Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:04, 3 July 2007 editSpylab (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,139 edits →Vandalism warnings: more warinings← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 12:30, 6 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 22:		Line 22:
	--] 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)		--] 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

			= Neo-Nazism =
	=Vandalism warnings=
			Hey, thanks for your constructive input here (e.g. your last replacement of the broken reference link). Having just been ] by GiorgioO, your non-destructive edit brightened my day. :-) I still sincerely believe we can come to an agreement on this text; I only ask for correct English and verification... sigh. Here's to consensus! ] 15:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
	*{{{icon\|] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst\|}}}#if:Neo-Nazism\|, as you did to ]}}. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->] 13:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

			= Unjustified block =
	*{{{icon\|] }}}Please stop. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst\|}}}#if:Ustaše\|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 -->] 13:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

	*{{{icon\|] }}}Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst\|}}}#if:User talk:NovaNova\|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->] 16:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed\|1=The Checkuser is quite clear - I am definitely not Puger nor GiorgioOrsini -
	*The following is for repeatedly making false accusations of vandalism in your edit notes for the ] article: {{{icon\|] }}}Please ] in your dealings with other editors{{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{1\|}}}\|, which you did not on ]}}. Please stop being ] to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Misplaced Pages. {{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-agf3 -->.] 03:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
			as per

			<br>
	*The following is for repeatedly destroying necessary corrections to grammar and formatting in the ] article: {{{icon\|] }}}This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{1\|}}}\|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{{{{subst\|}}}#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 -->] 03:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
			''Inconclusive. None of them are IP-related. Giorgio and Nova are geographically very
			close to each other. Giove is not even hemispherically related. --jpgordon???? 15:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)''<br>
			and as per
			''Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk) 03:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).''<br>
			So, I'd ask someone to remove this pointless block from my account. Thank you. --] 04:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)\|decline=No, the CheckUser stated that the evidence was '''inconclusive''', not that the accounts are unrelated. ] ] 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)}} {{unblock\|Here is just another sound proof of my innocence - July 28 200 as per Checkuser

			Modelsides = GiorgioOrsini. '''NovaNova unrelated'''. 02:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC) --] 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC}}

Latest revision as of 12:30, 6 March 2023

Croatia - Serbia

If you want to fight revert war no problem but you must know pages of war. You think that Croatia kingdom has more or less never existed. I think that Stefan Uroš IV Dušan of Serbia has not been emperor because he has declared himself emperor. For him it has been possible to declare himself God and Serbia population of that time will say: Yes master. Croatia has more argument (which you have not defeated on discussion page) to be kingdom of 1 Serbian king which has declared himself emperor. Rjecina 08:21, 21 May 2007 (CET)

Incorrect vandalism warning

Sorry about that, I was just reverting a little bit too quickly. Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Starcevic

You should take care about this article - due to the fact that you considerably contributed there. Hope you'll read this message soon.

--Giorgio Orsini 19:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Croatization

Hi,

Would you, please, be interested in expanding, clarifying, and improving http://en.wikipedia.org/Croatisation ???

Regards,

--Giorgio Orsini 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Neo-Nazism

Hey, thanks for your constructive input here (e.g. your last replacement of the broken reference link). Having just been bitten by GiorgioO, your non-destructive edit brightened my day. :-) I still sincerely believe we can come to an agreement on this text; I only ask for correct English and verification... sigh. Here's to consensus! SociableLiberal 15:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Unjustified block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NovaNova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Checkuser is quite clear - I am definitely not Puger nor GiorgioOrsini - as per
Inconclusive. None of them are IP-related. Giorgio and Nova are geographically very close to each other. Giove is not even hemispherically related. --jpgordon???? 15:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
and as per Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk) 03:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).
So, I'd ask someone to remove this pointless block from my account. Thank you. --NovaNova 04:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No, the CheckUser stated that the evidence was inconclusive, not that the accounts are unrelated. Shadow1 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Here is just another sound proof of my innocence - July 28 200 as per Checkuser

Modelsides = GiorgioOrsini. NovaNova unrelated. 02:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC) --NovaNova 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC}}