| Revision as of 14:41, 22 July 2007 editVintagekits (talk | contribs)22,333 edits →On Tyrenius talk page: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:13, 8 January 2025 edit undoHey man im josh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators347,546 edits NPP Awards for 2024Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- {{Vacation}} --> | |||
| {{archive box|]<br>]}} | |||
| {{Clear}} | |||
| == As a conscientious editor ... == | |||
| {{editnotice | |||
| | header = Hi, welcome to my talk page! | |||
| | headerstyle = font-size: 150%; color: #9900FF; font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Light' | |||
| | text = | |||
| *'''If you came here to discuss article content, please post at the article Talk page.''' That is where discussions about content belong, so that everybody watching the article can participate, and so the discussion becomes part of the page's historical record, and is easy to find. You can always ] me to draw my attention to a talk page discussion. | |||
| *'''Please''' <span class="plainlinks"></span> '''to leave a new message'''.}} | |||
| {{archive box|]<br>], ]<br>], ]<br>], ]<br>], ], ], ], ]<br>], ], ], ], ]<br>], ], ], ], ]}} | |||
| == Murillo de Aragão == | |||
| As a conscientious editor concerned to improve Misplaced Pages, you might like to signify your assent to participate in ] by signing up ] - especially as you're one of the Saints rather than sinners and without some knowledgeable, level headed editors like yourself it may be doomed to failure...]]<sup><font color="brown"><small>(kiwiexile at DMOZ)</small></font></sup> • 21:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Bastun, | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Greetings! Thank you for your review on my bio article about Murillo de Aragão. I am trying to locate the draft version of it so I can make the changes you suggested, but I am not managing to find it. | |||
| Hi Bastun. I am trying to keep out of a certain editor's way as much as possible to protect what remains of my sanity, but as you were involved in the discussion above I'd be interested in your take on the usage "X was a Member/]..." which seems to have crept into a few articles. I would propose that the form ] would be more in keeping with the MedCab resolution (as I read it) and also with our MoS. Finally, I'd be interested in your take on ; my understanding obviously differs from that of this user's. It may seem like a fairly trivial stylistic matter, but I think it's a shame to go through all the good work that seems to have been done in MedCab only to have the result (apparently) misrepresented like this. Any light you can shed on this would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, --] 23:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Could you help me, please? ] (]) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :The cabal consensus decision was pretty unambiguous - lower case 'v' (with a piped link as you suggest being absolutely fine. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::That is what is refered to as incorrect. p.s. why would you ask Bastun?--] 23:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi {{u|Bruno Furtado Vieira}}, you'll find the draft at ]. Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 18:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::Seeing as I took part in the debate, why wouldn't he ask me? Can I remind you of the decision? | |||
| :Dear Bastun, greetings once again! | |||
| ::::''Where the initial definition occurs in the lead section, it should firstly be stated that a person is a member of the IRA. The term volunteer should then normally be mentioned. Lower case "v" should be used for the time being. In the main text of an article the word, volunteer, is free to be used, but this has to be judged in each particular instance to achieve maximum sense and good style. It should not be used rigidly and other terms such as "IRA member" can also be used or any other appropriate reference. Different terms can be interspersed, and may vary from article to article. Please do not modify it. Shyam (T/C) 11:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)'' | |||
| :I tried to comply with your suggestions, but I am not sure if I managed. Please let me know how I can improve. Since I am new here, if you can lay out the details of how to fix the erros I would be very grateful. ] (]) 20:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's pretty clear. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::"''Lower case "v" should be used'' '''for the time being'''" - clear as day!--] 23:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Awards for 2024 == | |||
| :::::Indeed. ''The time being'' hasn't been finished, or finalised, or overturned by consensus. So lower case 'v' it is. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Actually thats incorrect - you cab go to the talk page it you want to change that.--] 23:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| :::::::Show me where a timelimit was agreed, or where a decision was reached to change the cabal outcome? All I'm seeing on the talk page is 'closed - do not alter...' and the box on the project page says: | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |] | |||
| ::::::::State: Closed | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ::::::::Comments: Concensus has been listed above. | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | | |||
| :::::::That's pretty unequivocal... ]<sup>]</sup> 00:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award''' | |||
| ::::::::I dont know why I am even discussing this with you - you've nothing to do with it - I'll let Tyrenius confirm the state of play as your opinion is insignificant in relation to this.--] 00:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| :::::::::You're discussing it with him because he is an interested editor, whose opinion is as valid as anyone else's. Rudeness is not required, so please cut it out as a habitual mode of communication with other editors. ] 12:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; width:100%;" | This award is given in recognition to Bastun for conducting 484 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! ] (]) 18:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| See the end of ]. This puts Vk in the clear for his usage of V since on that article - no one responded to his final statement in that talk page section. However, it hasn't achieved a consensus as such which can be enforced, so it is open to further debate still. ] 12:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| (deindent) See ]. --] 14:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| For repairing vandalism to my user page. --] 18:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| Thanks for that.--] 13:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Why was Gold's edit reverted. I'm I gold too? Now there were five editors material removed and golds makes six, are they all me? Why is that not reverted? Why request a bolck with thoses editors material removed? --] 18:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I didn't revert anyone, so no point asking me :P As regards the "5 editors", that's stretching things a bit - I think some of them were minor enough edits, e.g., correcting typos? Its common practice to request a block when an edit war is underway (and indeed, more grounds for it with the ArbCom case). ''Which'' version is the one that gets locked is irrelevant (as is made clear by the template that gets put on the page). As far as I understand it, it'll be whatever one is there when/if an admin locks it, but that has no bearing on which is the "proper" one - that gets debated on the Talk page and consensus rules. Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 20:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RE. Blatantly Incorrect edit summary == | |||
| Having received an on the background to my first from ] I have recognised where all the suspicion and accusations have come from but I just thought I should point out to you that in my eagerness to edit a page successfully, I took my time and copied and pasted the introduction from the page and essentially tinkered with the formatting, my contribution and previewed endlessly, several days in fact, before I posted my edit and was totally unaware that the page had moved on from what it had been when I started. As ] pointed out to me in the above explanation I had reverted to a version of the page editted by ] and so I have concluded through searching the history of the article that the version of the page I was working from was possibly one and considering that from my view it is evident that I merely added some 400 bytes nowhere near the 70kb you suggested. However I can totally see how from your the changes were substantial. Therefore I accept your view that my summary appeared incorrect, however I would also like you to accept that from my perspective it was a small contribution and my edit summary was in no way intended to deceive or misinform anyone on WP and please take ] into consideration. Kind regards --] 04:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC) PS besides the confusion was there anything else wrong with my edit any advice on my contribution would be welcome | |||
| ==Unlock on Article== | |||
| Hello Bastun, I have agreed with Sony to remove a quote on the Famine article, could you request to have the article unlocked. Thanks--] 13:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == On Tyrenius talk page == | |||
| Why did you remove made edit - I am seriously unimpressed with this.--] 14:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Users are free to remove comments from their talk page at their own leisure. That said, it's considered very bad taste to remove portions of comments in a way that might be misleading. ] 14:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::But as the diff points out - it wasn't my talk page. Apologies, Vintagekits. I think what happened there was I meant to copy and paste part of your comment to use in my reply and ended up cutting and pasting instead. Not my intention. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Fair enough, I accept then that it was a genuine mistake.--] 14:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:13, 8 January 2025
Hi, welcome to my talk page!
|
Murillo de Aragão
Dear Bastun,
Greetings! Thank you for your review on my bio article about Murillo de Aragão. I am trying to locate the draft version of it so I can make the changes you suggested, but I am not managing to find it.
Could you help me, please? Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Bruno Furtado Vieira, you'll find the draft at Draft:Murillo de Aragão. Regards, Bastun 18:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Bastun, greetings once again!
- I tried to comply with your suggestions, but I am not sure if I managed. Please let me know how I can improve. Since I am new here, if you can lay out the details of how to fix the erros I would be very grateful. Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2024
|
The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award | |
| This award is given in recognition to Bastun for conducting 484 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |