| Revision as of 02:26, 19 May 2007 editRm1854 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users509 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:59, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,459 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| You have reverted the Racism section of ] twice now. Don't do it again. If you do, I will request the admins block you from editing, because I have better things to do than revert your censorship of the article. ] | You have reverted the Racism section of ] twice now. Don't do it again. If you do, I will request the admins block you from editing, because I have better things to do than revert your censorship of the article. ] | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ron Paul|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <strong>] </strong>|<small>]</small> 04:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:]|on ''']'''|}}. In the future, please solve editing disputes through discussion rather than ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|] ] 07:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)}}</div> ] ] 07:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. --] (]) 05:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:59, 23 November 2015
hey anson,
good luck with using wikipedia. there are a lot of cool features this things has.
Welcome!
Hello, Interpaul, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Life, Liberty, Property 18:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ron Paul. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Tvoz |talk 18:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Template:External links
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Template:External links. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Misplaced Pages without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz 15:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI about Dr and MD
15.20 Omission of “Mr.” and the like
Social titles such as Mr., Mrs., Ms., and Dr. may be omitted in most contexts with no loss of respect. When an academic degree or professional designation follows a name, such titles are always omitted.
...
It is my pleasure to introduce Jennifer James, MD. Dr. James has shown...
Similarly, the now somewhat archaic abbreviation Esq. (Esquire) is used only after a full name and never when Mr., Dr., or the like precedes the name.
Anthony White, Esq., led the parade. Mr. White was carrying... Tvoz |talk 15:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Template:External links again
Please do not delete content from articles on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:External links. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Misplaced Pages:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. -- zzuuzz 15:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text
{{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.
Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Anthony.bradbury 16:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Whitewashing
You and other Ron Paul supporters have been repeatedly removing the section on the newsletter's racist comments with no justification and no participation in the talk page. Please stop. The section does cite the Houston Chronicle, which is a pretty good source. Rhobite 22:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
3 RR
You have reverted the Racism section of Ron Paul twice now. Don't do it again. If you do, I will request the admins block you from editing, because I have better things to do than revert your censorship of the article. Rm999
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ron Paul. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Tvoz |talk 04:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Ron Paul
Ron Paul has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured quality. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)