| Revision as of 18:14, 5 July 2007 editRyan Postlethwaite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,432 edits →Ha: re← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:45, 7 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,370 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite/archive24) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=March 2022}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite/ |
|archive = User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite/archive24 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{User:Killiondude/scrolling}} | |||
| <div style="font-size:12px">{{TOCright}}</div> | <div style="font-size:12px">{{TOCright}}</div> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |valign=top| | |valign=top| | ||
| * ] |
* ] | ||
| * ] |
* ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == RFA Withdrawal == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Hehe == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Loved the edit summary ;) I even made an account that would have gotten reported by the bot, but it didn't. ] <small><font color="teal">]</font></small> 21:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, I did try everything......Added <nowiki>{{Userlinks|example}}</nowiki> to try and kick start it. God damn it, why didn't that work? I guess I better go back to bot school!! ] 21:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Don't know, frustrating though! Have to do things old-school style... the block didn't work either, apparently... ] <small><font color="teal">]</font></small> 21:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] (''']''') 21:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :But first learn how to spell indefinite and this "someone" business simply will not do- you're a rubbish bot, you're fired. We want the old one back! ;-) ] (''']''') 21:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I was just about to go and ask a 'crat for a bot flag <small>Ryan cries</small> ] 21:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :First you were a regular flesh-and-blood editor, now you're a bot... are you Misplaced Pages's first cyborg editor? ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 21:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Me thinks so, I'm considering a name change to ] - it's more inline with my current work! ] 21:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That would ] in rfcn. ]] 21:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::No it wouldn't, because users should recognise that I have an ability to act as both human editor and a bot - many users see me as the perfect wikipedian :-) :-) ] 21:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Or the perfect ]? ]] 21:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Could be time for another one of Niko's infamous ] :-) - ] ] 22:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I think we should take this one to the ] (before we start the ] that is). ]] 22:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Ryan, ] (''']''') 22:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: Dr. Frankenthwaite has a certain ring to it, no? :) - ] ] 22:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| lol - nice pic. Is this the wrong moment to point out that Frankenstein was the creator not the monster? ;-) <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 22:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| : - ] ] 22:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC) (and yes, WJB, knew that!) | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| ] | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| :::::::<small>Desperately trying to outwit what made me spill my drink...</small>Since we're into ]s, how about "Ryan RobstlethCop"? ]] 22:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| ::::::::Hahahahahahah!!!!!! That is brilliant Niko!!!! Probably the best thing I've seen in my time here! ] 22:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| :::::::::In the sequel we can equip him with an iron tongue, or even more iron limbs. Any special requests? ]] 23:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| ::::::::::Hmmmm, although wikipedia isn't censored, I think we'd get banned for the only request that I'd have!! I like the iron tongue idea - I'm sure Adele will like it even more! ] 23:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to left, #c6ffdd, #fbd786, LightPink); | |||
| :::::::::::Why banned? Were you thinking of adding one of ]? <small>(Sheesh! I definitely need specialized help for thinking that...)</small> ]] 12:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Ryan Postlethwaite! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 21:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Happy |
== Happy Birthday! == | ||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {| style="border:2px ridge steelblue; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background:#EAF5FF; padding-left: 8px; padding-right: 8px; padding-top: 8px; padding-bottom: 8px;" align=center | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| |] | |||
| | name = Happy Birthday | |||
| |style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 10px; font-family: Comic Sans MS, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;"| | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| ''']''' has been identified as an '''''Awesome Wikipedian''''',<br> | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| and therefore, I've officially declared today as ]!<br> | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #a1ffce, #faffd1); | |||
| For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,<br> | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Ryan! | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big><br />Hi Ryan Postlethwaite! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! <span style="font family:Lobster;text-shadow: 4px 4px 20px lightskyblue, -4px -4px 20px HotPink">] ]</span> 02:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} <span style="font family:Lobster;text-shadow: 4px 4px 20px lightskyblue, -4px -4px 20px HotPink">] ]</span> 02:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy Birthday!== | |||
| Love,<br> | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| ]<br>01:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| <small>A record of your Day will always be kept ].</small> | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |} | |||
| |style = background:Darkgreen;border: 1px solid #CC9999; | |||
| :Excellent! You deserve this! ] 01:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |text = <span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;color:#FFFF00;">Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the ].</span>--] (]) 03:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::What he said! Yours sincerely, ]] 03:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| :::Dear Ryan, I'm so glad you liked your little gift; but I disagree with you, you ''totally'' deserve it! ;) At last I found the time to write you a long email, like I wanted for weeks, so I'll continue at your mailbox. Enjoy your day, sweetie! :) Love, ] - 10:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hooray for Ryan! ''''']]''''' <sup>]</sup> 22:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Not an insinuation at all,. actually... == | |||
| Having seen The Sunshine Man's answers, I actually think it's pretty unequivocal that he had no idea what he was talking about. Wouldn't it be far better for a user who wants to be an admin to learn policy on their own through example and reading things like XfDs, policies, and guidelines instead of guessing, getting a yes/no, and then getting a correct answer they can then regurgitate on an RFA so they can "prove" they know what it means to be an admin? You may see it as a tool; I see it a crutch and an excuse not to become more conversant with policy on one's own. ] 12:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You will see a link to my admin coachee page here - ], what I do is let him create his own thoughts and idea's, but guide him to important area's that he should know as an administrator. He writes a different essay each week, on a core issue such as ] or ] - I don't tell him what to write, I just tell him the area to do the essay on. Wouldn't you agree that this may help a user look at depth into key area's of wikipedia without me holding his hand? You go back to TSM having no idea what he is talking about, I disagree, he knows how this place works - he has just been a little misguided in a few area's - that's where an admin coach can help pick up on mistakes ealier than a full blown RfA would, it simply prepares users for adminship better. Some users can pick it up themselves, others need guidance, but with that guidance, they can still make excellent admins in the long run. ] 12:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I did go over the page you linked to quite carefully, and as a considered response, I would say I'm still mixed on the value of coaching, and here's why (bearing in mind I'm using "coachee" in general terms, but based on what I've seen thus far for TSM and Cremepuff): for the AfD listings, when there were ten votes before the coachee's vote, I honestly was unable to tell whether or not it was original reasoning or parroting of earlier votes. Original reasoning was clearer when the coachee's vote was second or third, so clearly there could be some improvement to the AfD coaching process to guarantee actual thought about policies, leading to a better indication of understanding. I mean, if 10 people say OR, and then I say OR, a third party only has my word to decide whether I thought of that on my own, or just followed the crowd. | |||
| ::I see a similar problem with the policy essays - you're saying "write about this policy", and the majority of the essays are simply a summary of that policy. I don't know about you, but ''I'' certainly haven't memorized WP:N, so is the coachee simply synthesizing and summarizing, especially when there are applicability missteps or omissions in the "original thought"-type sections, or does the coachee really understand the policy? I think a better way to go about this is to really put some infrastructure into this, and have some testbed AfDs to see what coachees do with a practical application of policy ''without'' a cushion of other voters. | |||
| ::My concern is that it does not seem possible at the moment, using this particular process, to ascertain whether the coachee is retaining (which is the ideal goal) or regurgitating (which is what it seems like from the limited examples). Obviously, we want admins who know (or can find) policies, and can apply them properly, not just admins who know the answers to the general questions that may come up on an RfA. I suppose the principle of coaching is sound, but I think the fundamental questions that I see show that there's still room for improvement in practice. ] 14:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA nom == | |||
| Thanks and I accept, will I note the acceptance on the RfA page now or wait until nearer the time it goes live? ] (''']''') 18:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Fill out your answers, then just before you transclude it, accept it - Best of luck! ] 18:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. ] (''']''') 18:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> --] 18:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Maybe I really did want to support the user because he'll go on a deletion spree...o.0 | |||
| Hehe, thanks for catching the mistake. :) <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 18:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It gave me a little chuckle! ] 18:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| There is a case of incivility which I hope you can help out with. I've never reported incivility before, so I'm not sure of the process. But is the diff. | |||
| This user has been extremely combative and rude since he hit the ] page and talk page, and the ] talk page. | |||
| Thanks! ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 19:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :User warned for incivility. You can give a warning yourself, but it's often better to let a neutral party take a look - I looked, didn't like so I warned. ] 19:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I already warned him several times, just not on his talk page. Thanks for your help! (: ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 19:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and ] == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I noticed that you created the category for this report so I guess you are looking into it? I'm not one of the regular editors of ], but I put it on my watchlist a couple of weeks ago when there was some trouble that got reported on ]. Looked like pretty obvious sockpuppetry to me to I figured it would be better for me to report it as an uninvolved observer. These things get so messy when one of the regular editors reports it. Do you think I need to request a checkuser? ] (]) 21:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :There's no need to request a CheckUser just yet - it seems obvious at the minute that the accounts are the same - so we can just keep on blocking. If it gets any more serious, let me know, because we could try and request an IP check to block the underlying IP's. I'm not actually involved in the case - I just blocked one of the users and saw the suspected sock puppet tag being added later. ] 21:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Cool. I will just continue to keep an eye on it, then. ] (]) 21:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::As I said, if you need any advice if it get's any worse, I'm more than happy to give a neutral view :-) ] 21:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Redoing the insult == | |||
| Now ] has made his uncivil behavior against me only, by crossing out the incivility originally leveled at both myself and Nealparr. | |||
| To me, this looks like repeating the insult, since he could have done nothing or crossed out the incivility. What's your suggestion? ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 23:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I can see your point, but there's not much we can really do about it - he struck out his original comments about an editor but not yours, it's not adding any extra incivility - just simply not removing his original comments about you. I think the best thing to do would just remain civil yourself - he's been warned - and if there's any further comments, he will be blocked (but I hope there will be nothing further). ] 00:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks! Yeah, he probably won't do any more. He could be a good editor, he's certainly got a lot of energy. ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 04:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: my suggestion is "Get over it, it's an internet site" ] 00:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Comment == | |||
| Perhaps you should spend less of your time being an online ] and do some work. Some of us actually have to support your less-than-keen attitude to work. We actually pay for it. So stop dicking around on wikipedia and do your college work. ] 00:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Calm down sir, I didn't remove your post from ] last time - we had our little disucssion with your other IP address and I left it at that - no need for the personal attacks. ] 00:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, "someone" removed it. I stick by my comment that if I'm paying tax money for your education, you need to do some more time studying. Love S ] 00:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Someone did, not me! I spend enough time studying thank you! ;-) ] 00:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I hope so mate, cause it looks like you spend a lot of time looking at ]. If you think it's ever going to take the place of a proper ] you're much mistaken, and our money is best spent elsewhere. It's nothing personal by the way, I just think you're a bit of a Floridan sycophant who should be spending their time elsewhere. Love S ] 00:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh and if you want to know why I called you a ], it's cause you removed my comment on a Discussion page. I don't edit or vandalise proper pages, I just try to stimulate discussion. And when I see it removed, I just think of ]. Love Steve ] 00:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::PPS hope your house is still dry :) | |||
| ::::::I spend my '''free''' time editing this amazing encyclopedia :-) The reason why I removed your comment was because the talk page of an article is for discussing the article - not for discussing the man and his merits - that's what a forum is for. Thanks for the concern about my house, it's dryish, but I've had my window open so my rooms all wet :-S Ah well, I guess I'll survive. ] 00:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Don't worry, I'm not a fascist, I'm pretty much down to earth - if you create an account and get to know me, you'll probably see I'm a bit of a laugh (See the rest of this talk page). ] 00:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks RobslethCop! == | |||
| Nice to see you policing . Cheers! ]] 09:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA thanks == | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid Black; background-color:OldLace; font-size: 9pt" | |||
| |align="center"|] | |||
| | | |||
| Hi Ryan. Thank you for your unwavering support and willingness to tie your reputation so closely to my actions by nominating me admin. My RfA passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of ].<br> | |||
| ::<font face="Kristen ITC">''']''' <sup>''(])''</sup></font> 06:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |align="center"|] | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Ryan, I'm sorry. I indefblocked ] as a proven sock of ]. For a hint of why, check and compare their latest userpages (esp. Bfissa's deleted one). Basically identical. However, it was checkuser proven. I'm sorry, as I know Trumpetband was adopted by you :( By the way, they were my impostor from last week, too, and there was another one in waiting, also blocked. Not the nicest thing to deal with before going on break - ] ] 08:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :C'est la vie...... ] 19:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I'm Better == | |||
| Hey, I'm Back. | |||
| :Ty (Bananaman1137) told me you were harassing himAccusing him of being me, but that's not possible because I'm Me And He's Him and he's not me and I'm not him unless you got drunk again ant then you'd be juhfghfhjfhgf and stuff.<br/> | |||
| —<font color="Green">'''''Remember, the Edit will be with you, always.'''''</font> <small>]</small> ] 18:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == E-mail == | |||
| Hi Ryan. I see you haven't been online recently. Just letting you know you have e-mail. --<small>(])</small> ] <sup>]</sup><small>]<sub>]</sub> (Let's Go Yankees!)</small> 20:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My RfA == | |||
| Thank you for participating in my ]. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete ] or block ]. -] (]) 18:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Abusive language == | |||
| Hey Ryan, | |||
| See ] to see content. He seems to have a God-like complex and when asked questions resorts to abusive language. ] has been warned previously. Thanks and good luck in your final year in pharmacology. --Chuck ] 21:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My recent RfB == | |||
| Thank you so much for your participation in ]. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community. | |||
| I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at ]. Thanks again! ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 04:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My RFA == | |||
| Hi Ryan, just a quick note to say thanks for participating ]. It was successful and I now have some shiny new buttons. If I can ever be of help, please ]. Happy editing, ]] 09:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WP:RFA/ACL 2 == | |||
| Hello Ryan, thanks for the strong support in my RfA. The final tally was 104/1/1. I hope I can still rely on help from you if and when I need it. ] 21:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My RFA == | |||
| Thanks for your support on my RFA. It failed this time, but I'll be working on suggestions from those who voted and will give it another try a few months down the road. ] 14:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My shoulder == | |||
| Just wanted to point you towards my clarification on Magnus' user page. I've always been a fan of yours; I intended no hard feelings by that comment, which I probably should have reworded. <span style="font-family: monospace">]</span> (<span style="font-size: smaller; background: black;">]</span>) 17:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :There's certainly no hard feelings at my end - I just wanted to make sure that you knew I wasn't trying to have a bitch at you - I can see both points of view to be honest, and I hope you come to some agreement (I won't be participating in further discussion as I don't have a clue about coding!!). All the best, ] 17:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ha == | |||
| I'm going to have to give myself a ] for after you admins ;-) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">''<font color="#0A9DC2">''~''</font>''''' ]<font color="#6EDCF7">her</font><font color="#9EE8FA">mit</font>'''</span> 18:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hehe, I saw that - thanks for sorting out, I guess I've obviously just worked to hard today! ] 18:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:45, 7 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Ryan Postlethwaite has not edited Misplaced Pages since March 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archive
Nomination of Pugese for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pugese is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pugese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Traumnovelle (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Ryan Postlethwaite! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |  |
Happy Birthday!
 | Happy birthday! Hi Ryan Postlethwaite! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! Hemlock :3 leave a message 02:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |
Hemlock :3 leave a message 02:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
 | Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee.--DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |