Revision as of 16:18, 31 May 2007 editRex Germanus (talk | contribs)11,278 edits →Biography← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:43, 6 January 2025 edit undo178.202.191.71 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
(998 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Germanic Cherusci chieftain (18/17 BC – AD 21)}} | |||
:''For the Protestant theologian, see ].'' | |||
{{About|the Germanic chieftain|other uses|Arminius (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{distinguish|Arimanius|Armenius}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2024}} | |||
{{Infobox royalty | |||
| name = Arminius | |||
| succession = Prince and Chieftain of the Cherusci tribe | |||
| image = Hermannsdenkmal statue.jpg | |||
| caption = Statue of Arminius at the ] memorial | |||
| reign = | |||
| coronation = | |||
| full name = Arminius<br><small>(His original Germanic name is unknown; modern German variants, e.g. ''Hermann'' and ''Armin'', are ]s.<ref name="SchulzeNamen">{{cite book |last1=Schulze |first1=Wilhelm|title=Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen |date=1904 |publisher=Weidmann |page=127}}</ref>)</small> | |||
| native_lang1 = | |||
| native_lang1_name1 = unknown (Modern German Armin and Hermann are ]s) | |||
| birth_date = 18/17 BC | |||
| birth_place = ] | |||
| death_date = AD 21 (aged 37–38) | |||
| death_place = Germania | |||
| burial_date = | |||
| burial_place = <!-- <br/> {{coord|LAT|LONG|display=inline,title}} --> | |||
| predecessor = ] | |||
| successor = ] | |||
| spouse = ] | |||
| issue = ] | |||
| royal house = | |||
| dynasty = | |||
| father = ] | |||
| mother = | |||
| religion = ] | |||
| signature = | |||
}} | |||
'''Arminius''' ({{IPAc-en|ɑr|ˈ|m|ɪ|n|i|ə|s}}; 18/17 BC–AD 21) was a chieftain of the ] ] tribe who is best known for commanding an alliance of Germanic tribes at the ] in AD 9, in which three ]s under the command of general and governor ] were destroyed. His victory at Teutoburg Forest precipitated the ]'s permanent strategic withdrawal and the ] of ],<ref>{{cite book|author=Dr. Aaron Ralby|title=Atlas of Military History|url=https://archive.org/details/atlasofworldmili0000ralb|url-access=registration|year=2013|publisher=Parragon|isbn=978-1-4723-0963-1|page=|chapter=The Roman Legion: Refining Military Organization}}</ref> and modern historians regard it as one of Imperial Rome's greatest defeats.<ref name="Murdoch">{{harvnb|Murdoch|2012|p=}}</ref> As it prevented the ] of Germanic peoples east of the ], it has also been considered one of the most decisive battles in history<ref name="Tucker">{{harvnb|Tucker|2010|p=}}</ref><ref name="Cawthorne">{{harvnb|Cawthorne|2012|p=}}</ref><ref name="Davis">{{harvnb|Davis|1999|p=}}</ref><ref name="Creasy">{{harvnb|Creasy|2007|p=104}}</ref> and a turning point in ].<ref name="Spectator">{{cite magazine |url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-eagles-were-tamed/ |title=How the eagles were tamed |date=27 March 2004 |magazine=] |access-date=25 April 2021 |quote=] referred to the Battle of the Teutoburg forest as a turning-point in world history.}}</ref> | |||
{{portalpar|Ancient Germanic culture}} | |||
]]] | |||
Born a prince of the Cherusci tribe, Arminius was part of the Roman-friendly faction of the tribe. He learned Latin and served in the Roman military, which gained him ], and the rank of ]. After serving with distinction in the ], he was sent to Germania to aid the local governor ] in completing the Roman conquest of the Germanic tribes. While in this capacity, Arminius secretly plotted a Germanic revolt against Roman rule, which culminated in the ambush and destruction of three Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest. | |||
'''Arminius''' (also '''Armin''', ]/] - ] AD) was a chieftain of the ] who defeated a ] in the ]. His tribal coalition against the ] successfully blocked the efforts Iulius Caesarius Claudianus ], nephew of Emperor ], to reconquer the Germanic territories east of the Rhine, although there is debate among historians about the outcome of several inconclusive battles (], Annals 2.22, ], Caligula 1.4). And although Arminius was ultimately unsuccessful in forging unity among the ], his upset victory had a far-reaching effect on the subsequent history of both the ancient Germanic tribes, of the Roman Empire, and ultimately, of Europe. | |||
In the aftermath of the battle, Arminius fought retaliatory invasions by the Roman general ] in the battles of ], ], and the ], and deposed a rival, the ] king ]. Germanic nobles, afraid of Arminius's growing power, assassinated him in 21. He was remembered in ] for generations afterwards.<ref name="Annals.02.88"/> The Roman historian ] designated Arminius as the liberator of the Germanic tribes and commended him for having fought the Roman Empire to a standstill at the peak of its power.<ref name="Annals.02.88">]. ]. "Assuredly he was the deliverer of Germany, one too who had defied Rome, not in her early rise, as other kings and generals, but in the height of her empire's glory, had fought, indeed, indecisive battles, yet in war remained unconquered. He completed thirty-seven years of life, twelve years of power, and he is still a theme of song among barbarous nations, though to Greek historians, who admire only their own achievements, he is unknown, and to Romans not as famous as he should be, while we extol the past and are indifferent to our own times."</ref> | |||
==Biography== | |||
Born in 18 or 17 BC as son of the Cheruscan war chief ], Arminius was trained as a Roman military commander and attained ] and the status of ] (petty noble) before returning to Germania and driving the Romans out. | |||
During the ] in the 19th century, Arminius was hailed by ] as a symbol of German unity and freedom.<ref name="Spiegel">{{cite web |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/battle-of-the-teutoburg-forest-germany-recalls-myth-that-created-the-nation-a-644913.html |title= Battle of the Teutoburg Forest: Germany Recalls Myth That Created the Nation |last1=Crossland |first1=David |date=28 August 2009 |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=16 January 2015}}</ref> Following ], however, Arminius' significance diminished in Germany due to the rise of ], ], and ]; the 2,000th anniversary of his victory at the Teutoburg Forest was only lightly commemorated in Germany.<ref name="Spiegel"/> | |||
''Arminius'' is probably a ]ized variant of the Germanic name '']'' meaning "great" (cf. ]). During the ] but especialy during 19th century ] nationalism, Arminius was used as a symbol of the "German" people (eventhough neither the ] as an ethnic group or their language existed at the time) fight against Rome.<ref>{{cite journal|title=German Pagan Antiquity in Lutheran Historical Thought|author=W. Bradford Smith|journal=The Journal of the Historical Society|volume=4|issue=3|year=2004|pages=351-74|url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j.1529-921X.2004.00104.x/abs/}}</ref> It is during this period that the name "Hermann" (meaning "army man" or "warrior") came into use as the German equivalent of Arminius; the religious reformer ] is thought to have been the first to equate the two names.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Arminius into Hermann: History into Legend|author=Herbert W. Benario|journal=Greece and Rome|volume=51|issue=1|year=2004|month=April|pages=83-94|url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=416722}}</ref> | |||
==Name== | |||
===Battle at the Teutoburg Forest=== | |||
The ] of the ] ] {{lang|la|Arminius}} is unknown, and confusion is further created by recent scholars who alternately referred to him as {{lang|la|Armenus}}.<ref name="MurdochEtymology">{{cite book |last1=Murdoch |first1=Adrian |title=Rome's Greatest Defeat: Massacre in the Teutoburg Forest |date=2009 |publisher=The History Press |isbn=978-0750940160 |page=84}}</ref> In his ''History'', ] calls him "Arminius, the son of Sigimer, a prince of the nation" and states he "attained the dignity of ]".<ref>{{cite book |url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Velleius_Paterculus/2D*.html |title=The Roman History |author=C. Velleius Paterculus |publisher=Loeb Classical Library |date=1924 |page=118}}</ref> Due to ] of the time, it is likely {{lang|la|Arminius}} is an adopted name granted to him upon citizenship or in any case not his ]. The name instead appears to ultimately be of Etruscan origin, appearing as {{lang|ett|armne}} and {{lang|ett|armni}}<!--Etruscan characters?--> on inscriptions found at ].<ref name="SchulzeNamen">{{cite book |last1=Schulze |first1=Wilhelm|title=Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen |date=1904 |publisher=Weidmann |page=127}}</ref> According to another theory, that name was given to Arminius for his service in Armenia.<ref name="MurdochEtymology"/> | |||
Around the year ] AD, Arminius assumed command of a Cheruscan detachment of Roman auxiliary forces, probably fighting in the ] wars on the ]. He returned to northern Germania in ]/] AD, where the Roman Empire had established secure control of the territories just east of the ], along the ] and ] rivers, and now sought to extend its hegemony eastward towards the ] and ] rivers, under ], a high-ranking administrative official appointed by ] as governor. Arminius soon began plotting to unite various Germanic tribes and to thwart Roman efforts to incorporate their territories into the empire. | |||
The ] translation of {{lang|la|Arminius}} as the ] ''Hermann'' dates from the 16th century, possibly first by ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Arminius into Hermann: History into Legend|author=Herbert W. Benario|journal=Greece and Rome|volume=51|issue=1|date=April 2004|pages=83–94|doi= 10.1093/gr/51.1.83}}</ref> In German, Arminius was traditionally distinguished as {{lang|de|Hermann der Cherusker}} ("Hermann the Cheruscan") or {{lang|de|Hermann der Cheruskerfürst}} ("Hermann the Cheruscan Prince"). Hermann etymologically means "Man of War", coming from the ] {{lang|goh|heri}} meaning "war" and {{lang|goh|man}} meaning "man".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Förstemann|first1=Ernst Wilhelm|title=Altdeutsches Namenbuch|date=1900|publisher=Nabu Press|isbn=9781270714996|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vorname.com/name,Hermann.html|title=▷ Vorname Hermann: Herkunft, Bedeutung & Namenstag|website=vorname.com|language=de|access-date=19 April 2020}}</ref> This has also led to his English nickname "Herman the German." | |||
In the fall of ], in the ], Arminius — then twenty-five years old — and his alliance of Germanic tribes (], ], ] and ]) ambushed and annihilated a Roman army (comprising the ], ] and ] ] as well as three ] detachments and six ]s of auxiliaries) totalling around 20,000 men commanded by Varus. Recent archaeological finds suggest that the long-debated precise location of the three-day battle is almost certainly near ] Hill, about 20 km north of ]. When defeat was certain, Varus committed ] by falling upon his sword. | |||
== |
==Early life and Roman military service== | ||
] | |||
After his victory, Arminius tried for several years to bring about a more permanent union of the northern Germanic tribes so as to resist the inevitable Imperial counter-offensive. After the Teutoburg Forest disaster, other Germanic tribes did become more openly hostile to Rome, although the most powerful Germanic ruler, King ] of the ], in ], remained neutral, although Arminius sent him the head of Varus (] II 119,5; he declined the present and sent it on to Rome for burial). Also, most of the ] were successfully wooed by the Romans. Still, Arminius succeeded in forging a solid block of anti-Roman tribes in what is now west-central Germany and the eastern ]. | |||
Born in 18 or 17 BC in ], Arminius was the son of the Cheruscan chief ] (German: ''Segimer''; Proto-Germanic: ''Sigimariz''; Old English: ''Sigemær''),<ref name=eb/> who was allied with Rome.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} | |||
Arminius learned to speak ] and joined the Roman military with his younger brother ]. He served in the ] between AD 1 and 6, and received a military education as well as ] and the status of ] before returning to Germania.<ref name=eb>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Arminius|encyclopedia=]|year=2014|publisher=]|location=Chicago}}</ref><ref name="Durschmied">{{harvnb|Durschmied|2013|p=}}</ref> These experiences gave him knowledge of Roman politics and military tactics, which allowed him to successfully anticipate enemy battle maneuvers during his later campaigns against the Roman army.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} | |||
Between 11 AD and 13 AD, the Romans under ], then heir apparent, made initial incursions along the ], ] and ] rivers, reestablishing some bases. In September 14 AD, Tiberius became emperor and his nephew ] took over the huge army on the Rhine, immediately launching a successful assault. The next spring, he launched a two-pronged invasion up the Ruhr and Lahn, the main success of which was the capture of Arminius's wife, ]. She was taken to Rome and displayed in Germanicus' victory parade in May, 17; she never saw her homeland again and is not mentioned again by Tacitus, who reported these events. The son she bore Arminius while in captivity, ], was trained by the Romans as a ] in ] and probably died in the arena. | |||
==Return to Germany== | |||
That was followed by another two-pronged attack with an army of as many as 100,000 troops that cut Arminius's forces in half along the Ems river, and then swept eastward. However, Arminius had launched an emotional appeal to the tribes to fight back against an invader whose only success was, he claimed, in making war on women (i.e., his wife), and had managed to collect such a huge force that he was able to inflict severe defeats on the huge Roman army. | |||
] in 31 BC, the shades of green represent gradually conquered territories under the reign of ], and pink areas on the map represent tributary tribes.]] | |||
Around the year AD 4, Arminius assumed command of a Cheruscan detachment of Roman auxiliary forces, probably while fighting in the ] wars on the ]. He returned to northern Germania in AD 7 or 8, where the Roman Empire had established secure control of the territories just east of the ], along the ] and ] rivers, and was now seeking to extend its hegemony eastward to the ] and ] rivers, under ], a high-ranking administrative official appointed by ] as governor. Arminius began plotting to unite various Germanic tribes in order to thwart Roman efforts to incorporate their lands into the empire. This proved a difficult task, as the tribes were strongly independent and many were traditionally enemies of each other.{{citation needed|date=January 2021}} | |||
Between AD 6 and 9, the Romans were forced to move eight of the eleven legions present in Germania east of the Rhine to crush ] in the ],<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.livius.org/le-lh/legio/v_alaudae.html | date = September 2010 | title = Legio V Alaudae | publisher = www.livius.org | access-date = 26 March 2020 | archive-date = 26 April 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150426044251/https://www.livius.org/le-lh/legio/v_alaudae.html | url-status = dead }}</ref> leaving Varus with only three legions to face the Germans, which was still 18,000 troops, or 6,000 men per legion. An additional two legions, under the command of ], were stationed in ].<ref>Syme, p. 60</ref> Arminius saw this as the perfect opportunity to defeat Varus.<ref>Velleius Paterculus, ''Compendium of Roman History'' 2, 109, 5; ], ''Roman History'' 55, 28, 6–7</ref> | |||
After securing the surrounding territory, Germanicus visited the Teutoburg Forest battlefield and buried the remains of the dead soldiers, building a monumental grave ] which indicated that he was in fact planning to hold onto that ground (Tacitus says it was later destroyed by the Germanic tribesmen and that Germanicus decided against rebuilding it -- i.e., he was no longer able to do so). He then launched a swift attack on Arminius, who lured him into a trap and succeeded in ambushing and largely wiping out his cavalry and his auxiliary units. Germanicus beat a hasty retreat northward up the Ems, sending half his army southward to restore a key ] -- another indication that the Romans planned to reconquer the area and thus wanted to restore its infrastructure. Arminius surrounded this force, led by Caecina, destroyed the repaired causeway, and drove the Romans in confused retreat through a swampy area. But in a nighttime council of the army, Arminius' uncle Inguiomer called for an assault on the Roman camp - and was supported by the warriors, against the urging of Arminius, who wanted to attack them again, when once they tried to escape. The assault failed, with heavy Germanic losses, and the surviving Romans escaped across the Rhine. | |||
==Anti-Roman uprising== | |||
In 16 AD, Germanicus again invaded Germania, this time from the north. Three major battles are reported in Tacitus account, the first being the ], where Arminius last saw his brother Flavus, who was fighting with the Romans. In a shouting-match across the river, probably around the modern city of ], Arminius called on his brother to return to his homeland, and Flavus made an opposite appeal, asking Arminius to make peace with a stern but forgiving Roman Empire, which was, he claimed, treating his captured wife and newborn son well. Neither convinced the other, and in the ensuing battle the Romans were able to cross the river, but with heavy losses. | |||
{{Main|Battle of the Teutoburg Forest}} | |||
] | |||
In the autumn of AD 9, the 25-year-old Arminius brought to Varus a false report of rebellion in northern Germany. He persuaded Varus to divert the three legions under his command (composed of the ], ], and ] ], plus three ] detachments and six ] of auxiliaries), which were at the time marching to winter quarters, to suppress the rebellion. Varus and his legions marched right into the trap that Arminius had set for them near ]. Arminius' tribe, the ], and their allies the ], ], ], ], and ] (five out of at least fifty Germanic tribes at the time)<ref name="Spiegel"/> ambushed and annihilated Varus' entire army, totaling over 20,000 men, as it marched along a narrow road through a dense forest. Recent archaeological finds show the long-debated location of the three-day battle was almost certainly near Kalkriese Hill, about {{convert|20|km}} north of present-day ]. When defeat was certain, Varus committed ] by falling upon his sword.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Bordewich|first=Fergus M.|date=September 2006|title=The Ambush That Changed History|url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-ambush-that-changed-history-72636736/|url-status=live|access-date=26 August 2021|website=Smithsonian Magazine|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140408145053/http://www.smithsonianmag.com:80/history/the-ambush-that-changed-history-72636736/? |archive-date=8 April 2014 }}</ref> The battle was one of the most devastating defeats Rome suffered in its history. Arminius' success in destroying three entire legions and driving the Romans out of Germany marked a high point of Germanic power for centuries. Roman attempts to reconquer Germania failed, although they did eventually manage to break Arminius' carefully coordinated alliance.{{citation needed|date=October 2020}} | |||
]]] | |||
The next battle took place at Idistaviso, further up the ], probably around ]. Both sides suffered heavy casualties. and Arminius himself was wounded, but the Romans were unable to secure a strategic advantage, and had to abandon their plan to drive into the Cheruscan heartland, around ]. Arminius escaped by smearing his face with blood, so that he would not be recognised. The final battle took place much further down the Weser, to the north, at the Angrivarian Wall, near ]. Here, again, both sides suffered heavy loss, but Germanicus was unable once again to wipe out the Germanic forces, and his own losses must have been very severe by this time, for, although it was the height of summer, he once again beat a hasty retreat and completely abandoned all conquered territory. And as in the previous year, his withdrawal route up the Ems river resulted in a catastrophe, as a ferocious storm scattered his fleet. Although he ended the year by launching some punitive operations, and also managed to recover 2 of the 3 ]s lost in the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, Emperor Tiberius denied his request to launch a further campaign the following year, realizing that any such effort would only invite further disaster. Instead, he accorded Germanicus the honor of a ], a victory march in which captives -- including Thusnelda -- and loot were paraded through Rome, and reassigned him to ]. This sparked Tacitus' wry remark that the Germanic tribes were more often "triumphed" in Rome than defeated in Germania. The third eagle was recovered later under Emperor ] (], Roman History 60.8) | |||
After the battle, the Germans quickly annihilated every trace of Roman presence east of the Rhine. Roman settlements such as the ] were abandoned. The vastly outnumbered Roman garrison of ] (present-day ]), under the command of the prefect Lucius Cedicius, inflicted heavy losses on the Germans before retreating into ], resisting long enough for ] to organize the Roman defense on the Rhine and ] to arrive with a new army. This prevented Arminius from crossing the Rhine and invading Gaul.<ref>Velleius Paterculus, Compendium of Roman History II, 120, 4; Cassius Dio, Roman History LVI, 22, 2a–2b</ref> | |||
== Marriage == | |||
===Inter-Tribal Conflicts and Death=== | |||
At some point after the battle, Arminius married a Germanic princess named ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Arminius/|title=Arminius|website=]|access-date=1 June 2019}}</ref> Her father was the Cheruscan prince ], who was pro-Roman. But Arminius ] and then impregnated Thusnelda circa AD 14. This ] was likely a result of a dispute between Arminius and Segestes who was against their relationship.<ref name=":0"/><ref>Tacitus, The Annals ]</ref> In May of 15 the Roman general Germanicus captured Thusnelda. At the point of her capture she was pregnant and living with her father, who had taken her back.<ref>Tacitus, The Annals ]</ref> Arminius deeply grieved the capture of Thusnelda and did not marry again.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.germanamericanpioneers.org/ThusneldaWifeofHermann_001.htm|title=Thusnelda, Wife of Hermann|website=www.germanamericanpioneers.org|access-date=1 June 2019}}</ref> Tacitus recorded that Arminius was "driven to frenzy" by the loss of his beloved wife.<ref name=":1">Tacitus, The Annals ]</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Winkler|first=Martin M.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qSegCgAAQBAJ&q=Thusnelda|title=Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology|year= 2015|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-049352-3|language=en}}</ref> ] states in the '']'':<blockquote>Arminius, with his naturally furious temper, was driven to frenzy by the seizure of his wife and the foredooming to slavery of his wife's unborn child. He flew hither and thither among the Cherusci, demanding "war against Segestes, war against Cæsar." And he refrained not from taunts.<ref name=":1"/></blockquote>Thusnelda gave birth to a son named ] who grew up in Roman captivity. Tacitus describes him as having an unusual story, which he promises to tell in his later writings, but these writings have never been found.<ref>Tacitus, The Annals ]</ref> | |||
Thereafter, war broke out between Arminius and Marbod, king of the Marcomanni (see above). The war ended with Marbod's retreat, but Arminius did not succeed in breaking into the "natural fortification" that Bohemia is, and the war ended in stalemate. Arminius also faced serious difficulties at home from the family of his wife and other pro-Roman leaders. | |||
==Roman retribution and death== | |||
In 19 A.D., his formidable opponent Germanicus was murdered by opponents in Rome; Arminius suffered a similar fate two years later, at the hands of opponents within his own tribe and also of the ] (Hessians), who felt he was becoming too powerful. Tiberius had purportedly refused an offer from a Chatti nobleman to assassinate Arminius, declaring that Rome did not employ such dishonorable methods. Whether that statement conformed with or was merely a cover for what the Romans in fact did will never be known. | |||
Between 14 and 16, ] led punitive operations into Germany, fighting Arminius to a draw in the ] and twice defeating him (according to Tacitus): first in the ] and later at the ]. In 15, Roman troops managed to recapture one of the three ] lost in the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. In 16, a second eagle was retrieved.<ref>Tac. ''Ann''. 1.60.4, 2.25.2</ref> Tiberius denied the request of Germanicus to launch an additional campaign for 17, however, having decided the frontier with Germania would stand at the Rhine river. Instead, he offered Germanicus the honor of a triumph for his two victories. The third Roman eagle was recovered in 41 by Publius Gabinius, under the emperor ].<ref>Dio 60.8.7.</ref> Arminius also faced opposition from his father-in-law and other pro-Roman Germanic leaders.<ref>Tac. ''Ann''. 1.54–59.</ref> His brother Flavus, who had been raised alongside him in Rome, remained loyal to the Roman Empire and fought under Germanicus against Arminius at the Battle of Idistaviso. With the end of the Roman threat, a war broke out between Arminius and ], king of the ]. It ended with Marbod fleeing to ] and Roman protection, but Arminius failed to break into the "natural fortification" of ], and the war ended in stalemate. In 19, Germanicus died in ] under circumstances which led many to believe he had been poisoned by his opponents. Arminius died two years later in 21, murdered by opponents within his own tribe who felt that he was becoming too powerful.<ref name="tacit">Tacitus, The Annals ]</ref><ref>], ''Annals'' 2.22 ff.; ], ''Caligula'' 1.4; Dio 57.18.1; on Arminius' assassination, Tac. ''Ann''. 2.88;</ref> Tiberius allegedly had refused an earlier offer from a Chatti nobleman to poison Arminius: "It was not by secret treachery but openly and by arms that the people of Rome avenged themselves on their enemies."<ref>Tac. ''Ann''. 2.87–88.</ref>] in Loggia dei Lanzi. Created in second century AD with modern restorations.|354x354px]] | |||
==Legacy== | ==Legacy and influence== | ||
Arminius' victory against the Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest had a far-reaching effect on the subsequent history of both the ancient ] and on the Roman Empire. The Romans made no further concerted efforts to conquer and permanently hold Germania beyond the Rhine and the '']''. Numerous modern historians have regarded Arminius' victory as one of the most decisive battles in history,<ref name="Tucker"/><ref name="Cawthorne"/><ref name="Davis"/><ref name="Creasy"/><ref name="Spectator"/><ref name="Durschmied"/> with some calling it "Rome's greatest defeat".<ref name="Murdoch"/> | |||
===Rome=== | |||
In the accounts of his Roman enemies he is highly respected for his military leadership skills and as a defender of the liberty of his people. Based on these records, the story of Arminius was revived in the sixteenth century with the recovery of the histories of ] by German ], who wrote in his ''Annales II, 88'': | |||
===Roman imperial expansion=== | |||
:''Arminius liberator haud dubie Germaniae et qui non primordia populi romani, sicut alii reges ducesque, sed florentissimum imperium lacessieret: proeliis ambiguus, bello non victus.'' (Arminius, without doubt Germania's liberator, who challenged the Roman people not in its beginnings like other kings and leaders, but in the peak of its empire; in battles with changing success, undefeated in the war.) | |||
]|date= 2023 }}</ref>]] | |||
In the accounts of his Roman enemies, Arminius is highly regarded for his military leadership and as a defender of the liberty of his people. Based on these records, the story of Arminius was revived in the 16th century with the recovery of the histories of Tacitus, who wrote in his ''Annales II, 88'': | |||
{{blockquote|text=Arminius, without doubt Germania's liberator, who challenged the Roman people not in its beginnings like other kings and leaders, but in the peak of its empire; in battles with changing success, undefeated in the war.<ref>{{cite book|title=Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology|first=Martin M.|last=Winkler|publisher=]|date=2016|isbn=9780190252915|page=30}}</ref>}} | |||
Arminius was not the sole reason for Rome's change of policy towards Germania. ] sought a secure boundary to protect ], and found this in the Rhine river instead of the Elbe (Cornell and Matthews, Atlas of the Roman World 80). The resources for the conquest of Germany may have been lacking after the great Roman civil wars in the Late Republic and loss of three legions in the Teutoberg Forest, but they were not however lacking later on (Goldsworthy, Roman Warfare 122). That indicates -- and archeological evidence supports this -- that Arminius' achievements together with the influence of Rome, which continued peacefully during the centuries that followed, also sparked a development within the Germanic tribes that made it possible for them to withstand further Roman aggression. | |||
Politics also played a factor; |
Arminius was not the only reason for Rome's change of policy towards Germania. Politics also played a factor; emperors found they could rarely trust a large army to a potential rival, though Augustus had enough loyal family members to wage his wars. Also, Augustus, in his 40-year reign, had annexed many territories still at the beginning of the process of Romanization. Tiberius, who succeeded Augustus in AD 14, decided that Germania was a far less developed land, possessing few villages and only a small food surplus, and therefore was not currently important to Rome. Conquering Germania would require a commitment too burdensome for the imperial finances and an excessive expenditure of military force. | ||
Modern scholars have pointed out that the Rhine was a more practical boundary for the Roman Empire than any other river in Germania. Armies on the Rhine could be supplied from the ] via the ], ], and ], with only a brief area of portage. Armies on the Elbe, however, would have to have been supplied by extensive overland routes or by ships travelling the hazardous Atlantic. Economically, the Rhine already had towns and sizable villages at the time of the Gallic conquest. The Rhine was significantly more accessible from Rome and better equipped to supply sizable garrisons than the regions beyond.<ref>] (2006). ''The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians''.</ref> | |||
Obtaining the final defeat and death of Arminius (possibly through assassination by client princes) was costly to Rome which no longer intended to rule directly in Germania east of the ] and north of the ]; Rome preferred to exert indirect influence through client kings, so Italicus, nephew of Arminius, was appointed king of the Cherusci; Vangio and Sido became vassal princes of the powerful ], (etc.), | |||
according to ], Book 12 | |||
Rome chose no longer to rule directly in Germania east of the Rhine and north of the ], instead preferring to exert indirect influence through the tactics of using ] and the appointing of ]s, which were cheaper than military campaigns. ], nephew of Arminius, was appointed king of the Cherusci; ] became ] princes of the powerful ], etc.<ref>], Book 12 </ref> Only when indirect methods proved insufficient to control the Germanic tribes beyond the Rhine, did Roman emperors occasionally lead devastating punitive campaigns deep into Germania. One of them, led by the Roman emperor ], resulted in a Roman victory in 235 at the ],<ref>Historia Augusta, ''The Two Maximini'' 12:1–4; Herodian, ''Roman History'', Book 7:2:3</ref> located in the modern German state of ], east of the Weser river, between the towns of ] and ]. | |||
===Germanic Sagas=== | |||
The story of Arminius and his victory may have lived on in Germanic ], in the form of the dragon slayer ] of the ] (who is called Sigurd in the Scandinavian tradition). An Icelandic account states that Sigurd "slew the dragon" in the Gnitterheide -- today a suburb of the city of ], located at a strategic site on the Werre river which could very well have been the point of departure of Varus's legions on their way to their doom in the Teutoburg Forest. | |||
=== |
===Germanic sagas=== | ||
In the early 19th century, attempts were made to show that the story of Arminius and his victory may have lived on in the ] ]s,<ref>{{cite journal|title=Ueber den Ursprung der Siegfriedsage|author=A. Giesebrecht|journal=Germania|issue=2|year=1837|url=https://archive.org/details/UeberDenUrsprungDerSiegfriedsage/}}</ref> in the form of the dragon slayer ] of the ] and the ] (Under his Germanic name Siegfried). An Icelandic account<ref>{{citation |title= Nikulas Bergsson, Arnamagnæan Collection manuscript 194, 8yo |author=unknown | year=1387}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title= Altnordische Kosmographie: Studien und Quellen zu Weltbild und Weltbeschreibung in Norwegen und in Island vom 12. bis zum 14. Jahrhundert |author= Simek, R. |journal= Berlin/New York | year=1990}}</ref> states that Sigurd "slew the dragon" in the Gnitaheidr—today the suburb Knetterheide of the city of ], located at a strategic site on the ] river which could very well have been the point of departure of Varus' legions on their way to their doom in the Teutoburg Forest. One of the foremost Scandinavian scholars of the 19th century, ],<ref>{{cite book|title=Grimm centenary; Sigfred-Arminivs, and other papers | |||
In Germany, he was rechristened "Hermann" by ], and he became an emblem of the revival of German ] fueled by the wars of ] in the ]. | |||
|author= G. Vigfusson, F. York Powell|publisher=Oxford Clarendon Press|year=1886|url=https://archive.org/details/grimmcentenarysi00gudb}}</ref> identified Sigurd as Arminius. This educated guess was also picked up by ], who was a prominent ] academic during ].<ref>O. Höfler, "Siegfried Arminius und die Symbolik," ''Heidelberg'' (1961), 60–64, and also in ''Siegfried, Arminius und der Nibelungenhort'' (Vienna 1978); F.G. Gentry, W. McConnell, W. Wunderlich (eds.), ''The Nibelungen Tradition. An Encyclopedia'' (New York–London 2002), article "Sigurd".</ref> | |||
===German nationalism=== | |||
Another theory regarding Arminius' Latin name is that it is based on the Latin word ''armenium'' a vivid blue, ] pigment made from a stone. Thus, Arminius would have been called "blue eyes," and his brother Flavus "blondie" -- as references to the stereotype physical features which the Romans assigned to their Germanic neighbors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/hive/Medieval/Siegfried.htm | title=Arminius: The Original Siegfried | accessdate=2006-09-06}}</ref> In that case, the theory goes, "Arminius" does not necessarily have anything to do with the word and God-name "irmin", and his Germanic name could thus have been anything -- Siegfried, for instance. Proponents of that theory argue that his father, too, (Segimerus, the modern form of which is "Siegmar") also bore a name with the stem "sieg," or "victorious". | |||
After Tacitus' ] were rediscovered by ]s and ] during the ] of the 15th century, Arminius became an important symbol of German ], as a figure who successfully opposed ] and prevented the ] of his people by outgeneraling and defeating one of the world's first superpowers. Indeed, learning of his victory over the Roman army was especially important to ]s, as the Renaissance only reached the ] much later than southern Europe and German humanists were widely looked down upon by their Italian colleagues.{{Sfn|Doyé|2002|p=587}} The first literary adaptation of the Arminius story came in 1520 with ]'s Latin dialogue ], which inserts the Germanic leader into a reimagining of the twelfth chapter of ]'s satirical ''Dialogues of the Dead''; a debate between ], ], and ] before the underworld judgment seat of ] over who most deserves the position of history's greatest general and military strategist. Arminius argues his own claim and calls upon ] to bear witness, and ultimately wins the case and the eloquent praise of Minos.<ref> {{Cite journal |last=Benario |first=Herbert W. |date=April 2004 |title=Arminius into Hermann: History into Legend |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567880 |journal=Greece & Rome |volume=51 |issue=1 |pages=83–94 |jstor=3567880 }}</ref> | |||
This version influenced later adaptations of the story, and reflected a wide interest in Arminius during the years of the ]; the name ''Arminius'' was interpreted as reflecting the name ''Hermann'' by ], who saw Arminius as a symbol of his religious followers among the German people and their resistance to the ] and the ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=German Pagan Antiquity in Lutheran Historical Thought|author=W. Bradford Smith|journal=The Journal of the Historical Society|volume=4|issue=3|year=2004|pages=351–374 | doi = 10.1111/j.1529-921X.2004.00104.x}}</ref> | |||
===German Nationalism=== | |||
] | |||
In 1808, ]'s published but unperformed play ''Die Hermannsschlacht'', unperformable after Napoleon's ], aroused anti-Napoleonic German sentiment and pride among its readers. | |||
During the military occupation of the German States, first by the ] and then by the ] of ], ''Hermann der Cheruskerfürst'' once again became a national icon and a martyr within both ] and the ] ] fueled by the ], which are still termed in Germany the ]. This may particularly be seen as in ]'s 1812 painting '']''.<ref name="Klein/Käppel">Dorothea Klein (ed.), Lutz Käppel (ed.): ''Das diskursive Erbe Europas: Antike und Antikerezeption''. Peter Lang, 2008, {{ISBN|9783631560136}}, </ref> During the ] in the 19th century, Arminius was hailed as a symbol of German unity and liberation.<ref name="Spiegel" /> | |||
The play has been revived repeatedly at moments propitious for raw expressions of ] and was especially popular during the ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia| encyclopedia=The Literary Encyclopedia | title=Die Hermannsschlacht | first=William C | last=Reeve | year=2004 | url= http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=13117 | publisher=The Literary Dictionary Company | accessdate=2006-09-06}}</ref> | |||
], ] (1884)]] | |||
In ], construction was started on a massive statue of Arminius, known as the "]", on a hill near ] in the Teutoburg Forest; it was completed and dedicated during the early years of the Second ] in the wake of the German victory over France in the ] of ]–]. The monument has been a major tourist attraction ever since, as has "]", a similar statue erected in the ]. The German Bundesliga football-club ] is also named after Arminius. | |||
In 1808, ] wrote the play '']'',<ref>Heinrich von Kleist: Die Herrmannsschlacht. Ein Drama (Frankfurt am Main and Basel: Stroemfeld-Roter Stern, 2001).</ref> but with Napoleon's ] it remained in manuscript, being published in 1821 and not staged until 1860. The play has been revived repeatedly at moments of national crisis and was especially used as ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia| encyclopedia=The Literary Encyclopedia | title=Die Hermannsschlacht | first=William C | last=Reeve | year=2004 | url= http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=13117 | publisher=The Literary Dictionary Company | access-date=6 September 2006}}</ref> | |||
In 1838, construction was started on a massive statue of Arminius, known as the '']'', on a hill near ] in the Teutoburg Forest; it was finally completed and dedicated during the early years of the Second ] in the wake of the German victory over France in the ] of 1870–1871. The monument has been a major tourist attraction ever since, as has the ], a similar statue erected in ], in the United States in 1897. The Hermann Heights monument was erected by the ], a fraternal organization formed in ] by ]s as a means of self protection against ] and discrimination in 1840; and that flourished during the 19th century in American cities and rural areas with large populations speaking the ]. ], a town on the ] founded in the 1830s and incorporated in 1845, was also named for Arminius. | |||
The Order of the Sons of Hermann, named for Hermann the “Cherusker”, had its origins as a mutual protection society for the protection of German immigrants in New York City during the 1840s. The order promoted the love of German language and preservation of German traditions and customs. Also provided for members was low cost insurance. The order flourished in many U.S. communities where German immigrants settled but was in decline by late 20th century probably owing to thorough acculturation of the immigrants’ progeny. | |||
Following the defeat of ] in 1945, Arminius became lesser-known among ] and the educational system shied away from teaching about his life due to a sense of guilt and shame, rooted in both ] and ], related to any form of ].<ref name="Spiegel"/> There was, however, a radically different practice in ]. Particularly during the ], Arminius and his warriors were ] reinterpreted quite similarly to the ] led by ] in the ] ] promoted by the State; as an early ] and as ] against the "Roman slaveholder society" (''Sklavenhaltergesellschaft''). The legacy of Arminius and his followers was further reinterpreted as symbolic of the allegedly "peace-loving" ] countries, while Imperial Rome was made into a symbol of the ] and allegedly ]ic ] and the ] ], which were cast as the new evil empire needing to be resisted.<ref name=zeit>Tillmann Bendikowski: . Zeit Online, 4 November 2008 (German)</ref> | |||
==Modern popular culture== | |||
In '']'' by ], a novel describing the rise of the ] to power, a major theme is the struggle between a liberal, half-] pupil and a Nazi teacher - over the student's paper on Arminius which the teacher considers "unpatriotic" and "an insult to German nationalism". | |||
According to journalist David Crossland: "The old nationalism has been replaced by an easy-going ] that mainly manifests itself at sporting events like the soccer<!-- Do not change this to "football". This is a direct quote. --> ]."<ref name="Spiegel"/> The German Bundesliga football club ] is named after Arminius. In the ], on the other hand, the 2,000-year anniversary of the battle was celebrated in ], proudly and without restraint. There were mock battles between Romans and club-wielding barbarians and also a lecture series in an auditorium.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.twincities.com/2009/09/20/new-ulm-celebrates-2000th-anniversary-of-battle/|title=New Ulm celebrates 2,000th anniversary of battle|date=20 September 2009|website=Twin Cities|language=en-US|access-date=19 April 2020}}</ref> | |||
==Other References== | |||
<references/> | |||
== |
==Cultural references== | ||
=== Literature === | |||
* - includes a portion on Arminius | |||
Fictionalized versions of Arminius or commentary upon his legacy appear in: | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1520), by ] | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1808) by ] | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1843) by ] | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1851) by Sir ] | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1934) by ] | |||
] | |||
* '']'' (1999), edited by ] | |||
] | |||
* ''Give Me Back My Legions!'' (2009) by ] | |||
] | |||
* ''Eagles At War'' (2015) by ] | |||
] | |||
* ''Wolves of Rome'' (2016) by ] (first published in Italian as ''Teutoburgo'') | |||
=== Music and opera === | |||
{{Link_FA|de}} | |||
* '']'' is a 1692 opera about Arminius by the Bohemian-Austrian composer ]. | |||
* '']'', a 1732 opera by ] | |||
* '']'' is a 1736 opera about Arminius by ]. | |||
* '']'' is an 1877 oratorio about Arminius by the German composer ]. | |||
=== Television === | |||
* '']'' is a 2020 TV show that features a fictionalised version of Arminius (portrayed by ]) as one of the central characters. | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Biography}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== Citations == | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
== Sources == | |||
* {{cite book |last=Cawthorne |first=Nigel |author-link=Nigel Cawthorne |date=2012 |title=Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wHpVn68GCogC&pg=PA75 |publisher=Arcturus Publishing |pages=75–77 |isbn=978-1848589544 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Creasy |first1=Edward |author1-link=Edward Shepherd Creasy |title=The Fifteen Decisive War Battles of the World: From Marathon to Waterloo |date=2007 |publisher=Read Books |isbn=978-1-84664-127-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J8loBFKe3LoC}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Davis |first=Paul K. |author-link=Paul K. Davis (historian) |date=1999 |title=100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nv73QlQs9ocC |publisher=] |pages=68–71 |isbn=0195143663 }} | |||
* Dörner, Andreas, ''Politischer Mythos und symbolische Politik. Der Hermannmythos: Zur Entstehung des Nationalbewußtseins der Deutschen'' (Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1996). | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Doyé |first=Werner M |title=Deutsche Erinnerungsorte |publisher=] |year=2002 |editor-last=François |editor-first=Etienne |volume=3 |location=Munich |pages=587-602 |language=de |chapter=Arminius |editor-last2=Schulze |editor-first2=Hagen}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Durschmied |first=Erik |author-link=Erik Durschmied |date=2013 |title=The Weather Factor: How Nature Has Changed History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ESY980GKv3cC&pg=PA1751 |publisher=] |pages=1751–1770|isbn=978-1444769654 }} | |||
* von Essen, Gesa, ''Hermannsschlachten. Germanen- und Römerbilder in der Literatur des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts'' (Göttingen: Wallstein, 1998). | |||
* Kuehnemund, Richard, ''Arminius or the Rise of a National Symbol in Literature: From Hutten to Grabbe'' (New York: AMS Press, 1966). | |||
* Münkler Herfried, and Hans Grünberger: "Arminius/ Hermann als nationales Symbol im Diskurs der deutschen Humanisten 1500–1570", In: Herfried Münkler, Hans Grünberger, and Kathrin Mayer, ''Nationenbildung. Die Nationalisierung Europas im Diskurs humanistischer Intellektueller. Italien und Deutschland'' (Berlin: Akademie, 1998), pp. 263–308. | |||
* {{cite book |last=Murdoch |first=Adrian |date=2012 |title=Rome's Greatest Defeat: Massacre in the Teutoburg Forest |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pao7AwAAQBAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-0752494555 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Tucker |first=Spencer |author-link=Spencer C. Tucker |date=2010 |title=Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wHpVn68GCogC |publisher=] |isbn=978-1598844290 }} | |||
* ] (ed.), ''Hermanns Schlachten. Zur Literaturgeschichte eines nationalen Mythos'' (Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2008). | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Winkler |first1=Martin M. |title=Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology |date=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-025291-5 |language=en}} | |||
* Wolters, Reinhard ''Die Schlacht im Teutoburger Wald: Arminius, Varus und das roemische Germanien'' (München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2008). | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Commons category|Arminius}} | |||
{{EB1911 poster|Arminius}} | |||
* at the '']'' | |||
* at the '']'' | |||
* – LWL-Institut für westfälische Regionalgeschichte (in German) | |||
* – includes a portion on Arminius | |||
* (in German) | |||
* | |||
* by Clay Risen in '']'', 9 October 2009 – article on modern German views of Hermann and the 2,000th anniversary of the battle | |||
The Football (Soccer) Team „DSC Arminia Bielefeld“ is named After Arminius | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Arminius}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 6 January 2025
Germanic Cherusci chieftain (18/17 BC – AD 21) This article is about the Germanic chieftain. For other uses, see Arminius (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Arimanius or Armenius.
Arminius | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statue of Arminius at the Hermannsdenkmal memorial | |||||
Prince and Chieftain of the Cherusci tribe | |||||
Predecessor | Segimer | ||||
Successor | Italicus | ||||
Born | 18/17 BC Germania | ||||
Died | AD 21 (aged 37–38) Germania | ||||
Spouse | Thusnelda | ||||
Issue | Thumelicus | ||||
| |||||
Father | Segimer | ||||
Religion | Germanic |
Arminius (/ɑːrˈmɪniəs/; 18/17 BC–AD 21) was a chieftain of the Germanic Cherusci tribe who is best known for commanding an alliance of Germanic tribes at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest in AD 9, in which three Roman legions under the command of general and governor Publius Quinctilius Varus were destroyed. His victory at Teutoburg Forest precipitated the Roman Empire's permanent strategic withdrawal and the decolonisation of Germania Magna, and modern historians regard it as one of Imperial Rome's greatest defeats. As it prevented the Romanization of Germanic peoples east of the Rhine, it has also been considered one of the most decisive battles in history and a turning point in human history.
Born a prince of the Cherusci tribe, Arminius was part of the Roman-friendly faction of the tribe. He learned Latin and served in the Roman military, which gained him Roman citizenship, and the rank of eques. After serving with distinction in the Great Illyrian Revolt, he was sent to Germania to aid the local governor Publius Quinctilius Varus in completing the Roman conquest of the Germanic tribes. While in this capacity, Arminius secretly plotted a Germanic revolt against Roman rule, which culminated in the ambush and destruction of three Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest.
In the aftermath of the battle, Arminius fought retaliatory invasions by the Roman general Germanicus in the battles of Pontes Longi, Idistaviso, and the Angrivarian Wall, and deposed a rival, the Marcomanni king Maroboduus. Germanic nobles, afraid of Arminius's growing power, assassinated him in 21. He was remembered in Germanic legends for generations afterwards. The Roman historian Tacitus designated Arminius as the liberator of the Germanic tribes and commended him for having fought the Roman Empire to a standstill at the peak of its power.
During the unification of Germany in the 19th century, Arminius was hailed by German nationalists as a symbol of German unity and freedom. Following World War II, however, Arminius' significance diminished in Germany due to the rise of anti-militarism, pacifism, and anti-nationalism; the 2,000th anniversary of his victory at the Teutoburg Forest was only lightly commemorated in Germany.
Name
The etymology of the Latin name Arminius is unknown, and confusion is further created by recent scholars who alternately referred to him as Armenus. In his History, Marcus Velleius Paterculus calls him "Arminius, the son of Sigimer, a prince of the nation" and states he "attained the dignity of equestrian rank". Due to Roman naming conventions of the time, it is likely Arminius is an adopted name granted to him upon citizenship or in any case not his Germanic name. The name instead appears to ultimately be of Etruscan origin, appearing as armne and armni on inscriptions found at Volaterrae. According to another theory, that name was given to Arminius for his service in Armenia.
The German translation of Arminius as the name Hermann dates from the 16th century, possibly first by Martin Luther. In German, Arminius was traditionally distinguished as Hermann der Cherusker ("Hermann the Cheruscan") or Hermann der Cheruskerfürst ("Hermann the Cheruscan Prince"). Hermann etymologically means "Man of War", coming from the Old High German heri meaning "war" and man meaning "man". This has also led to his English nickname "Herman the German."
Early life and Roman military service
Born in 18 or 17 BC in Germania, Arminius was the son of the Cheruscan chief Segimerus (German: Segimer; Proto-Germanic: Sigimariz; Old English: Sigemær), who was allied with Rome.
Arminius learned to speak Latin and joined the Roman military with his younger brother Flavus. He served in the Roman army between AD 1 and 6, and received a military education as well as Roman citizenship and the status of equite before returning to Germania. These experiences gave him knowledge of Roman politics and military tactics, which allowed him to successfully anticipate enemy battle maneuvers during his later campaigns against the Roman army.
Return to Germany
Around the year AD 4, Arminius assumed command of a Cheruscan detachment of Roman auxiliary forces, probably while fighting in the Pannonian wars on the Balkan peninsula. He returned to northern Germania in AD 7 or 8, where the Roman Empire had established secure control of the territories just east of the Rhine, along the Lippe and Main rivers, and was now seeking to extend its hegemony eastward to the Weser and Elbe rivers, under Publius Quinctilius Varus, a high-ranking administrative official appointed by Augustus as governor. Arminius began plotting to unite various Germanic tribes in order to thwart Roman efforts to incorporate their lands into the empire. This proved a difficult task, as the tribes were strongly independent and many were traditionally enemies of each other.
Between AD 6 and 9, the Romans were forced to move eight of the eleven legions present in Germania east of the Rhine to crush a rebellion in the Balkans, leaving Varus with only three legions to face the Germans, which was still 18,000 troops, or 6,000 men per legion. An additional two legions, under the command of Lucius Nonius Asprenas, were stationed in Moguntiacum. Arminius saw this as the perfect opportunity to defeat Varus.
Anti-Roman uprising
Main article: Battle of the Teutoburg ForestIn the autumn of AD 9, the 25-year-old Arminius brought to Varus a false report of rebellion in northern Germany. He persuaded Varus to divert the three legions under his command (composed of the 17th, 18th, and 19th legions, plus three cavalry detachments and six cohorts of auxiliaries), which were at the time marching to winter quarters, to suppress the rebellion. Varus and his legions marched right into the trap that Arminius had set for them near Kalkriese. Arminius' tribe, the Cherusci, and their allies the Marsi, Chatti, Bructeri, Chauci, and Sicambri (five out of at least fifty Germanic tribes at the time) ambushed and annihilated Varus' entire army, totaling over 20,000 men, as it marched along a narrow road through a dense forest. Recent archaeological finds show the long-debated location of the three-day battle was almost certainly near Kalkriese Hill, about 20 kilometres (12 mi) north of present-day Osnabrück. When defeat was certain, Varus committed suicide by falling upon his sword. The battle was one of the most devastating defeats Rome suffered in its history. Arminius' success in destroying three entire legions and driving the Romans out of Germany marked a high point of Germanic power for centuries. Roman attempts to reconquer Germania failed, although they did eventually manage to break Arminius' carefully coordinated alliance.
After the battle, the Germans quickly annihilated every trace of Roman presence east of the Rhine. Roman settlements such as the Waldgirmes Forum were abandoned. The vastly outnumbered Roman garrison of Aliso (present-day Haltern am See), under the command of the prefect Lucius Cedicius, inflicted heavy losses on the Germans before retreating into Gaul, resisting long enough for Lucius Nonius Asprenas to organize the Roman defense on the Rhine and Tiberius to arrive with a new army. This prevented Arminius from crossing the Rhine and invading Gaul.
Marriage
At some point after the battle, Arminius married a Germanic princess named Thusnelda. Her father was the Cheruscan prince Segestes, who was pro-Roman. But Arminius abducted and then impregnated Thusnelda circa AD 14. This elopement was likely a result of a dispute between Arminius and Segestes who was against their relationship. In May of 15 the Roman general Germanicus captured Thusnelda. At the point of her capture she was pregnant and living with her father, who had taken her back. Arminius deeply grieved the capture of Thusnelda and did not marry again. Tacitus recorded that Arminius was "driven to frenzy" by the loss of his beloved wife. Tacitus states in the Annals:
Arminius, with his naturally furious temper, was driven to frenzy by the seizure of his wife and the foredooming to slavery of his wife's unborn child. He flew hither and thither among the Cherusci, demanding "war against Segestes, war against Cæsar." And he refrained not from taunts.
Thusnelda gave birth to a son named Thumelicus who grew up in Roman captivity. Tacitus describes him as having an unusual story, which he promises to tell in his later writings, but these writings have never been found.
Roman retribution and death
Between 14 and 16, Germanicus led punitive operations into Germany, fighting Arminius to a draw in the Battle at Pontes Longi and twice defeating him (according to Tacitus): first in the Battle of Idistaviso and later at the Battle of the Angrivarian Wall. In 15, Roman troops managed to recapture one of the three legionary eagles lost in the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. In 16, a second eagle was retrieved. Tiberius denied the request of Germanicus to launch an additional campaign for 17, however, having decided the frontier with Germania would stand at the Rhine river. Instead, he offered Germanicus the honor of a triumph for his two victories. The third Roman eagle was recovered in 41 by Publius Gabinius, under the emperor Claudius. Arminius also faced opposition from his father-in-law and other pro-Roman Germanic leaders. His brother Flavus, who had been raised alongside him in Rome, remained loyal to the Roman Empire and fought under Germanicus against Arminius at the Battle of Idistaviso. With the end of the Roman threat, a war broke out between Arminius and Marbod, king of the Marcomanni. It ended with Marbod fleeing to Ravenna and Roman protection, but Arminius failed to break into the "natural fortification" of Bohemia, and the war ended in stalemate. In 19, Germanicus died in Antioch under circumstances which led many to believe he had been poisoned by his opponents. Arminius died two years later in 21, murdered by opponents within his own tribe who felt that he was becoming too powerful. Tiberius allegedly had refused an earlier offer from a Chatti nobleman to poison Arminius: "It was not by secret treachery but openly and by arms that the people of Rome avenged themselves on their enemies."
Legacy and influence
Arminius' victory against the Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest had a far-reaching effect on the subsequent history of both the ancient Germanic peoples and on the Roman Empire. The Romans made no further concerted efforts to conquer and permanently hold Germania beyond the Rhine and the Agri Decumates. Numerous modern historians have regarded Arminius' victory as one of the most decisive battles in history, with some calling it "Rome's greatest defeat".
Roman imperial expansion
In the accounts of his Roman enemies, Arminius is highly regarded for his military leadership and as a defender of the liberty of his people. Based on these records, the story of Arminius was revived in the 16th century with the recovery of the histories of Tacitus, who wrote in his Annales II, 88:
Arminius, without doubt Germania's liberator, who challenged the Roman people not in its beginnings like other kings and leaders, but in the peak of its empire; in battles with changing success, undefeated in the war.
Arminius was not the only reason for Rome's change of policy towards Germania. Politics also played a factor; emperors found they could rarely trust a large army to a potential rival, though Augustus had enough loyal family members to wage his wars. Also, Augustus, in his 40-year reign, had annexed many territories still at the beginning of the process of Romanization. Tiberius, who succeeded Augustus in AD 14, decided that Germania was a far less developed land, possessing few villages and only a small food surplus, and therefore was not currently important to Rome. Conquering Germania would require a commitment too burdensome for the imperial finances and an excessive expenditure of military force.
Modern scholars have pointed out that the Rhine was a more practical boundary for the Roman Empire than any other river in Germania. Armies on the Rhine could be supplied from the Mediterranean Sea via the Rhône, Saône, and Mosel, with only a brief area of portage. Armies on the Elbe, however, would have to have been supplied by extensive overland routes or by ships travelling the hazardous Atlantic. Economically, the Rhine already had towns and sizable villages at the time of the Gallic conquest. The Rhine was significantly more accessible from Rome and better equipped to supply sizable garrisons than the regions beyond.
Rome chose no longer to rule directly in Germania east of the Rhine and north of the Danube, instead preferring to exert indirect influence through the tactics of using divide and rule and the appointing of client kings, which were cheaper than military campaigns. Italicus, nephew of Arminius, was appointed king of the Cherusci; Vangio and Sido became vassal princes of the powerful Suebi, etc. Only when indirect methods proved insufficient to control the Germanic tribes beyond the Rhine, did Roman emperors occasionally lead devastating punitive campaigns deep into Germania. One of them, led by the Roman emperor Maximinus Thrax, resulted in a Roman victory in 235 at the Battle at the Harzhorn Hill, located in the modern German state of Lower Saxony, east of the Weser river, between the towns of Kalefeld and Bad Gandersheim.
Germanic sagas
In the early 19th century, attempts were made to show that the story of Arminius and his victory may have lived on in the Old Norse sagas, in the form of the dragon slayer Sigurd of the Völsunga saga and the Nibelungenlied (Under his Germanic name Siegfried). An Icelandic account states that Sigurd "slew the dragon" in the Gnitaheidr—today the suburb Knetterheide of the city of Bad Salzuflen, located at a strategic site on the Werre river which could very well have been the point of departure of Varus' legions on their way to their doom in the Teutoburg Forest. One of the foremost Scandinavian scholars of the 19th century, Guðbrandur Vigfússon, identified Sigurd as Arminius. This educated guess was also picked up by Otto Höfler, who was a prominent Nazi academic during World War II.
German nationalism
After Tacitus' Annals were rediscovered by Renaissance humanists and first published during the Gutenberg Revolution of the 15th century, Arminius became an important symbol of German national identity, as a figure who successfully opposed colonialism and prevented the Romanization of his people by outgeneraling and defeating one of the world's first superpowers. Indeed, learning of his victory over the Roman army was especially important to German Renaissance humanists, as the Renaissance only reached the Holy Roman Empire much later than southern Europe and German humanists were widely looked down upon by their Italian colleagues. The first literary adaptation of the Arminius story came in 1520 with Ulrich von Hutten's Latin dialogue Arminius, which inserts the Germanic leader into a reimagining of the twelfth chapter of Lucian's satirical Dialogues of the Dead; a debate between Alexander the Great, Hannibal, and Scipio Africanus before the underworld judgment seat of Minos over who most deserves the position of history's greatest general and military strategist. Arminius argues his own claim and calls upon Tacitus to bear witness, and ultimately wins the case and the eloquent praise of Minos.
This version influenced later adaptations of the story, and reflected a wide interest in Arminius during the years of the German Reformation; the name Arminius was interpreted as reflecting the name Hermann by Martin Luther, who saw Arminius as a symbol of his religious followers among the German people and their resistance to the Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church.
During the military occupation of the German States, first by the French Revolutionary Army and then by the French Imperial Army of Napoleon Bonaparte, Hermann der Cheruskerfürst once again became a national icon and a martyr within both German Romanticism and the anti-Colonialist romantic nationalism fueled by the Napoleonic Wars, which are still termed in Germany the Wars of Liberation. This may particularly be seen as in Caspar David Friedrich's 1812 painting The Tombs of the Old Heroes. During the unification of Germany in the 19th century, Arminius was hailed as a symbol of German unity and liberation.
In 1808, Heinrich von Kleist wrote the play Die Hermannsschlacht, but with Napoleon's victory at Wagram it remained in manuscript, being published in 1821 and not staged until 1860. The play has been revived repeatedly at moments of national crisis and was especially used as propaganda in Nazi Germany.
In 1838, construction was started on a massive statue of Arminius, known as the Hermannsdenkmal, on a hill near Detmold in the Teutoburg Forest; it was finally completed and dedicated during the early years of the Second German Empire in the wake of the German victory over France in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–1871. The monument has been a major tourist attraction ever since, as has the Hermann Heights Monument, a similar statue erected in New Ulm, Minnesota, in the United States in 1897. The Hermann Heights monument was erected by the Sons of Hermann, a fraternal organization formed in New York City by German Americans as a means of self protection against anti-German sentiment and discrimination in 1840; and that flourished during the 19th century in American cities and rural areas with large populations speaking the German language in the United States. Hermann, Missouri, a town on the Missouri River founded in the 1830s and incorporated in 1845, was also named for Arminius.
Following the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945, Arminius became lesser-known among West Germans and the educational system shied away from teaching about his life due to a sense of guilt and shame, rooted in both the Holocaust and Nazi war crimes, related to any form of German nationalism. There was, however, a radically different practice in East Germany. Particularly during the Cold War, Arminius and his warriors were anachronistically reinterpreted quite similarly to the slave revolt led by Spartacus in the Marxist-Leninist official history promoted by the State; as an early socialist revolution and as revolutionary terror against the "Roman slaveholder society" (Sklavenhaltergesellschaft). The legacy of Arminius and his followers was further reinterpreted as symbolic of the allegedly "peace-loving" Warsaw Pact countries, while Imperial Rome was made into a symbol of the capitalist and allegedly Fascistic United States and the NATO military alliance, which were cast as the new evil empire needing to be resisted.
According to journalist David Crossland: "The old nationalism has been replaced by an easy-going patriotism that mainly manifests itself at sporting events like the soccer World Cup." The German Bundesliga football club DSC Arminia Bielefeld is named after Arminius. In the German diaspora, on the other hand, the 2,000-year anniversary of the battle was celebrated in New Ulm, Minnesota, proudly and without restraint. There were mock battles between Romans and club-wielding barbarians and also a lecture series in an auditorium.
Cultural references
Literature
Fictionalized versions of Arminius or commentary upon his legacy appear in:
- Arminius (1520), by Ulrich von Hutten
- Die Hermannschlacht (1808) by Heinrich von Kleist
- Germany. A Winter's Tale (1843) by Heinrich Heine
- The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World (1851) by Sir Edward Shepherd Creasy
- I, Claudius (1934) by Robert Graves
- What If? (1999), edited by Robert Cowley
- Give Me Back My Legions! (2009) by Harry Turtledove
- Eagles At War (2015) by Ben Kane
- Wolves of Rome (2016) by Valerio Massimo Manfredi (first published in Italian as Teutoburgo)
Music and opera
- Arminio is a 1692 opera about Arminius by the Bohemian-Austrian composer Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber.
- Germanico in Germania, a 1732 opera by Nicola Porpora
- Arminio is a 1736 opera about Arminius by George Frideric Handel.
- Arminius is an 1877 oratorio about Arminius by the German composer Max Bruch.
Television
- Barbarians is a 2020 TV show that features a fictionalised version of Arminius (portrayed by Laurence Rupp) as one of the central characters.
See also
- Ariovistus
- Bato the Breucian
- Bato the Daesitiate
- Boudica
- Divico
- Gaius Julius Civilis
- Teutobod
- Vercingetorix
Citations
- ^ Schulze, Wilhelm (1904). Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen. Weidmann. p. 127.
- Dr. Aaron Ralby (2013). "The Roman Legion: Refining Military Organization". Atlas of Military History. Parragon. p. 241. ISBN 978-1-4723-0963-1.
- ^ Murdoch 2012
- ^ Tucker 2010, p. 75
- ^ Cawthorne 2012
- ^ Davis 1999, p. 68
- ^ Creasy 2007, p. 104
- ^ "How the eagles were tamed". The Spectator. 27 March 2004. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
Mommsen referred to the Battle of the Teutoburg forest as a turning-point in world history.
- ^ Tacitus. The Annals.2.88. "Assuredly he was the deliverer of Germany, one too who had defied Rome, not in her early rise, as other kings and generals, but in the height of her empire's glory, had fought, indeed, indecisive battles, yet in war remained unconquered. He completed thirty-seven years of life, twelve years of power, and he is still a theme of song among barbarous nations, though to Greek historians, who admire only their own achievements, he is unknown, and to Romans not as famous as he should be, while we extol the past and are indifferent to our own times."
- ^ Crossland, David (28 August 2009). "Battle of the Teutoburg Forest: Germany Recalls Myth That Created the Nation". Spiegel Online International. Der Spiegel. Retrieved 16 January 2015.
- ^ Murdoch, Adrian (2009). Rome's Greatest Defeat: Massacre in the Teutoburg Forest. The History Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-0750940160.
- C. Velleius Paterculus (1924). The Roman History. Loeb Classical Library. p. 118.
- Herbert W. Benario (April 2004). "Arminius into Hermann: History into Legend". Greece and Rome. 51 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1093/gr/51.1.83.
- Förstemann, Ernst Wilhelm (1900). Altdeutsches Namenbuch (in German). Nabu Press. ISBN 9781270714996.
- "▷ Vorname Hermann: Herkunft, Bedeutung & Namenstag". vorname.com (in German). Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ "Arminius". Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2014.
- ^ Durschmied 2013, p. 1759
- "Legio V Alaudae". www.livius.org. September 2010. Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- Syme, p. 60
- Velleius Paterculus, Compendium of Roman History 2, 109, 5; Cassius Dio, Roman History 55, 28, 6–7
- Bordewich, Fergus M. (September 2006). "The Ambush That Changed History". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 8 April 2014. Retrieved 26 August 2021.
- Velleius Paterculus, Compendium of Roman History II, 120, 4; Cassius Dio, Roman History LVI, 22, 2a–2b
- ^ "Arminius". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 1 June 2019.
- Tacitus, The Annals 1.55
- Tacitus, The Annals 1.57
- "Thusnelda, Wife of Hermann". www.germanamericanpioneers.org. Retrieved 1 June 2019.
- ^ Tacitus, The Annals 1.59
- Winkler, Martin M. (2015). Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-049352-3.
- Tacitus, The Annals 1.58
- Tac. Ann. 1.60.4, 2.25.2
- Dio 60.8.7.
- Tac. Ann. 1.54–59.
- Tacitus, The Annals 2.88
- Tacitus, Annals 2.22 ff.; Suetonius, Caligula 1.4; Dio 57.18.1; on Arminius' assassination, Tac. Ann. 2.88;
- Tac. Ann. 2.87–88.
- "Arminius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2023.
- Winkler, Martin M. (2016). Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology. Oxford University Press. p. 30. ISBN 9780190252915.
- Peter Heather (2006). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians.
- Tacitus, Book 12
- Historia Augusta, The Two Maximini 12:1–4; Herodian, Roman History, Book 7:2:3
- A. Giesebrecht (1837). "Ueber den Ursprung der Siegfriedsage". Germania (2).
- unknown (1387), Nikulas Bergsson, Arnamagnæan Collection manuscript 194, 8yo
- Simek, R. (1990). "Altnordische Kosmographie: Studien und Quellen zu Weltbild und Weltbeschreibung in Norwegen und in Island vom 12. bis zum 14. Jahrhundert". Berlin/New York.
- G. Vigfusson, F. York Powell (1886). Grimm centenary; Sigfred-Arminivs, and other papers. Oxford Clarendon Press.
- O. Höfler, "Siegfried Arminius und die Symbolik," Heidelberg (1961), 60–64, and also in Siegfried, Arminius und der Nibelungenhort (Vienna 1978); F.G. Gentry, W. McConnell, W. Wunderlich (eds.), The Nibelungen Tradition. An Encyclopedia (New York–London 2002), article "Sigurd".
- Doyé 2002, p. 587.
- Benario, Herbert W. (April 2004). "Arminius into Hermann: History into Legend". Greece & Rome. 51 (1): 83–94. JSTOR 3567880.
- W. Bradford Smith (2004). "German Pagan Antiquity in Lutheran Historical Thought". The Journal of the Historical Society. 4 (3): 351–374. doi:10.1111/j.1529-921X.2004.00104.x.
- Dorothea Klein (ed.), Lutz Käppel (ed.): Das diskursive Erbe Europas: Antike und Antikerezeption. Peter Lang, 2008, ISBN 9783631560136, p. 329
- Heinrich von Kleist: Die Herrmannsschlacht. Ein Drama (Frankfurt am Main and Basel: Stroemfeld-Roter Stern, 2001).
- Reeve, William C (2004). "Die Hermannsschlacht". The Literary Encyclopedia. The Literary Dictionary Company. Retrieved 6 September 2006.
- Tillmann Bendikowski: Deutsche Geschichte – Mythos einer Schlacht. Zeit Online, 4 November 2008 (German)
- "New Ulm celebrates 2,000th anniversary of battle". Twin Cities. 20 September 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
Sources
- Cawthorne, Nigel (2012). Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict. Arcturus Publishing. pp. 75–77. ISBN 978-1848589544.
- Creasy, Edward (2007). The Fifteen Decisive War Battles of the World: From Marathon to Waterloo. Read Books. ISBN 978-1-84664-127-5.
- Davis, Paul K. (1999). 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present. Oxford University Press. pp. 68–71. ISBN 0195143663.
- Dörner, Andreas, Politischer Mythos und symbolische Politik. Der Hermannmythos: Zur Entstehung des Nationalbewußtseins der Deutschen (Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1996).
- Doyé, Werner M (2002). "Arminius". In François, Etienne; Schulze, Hagen (eds.). Deutsche Erinnerungsorte (in German). Vol. 3. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck. pp. 587–602.
- Durschmied, Erik (2013). The Weather Factor: How Nature Has Changed History. Hachette UK. pp. 1751–1770. ISBN 978-1444769654.
- von Essen, Gesa, Hermannsschlachten. Germanen- und Römerbilder in der Literatur des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen: Wallstein, 1998).
- Kuehnemund, Richard, Arminius or the Rise of a National Symbol in Literature: From Hutten to Grabbe (New York: AMS Press, 1966).
- Münkler Herfried, and Hans Grünberger: "Arminius/ Hermann als nationales Symbol im Diskurs der deutschen Humanisten 1500–1570", In: Herfried Münkler, Hans Grünberger, and Kathrin Mayer, Nationenbildung. Die Nationalisierung Europas im Diskurs humanistischer Intellektueller. Italien und Deutschland (Berlin: Akademie, 1998), pp. 263–308.
- Murdoch, Adrian (2012). Rome's Greatest Defeat: Massacre in the Teutoburg Forest. The History Press. ISBN 978-0752494555.
- Tucker, Spencer (2010). Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1598844290.
- Wagner-Egelhaaf, Martina (ed.), Hermanns Schlachten. Zur Literaturgeschichte eines nationalen Mythos (Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2008).
- Winkler, Martin M. (2016). Arminius the Liberator: Myth and Ideology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-025291-5.
- Wolters, Reinhard Die Schlacht im Teutoburger Wald: Arminius, Varus und das roemische Germanien (München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2008).
External links
- Arminius at the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Arminius at the Ancient History Encyclopedia
- "Arminius / Varus: Die Varusschlacht im Jahre 9 n. Chr." – LWL-Institut für westfälische Regionalgeschichte (in German)
- "Terry Jones' Barbarians: The Savage Goths" – includes a portion on Arminius
- A description of Arminius and his fight against the Romans (in German)
- Hermann Biography Workbook for High School
- "They Need a Hero" by Clay Risen in The National, 9 October 2009 – article on modern German views of Hermann and the 2,000th anniversary of the battle
The Football (Soccer) Team „DSC Arminia Bielefeld“ is named After Arminius
Categories: