| Revision as of 18:13, 19 June 2007 editBrilliburger (talk | contribs)123 edits Undid revision 139250389 by The Filmaker (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:21, 14 October 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,951 editsm Fixing Lint errors from Misplaced Pages:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31)Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
| (118 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=May 2014}} | |||
| {{usertalkpage}} | |||
| {{usertalkpage}} | |||
| {{bottompostusertalk}} | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| == |
== Re: Return of the Jedi == | ||
| Hey. I've worked on some FA pushes (i.e. ]). I am looking forward to working with you. I am usually interested in FA pushes. Can you help me out? I am considering some articles for my self-nomination. All Wikiprojects always stride for GAs and FAs, remember? By the way, thank you for your comments both on the Return of the Jedi article and on my talk page. They are much appreciated. :D Good luck and regards. ] 17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I just did a fairly quick run-through copyedit; you may wish to look it over and make sure that I didn't make any assumptions. In terms of succinctness, there is probably some room for improvement, but, not having ever seen this series, I'm kind of wary of making bolder wording changes. — ]::] 07:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've halted the FAC on the Return of the Jedi until these issues that you explained are resolved (see ]). Thanks. ] 21:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Serenity Plot == | |||
| :::I would need some help in finding sources, especially for the production section. I will need some people from the League of Copyeditors for the copyediting. Thanks. ] 22:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I've done some copyediting on the article, placed a copyedit request at the WikiProject League of Copyeditors and added a "copyedit" tag, but is there anything else left I can do to help with this article on becoming an FA status? Thanks. ] 20:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Also, I would be very much appreciated if you help me find a copyeditor or find reliable sources for this article. Thanks. ] 20:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I did some considerable copyediting to ] last night, but I have some questions regarding your recent reversions of a few of my edits. Please see my comments near the bottom of ]. —] 20:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Just in case that you were adressing your last comment to me, we arrived at that guideline because of ]. Plus, the guideline leaves loopholes for complicated plots. The guideline is viewable at ]. Thanks, ] 02:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I also did some proofreading. Thank you for your comments earlier, both on the ROTJ article and on my talk page. I fixed a few errors that Beverson made. By the way, I have earlier placed a final proofread request at ]. I have made some editing and cleaning up as well. If I made the FA push without you, I apologize. :D All the best. ] ] ] 23:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| :Also, please see my comments at ] as well. Thanks. ] ] ] 00:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AfD == | |||
| I'll try to take a thorough look at it soon. From a brief scan last night, it looked organizationally okay, but I did see some copyediting issues, in my book; there was one instance a slash was used instead of "or". — ]::] 18:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like someone beat me to it. Maybe I'll try to give it a copyedit instead. :) — ]::] 05:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'll try to give it a look soon, but I am and will be somewhat busy in real life for a while. — ]::''']''' 13:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: As you can probably tell, I'm not here too often anymore. If I'm not mistaken, you've achieved your objectives on this regardless. Good job.--] 05:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I've made my recommendation, but I have to say that it unfortunately looks like the AfD will wind up for '''keep''' or '''no consensus'''. These processes are usually a WOFT because most editors don't know what ]. I think, also, the general rule of thumb is that the longer the AfD page (not in terms of <s>votes</s> recommendations, but back-and-forth discussion), the less likely a consensus is reached. Also, ], would you mind checking out '']''? I've been expanding it (still need to rewrite the Plot section and add a decent Critical reaction section), but thoughts on the structure would be appreciated. I still have citations on the talk page that I'm incorporating into the article. —] (] • ]) - 17:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == SWIII: RotS == | |||
| :No worries. You basically said what I said, just (as I reflected on it when I put it back) with a little less "tone". <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">]</span> <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">]</span> 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I've tried to make my point a little clearer - that RotS was not the first Star Wars film to have Darth/Anakin played by the same actor, but is currently the only film to do so. It's a small point to argue, but as it was it's an incorrect statement. ] 16:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, sorry, my bad. My mistake. I thought that, as originally filmed, Anakin (force ghost) at the end of RotJ was played by the same person who was in the Darth Vader suit, and on actually putting in some effort and looking I have discovered that this is, indeed, not true. Still a bit of a dodgy point, since we see Sebastian Shaw's face while most of Vader is still in the suit, but I'll withdraw my objection and my edit. ] 17:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Made in America (The Sopranos) == | |||
| ==ESB== | |||
| Hey, I just helped to copyedit a bunch of articles, so I'm taking a little break. I'll definitely pitch in with the League though. — ''']]]''' 19:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| In regard to your recent edits to the article, I noticed you changed the section title "Plot summary" to "Plot". The addition of "summary" was to clarify that the section is meant to summary, rather than the entirety of the plot. The shortened title is also dwarfed by the subsection that proceeds it. ] 01:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: ''Batman Begins'' == | |||
| == Made in America (the Sopranos) == | |||
| I know, I know... I slipped up. Couldn't go back and change the edit summary. I was suggesting that ''Superman Returns'' isn't the ideal article to learn from, when it failed the GA test and ''Batman Begins'' passed. Better to learn from the FA-class ''Star Wars'' articles. :) I'm working on shaping up '']'', any suggestions? I might subsection the Production section... not sure if I can make it sound linear in one body of text. There are some FA-class film articles that have some regular Production paragraphs, then subsections with more detailed paragraphs. Any thoughts on that or anything else? (My pride is the Development section; definitely added a new dimension to the film in my mind.) —] (] • ]) - 14:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You deleted a submission to the Sopranos article adding only four letters to describe your reasons for doing so, typing 'rv or', i presume you mean 'original research' - the contribution was as follows: | |||
| "Most interpretations of the ending scene take no account of the song playing in the diner as Tony first enters - "All That You Dream" - its chorus is | |||
| :Ok, I'll see how Development works as a subsection in the Production section. The Production section is definitely underdeveloped, as you can see that we've only gotten as far as announcing when it would start. Do you think the Development could stand alone if the Production was expansive enough in time? I'm hoping to work in the trivia details somewhere else, definitely -- they were just a couple of cited items compared to the whole bunch that we exported to the talk page. —] (] • ]) - 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| - | |||
| - "I've been down but not like this before | |||
| - Can't be 'round this kind of show no more" | |||
| - | |||
| Given that Chase has said he will make no further comment, the significance of this is up to the viewers." | |||
| If you had bothered to cut and paste these lyrics into the web you would see that by now thousands of people are discussing this. the only section of the contribution that could be qualified as original research is the final sentence, stating that given the writers will make no comment, the viewers are left to interpret its meaning for themselves. | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| So why did you remove it? | |||
| Hey, I'm really busy in real life at the moment, if you haven't judged by the slowness of my response and the lack of Misplaced Pages activity over the week. Can you find someone else to weigh in? There's ] and ]. Sorry that I can't help you personally. — ]::''']''' 02:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure, because listing a few of the more obvious/common references might make the article more comprehensive. Only a few though; maybe a paragraph. — ''']]''' 05:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Middle-earth in popular culture - pre-DRV request notification == | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aleckenny.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| Hi there. I'm leaving a courtesy note to let you know that I am asking the closing admin to reconsider ]. My arguments are laid out at ]. As you opened the original AfD, I'm notifying you so that you can add your opinion, either there or later if it goes to DRV. Thanks. ] 11:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 04:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==The Godfather/Sandbox== | |||
| ==Protection necessary?== | |||
| A {{]}} template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. ] 12:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Is it really necessary to protect '']'' purely because it will be Today's Featured Article tomorrow? Or did I miss the memo saying that it was standard procedure to protect an article that will be Today's Featured Article? ] 23:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The article has only been ''move''-protected so that no one can move the article. There is absolutely no need for an article to be moved during the twenty-four hours it is featured at Today's Featured Article. I've been move-protecting the featured article for several weeks now, but when I forgot to move-protect one. -- ''']''' 23:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Page move== | ||
| I moved an article you made to ]. I assume it wasn't supposed to be in the main namespace ] 02:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| "Mixed reviews" should be balanced enough. Those who disagree need to understand that "mixed" means both good and bad, which ESB certainly received when it first came out (I've read plenty of stuff from that era, saying that it was 'unsatisfactory' or 'worthy sequel'). — ''']]''' 01:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Finish all your work on the article in the sandbox, and then start a peer review. Then things will get clear for that user. — ''']]''' 04:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah; but open the peer review at the same time you bring the sandbox contents in "to be fair". — ''']]''' 05:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WP:Films Welcome== | |||
| ==Stress== | |||
| I was surprised you weren't already a member after all of the many improvements to GA/FA you have helped with. Anyway, here's an official welcome! --] 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I pity you; all the stress you must go through trying to maintain your featured articles :) I should probably go through and give a quick maintenence check for mine, as well. — ''']]''' 13:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border: 2px solid black; background: black; background-color:lightgreen; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 90%"> | |||
| <div style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">'''Welcome!'''</div> | |||
| ] | |||
| Hey, welcome to the ]! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{tl|User WikiProject Films}} to your user page. | |||
| A few features that you might find helpful: | |||
| == ''Children of Men'' == | |||
| * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's ]; it is highly recommended that you . | |||
| * The project has a ]. The newsletter for July has been ]. August's issue is ''currently in production''; it will be delivered as a link, but ] are available. | |||
| Seeing that you profess in quality film articles, I was wondering if you could share your opinion over a disagreement at '']''. There is a mild conflict between a couple of editors regarding a phrase that appears at the end of the film after credits have rolled. Its thematic importance is pointed out later in the Themes section, but one editor believes that it doesn't belong in the plot, while the other editor believes it to be part of the overall package being delivered by the director to the audience. You can read discussion beginning ], going... a bit of ways down. :) Personally, I'm conflicted, as I originally tried to insert it in an objective light (merely saying that the phrase appeared), and leaving the interpretation for the Themes section. If you have the time, your input would be appreciated. Thanks. —] (] • ] • ]) - 18:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like: | |||
| == Star Wars articles == | |||
| * Want to jump right into editing? The ] show things you should include. | |||
| It seems the articles still contain those same errors I pointed out.I checked the ] article and it still states the 1997 special edition came to DVD.This is not true. | |||
| * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the ] to see how you can help. | |||
| Please let's do change it.The 2004 DVD edition is a sperate edition.See ] to learn more.Regards.--] | |||
| * Want to know how good our articles are? Our ] has rated the quality of ''every'' film article in Misplaced Pages. Check it out! | |||
| * Want to collaborate on articles? The ] picks an article every week to work on together. | |||
| If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask ], and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! ] 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry,I didn't know you were away.About the return of the jedi article,I fixed it.The problem wasn't in the article of the original trilogy,but on each movie seperately.It states that the movie was re-released in 1997 on theatres,VHS,Laserdisc and DVD.This is not true.The 2004 DVD editions are '''not''' the 1997 special editions because they carry significant differences to the 1997 editions.True they are special editions because of updates and better special effects,but they are not the 1997 editions. | |||
| </div> | |||
| I think you should add the articles to you watchlist in case a confused user reverts my edits.I'll even bring this up on the Star Wars discussion page just to clarify.Regards.--] | |||
| ==How's it going?== | |||
| ==Outside Opinion Requested: Children of Men== | |||
| I wanted to see what your up to, what articles are being pushed, and what does ROTJ need to be ready for an FAC push? Also, are we going to work on the Star Wars article to make sure it stays a featured topic? All the best! ] 20:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :About half done copyediting, no problems thus far :) ] 23:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Will finish copyediting tonight/tomorrow. Also, I have a important request. I have created an article, ] to cover all of the Ghostbusters stuff, and I have merged a ton of articles into it, so it is kind of a mess. Could you please help me with it? Copyediting, trimming junk, etc? Thanks so much... ] 02:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey. I've been a little busy trying to finish up old priorities, so I might not be able to get to those articles. — ''']]''' 02:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==re:"Fanboy" vandal== | |||
| Hi! | |||
| Unfortunately, the other account wasn't blocked indefinitely, so we can't get him for block evasion. He's one revert away from 3RR, and if starts again yesterday, I'll block him anyway for gaming the system. — ''']]''' 18:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I was hoping to enlist your assistance in resolving a difference in edits for the article for the movie, ]. | |||
| The differences in edits is relatively minor but contentious, with low-level edit-warring back and forth replacing one version, then the other. It has even resulted in one of the parties being reported for 3RR violations. And of course, it has strained civility to the breaking point. A third voice (preferably someone who has seen the movie, but not vital) is needed. A request for editor review was requested before from two other editors, without response. I would suggest taking a look at the key points as they have been debated on the discussion page, but the debate has gone on for...quite a bit. | |||
| If you will permit me, the two edits take place in the synopsis, viewed by their diff . | |||
| ==re:ROTJ== | |||
| *One side of the debate (indicated by the linked edit on the left) argues that statements and sounds heard at the end of the film (the sounds of children laughing and playing and the words Shantih, Shantih, Shantih appearing on the screen at the very end) were not specifically part of the synopsis as it was no more a part of the "storyworld" than the credits or specifcally thematic components. This pov statees that the components are solely thematic, and should be only be mentioned in the Themes header of the article. | |||
| ]. — ''']]''' 03:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah. He's quite...enthusiastic? . — ''']]''' 03:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah. I'm a firm believer that the main editor should nominate the article. If necessary, a vote can be held for the honors. — ''']]''' 03:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Star Wars articles and production info == | |||
| *The other side of the debate (indicated by the linked edit on the right) argues that these same statements, by the very fact that they were observable portions of the film should be a part of the synopsis, in keeping with the of the word, further reasoning that casual visitors want an accurate depiction of what was on the screen for the film's duration, allowing for any thematic discussion of the synopsis to take place in the Themes section, either in brief or in depth. | |||
| I just wanted to say a few brief words off of the FAC. First of all, congratulations on making it this far on getting the entire series to FA status. It's quite an accomplishment, especially in the light of the high trafffic the articles must get! | |||
| I thank you for taking the time to read this request, and I hope you can assist us in finding a compromise.] 15:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| My comment regarding the ROTJ FAC is mainly that there is not enough out-of-universe information there, although what is presented is done well. In comparison, the ANH article has an extensive amount of info regarding Lucas's personal travails making the film, which I think are no less worthy than the challenges faced by the crew en-masse or the technical innovations required to create the films. The problem is that the information sources (particularly the links I provided) can be rather tech-speak and don't necessarily provide the most obvious context. I'd be willing to help not only with the ROTJ article, but also with the other SW articles each in bringing a lot of this up to spec. Particularly, it's distressing to see the ANH article mention the "groundbreaking" work of ILM in the lead (quite a justifiable statement), but then fail to mention much about ILM aside from its founding and the politics. Specifically, ''what'' made it groundbreaking? I also have the Mark Cotta Vaz book, so I'll see what can be dug up. I guess my overall objections are simply that for films that are so expensive, technically intensive, and innovative if not groundbreaking, one would be hard pressed to learn this if your only encounter with Star Wars was reading the WP articles. Thanks for your time, ] 21:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==I'm somewhat back== | |||
| Congrats on the House Pilot episode, great work on that. I will copyedit the article tomorrow, and let me know if you need anything for the FAC. I have been moving, changing schools, and getting engaged, so haven't been as busy on Misplaced Pages these last few months. :) ] 06:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Okay, I've just gotten started. I think I'm probably also going to split off the post-production/visual effects information to a new section, especially given how SFX intensive and groundbreaking the films were. (Don't worry, there's still more relevant info that I plan to populate that with). Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads up. Please take a look and let's continue the discussion. Thanks, ] 02:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==A Fine Line== | |||
| On a somewhat related issue, please allow me to pick your brain a bit. When writing a synopsis, there is the need to avoid OR. Where is the fine line between the use of descriptive words in the synopsis which describe a character's motivations and inventing them? In examples, most taken from an FA article: | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| == ] == | |||
| All of the aforementioned articles use descriptive words to allude to the perceived state of the characters in the film. Can you explain the difference to me a bit?] 06:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I agree that the previous thumbnail was too small, but I think your version is somewhat too large based on ]b. Would it be possible to upload a version that's about 300-400 pixels on its longest side? This should satisfy any non-free use concerns. Thanks! ] ] 01:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, one last quibble to make the image fully compliant with NFCC - who is the copyright holder of the image? The source doesn't specify. Thanks! ] ] 02:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Movieguy999 == | |||
| :A bit over my head for all that before my first cuppa, but I think I understand yiour point. Of the four examples, 1,2 and 4 were from FA articles. Number 3 was a proposed alteration to the synopsis which would have reflected the intended ambiguity of the ending. The entire film, the viewer is told that the Human Project is trying to save mankind from extinction, and when we finally see them in the final moments of the film, they are not friendly at all. They don't wave, they don't smile; they don't act like Good Guys. A firend of mine said that she thought that 10 minutes later, it could very well have been a horror movie. Add to that the warning that Theo told Kee to keep the baby close, no matter what, and there is enough amibuity for second helpings. Do you see my point?] 16:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I just want to let you know that the TPM, AOTC and ROTS articles are having problems. Movieguy999 has now added weasel and neutrality tags to these articles to prevent edit war. Movieguy999 has been constantly removing reliable sources in the reaction section before this. Your comments regarding these situations will be very much appreciated. Thanks. ] ] ] 18:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your "helpful" edits == | |||
| I have now reported that incident at ]. ] ] ] 18:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Would you please knock it off with the removing sections. It equalizes the House episodes and when anonymous members and regular ones want to place something in a catgoery and it isn't there, they tend to make different names and throw the whole system out of whack.<br>]] ] 05:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Movieguy999 has also said, in his most recent comment, on ], that the discussion has been completely one-sided. He has said that has made case, the article clearly has issues, and no one has made an attempt to resolve them and had given exact details of what is wrong and has commented to you that have done nothing but point to other articles and own fan opinion. I am getting sick and tired of having to revert his edits. If that happens again, can we report this issue to the administrators? Thanks. ] ] ] 14:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey! "Borderline personal attack? Grow up. Stop removing content willy-nilly. If you plan to reorganize the way you just ''have'' to have it, '''stop ignoring all the info submitted and file it appropriately'''. Don't be lazy. <br>]] ] 04:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I have once again reported that incident at ]. Any comments there should be very much appreciated. ] ] ] 17:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * I agree. You didn't open any discussion about the articles, you just went through and deleted the sections. Those are big chunks of text and if you don't think they should be there, tell us why. But please don't start blanket editing the articles like that without talking about it first. You can agrue why those sections should be removed and let the community discuss it (because this is a community and a lot of people work on these articles). Until then, I'm going to restore those sections. ] 02:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter== | |||
| == ESB == | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This is an automated delivery by ] 13:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| I'm thinking about taking a break from copy-editing. I gave the lead a quick runthrough, and I'll go through and give it a quick read once I get the chance. — ''']]''' 14:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == sockpuppet case == | |||
| Hi, I decided to butt in really and help out, as I've never really edited a ''Star Wars'' article. Why exactly do you need others to copyedit by the way? I hope ESB and ROTJ are featured by the end of the year. ] 20:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| He may well be the same person, but he hasn't violated ]. It's not prohibited to abandon one account and start using another, as long as you're not evading an existing block or ban. ] (]) 00:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey, I'm afraid that I have zero time for Misplaced Pages at the moment. ''Both'' of my hard drives just got wiped by some bizarre hardware failure — my current guess is that a cable somehow became loose — so I'm going to be spending some quality time getting my system fully up. Sorry that I can't help you this time around. — ]::''']''' 09:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I'll take a look later today. Am about to leave the house in a few minutes. Appreciate the invitation! —] (] • ] • ]) - 16:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. (Note: This is a notification by myself, because you were the nominator and main editor of this article). ] ] ] 01:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Thanks for the message. I'll be sure to check it all out soon. Cheers. ] 16:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hope the changes are satisfactory. Let me know if anything further is needed. —] (] • ] • ]) - 15:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Revenge Of The Sith == | |||
| :Meh, sorry about that. I think my eyes perceived a ghost paragraph or something? I think I need some coffee on this fine morning. —] (] • ] • ]) - 15:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "Be Bold" == | |||
| The article also says don't be reckless. If you see an empty section that no-one has added text to, you can feel free to delete it. It doesn't improve the article to have empty places, you're right. But that doesn't mean you should delete half the page around it as well, including places where there ARE text. ] 02:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| "Though many critics and fans saw it as one of the best of the series, or at least, the strongest of the three prequels, others saw it as more or less on par with The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones." | |||
| ==Another awesome job!== | |||
| Empire strikes back looks great, only needed very minor copyediting at this point. It has come a long way from before it was GA. I hope to be more helpful on the Return of the Jedi, a personal favorite of mine :) Be in touch! ] 21:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hey== | |||
| Dear Filmaker, | |||
| This reads exactly like: "Though some people liked the movie, other people didn't." | |||
| I came across your page as I was looking at FAC pages. Six pages in your FA history, quite impressive! I am working on getting the ] page to FA status. So, I was hoping to get your advice on how to get there? Thanks for your time! ] 06:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| And your source, the New Yorker article, makes absolutely ZERO mention of Revenge being on par with AOTC and TPM, being one of the best of the series, or being the strongest of the three prequels. | |||
| ==One to go== | |||
| Congrats; one more to go :) Then it's on to individual characters and concepts? — ''']]''' 06:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] 01:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image request == | |||
| ==] roll call== | |||
| You're one of those guys who can make an image off a DVD. I have a request then: I intend on making '']'' FA, and what I need is something from the ] hosted documentary: | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px #ffa500; background-color: #0BDA51;"> | |||
| *Stan Winston's company making animatronics. | |||
| <center>Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the ''']''' participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the ]. You may also wish to add '''<nowiki>{{User WikiProject Films}}</nowiki>''' to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several ''']''' that you may be interested in joining as well. | |||
| *The animatic of T-rex chasing Gallimimuses that made Spielberg and Tippett realise CGI was here to stay. | |||
| <br> | |||
| Contact on whether or not you can do it. It'd be much obliged. ] 18:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Also, ''']''' are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at ]. Thanks and happy editing!</center></div><small>An automatic notification by ] 01:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Unspecified source for ]== | |||
| Aw shucks. What tool is needed to make images as a quick query? ] 19:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Godfather== | |||
| The new version looks a lot better, for sure. — ''']]''' 03:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure! I'll take a look :) ] 02:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ==CineVoter== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| {| align=center class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #000000; padding: .5em; margin-bottom: 3px; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
| | style="padding-right: 4px; padding-left: 4px;" | ] | |||
| As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
| | You voted for the ], and it has been chosen as <br/><big><center>''']'''.</center></big>'''Please help improve it''' to match the quality of an ] Misplaced Pages ] article.</small> | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 06:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source --> ] ] 06:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. | |||
| Please note that ] have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. <small>This has been an automated delivery by ] 00:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nathan fillion gun.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 21:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Twojedi.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 15:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. <small>This has been an automated delivery by ] 21:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Preity Zinta FA== | |||
| Hi there. The ] article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at ]. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable.] <sup>]</sup> 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Justice League of America == | |||
| Can I ask you to undo the setup of the film article? Per the ], stand-alone articles on unproduced projects are not warranted. I assume that you set it up because of the declaration of a release date, but that does not mean that the film will be produced. For example, ] similarly has a release date declared, but production hasn't started on it yet. That's why we've had articles like ] and ] under broader articles. —] (] • ]) - 00:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've reverted your changes; I hope that's alright. Let me know if you have any issues with the approach. If filming starts, which may not happen what with the strike and all preventing necessary rewrites, the project may not go underway. If it does, though, we can restore the article. —] (] • ]) - 05:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:3912 sw007.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 22:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] 02:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Return of the jedi 4.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 20:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ep3 ia 80647.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 20:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sw3 cast.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Padmeattempt.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Merry Christmas == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{{1|] (])}}} is wishing you a ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge! <br /> | |||
| Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==WikiProject St. Louis== | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="center"|] | |||
| | Hello, I noticed you've made edits to ] articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the ''']'''. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to ''']''' status. Hope you can participate! | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| <small>This is an automated notice by ] 21:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ] | |||
| I have added the summary of the special effects from watching the doucmentary and an online source and have added the complete awards section which I have sub parted in reaction as it looked too big,. THis may need writing into the text further I don't really mind. I plan to take an image of the rig for the Ventian house used while filming to show the mechanics of the baloon and cylinders -this would give it that bit extra to show - look we really know what we are talking about here. I plan to add a small section on technical specs type of cameras used etc. When this is copy edited it a bit then I want this up for a featured proposal. It is becoming an excellent article ] <sup>]]</sup> 20:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | ] 20:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Other users seem pleased enough with the progession so far but it may need to be cut down slightly I don't want it over 60kb ] <sup>]]</sup> 20:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ]s == | |||
| Why delete all three? At least one ] <sup>]]</sup> 21:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Happy New Year, Filmaker! Given your vast contributions to ] pages (and per a recommendation by ]), I thought I could solicit your assistance. I've submitted two articles for ], and thought that you might like to critique them: | |||
| If the character is so unimportant why does he have his own wikipedia article when most of the others are on merged lists? ] <sup>]]</sup> 21:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'']''. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and ], I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other ] films) quality. | |||
| *]. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks ] ]. Although I've already requested ], as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Comments and suggestions are appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other '']''-centric articles. | |||
| If you have the time, it'd be great if you could look over those two articles and assess their flaws and weaknesses. Thanks, and, once again, a Happy New Year to you! — ] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| In many film articles the film not only has an image of the dvd but also the soundtrack. The poster is the dvd ] <sup>]]</sup> 21:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Heads up == | |||
| An image of an award win is used in ] in exactly the same way which I helped get to an FA. Of course it is not essential but are any of the other images truly essential? I am trying to improve this as much as possible and believe images really help fit the full picture. I don't like articles with no vidual media whatsoever but also don't like clutter. I thought it was fine at least with one of them] <sup>]]</sup> 21:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Since you've substantially edited the first episode, I'm letting you know that I plan on redirecting most of the "List of House episodes" per ] soon. Every episode after "Pilot" lacks multiple secondary sources which must be present for a single episode to need an article. This includes reception and development. I'm sure you are aware single plot summaries and trivia don't make a substantial article, and it is usually only the first and last episodes that pass the notability guideline to warrant their own articles. ] 22:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I do find it very odd that you beleive that the gun barrel image really adds something absolutely amazing to the plot but an image of a major award win in the award section isn't. I think you'll choose anything to suit your own opinions. Can you tell me staight and honestly you think that gun barrel image tells something remarkable about the plot. It is in the plot section. I don't have a problem with it but that does not really add anything significant to the plot. Images help to put it into its context. ] <sup>]]</sup> 10:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :If you know of any other episode can have more than just plot and trivia, please let me know ]. ] 22:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == A Beautiful Mind == | |||
| OK then but I am returning just the dvd image then -this like the main poster is part of the campaign for the dvd promotion which constitutes a sepreate paragraph. DVD release is very important an an image showing it is not a problem and helps the article. Look I am trying to improve this and I can't see that an image or two is really damaging to the article. ] <sup>]]</sup> 10:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I was looking through the article history, and I noticed that you're the most recent primary editor of the article. Being as the article is already at A-Class status, would you be interested in taking the article through an FAC? ] (]) 22:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| How does the image of the gun barrel help the article? ] <sup>]]</sup> 14:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Germany Invitation == | |||
| Look life is too short to argue I would rather work together friendly to get it to FA status rathing than wasting each others time when we could work ogether properly. but are you saying an image of the key to the plot Mr White is not helping to create "the look" of the film. However little he appeared in the film this was intentional to create an air of mystery. He even has a seperate wikipedia article when 90% of the other characters are on lists. How can you say he is not important to the film? I'll forget the award image but i diagree with you about the others. The question is what is stopping this article from becoming an FA? ] <sup>]]</sup> 14:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| | |||
| OK I'll leave white out but if I find the proper dvd cover not the poster surely you can't argue against this? Some Bond articles like Die another day have unneccesaary images of both soundtrack, book and dvd. An image of dvd is the most important that those others. ] <sup>]]</sup> 11:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |valign="top" style="border-style:solid; border-width:2; border-color:#C0C0C0"| | |||
| {| | |||
| | | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, The Filmaker! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. | |||
| * ] | | |||
| * ] | | |||
| <br> | |||
| | | |||
| |} | |||
| |} | |||
| --] (]) 17:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| I'd like to see these following improvements until it is ready for FA nomination: | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. ] (]) 02:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| *Intergrate award list fully into written text and avoid redundant repetition. | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 18:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *Copy edit the article fully -most notably in the reaction and release section where some wording is not quite polished enough -too many short sentences and some phrasing is still quite clumsy. | |||
| *Try to intergrate a bit of basic summary of the screenplay into an existing section basic differences from original novel -the similarity to Flemings and original charcter and plot also needs at the very least mentioning. No quoting but some mention of the dialogue in places might help -Judi Dench's character is even more hostile this time and she uses stonger language than ever before in fitting with the "darker Bond". | |||
| *Mentioning the dates of casting - it was actually done in September 2005 and the final decsion for Craig for made in only a few weeks announced in October although the production team had had their eye on Craig since 2003. | |||
| *One final image please. of the actual DVD COVER from than the poster. I'll forget about the award and Mr White. | |||
| == WikiProject Films coordinator elections == | |||
| What do you think amigo? ] <sup>]]</sup> 12:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please ] by March 28! ] (]) 09:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have restructured sentencing and phrasing considerably with more professional wording throughout the article now removing a few sentences and words which affect the integrity of the article, the release section was repetitive before also and 3/4 of the US section before was about the UK -it should appear more readible now it has been rewritten. I also hope you like the Special effects section, which I see as the missing gap in info and having watched the doucmentary several times on behind the scenes I can confirm it sumarizes all the important information fully and I beleive it is a very useful asset in learning about the film. I would like to add a final image of the venice rig set used at Pinewood whilst filming though but I have mostly finished my work and appreciate that you all allowed me to improve it where I was intially reverted within seconds!!! I hope you and everyone is happy with the developments and won't re edit it too much. If there is no objection I now think it just about ready for FA proposal. ALl the best ] <sup>]]</sup> 17:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC). | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| OK whatever. I am amazed at your distaste for images!!!! I figure at least one image in bottom section helps and was very appropriate but never mind. Whatever the case I have rewritten the article and am proposing it for an FA today. Thanks for your appreciation anyway even if we can't agree on the images!!!! ] <sup>]]</sup> 09:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 01:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| Hey ok that fine mate. I just thought it might help the article. The important thing is that I have rewritten the article and it is hopefully up to FA. I beleive we already have one or two supports already - beleive me I couldn't care less about the images if this is voted an FA without them. I only thought it might help improve it. The main thing is that people are happy with my work and are aware that I have an ability -that people respect my work and everybody else combined who have made the article are respected too for their efforts including yourself. All the best ] <sup>]]</sup> 18:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br/><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 01:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Putting things into perspective... == | |||
| ==James Blond== | |||
| I have addressed the James Blond in the intro. THats the best pplace to mention the protest against Bond the casting section should discuss the actual decsion making process beofre going on to production. I wish you had quickly told me that you saw it as a problem before opposing and it can be quickly rectified ] <sup>]]</sup> 19:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: LightGrey;" | |||
| Personally I consider in my view 5'10 is short and I don't really consider 6'1 all that tall I'm 6'4 1/2 and in my view Craig is pretty rough looking!!! but amzingly he does seem to have that quality of a bond which is beleivable. Those possible pov issues have been worded to show it is the view of fans who threatened to boycott the film rather than saying he is short or is blond. It is very difficult to attempt to please verybody but I agree that the briefing helps considerably and his highly appropriate ] <sup>]]</sup> 20:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The WikiProject Films Award''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, ] (]), hereby award ] the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to ]. Awarded retrospectively for being instrumental in making an article of the ] ('']'') into a featured article. | |||
| <dd style="font-size: 85%; color: #666; text-align: right; padding-right: 5px; font-style: italic;">Awarded 03:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)</dd> | |||
| |} | |||
| But remember it is from my view. 5 ft 10 I believe is even slightly above average in the UK let alone other countries (except Holland) so of course its not short compared to most of the population -but it depends on whose perspective!!! THis same thing applies in the article people see things from different persepctives. Anyway I hope the brief helps fill in the gap Saludos ] <sup>]]</sup> 20:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| Thanks. ] <sup>]]</sup> 20:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 20:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:A-beautiful-mind-3.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Somebody has removed the section I added. Even if the sources are removed we have to mention the controversy at least in a sentence or two. It is very difficult to accomdate everyone!!!] <sup>]]</sup> 20:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Akiva goldsman4.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have restored the brief but rmeoved the website reference. Going well so far 6/6 in support. ] <sup>]]</sup> 10:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| ===New section:Title sequence=== | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --] (]) 00:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Another sub section summarizing details of how the credits were designed and the reasons behind it would be even greater | |||
| *http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=4511 | |||
| ] <sup>]]</sup> 10:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== The Dark Knight == | ||
| Sure thing. My IM is SonOfYoungwood, and my e-mail is SonOfYoungwood@aol.com. — ''']]''' 02:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, long time no see! Are you aware that ] says to exclude user ratings? We've had a lot of discussion about this already on the film article's talk page. —] (] • ]) - 17:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Godfather == | |||
| That debate seems to be going about the same as always, which means it will probably result in a delete. — ''']]''' 23:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Films ]== | |||
| == Jurassic Park FAC == | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 02:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith == | |||
| You wouldn't mind making a comment at ]? It'd be much appreciated. ] 20:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Just to let you know, you have significantly contributed to ]. Its in a GA process right now, and you're welcome to assist ]. ] ] 14:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hello? ] 12:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== WP:CHICAGO == | ||
| According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (]) that includes a category at ] and that has been promoted to ], ] or ]. You are not signed up as an active member of ]. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at ]. Also, if you are a member, be aware of ] and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's ], ], ], ], ] ], ], ], ], ], and ] discussion pages in one location at the new ] page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 19:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {| align=center class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #000000; padding: .5em; margin-bottom: 3px; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
| | style="padding-right: 4px; padding-left: 4px;" | ] | |||
| | You voted for the ], and it has been chosen as <br/><big><center>''']'''.</center></big>'''Please help improve it''' to match the quality of an ] Misplaced Pages ] article.</small> | |||
| |}--<font style="background:Orange;">]]</font> 00:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Pilot (House)== | |||
| == What topic within the DST debate isn't being covered? == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. | |||
| ==WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections== | |||
| Thanks for your contribution ] to the DST talk page. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by the "debate as to whether to discontinue" DST? How does this differ from the topics currently covered in the DST page's ] section? ] 16:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Election 3/Nomination}} ] (]) 06:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Films ] == | |||
| == POV Pusher == | |||
| The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 01:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Looks like he's stopped for now. — ''']]''' 21:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've warned Venom-Smasher for 3RR, since he's one edit away if not over the limit for today, but something tells me that it's not going to stop him. I'll keep an eye on those articles too, since I feel they are neutral, but hopefully we can all come to a solution on the problem that won't result in a bunch of 3RR blocks or worse. ''''']]<sup>]</sup>''''' 03:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, I saw what happened back in December, but wasn't really up to getting involved other than trying to revert him back once or twice. I guess the only thing we can do is wait right now since I reverted back to the original versions on both Episodes I and II. His incivility is getting out of hand though, and that can end up in a much bigger block than 3RR if he keeps it up. ''''']]<sup>]</sup>''''' 04:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Preview button == | |||
| == New section "Politics" added to Daylight saving time == | |||
| ] Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages{{#if:Kevin Smith|. Regarding your edit(s) to ]|. In the future}}, it is recommended that you use the ] button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up ] and the ]. {{#if:It appears you've been around a while. Just wanted to remind you about the "Show Preview" button. For those of us monitoring pages for vandalism it is easier to see a single page of many edits than traversing through many pages of single edits. Thank you for your cooperation.|It appears you've been around a while. Just wanted to remind you about the "Show Preview" button. For those of us monitoring pages for vandalism it is easier to see a single page of many edits than traversing through many pages of single edits. Thank you for your cooperation.|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-preview --> --] (]) 08:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your ] dated April 25 on ]. I've added a section ] that I hope addresses the issue. The page recently came up as a Featured Article Candidate, and two reviewers agreed with you on exactly that point—good call! Please see ] if you'd like to weigh in on the latest version of the article. ] 23:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Star Wars == | ||
| Star Wars articles take second highest priority, so I'll pick at it for the next few days. — ''']]''' 19:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Since you've worked in ], which I've edited a lot after the FA demotion, I wondered if you could take a look at the article and do some copyediting, as I intend on taking that to A-Class (or probably FA again). Thanks. ] ] 03:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == SW languages == | |||
| ==Repost of ]== | |||
| Hi. Just to make it clear, I wasn't trying to bring a chuckle, it's fact: . But maybe it doesn't belong to the infobox. I'll try to put it into the article somehow. --] 04:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on {{#if:The Green Lantern (film)|]|a page you created}} requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a ] following a ]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{tl|hangon}} '''underneath''' the other template on the article and put a note on the page's ] saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use ] instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.<!-- Template: Uw-repost --> ] (]) 13:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for remaining courteous in your message but yes I was the nominator of the article for speedy deletion. It meet the criteria for speedy deletion because the article had already been deleted through the AfD process though under a different title (see ]). The same reasoning for deletion still applies to this incarnation of the article as the film has yet begin principle photography. I do realize that this is highly anticipated film and likely gross a lot of money but notoriety does not guarantee that the film will be free of set backs (see ]) and wikipedia is not a ]. Again thank you for your courteousness. -] (]) 18:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello!== | |||
| How's it going? What have you been up to lately? Need someone to help with ROTJ soon? All the best! ] 03:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| == Star Wars image == | |||
| ] Hello The Filmaker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are ]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Gustavo Sorola}}</small> | |||
| Policy has lately been clarified at ] per the new foundation licensing policy. In short, the situation is not the same as before, and non-free images are no longer used on the MainPage. I believe the building to be a satisfactory image, as it represents a very prominent location in the film (i.e. the hero's childhood home), and would be familiar to any fan. If you have another suggestion of a free image, I would of course be glad to hear it.--] 18:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Geoff Ramsey}}</small> | |||
| :Unfortunately, we cannot post "non-free content" on the main page because of legal nonsense. — ''']]''' 20:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 18:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== GAR Notification == | ||
| It doesn't say anything like that on ]. I hope this was an innocent mistake, rather than an attempt to mislead a newbie. ] 16:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Letting you know that I've opened a ] for ], an article you are a significant contributor for. You can see my concerns at ]. ]<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 20:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Star Wars Film Title Acronyms == | |||
| I have replied to your comments in the 'Appropriate Tone' paragraph on the discussion page for A New Hope, be interested to hear any further thoughts you have on this. ] 15:04, 26 May 2007 | |||
| == Featured article review of The Empire Strikes Back == | |||
| == Where to next? == | |||
| I have nominated the article that you had promoted to FA status several years ago. I feel it has lost the formatting, grammar, and sourcing required to be considered amongst the best articles of Misplaced Pages. ]. - ''']''' ] ] 19:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I wonder, after getting ROTJ to FA, what film series would you like to focus your attention next? ] 09:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : And I've removed it; the nominator did not apparently read the instructions at ]. ] (]) 19:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == You are now a Reviewer == | |||
| Cool for Indiana Jones, I've always been whipping '']'' into shape. ] 15:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| I think you could work on '']'', because those articles need a lot of work. I can keep tending to Indiana Jones, though I will request your help if I really, really need it. How does that sound? ] 11:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to ] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a ] scheduled to end 15 August 2010. | |||
| Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only ], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at ]. | |||
| == "please do research before removing information" == | |||
| When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious ] or ], and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see ]). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found ]. | |||
| No. The burden of proof is on the editors who add information. If the link is all that it takes to clarify it (although I'm still dubious on this whole "canon scale"), then the editor should include it. What I saw was information "substantiated" by an unreliable source; it was fine for me to remove it. --] 16:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> ] (]) 18:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: "Manos" title == | |||
| '']'' was the title of the page when I first came across it. I changed it to '']'' because no one could give a good reason at the time for that particular form, and that was the title being used on IMDB. In actuality, if you check around on the internet you will find that there is no definitive form of the title that everyone seems to agree on, I've seen it as ''Manos, The Hands of Fate'' and ''Manos - The Hands of Fate'' as well. | |||
| == The Empire Strikes Back == | |||
| Recently, however, I was reading a critique of the film, and the author stated that he choses ''"Manos" The Hands of Fate'' as the "real" title as that is its form in the opening and closing title cards of the film. That made up my mind on the subject, and when someone else changed it to that form in the body of the article, I thought I might as well change it back to the way it was. -- ] 18:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{#if:|] has|I have}} nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. --] (]) 18:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Do Not Want == | |||
| Is or (encyclopedia dramatica link blacklisted) good enough to cite as a reference? I couldn't find a news article or anything like that. If it's not, I'll just be quiet about it. ] 20:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :"Unfortunately, no those will not work. Websites with information that is submitted by everyday joes are not allowed as sources for Misplaced Pages. The Filmaker 01:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)" | |||
| ::Ironic, isn't it? Basically a Wiki by that definition can't be a source for a Wiki. Anyway, nevermind then. ] 22:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image (Image:Star wars episode one the phantom menace ver1.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| {{#if:|] has|I have}} nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].--] (]) 18:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ]] 21:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== October 2010 == | ||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- igloo:vandalism1 --> '''] | <sup>]</sup> <small>]</small>''' 03:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I don't really have an opinion on this one; it has its advantages and disadvantages. However, the synthesized budget numbers and whatnot will need sources. — ''']]''' 00:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| == Re: Return of the Jedi == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| Hey. I've worked on some FA pushes (i.e. ]). I am looking forward to working with you. I am usually interested in FA pushes. Can you help me out? I am considering some articles for my self-nomination. All Wikiprojects always stride for GAs and FAs, remember? By the way, thank you for your comments both on the Return of the Jedi article and on my talk page. They are much appreciated. :D Good luck and regards. ] 17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Not notable''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| ::I've halted the FAC on the Return of the Jedi until these issues that you explained are resolved (see ]). Thanks. ] 21:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would need some help in finding sources, especially for the production section. I will need some people from the League of Copyeditors for the copyediting. Thanks. ] 22:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I've done some copyediting on the article, placed a copyedit request at the WikiProject League of Copyeditors and added a "copyedit" tag, but is there anything else left I can do to help with this article on becoming an FA status? Thanks. ] 20:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Also, I would be very much appreciated if you help me find a copyeditor or find reliable sources for this article. Thanks. ] 20:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == AfD == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I've made my recommendation, but I have to say that it unfortunately looks like the AfD will wind up for '''keep''' or '''no consensus'''. These processes are usually a WOFT because most editors don't know what ]. I think, also, the general rule of thumb is that the longer the AfD page (not in terms of <s>votes</s> recommendations, but back-and-forth discussion), the less likely a consensus is reached. Also, ], would you mind checking out '']''? I've been expanding it (still need to rewrite the Plot section and add a decent Critical reaction section), but thoughts on the structure would be appreciated. I still have citations on the talk page that I'm incorporating into the article. —] (] • ]) - 17:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Good article reassessment== | |||
| :No worries. You basically said what I said, just (as I reflected on it when I put it back) with a little less "tone". <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">]</span> <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">]</span> 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| An article that you have been involved in editing, ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Made in America (The Sopranos) == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| In regard to your recent edits to the article, I noticed you changed the section title "Plot summary" to "Plot". The addition of "summary" was to clarify that the section is meant to summary, rather than the entirety of the plot. The shortened title is also dwarfed by the subsection that proceeds it. ] 01:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Made in America (the Sopranos) == | |||
| You deleted a submission to the Sopranos article adding only four letters to describe your reasons for doing so, typing 'rv or', i presume you mean 'original research' - the contribution was as follows: | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ''''']'''''/]|]\ 01:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| "Most interpretations of the ending scene take no account of the song playing in the diner as Tony first enters - "All That You Dream" - its chorus is | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| - | |||
| ] | |||
| - "I've been down but not like this before | |||
| - Can't be 'round this kind of show no more" | |||
| - | |||
| Given that Chase has said he will make no further comment, the significance of this is up to the viewers." | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| If you had bothered to cut and paste these lyrics into the web you would see that by now thousands of people are discussing this. the only section of the contribution that could be qualified as original research is the final sentence, stating that given the writers will make no comment, the viewers are left to interpret its meaning for themselves. | |||
| :'''The article seems to be a ]; all of its information is contained nearly verbatim in the original '']'' article.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| So why did you remove it? | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 14:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for March 27== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Not notable author. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Approaching none of the content is supported by the references.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| I hate to be a bother, but please have a look at ] when you have time and give your honest opinion. With regards. --] (]) 19:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Nathan fillion gun.jpg== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the file appears to be a blatant ] infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-imgcopyvio-notice --> ] (]) 10:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> | |||
| == Notice == | |||
| ], an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. –<span style="font-family:CG Times">] ]<sup>]</sup></span> 19:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:21, 14 October 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. The Filmaker has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Filmaker. |
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Re: Return of the Jedi
Hey. I've worked on some FA pushes (i.e. Final Fantasy XII). I am looking forward to working with you. I am usually interested in FA pushes. Can you help me out? I am considering some articles for my self-nomination. All Wikiprojects always stride for GAs and FAs, remember? By the way, thank you for your comments both on the Return of the Jedi article and on my talk page. They are much appreciated. :D Good luck and regards. Sjones23 17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've halted the FAC on the Return of the Jedi until these issues that you explained are resolved (see Talk:Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi#FAC). Thanks. Sjones23 21:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would need some help in finding sources, especially for the production section. I will need some people from the League of Copyeditors for the copyediting. Thanks. Sjones23 22:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've done some copyediting on the article, placed a copyedit request at the WikiProject League of Copyeditors and added a "copyedit" tag, but is there anything else left I can do to help with this article on becoming an FA status? Thanks. Sjones23 20:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I would be very much appreciated if you help me find a copyeditor or find reliable sources for this article. Thanks. Sjones23 20:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would need some help in finding sources, especially for the production section. I will need some people from the League of Copyeditors for the copyediting. Thanks. Sjones23 22:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've halted the FAC on the Return of the Jedi until these issues that you explained are resolved (see Talk:Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi#FAC). Thanks. Sjones23 21:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I did some considerable copyediting to ROJ last night, but I have some questions regarding your recent reversions of a few of my edits. Please see my comments near the bottom of the talk page. —beverson 20:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- I also did some proofreading. Thank you for your comments earlier, both on the ROTJ article and on my talk page. I fixed a few errors that Beverson made. By the way, I have earlier placed a final proofread request at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_League_of_Copyeditors/proofreading#Ready_for_final_proofread. I have made some editing and cleaning up as well. If I made the FA push without you, I apologize. :D All the best. Greg Jones II 23:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, please see my comments at the talk page as well. Thanks. Greg Jones II 00:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD
I've made my recommendation, but I have to say that it unfortunately looks like the AfD will wind up for keep or no consensus. These processes are usually a WOFT because most editors don't know what arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. I think, also, the general rule of thumb is that the longer the AfD page (not in terms of votes recommendations, but back-and-forth discussion), the less likely a consensus is reached. Also, quid pro quo, would you mind checking out Road to Perdition? I've been expanding it (still need to rewrite the Plot section and add a decent Critical reaction section), but thoughts on the structure would be appreciated. I still have citations on the talk page that I'm incorporating into the article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. You basically said what I said, just (as I reflected on it when I put it back) with a little less "tone". BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Made in America (The Sopranos)
In regard to your recent edits to the article, I noticed you changed the section title "Plot summary" to "Plot". The addition of "summary" was to clarify that the section is meant to summary, rather than the entirety of the plot. The shortened title is also dwarfed by the subsection that proceeds it. Just64helpin 01:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Made in America (the Sopranos)
You deleted a submission to the Sopranos article adding only four letters to describe your reasons for doing so, typing 'rv or', i presume you mean 'original research' - the contribution was as follows:
"Most interpretations of the ending scene take no account of the song playing in the diner as Tony first enters - "All That You Dream" - its chorus is - - "I've been down but not like this before - Can't be 'round this kind of show no more" - Given that Chase has said he will make no further comment, the significance of this is up to the viewers."
If you had bothered to cut and paste these lyrics into the web you would see that by now thousands of people are discussing this. the only section of the contribution that could be qualified as original research is the final sentence, stating that given the writers will make no comment, the viewers are left to interpret its meaning for themselves.
So why did you remove it?
Middle-earth in popular culture - pre-DRV request notification
Hi there. I'm leaving a courtesy note to let you know that I am asking the closing admin to reconsider Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Middle-earth in popular culture. My arguments are laid out at User talk:Coredesat#Middle-earth in popular culture - pre-DRV request. As you opened the original AfD, I'm notifying you so that you can add your opinion, either there or later if it goes to DRV. Thanks. Carcharoth 11:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
The Godfather/Sandbox
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Godfather/Sandbox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Postcard Cathy 12:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Page move
I moved an article you made to User:The Filmaker/Style guidelines for film articles. I assume it wasn't supposed to be in the main namespace eaolson 02:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:Films Welcome
I was surprised you weren't already a member after all of the many improvements to GA/FA you have helped with. Anyway, here's an official welcome! --Nehrams2020 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for July has been published. August's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
- Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
- Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Misplaced Pages. Check it out!
- Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
How's it going?
I wanted to see what your up to, what articles are being pushed, and what does ROTJ need to be ready for an FAC push? Also, are we going to work on the Star Wars article to make sure it stays a featured topic? All the best! Judgesurreal777 20:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- About half done copyediting, no problems thus far :) Judgesurreal777 23:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Will finish copyediting tonight/tomorrow. Also, I have a important request. I have created an article, Ghostbusters (franchise) to cover all of the Ghostbusters stuff, and I have merged a ton of articles into it, so it is kind of a mess. Could you please help me with it? Copyediting, trimming junk, etc? Thanks so much... Judgesurreal777 02:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey. I've been a little busy trying to finish up old priorities, so I might not be able to get to those articles. — Deckiller 02:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
re:"Fanboy" vandal
Unfortunately, the other account wasn't blocked indefinitely, so we can't get him for block evasion. He's one revert away from 3RR, and if starts again yesterday, I'll block him anyway for gaming the system. — Deckiller 18:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
re:ROTJ
I know the feeling. — Deckiller 03:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. He's quite...enthusiastic? . — Deckiller 03:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. I'm a firm believer that the main editor should nominate the article. If necessary, a vote can be held for the honors. — Deckiller 03:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Star Wars articles and production info
I just wanted to say a few brief words off of the FAC. First of all, congratulations on making it this far on getting the entire series to FA status. It's quite an accomplishment, especially in the light of the high trafffic the articles must get!
My comment regarding the ROTJ FAC is mainly that there is not enough out-of-universe information there, although what is presented is done well. In comparison, the ANH article has an extensive amount of info regarding Lucas's personal travails making the film, which I think are no less worthy than the challenges faced by the crew en-masse or the technical innovations required to create the films. The problem is that the information sources (particularly the links I provided) can be rather tech-speak and don't necessarily provide the most obvious context. I'd be willing to help not only with the ROTJ article, but also with the other SW articles each in bringing a lot of this up to spec. Particularly, it's distressing to see the ANH article mention the "groundbreaking" work of ILM in the lead (quite a justifiable statement), but then fail to mention much about ILM aside from its founding and the politics. Specifically, what made it groundbreaking? I also have the Mark Cotta Vaz book, so I'll see what can be dug up. I guess my overall objections are simply that for films that are so expensive, technically intensive, and innovative if not groundbreaking, one would be hard pressed to learn this if your only encounter with Star Wars was reading the WP articles. Thanks for your time, Girolamo Savonarola 21:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I've just gotten started. I think I'm probably also going to split off the post-production/visual effects information to a new section, especially given how SFX intensive and groundbreaking the films were. (Don't worry, there's still more relevant info that I plan to populate that with). Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads up. Please take a look and let's continue the discussion. Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 02:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:RevengeOTJedi.jpg
I agree that the previous thumbnail was too small, but I think your version is somewhat too large based on WP:NFCC#3b. Would it be possible to upload a version that's about 300-400 pixels on its longest side? This should satisfy any non-free use concerns. Thanks! Videmus Omnia 01:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, one last quibble to make the image fully compliant with NFCC - who is the copyright holder of the image? The source doesn't specify. Thanks! Videmus Omnia 02:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Movieguy999
I just want to let you know that the TPM, AOTC and ROTS articles are having problems. Movieguy999 has now added weasel and neutrality tags to these articles to prevent edit war. Movieguy999 has been constantly removing reliable sources in the reaction section before this. Your comments regarding these situations will be very much appreciated. Thanks. Greg Jones II 18:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I have now reported that incident at WP:ANI. Greg Jones II 18:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Movieguy999 has also said, in his most recent comment, on Talk:Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, that the discussion has been completely one-sided. He has said that has made case, the article clearly has issues, and no one has made an attempt to resolve them and had given exact details of what is wrong and has commented to you that have done nothing but point to other articles and own fan opinion. I am getting sick and tired of having to revert his edits. If that happens again, can we report this issue to the administrators? Thanks. Greg Jones II 14:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I have once again reported that incident at WP:ANI. Any comments there should be very much appreciated. Greg Jones II 17:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
sockpuppet case
He may well be the same person, but he hasn't violated WP:SOCK. It's not prohibited to abandon one account and start using another, as long as you're not evading an existing block or ban. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. (Note: This is a notification by myself, because you were the nominator and main editor of this article). Greg Jones II 01:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Revenge Of The Sith
"Though many critics and fans saw it as one of the best of the series, or at least, the strongest of the three prequels, others saw it as more or less on par with The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones."
This reads exactly like: "Though some people liked the movie, other people didn't."
And your source, the New Yorker article, makes absolutely ZERO mention of Revenge being on par with AOTC and TPM, being one of the best of the series, or being the strongest of the three prequels.
Movieguy999 01:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call
An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Nathan_fillion_gun.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nathan_fillion_gun.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 06:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nathan fillion gun.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nathan fillion gun.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β 21:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Twojedi.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Twojedi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films October 2007 Newsletter
The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Preity Zinta FA
Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Justice League of America
Can I ask you to undo the setup of the film article? Per the notability guidelines for films, stand-alone articles on unproduced projects are not warranted. I assume that you set it up because of the declaration of a release date, but that does not mean that the film will be produced. For example, Prince of Persia similarly has a release date declared, but production hasn't started on it yet. That's why we've had articles like Spider-Man 4 and Jurassic Park IV under broader articles. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've reverted your changes; I hope that's alright. Let me know if you have any issues with the approach. If filming starts, which may not happen what with the strike and all preventing necessary rewrites, the project may not go underway. If it does, though, we can restore the article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:3912 sw007.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:3912 sw007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films November 2007 Newsletter
The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Return of the jedi 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Return of the jedi 4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ep3 ia 80647.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ep3 ia 80647.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sw3 cast.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sw3 cast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Padmeattempt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Padmeattempt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Alientraveller (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!
Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
WikiProject St. Louis
 |
Hello, I noticed you've made edits to St. Louis articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the St. Louis WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate! |
Grey Wanderer | Talk 20:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Peer Reviews
Happy New Year, Filmaker! Given your vast contributions to film pages (and per a recommendation by User:Erik), I thought I could solicit your assistance. I've submitted two articles for peer review, and thought that you might like to critique them:
- Duck Soup. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and references, I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other Marx Brothers films) quality.
- Princess Leia Organa. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Comments and suggestions are appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles.
If you have the time, it'd be great if you could look over those two articles and assess their flaws and weaknesses. Thanks, and, once again, a Happy New Year to you! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 22:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter
The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Heads up
Since you've substantially edited the first episode, I'm letting you know that I plan on redirecting most of the "List of House episodes" per WP:EPISODE soon. Every episode after "Pilot" lacks multiple secondary sources which must be present for a single episode to need an article. This includes reception and development. I'm sure you are aware single plot summaries and trivia don't make a substantial article, and it is usually only the first and last episodes that pass the notability guideline to warrant their own articles. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 22:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you know of any other episode can have more than just plot and trivia, please let me know here. « ₣M₣ » 22:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
A Beautiful Mind
I was looking through the article history, and I noticed that you're the most recent primary editor of the article. Being as the article is already at A-Class status, would you be interested in taking the article through an FAC? Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
|
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter
The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter
The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Putting things into perspective...
|
The WikiProject Films Award | |
| I, Girolamo Savonarola (talk), hereby award The Filmaker the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to WikiProject Films. Awarded retrospectively for being instrumental in making an article of the WikiProject Films core list (Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope) into a featured article.
|
WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:A-beautiful-mind-3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:A-beautiful-mind-3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Akiva goldsman4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Akiva goldsman4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
The Dark Knight
Hello, long time no see! Are you aware that MOS:FILM#Critical reception says to exclude user ratings? We've had a lot of discussion about this already on the film article's talk page. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
Just to let you know, you have significantly contributed to Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Its in a GA process right now, and you're welcome to assist here. Pie is good 14:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO
According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Batman Begins) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Pilot (House)
Pilot (House) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Roll call and Coordinator nominationsIt's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!
It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Preview button
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Regarding your edit(s) to Kevin Smith, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. It appears you've been around a while. Just wanted to remind you about the "Show Preview" button. For those of us monitoring pages for vandalism it is easier to see a single page of many edits than traversing through many pages of single edits. Thank you for your cooperation. --TreyGeek (talk) 08:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Star Wars
Since you've worked in Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, which I've edited a lot after the FA demotion, I wondered if you could take a look at the article and do some copyediting, as I intend on taking that to A-Class (or probably FA again). Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 03:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Repost of The Green Lantern (film)
A tag has been placed on The Green Lantern (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for remaining courteous in your message but yes I was the nominator of the article for speedy deletion. It meet the criteria for speedy deletion because the article had already been deleted through the AfD process though under a different title (see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Green Lantern (movie)). The same reasoning for deletion still applies to this incarnation of the article as the film has yet begin principle photography. I do realize that this is highly anticipated film and likely gross a lot of money but notoriety does not guarantee that the film will be free of set backs (see WP:NFF) and wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Again thank you for your courteousness. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello The Filmaker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Gustavo Sorola - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Geoff Ramsey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
GAR Notification
Letting you know that I've opened a Good article reassessment for Daniel Day-Lewis, an article you are a significant contributor for. You can see my concerns at Talk:Daniel Day-Lewis/GA1. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 20:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Featured article review of The Empire Strikes Back
I have nominated the article that you had promoted to FA status several years ago. I feel it has lost the formatting, grammar, and sourcing required to be considered amongst the best articles of Misplaced Pages. Feel free to add your own comments. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ¢ 19:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- And I've removed it; the nominator did not apparently read the instructions at WP:FAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
The Empire Strikes Back
I have nominated Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --The Taerkasten (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
I have nominated Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--The Taerkasten (talk) 18:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Devil (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | My track record 03:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Gus Sorola
The article Gus Sorola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Good article reassessment
An article that you have been involved in editing, A Beautiful Mind (film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.
Nomination of Stephen Barker Turner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Barker Turner is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Stephen Barker Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Red vs. Blue production
The article Red vs. Blue production has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The article seems to be a redundant content fork; all of its information is contained nearly verbatim in the original Red vs. Blue article.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomader (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph G. Beck, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Shaw and Sonny Boy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Joseph G. Beck
The article Joseph G. Beck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable author. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Approaching none of the content is supported by the references.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Gus Sorola for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gus Sorola is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gus Sorola (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello
I hate to be a bother, but please have a look at this discussion when you have time and give your honest opinion. With regards. --Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 19:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nathan fillion gun.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nathan fillion gun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Finley Williamson
A tag has been placed on John Finley Williamson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Karst (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Notice
Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 19:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Categories: