surrounding geography or shortage of supplies or support, as happened to the Royalist infantry on Wadborough Hill after the Battle of Naseby.
Some military thinkers have cautioned against putting an opposing force into a last stand situation, recognising that trapped men will fight harder. Sun Tzu wrote: "To a surrounded enemy, you must leave a way of escape". Similarly, they have sometimes suggested deliberately putting their own forces in such a situation, for example by burning boats or bridges that could tempt them to retreat.
The historian Bryan Perrett suggests that although the majority of last stands throughout history have seen the defending force overwhelmed, on rare occasions the outnumbered defenders succeed in their desperate endeavours and live to fight another day, and he lists the Battle of Agincourt and the Battle of Rorke's Drift as such engagements.
Fear of execution
Troops may fight a last stand if they believe that they will be executed if they surrender.
In Custer's last stand, at the end of the battle, the extent of the soldiers' resistance to the Lakota and Cheyenne warriors indicated they had few doubts about their prospects for survival if they surrendered. In the end, the hilltop where George Armstrong Custer's remaining troops made their last stand made it impossible for Custer's men to secure a defensive position. Nevertheless, the soldiers put up their most dogged defence, and died fighting.
During the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, by the end of 1942, the Jews trapped in the Warsaw Ghetto learned that the deportations were part of an extermination process, as the deportees were sent to death camps. Many of the remaining Jews decided to revolt. The first armed resistance in the ghetto occurred in January 1943. On 19 April 1943, Passover eve, the Nazis entered the ghetto. The remaining Jews knew that the Nazis would murder them all and they decided to resist the Nazis to the last, rather than surrender.
Another example of a famous last stand was during the First Battle of Mogadishu, where two US 1st SFOD-D snipers, MSG Gary Gordon and SFC Randy Shughart, protected the crash site of helicopter "Super 6-4" and injured pilot Mike Durant, whom they feared would be executed by a crowd of deadly rioters. The two snipers killed 25 and wounded dozens more before they ran out of ammunition and were killed. Their defense, however, allowed Mike Durant to survive long enough for one of the local warlords to take him prisoner. The US was ultimately able to arrange for his release and he was returned home. For their actions, MSG Gordon and SFC Shughart were posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.
Fear of mistreatment
People may fight to the death due to the belief that if they surrender they will be tortured or enslaved. At the Siege of Numantia, the inhabitants refused to surrender to the Romans because they were unwilling to become slaves. Japanese soldiers in World War II were told by their superiors that they would be tortured if captured.
Protecting leader
In some cases, troops will make a last stand to protect their ruler or leader or commander. In the Battle of Hastings in 1066, King Harold II battled the Norman William the Conqueror, who invaded with 7,000 men. After most of the English were killed in the battle, "Harold and his housecarl bodyguard...fought on until an arrow struck the king in the eye." After Harold died, the housecarl bodyguard made a last stand and "...fought to the death around the body of their dead king."
When Rome was attacked in 1527 by the army of the Holy Roman Empire under Emperor Charles V, over 20,000 troops stormed the city. The 189 Swiss Guards made a last stand against the massive army by forming a square around St. Peter's Basilica to give Pope Clement VII time to escape through secret tunnels, and held the doors until Clement could escape.
At the 1795 battle of Krtsanisi, where the Persian army led by Agha Muhammad Khan defeated the Georgians, the Three Hundred Aragvians – a detachment of the highlanders from the Aragvi valley – loyally fought and died in order to enable the escape of King Heraclius II, for which they are remembered as national heroes and were canonized by the Georgian Church.
The Battle of Pavan Khind involved a rearguard last stand. It took place on July 13, 1660, at a mountain pass in the vicinity of fort Vishalgad, near the city of Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India between the Maratha warrior Baji Prabhu Deshpande and Siddi Masud of Adil Shahi dynasty. 300 Marathas in a rearguard action, held off an attacking force of 10,000 Bijapuris, allowing their king Shivaji to escape to a nearby fort. Ultimately the battle ended with the destruction of the rearguard Maratha forces, and a tactical victory for the Adil Shahi Sultanate, but failed to achieve its strategic objective of capturing the Maratha king Shivaji.
The Battle of Chamkaur occurred in 1704 when the tenth Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singh, and a small force of 40 Sikhs, was attacked by a much larger force of Mughal soldiers at his fort for his refusal to convert to Islam. The forty Sikhs fought to their death, allowing enough time for the Guru to escape the fort and live another day.
Defending tactically crucial point
During the second Persian invasion of Greece the Greeks hoped to use the narrow pass of Thermopylae to prevent the vastly large army of the Persians from outflanking them. A Greek force of 7,000 men marched north to block the pass in the middle of 480 BC. The Persian army, ranging between about 100,000 and 150,000, arrived at the pass in late August or early September. During the Battle of Thermopylae, the vastly outnumbered Greeks held off the Persians for seven days (including three of battle) before the rear-guard was annihilated in one of history's most famous last stands. During two full days of battle, the small force led by Leonidas blocked the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass. When Leonidas became aware that his force was being outflanked, he dismissed the bulk of the Greek army and remained to guard their retreat with 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans, fighting to the death. Although the Greeks lost the battle, it did check the advance of the Persian army and the delay helped the Greeks prepare a successful defence and ultimately win the war.
An analogous battle, with reversed roles, would be fought 150 years later, during the invasion of the Achaemenid Empire by Alexander the Great: Persians, led by Ariobarzanes of Persis, tried desperately to stop the Macedon offensive towards the capital city Persepolis, blocking the Persian Gates pass.
A similar action to Thermopylae occurred in April 1951 at the Battle of Kapyong when strategic Hill 677 was held by the 700 men of the Canadian 2 PPCLI against two attacking Chinese PVA divisions, encircled and outnumbered by more than 10 to 1 in the immediate battle area, and by about 30 to 1 on the larger battlefield. The PPCLI were exhausted of ammunition and supplies, but the commander Lt. Col. James Riley Stone ordered "no retreat, no surrender", and called in artillery fire on his own positions when they were overrun. The PVA divisions eventually withdrew with about 5,000 dead and a large number wounded.
Buying time
Sometimes, rather than face annihilation at the hands of a pursuing victorious army, a rearguard will be tasked by the commander of the defeated army with hindering the advance of the victorious army. Even if the rearguard is destroyed in a last stand, its sacrifice may buy their commander time to disengage without losing the majority of his army as happened during the Battle of Roncevaux Pass (778), Battle of Tirad Pass (1899), the Battle of Badgam (1947) which proved to be critical to preventing the fall of Srinagar to tribal lashkars.
Perceived duty
A last stand may also be the last pitched battle of a war where the position of the defending force is hopeless but the defending force considers it their duty not to surrender until forced to do so, as happened to the last Royalist field army of the First English Civil War at the Battle of Stow-on-the-Wold in 1646.
At the Battle of Saragarhi in 1897, the British Indian contingent consisting of 21 Sikh soldiers of the 36th Sikhs, when faced with insurmountable opposition of 10,000 Afghans, decided to make a last stand in accordance with their traditional and religious belief that duty is above all convictions. All 21 Sikhs were killed, together with approximately 600 Afghans.
During the Battle of Okinawa, the Imperial Japanese Navy battleship Yamato sailed from the Japanese home islands to join the fight, in which she would have been hopelessly outgunned. As a last ditch effort she would have beached herself on the shore, her crew joining the troops on the island and using her as a stationary gun battery. Yamato was sunk on her approach with the loss of some 3,055 crew of her complement of 3,332 after coming under attack from a large strike force of carrier borne aircraft. Given the tactical situation, one battleship accompanied by several smaller vessels with no air support against a fleet of aircraft carriers, the outcome was predictable to military leaders, and ultimately one born out of shame at being questioned by the Emperor over their lack of contribution to the ongoing defensive war effort when the Japanese Army was slowly being annihilated and while air crews were performing suicidal kamikaze missions.
At the end of a siege
Before the 20th century, "no quarter was given" if a besieged garrison had refused any offered terms of surrender prior to the attackers breaching the defences, so a last stand was part of the end of many sieges, such as the Battle of the Alamo.
However, since the 1907 IV Hague Convention it is unlawful for an attacking force to kill a garrison if they attempt to surrender, even if it is during the final assault on a fortified position. It is also forbidden to declare that "no quarter will be given".
Historical significance
Last stands loom large in history due to the pull on popular imagination. Historian Nathaniel Philbrick argues:
Long before Custer died at the Little Bighorn, the myth of the Last Stand already had a strong pull on human emotions, and on the way we like to remember history. The variations are endless — from the three hundred Spartans at Thermopylae to Davy Crockett at the Alamo—but they all tell the story of a brave and intractable hero leading his tiny band against a numberless foe. Even though the odds are overwhelming, the hero and his followers fight on nobly to the end and are slaughtered to a man. In defeat the hero of the Last Stand achieves the greatest of victories, since he will be remembered for all time.
During World War I, the expression to fight "with one's back to the wall" became a widely-known way to refer to making a last stand. The London Times reported on April 13, 1918, that General Douglas Haig ordered British troops that "Every position must be held to the last man...With our backs to the wall...each one of us must fight on to the end".
See also
References
- "last stand - Definition of last stand in English by Oxford Dictionaries". Oxford Dictionaries - English. Archived from the original on April 4, 2018.
- Rollin, Charles (1804). The ancient history of the Egyptians, Carthaginians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes and Persians, Macedonians, and Grecians. Vol. 3 (10 ed.). Printed for W. J. & J. Richardson. p. 34.
- Hamm, Jean Shepherd. Term Paper Resource Guide to Medieval History. Greenwood (November 25, 2009). pp. 88-90. ISBN 978-0313359675
- David Plant 1645: The Storming of Leicester and the Battle of Naseby Archived 2008-05-09 at the Wayback Machine, www.british-civil-wars.co.uk Archived 2017-06-29 at the Wayback Machine , Retrieved 2009-05-24
- Martin Marix Evans, Graham Turner. Naseby 1645: The Triumph of the New Model Army,, Osprey Publishing, 2007 ISBN 1-84603-078-1, ISBN 978-1-84603-078-9. p. 76 Archived 2023-08-17 at the Wayback Machine
- Sun, Tzu. The Art of War, Chapter XI 23-25. Archived from the original on 2018-03-08. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
- Bryan Perrett. Last Stand!: Famous Battles Against the Odds. p. 9
- "Warsaw Ghetto Uprising". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
- "January 1943: The First Armed Resistance in the Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem". www.yadvashem.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2017-05-13.
- "Fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem". www.yadvashem.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2017-05-13.
- "10 Heroic Last Stands from Military History - Listverse". listverse.com. 28 August 2009. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
- Louis E. Fenech; W. H. McLeod (2014). Historical Dictionary of Sikhism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 218. ISBN 978-1-4422-3601-1. Archived from the original on 2023-08-17. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
- Sacks, Kenneth (2003). Understanding Emerson: "The American scholar" and his struggle for self-reliance. Princeton University Press. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-691-09982-8.
- Cassin-Scott, Jack (1977). The Greek and Persian Wars 500-323 B.C. Osprey. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-85045-271-6.
- Cummins, Joseph (2011). History's Greatest Wars: The Epic Conflicts that Shaped the Modern World. Fair Winds Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-59233-471-1.
- Robinson, Cyril Edward (1929). A History of Greece. Methuen & Company Limited. Retrieved 7 April 2013.
- Sen, Maj Gen L. P. (1969). Slender Was the Thread: Kashmir Confrontation 1947-48. New Delhi: Orient Longman. p. 308. ISBN 0-86131-692-4. Archived from the original on 17 August 2023. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- Sidney Low, et al., The dictionary of English history, Cassell and company, 1928. "At the battle of Naseby Astley commanded the infantry, and in 1646 he made a last stand at Stow-on-the-Wold against the Parliament."
- Pandey, Geeta (5 December 2011). "India polo match honours Sikhs' 1897 Saragarhi battle". British Broadcasting Corporation. bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 May 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
- "Combined Fleet – tabular history of Yamato". Parshall, Jon; Bob Hackett, Sander Kingsepp, & Allyn Nevitt. 2009. Archived from the original on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 1 April 2010.
- Gunderson, Cory Gideon (2004). The battle of the Alamo. ABDO. p. 15. ISBN 1-59197-278-7.
- IV Hague Convention. The Laws and Customs of War on Land October 18, 1907.Article 23 Archived 2011-07-03 at the Wayback Machine
- Philbrick, Nathaniel. The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn. New York: Viking Books, 2010, p. xvii.
- Ammer, Christine. The Fact on File Dictionary of Cliches. Checkmark Books, 2001. p. 16