Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fadix: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:35, 27 July 2007 editFadix (talk | contribs)5,105 edits →[]← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:55, 27 February 2015 edit undoGeni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators37,929 editsm Reverted edits by 212.159.127.48 (talk) to last version by LessHeard vanU 
(28 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{softredirect|User:Fadix}}
== Civility, privacy ==
First of all, even though you claim to have 'left', continuing to edit any pages means that you are still subject to wikipedia policies. I have removed the IRC chat logs you posted above, as copy/pasting IRC transcripts is STRICTLY forbidden without the express consent of all parties involved. Secondly, I've removed the personal attack you made in your rant above. If you continue, you may be blocked and your talk page protected from editing if you continue. --] 15:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
:Where can I find a concise account of what happned? I see a 3-day block accompanied with "personal attacks, threats of more." Please cite individual diffs. Thanks in advance. ] 05:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
::On 2nd look, this block took place nearly two weeks ago, so it has become academic ], and otherwise, should be structured in an RfC format. You're free to do so, of course. I'd say, you should return, and in the future, if you need a 2nd administrative opinion on another admin's action , drop me a line. ] 05:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


== Proposed deletion of Armenian Genocide/resources ==
== yüzde ==
I did not make that mistake before. I remember clearly correcting one... anyway by coming up with a translation I guess I have already passed that step.] 19:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


]
by the way you are wrong about deepblue. He is not Holdwater. Holdwater is not here for the time beeing.] 19:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern:
:<b>Is linked from Talk: in archive box, but I assume someone was planning to make it but didn't. Shouldn't be cluttering up the archive box.</b>


All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ].
Torque may be holdwater I dont know. but despite your advanced observation skills and devotion I have to say that Deep is not. that is my feeling you will continue to believe in yours. So you can speak Turkish? Indicating that we are dealing with the elites of the diaspora. And maybe someday Holwater was here too. wikipedia turned out to be much more that I expected. may I just ask your age? oproximately?] 22:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ]<sup>]|]</sup> 19:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
you may be right about the diaspora I have no clue. what I observed is Armenians from Armenia are so different from dispora armenians. I guess you are very well aware that I am a rookie. Actually I havent read a single book about the subject before coming here an strugling with you. but to see why I am so sure and will be devoted see Marshal Bayramyans talk page under the title Correct (there may be some words there about you that you may not like). I am ready to belive your claim about you being neutral in article but your remarks about Katchazuni (trying to discredit what he writes) and accepting charney as a reliable source with a face vaule is much much questionable. And you come up with so careles claims that you refrained from doing while facing Torque also makes me think that you make things up (or using thinks that are previously made up) when facing people who are not so well eqipped. And for gods sake it is so obvious that there were hardly 1.6 milion Armenians at that time how do you insinst and claim 1.5 killed or 2 mil lived in ottoman empire? Anyway We will always be opposing each other in this issue but there is no need to be incivil.] 00:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


== fyi ==
i got a very bad answer from marshal and erasing my edits from his page] 00:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


See
well what can i say. you are right in some issues. The forged idendity is just a mistake but it still is not completey forged. I came here thinking that it is just another forum. I was not aware this was so serious. once I started and it had to go on. I am sorry. I still think that you are a trouble maker and i have told much worse things to you before, no need to mention that. and I will of course try to do anything to chance the article. Besides that picture was really doubtfull. I did not wish to change it anyway because i knew you will come up with a worse one. you erased it and i had to put a new one. I act this way because before even reading anybook I knew every thing from my family just like your eye withneses, we have also our victims and if anyone who has killed people of my family comes and blames us of genocide and denial then i will go crazy. I am also a children of a survivor. You should not be surprised of my rage. You always ask for respect but show no respect to our deaths. I dont like you not because you are armenian but you know you are adding lies. I can understand others naive armenians who are much less knowledgabele. but you... you should know you are adding lies.] 01:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
which placed ] on the Wikisource ] as a new text. I've completed the proofing and formatting of it. See ], too. Cheers, ] 11:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

:yea, I've seen... three interesting and juicy arbitration cases going on too, it's like watching a soccer match. ;) ] ] 02:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
and finally I dont think deep is holdwater because I mailed TAT with my original name and same mail adress I used here and talked about wiki and holdwater said he has no time. Here Deep assumed that I am really foreigner and wrote a long answer to me about turkish position.] 02:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

==test==
{{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|it is used on Misplaced Pages.}}

]

== Photo ==

I don't think the photo you've posted should be included especially with an Armenian Genocide phrase in the caption. But I'll leave that to others to decide. I just want to say that I wanted to revert Karl Meire's edits, did not intend to revert the photo. If you include the photo again, I'm not going to revert it. ] 17:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

== Assume good faith ==

What can I do to have you assume good faith with me? Was any of my edits done in bad faith? Please let me know. May be we can work things out one-on-one easier than on the talk page. ] 05:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

==I think you SHould say something==

This manipulative behaviour has gone far enough and is very frustrating to the editorial environmnet. I think you should say something here . Enough is enough; we should be able to edit rationally.

Thanks ]

FYI:The way you see me conduct myself in the NK article is the same way I conduct myself in other articles. ]

== hi ==
I assume that you read all my contributions so I am not talking behind your back.] 01:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

first. come on. I should be ashamed because I lied to you eh. LoL. thats the last thing in my to do list. If you wish to play a game of ethics with me let me tell you it wont work and I would advice you to do it first yourself. question your life in the web.

Second. Yes I am talking about that Holdwater stuff. please I am Just telling again you are making your self funny. I talked with all these people seperately. you are a highly intelligent man who has devoted his life to web forums and being the genocide Champion and I see that as a real waste. oh I know it is none of my bussiness. just like you I love sticking my nose every where.

finally. FYI: I have read almost every page in discussion, not like a real book ofcourse with fast tracking it took almost 4,5 hrs. I am really a grand child of a survivor so I wont buy any of your "I have read all avaliable" bluffs. '''Do you feel honest within your self.''' blaming a nation and its people with genocide recklessly. '''Especially when facing a person whose relatives were killed by your ancestors.''' dont tell me "scolars are saying these and that" stories. If you fare honest then you may have the right to ask people to be honest. bye.] 03:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks --> --<small>] ]</small> 12:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

:Congratulations, in attempting to defend yourself, you managed to call Cool Cat a liar along the way. I don't really care what else Neurobio is up to, my concern at the moment is getting both (yes, BOTH) of you to stop making any sort of personal attacks. If you really, truly want the content of the articles you are working on to be sorted out, then I'd strongly suggest you try talking about that for a change instead of sniping at each other. --] 23:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

== Great Job. ==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of National Merit'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Dear Fadix. I am hereby awarding you with this National Merit Barnstar for your exceptional work on Armenia-related articles, especially concerning the Armenian Genocide. Continue the great job. ] 10:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
|}


== Great fire of İzmir ==

Your comment has been noted, I'm currently working on the subject to complete the most comprehensive work ever done, in which your and all others' cited contributions will be included. Available soon. Thanks for your interest. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your note and the trust your show me. Both are greatly appreciated. Regarding the articles you mention, I am doing my best to help make them as comprehensive and neutral as possible. It helps me a lot to know that you are also doing the same from your perspective. Still, I want you to know that I am not a professional historian, and sometimes my ignorance or bias might become too obvious. Since you appear to have done extensive reading on the subject, I would appreciate a comment whenever you think that I have got something wrong :-) ] 12:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Nothing justifies deleting cited information as nothing can justify adding biased one. My claim was neither; just because I didn't pay enough attention, some cited information as well as grammer fixes might have been reverted accidentally by myself in the effort of removing biased information. That is the case I noted and expressed my thanks for your interest in enlightning me. Now I'm working on a large scale re-write including additional references and I will pay more attention on not deleting unbiased work of others. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

==Reply==

First off, why didn't you read what I wrote? "I welcome your comments. Do not reply to each other. Just give comments, suggestions and sources. Do not quote. - FrancisTyers · 20:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)" I was quite explicit. I moved your section up to the discussion section. You can reply either there or in the main "Notes" area, but follow the guidelines. When you reply to Grandmaster I ''will'' delete it, the same goes for when he replies to you. - ] ] 21:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for working with the process. - ] ] 23:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to get everything clear, then we can decide on what should be included, how it should be worded. - ] ] 23:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

:Is there anything you would like to add to the timeline, or is that the whole story for that time. e.g. All relevant events? - ] ] 15:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

:I'm interested in when it was "Nagorno-Karabakh" as a distinct entity. I don't think there is any arguing that the NKAO was started, so no need for the 1924 stuff. - ] ] 15:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

::Ok, I'm interested in when it was under Bolshevik/Soviet control. - ] ] 15:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Which december, make it clear in the timeline. - ] ] 16:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Happy with the timeline yet? - ] ] 19:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

==Nakhichevan referendum==
I'm interested in finding out the truth behind the history of Nakhichevan. Did the Armenians really boycott the referendum and was there a source for this? -- ] 01:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
:If you don't have a source that says the Armenians boycotted the election, then do you at least have a reference for those statistics (60% to 40%)? I'd be willing to add in there that some believe that the Armenians boycotted it, etc. -- ] 12:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] picture ==

Hi, I have some questions about that photo, can you come to the Pontian Greek Genocide page and help clarify it? --] 16:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

==Yo==

Can you take a look at 7 again? We are using the same verb. - ] ] 19:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

<blockquote>
Nagorno-Karabakh became a source of dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan when both countries gained independence in 1918. After Bolsheviks took the region over two years later, they first granted the region to the newly created Armenian SSR, but later reversed that decision and granted Nagorno-Karabakh autonomy within the Azerbaijan SSR. The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) was established in 1923, which was to remain until the collapse of the Soviet Union.
</blockquote>

Hi, could you please outline why you are opposed to using "granted" to describe both the giving of NK to Armenia and Azerbaijan? Could you list synonyms that you would be happy using? - ] ] 19:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that. I've made a minor change. How about 'ol 7 now? - ] ] 19:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

==re HI==
I dont know dude, I might just go away cuz im getting tired with the fact that as soon as it was unblocked, the usual suspects started adding more pics, removing part of the Pamuk stuff, changing key words such as opposition to denial etc, and frankly, like you, I dont mind changes but when they are done without an iota of discussion on the talk page and lots of namecalling, its just vandalism. And now our dear friend THOTH is back!!! BTW, where have you been? ] 05:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

== Pontian Greek Genocide ==

Hi, what do you think of the name of this article? Do you have any possible alternatives? Thanks, --] 13:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

:Well i did suggest something like that along the lines of ] with various incidents explained in there. But people seem to be looking for a commonly used term, and from what i can see, there simply isn't one. --] 17:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

== NK page ==

Hey Fadix. Please comment on the NK talk page.--] 00:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

== Pontian Greek ==

Can we again discuss the title issue? It is really not fair to accuse a nation of genocide just on a whim.. It is a serious allegation that must be backed-up by serious academic research. The definition of the United Nations and the international law must be taken into account. Pls let's not use Misplaced Pages to fuel ethnic hatred. The article still doesn't have even one impartial source or citation. Pls reply... If not we can easily witness a proliferation of 'genocide' sites on Misplaced Pages, claiming that every nation in this world has committed genocide against each other... ] 10:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

== Assyrian Genocide ==

Don't you think that the article Assyrian Genocide is written from a biased point of view with a childish way of expression?

]

== ] ==

I apologize for spamming your talk page, but since you had contributed in the past to the ] proposal, which is currently ready for a wider consultation, I thought you might want to give it another look now and, hopefully, suggest some final improvements. Thanks. --]<sup>]</sup> 22:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Hey Fadix,

Thanks for your interesting comment, I read it and wanted to ask you some questions.

Turkish historians and the small minority of western ones (McCarthy, Lewis, etc.) stress the fact that both sides died. Does the fact that Turks died as well prevent it from being a genocide? How many Muslims do you think were killed? If someone looks at both sides of the issue, is it still a genocide? Thanks in advance.

BTW, please don't insult neurobio—instead, keep the level cool. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]]</span> 03:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

:That was '''very''' informative. I guess I have no more questions...thanks again! &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]]</span> 05:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

==Armenian Genocide==
Thanks for the honesty, at least. You've now been blocked for 72 hours for . --] 04:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
:Thank you for the block. This or the rest of the similar craps he wrote is what this idiot worth as an answer, and I still maintain he is a parasit to the community who has done nothing better than spamming, vandalising and parasiting. Anyways, I had no intention to edit in those 72 last hours, so it doesn't change a thing. ] ] 07:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
::Making personal attacks while blocked is not acceptable, either. --] 17:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
:::OK, then, maybe you could give any example of one single contribution he made beside spamming the talk page, paranoiding ''Armenian propaganda and forgies'' all over the place, and calling articles garbage. If you want attacks and slanders, here . This guy is given the right to slander in Turkish, besides calling articles trash, comparing Misplaced Pages to a circus, spamming entire talk page, making whole generalization comments, and in exchange hasn't even contributed ones in a positive way. I would refuse to respect someone who doesn't respect me, call my contributions trash. At least this time, I have slandered, and the 72 hours was a little price to pay for the relief. ] ] 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
::::Not so say, from the day I have registered an account to now, not once have I ever been blocked for disruption of articles, for revert warring, for vandalism etc., while everyone who have reported me have all been blocked for at least one of those, and this is all that matters for me. ] ] 18:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::I'd suggest you learn to care about more. This behavior is not acceptable. No amount of misbehavior on another user's part gives you license to break the rules yourself. Do it again for any reason and you will be blocked for longer. --] 04:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::Look dude, you better check my contribution history. I will once more be away for the next week, once I'll be available, my block will already be expired. Your action has absolutly no positive result overall, as while I slander a pseudo-member who has only a history of spamming, vandalism, edit warring, racism, who would slander in Turkish worst than I will ever(at least I am not a coward I do it in English), parasits like this will still the end of the day not respect any policies or guidelines but get away with it, because administrators like you will only place worth on NPA policy, while it is probably the only policy which is not directly linked with articles. Anyways, do you see me complaining about the block? No, so why do you even feal that you should answer me back? ] ] 05:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::::You just called him a 'parasite' again. What you did was wrong, and if you're going to keep making personal attacks, I'm going to have to extend your block. --] 23:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding : Please keep your tone civil. Do not attack others, and focus on content instead. --] 22:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

== MKA ==

Please take a look ].
Regards.
<font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="4">]</font>] 18:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

== your message to me ==

Dear Fadix,
Sorry,I didnt understand what you mean. Please clarify it. Regards.<font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="4">]</font>] 12:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

==AG translation==

I must first say how happy I am for your support, because I was really discouraged to continue to making further edits on wikipedia. Thank you very much. What is written here is only the direct translation of Turkish Armenian Genocide article. I am not sure about the citation, even though I will add them as they appear on the Turkish page.

===Turkish Thesis===
'''Armenain Genocide Allegations''' are allegations claimed by some historians that ] specifically planned to destroy all ] living in ] in ].
It is claimed that In the Armenian Relocalization started at ] aimed to destory all Armenian population living in ] and 1 to 1.5 Armenians lost their lives. The main support of Genocide Allegation is that it is planned directly by the ], rather than the facts about rapes and humanitarion issues. During , Armenian revolts forced ] to relocalize the ] due to logistic and secutiry reasons.
Facing with such allegations, the attitude of ] is to accept that many Armenians had lost their lives before and after the relocalization, but these deaths are not due to a systematic genocide but rather due to consequences of war, epidemic diseases and the lack of opportunities to ease such a departure.
Both sides show some proof to prove their thesis. The proposal of ] of making all governmental archives publica and urging all historians and scientists to investigate these document, is rejected by ].<ref> </ref>
Now, in Switzerland, it is illegal to refuse the Armenian Genocide. About 20 coutries accepted laws in their parliament which recognizes Armenian Genocide. The ] didn't make such a law in federal means, but 36 states recognized the Allegation. Some countries (i.e ] and ]) preferred to use word massacre rather than genocide.
====Historical Account====
Due to the difference in their religious sect, ] used to have some problems with the ]. By the arrivals of ] in ] by the ] ] become freer in their worships. The problems due to the separation of Armenian Church from ] Church in A.D ] is ended by the start of ] era. ] and ] nations lived together without any problem until ]. In ], the ] committee, influenced by the ] philosophy from ], initiated the nationalistic emotions of Armenians to get stronger. Along with ] committee, "Armenian Revolutionary Federation" or ] Organization or Tashnak Party founded in ] in Tbilisi, incited the Armenians against the ]. These organizations armed the civilians in order to establish an independent state.

After the Ottomans losing the ] battle to ], the land from Caucasia to ] is invaded by ] Army.

During the ], while the ] were fighting against ] and ] armies in numerous fronts, Armenians living in ] allied with Russians and revolted in ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and in many other provinces. (to be continued) and please wait until the end of the whole translation before starting putting bits of pieces. We can continue to work together by the way. Thanks. ] 15:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

== Re: I don't appreciate it ==

It doesn't matter if neurobio is an ill intentioned user or not. Suppose my brother is mentally retarded. I would still be offended if people said, "is your brother some sort of retard?" Neither ] nor ] say "if something is true, then the policy doesn't apply". You are welcome to have your own opinion one someone, but it's not ok to insult people. BTW, when did you learn Turkish? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 03:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

:I don't think saying that Misplaced Pages is a mad house qualifies as a personal attack. Can you provide diffs where neuro has "bashed Armenians" and called their work "trash"? How recent did he say this? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 03:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

::I guess I did miss it. Please show me diffs. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt>

:::When did I revert your edit? All I did was the part where you said, "unless you want only bad intentioned editors like neurobio contributing" (for obvious reasons). Do what you want at ], but you have still failed to provide diffs for me. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 02:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

== Reply ==

Hi Fadix, i'll have a look into it. Thanks, --] 20:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

== Response ==


Listen you mentioned Farsi. I'm Persian Armenian and my parents are fluent in Farsi. We know all about the Middle east and the languages and sounds. Farsi only has the 'Kh' which we have also. All the rest of the sounds (which I cant put here in English cause they dont have those sounds)from the 38 Farsi doesnt have. Our language is unique compared to all other languages. What I'm finding my self personally from looking at translated Hurrian words in English which is not the best way to look since English doesnt have those sounds. Its that those sounds and words are found in Hurrian more than Greek or Persian. Armenian words I personally found in Hurrian. The authors I pointed out to Dbachmann mention even Armenian sentences which I showed one sample of the cuneiform inscription and its meaning in Armenian. We definitely have a link with Hurrians. First of all, Hurrians isnt even a people but what I see and most of the scholars is that its an elite language our ancient kingdoms used, specially for specific purposes. ] 06:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I made a typo, it wasnt all 38 sounds Farsi doesnt have, its those other 8 or 9 other sounds which English doesnt have the example to put. ] 06:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The Hurrian translations are not yet found fully. So they have found very few of the translations. Im sure once they find it we see links with Sumerian, Hurrian (which Urartu used also) with Armenian. We have to look at all of these inscriptions and see the links with the language. I know Georgians have the same word 'Ar"S"ib' also as Armenian ArSiv, with the b = v. Just like Erebuni is Erevan and Bian is Van. Are you Hye? :)] 06:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

You seem like one of those people that dont fully understand Armenian history. First of all we never called ourselves "Armenia", but Hayasdan. From Haik which he was from the 3rd millennium of the tribes of Armen (Armenian tribe). Armens in Ararat were also called Armeni from 2300 BC inscriptions of Akkadians. The Armans or Hyes have always been in the land of Aratta (Ararat). To this day Arabs, Persians, Assyrians which inscripted the 'Armani' reference, call us by 'Armeni' to this day. ] 06:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

== I don't appreciate it, either ==

It is actually discomforting that a plea for fairness, balance and self-restraint addressed to all contributors is interpreted as a personal attack which deserves an apology. It is also discomforting that, in spite of the alleged "be bold - anyone can edit" principle that supposedly animates Misplaced Pages, a user has to explain on the talk page the reasons for removing a sentence that is not only POV, but also factually inaccurate (and expressed in a childish manner, by the way) and a quotation that is quite biased, to say the least.
However, I do understand your reasons. Since Misplaced Pages is populated by a significant share of users who apparently don't have anything better to do in their lives than staging endless (and quite useless) edit wars, and since my intention is to offer a positive contribution, I will follow your advice and post my proposals on the talkpage as soon as possible.
Your comments and suggestions will be more than welcome. Happy New Year. ] 21:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for your reply, I am sorry if I sounded harsh and rude. ] 21:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

::Hi, I tried to express my reasons ''']'''. ] 22:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

== Mediation ==

A ] has been filed with the ] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to ]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.''' <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 20:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

== Paytakaran ==

If you didn't want to get involved, shouldn't you have thought about that ''before'' reverting him? Sorry, but once you revert, you're involved. It doesn't meen you have to participate in the mediation, but this is the same reason why admins can't revert before they protect a page. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 06:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

:You don't have to keep making comments on the talk page if you don't want to... <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

::I meant ], not my talk page. If you ''really'' don't want to be involved, just make an effort to do so and I'll cross your name off the list. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

== Personal attacks ==

Knock it off already. Do you ''want'' to get blocked again? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

== Reply ==

Listen, I do not know the background of the article at all in fact. I joined Misplaced Pages only four months ago, and I didn't get involved with that article that much (not for a particular reason, so it is not something that has to with someone or a "group"). I ''know'' that there is always some rough riding going on in and around that article, so not much would surprise me :) If you contributed a good deal to an article in good faith and people are just calling it crap, then I can understand your frustration. People can disagree on content, but there shouldn't be any personal disrespect. All I am saying is that I have ''no'' idea of the background of the article (especially who did what when). I perused the archives for some background info, however. Personally I am only trying to bring some humor and/or distraction to the talk page so that the conversation doesn't get out of hand (as it tends do so so often, even I let myself get carried away). For example, this article was protected because of a particular disagreement on content between OttomanReference and some other users, but there has been no mention of it since the protection - just a small note couple of hours after. It is nobody's fault particularly; nobody brought it up!!

But listen, there is no need to lose your rag, just chill. As I said, I ''know'' the type of stuff that is happening about that subject, and not just in Misplaced Pages, as well as a lot of things associated with it in today's world. The article is already protected, so take some time away and clear your head. I also lose it sometimes here, so I know :) (that's why it can be a madhouse btw, not coz people are stupid! It is mad in a funny way lol) But also remember that there will ''always'' be fundamental disputes in that article, so just keep that in mind (I would say the same thing to a Turkish user as well, it is nothing personal) In the same way that there will always be huge disputes with Isreal/Palestine articles for example. C'est la vie... Cheers! ] 03:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

(By the way, which articles that I created? I generally make a point of not creating articles that will be grounds for edit-wars. I created some articles like ] simply because there needed to be one in line with other country articles, not to offend someone :))] 03:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

==Neurobio==

Allright fadix, I am very sorry to see that you take it personally. I know this guy no better than I know you, so I do not protect him intentionally. I read every single line of what you have written in the genocide talk page, and even though I never agree with you; reading your passages are very educating to me. But, it is hard to follow a text when it is full of personal attacks. I do not know tellarmeniantale, and I do not appreciate Neurobio saying ''Misplaced Pages, an amazing circus for all of us'' but you shouldn't mention it in the talk page of the genocide. I know that you have good relations with anyone else in the wikipedia. I also haven't forget your support when I first contributed to wikipedia, if it weren't for you and Baristarim, I would have left a long before.

] article is constructed before I start wikipedia two months ago. It addresses the view of majority very well, so tebrikler:), but it lacks anti-genocide POV as I have stressed in the talk pages. I plan to finish my translation till february 19, merge it with ''denial of the genocide'', ask Baristarim for a peer review, and present it to you with the title of either ''Turkish Thesis on the Armenian Genocide'' or ''Refusal of the Genocide''. I will also answer you on Orbay in the talk page of the genocide. Thanks ] 03:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

==Request for Mediation==
{| class="messagebox" style="width:80%"
|-
|]
|
|A ] to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, ].
::::::::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span>

<small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account operated by the ] to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please ].</center></small>
|}
<div align="right">''This message delivered: 04:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)''.</div>

== AMA ==

Just to let you know I will be helping in the dispute you are in. Do you know the policy ]? I feel as if you think you own the article and you don't want anyone else editing it, am I right? If I am right then you are breaking this policy. Also if you reverted his edits without looking at them like he said then you are sending the message that you do not care about what he rights. ], even if he is wrong assume that he is doing for the good of wikipedia. You should ] if it talkes about trying not to delete info with ] and a ]. Also I would like you to look at ]. Have a nice week and god bless. --] 15:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
*Can you please not talk about the blocks. --] 20:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
*I believe that all of you to some degree feel as if you own the article. If not then there would not of been a dispute. Also peoples past does not matter. Have a nice week and god bless. --] 20:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

{{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}}
</div><!-- Template:smile2 -->
*If your civil, and work with the others well I'll reward you. Have a nice week and god bless.--] 21:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
* Just to let you know we are going to talk about this on ] from now on. Have a nice week and god bless you and everyone you know. --] 23:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

==Nakhichevan==
Hey Fadix, thanks for your contributions on Nakhichevan! I will try to find sources for most if not all of those names this weekend. Best, ] 22:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

== AMA ll ==

There may be a second advocate in this case. I have also asked a lot of people to comment. Peace. --] 02:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

== Hi ==

Can you enable your e-mail address please? Cheers. --] 18:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

== Ararat arev ==

Actually, if you read ], Angine is apparently his girlfriend in Iran. So she appears to be his ] instead. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 21:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

:Well, if you see that {{user|217.219.53.253}} has edited her userpage, also note that the IP is located in Iran. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 22:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

::You know where to report it. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 22:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

== Hey ==

Check your mail soon please, merci. ] 18:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

== N-K ==

Auto-protect? So it was mentioned on some page that handles automatic edit-war protections? That's kind of annoying, since now a protect shows up in the log but not the unprotect.--] 23:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

== Re: trash ==

Nope, never seen it before. Interesting. Who is Adamu Adamu? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 01:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

== Karbakh ==

I support your comment, but please do vote, the Azeris have already set foot, the shady bunch, adil, atabek and batabak, i already know batabak and atabek are the same since i cracked him last time now im going to crack him again, kunats hivan koseren, the Turks will obviously reject this because its a major loss to them. ] 05:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
:Hmm you are right i agree, but we should learn how to fight back because that is what we are known for i have a few tactics but i can't list them here, you remember that email? peace. ] 06:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
::That constitutes as fighting back, but we need more hyerer here. ] 06:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

== Personal attacks ==

Hello Fadix. I came to ask you to refrain from making ], as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Armenian_Revolutionary_Federation&curid=2337059&diff=107;(UTC)

::If I understand correctly, the guy has the right to call me a racist, and I can't answer back in kind? And where is your warning to him, this time you can't pretend to not have seen it, its a couple of lines above my entire message you have deleted. The guy modified the name of a living person, added the "i" to make it sound as an Armenian as an insult just a few days ago. Also, there is no given right to you, to delete an entire message, because of one phrase, you are abusing your administrator privilages. The rest of my message doesn't contain any material which gives you the right to delete. ] ] 04:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

:::Correct. If he makes personal attacks, report it to admins. Do not respond by insulting him and the other Azeri editors. I will warn him, and yes, I saw his comment where he said "Strange, wouldn't you rather admit that the racists here seem to be both of you." However, ] in part says ''Frequently, the best way to respond to an isolated personal attack is not to respond at all.'' I understand it's not just a lone personal attack, but the guy is blocked... there isn't much harm he can do since his talk page is the only place he can post comments. If you stop posting on his talk page, it is very likely he will stop responding. It's as if you're sticking your hand into a lion's cage; you keep doing it even though you know you'll get bitten and even though you can just leave it alone. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
::::The last days, they've successfuly been able to lock a couple of articles. Merge the last days Atabek edits with those of Dacy69, within few minutes matter, FEW MINUTES, do the merge and you'll see. I admit Adil is blocked and could not do any harm, but I REFUSE to report any members with whom I am in conflict with. Since it would be obvious that it is not in good faith. The report incidence has become a tool to shut people with whom people disagree with. Do you seriously believe that in an edit conflict in which both sides aren't respecting guidelines and policies, reporting the "other" sides users is done in good faith? How many times the one reporting it has been blocked himself in the process? You are encouraging me to give in members with whom I am in conflict with. ] ] 04:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

:::::I can understand your frustration, and I can see why you don't want to report other users. This is exactly the same reason ] was deleted, actually. Let me quote from a user I know:

:::::<blockquote>Rather than doing things like reporting them to administrators for blocks, or trying to prove their misconduct; imagine how you would feel if someone "reported" you for alleged misbehavior: you wouldn't like it. It would escalate the conflict. Instead, remain cordial and don't engage in petty behavior outside of ] (discussion/mediation). If simple discussion isn't working, or you notice that it's getting heated quickly, disengage from the conflict and seek outside opinions and mediation, and be willing to make a serious attempt at compromise.</blockquote>

:::::<tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 05:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, a last note, if you unblock me and exchange the 24 hours block with a 48 hours restriction on not getting involved in such conflicts, I will welcome it. I want to contribute on science related articles and I promess to not do anything else, not even answering in users talkpage. ] ] 04:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

:Hmmmm, ok. Can we make that three days instead? Keep in mind that this doesn't give you a free ticket to resume personal attacks once the three days expire. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 05:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
::OK. ] ] 05:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
:::Done. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 05:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
::::I am still not able to edit. ] ] 05:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
:::::Try again. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 08:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

You can post it yourself; my point was just that you should stick to discussing the article at hand, nothing else. That's all. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 10:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

The statements for inclusion to the article have been revised to accomodate your reservations. Have your objections been dealt with adequately in the latest version of the draft? I look forward to your reply. ''''']'''''17:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


Well, being that cooperation is the opposite of disputing, perhaps you could look over Grandmaster's statements of fact and let me know which ones you agree with. ''''']'''''18:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


I believe I've identified the main problem in the Paytakaran discussion. The main cause of the dispute is not a disagreement on the part of the participants. It is miscommunication. The two sides have been having trouble getting their points across, and/or understanding what the other side means. This has caused them to continue to argue over points that could easily be resolved if they each knew what the other side was trying to say. It was hard to spot at first, because it's rather subtle...

I didn't understand your last answer, for instance. You didn't answer the specific question I asked but a more general one, and I didn't realize this until after I started to type a reply. Your answer doesn't use the number scheme used on the statements and sources page, leaving me to guess or assume your intentions from an interpretation of your answer, and therefore I can't really be sure which statements you wouldn't mind having included in the article.

To avoid the need for interpretation, I need very specific answers. The statements aren't listed as 1) 2) 3) 4), but as 1a), 1b) 1c), etc. Please look them over, and let me know precisely which ones you don't have a problem with (and which you agree can be placed in the article). That may help the mediation move forward smoothly and avoid further disputing.
''''']'''''11:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

=== Reply to your general answer ===

I look forward to your reply to my query above. I'll also do my best to interpret your previous (general) answer. My replies are indented...

He already knows.

: I'm not sure he does. I sure don't, and I read the entire discussion too.

1) Paytakaran is the province mostly, this is the only fact.

: There is no 1). There are 1a) through 1f). Are you saying you appove of all of those?

2) Paytakaran has only been an Arenian province, Albania had Caspiane not Paytakaran. Just like Istanbul is a Turkish city not Greek, Constantinople was a Greek city.

: You said "Arenian". Did you mean "Armenian"? So even though Constantinople and Istanbul is the same city (with the same location and many of the same buildings), it isn't the same city by virtue of who controls it, occupies it, and what it is named?

: Therefore, you wish that care should be taken that the synonymns don't misrepresent the place at inappropriate times in history. That is, if I'm interpretting you correctly, the historic Paytakaran should not be referred to as "Beylaqan" (in parentheses immediately following "Paytakaran").

: What if Grandmaster included the dates in which the alternate names applied? Would that fix it to your satisfaction?

3) There was no Paytakaran being a central city also known as Beylaqan. Presenting this as fact is to impose one position against the other. Beylaqan was a town, some transliterate it as Paytakaran, but this would go in a disambiguation page and could not be presented in parallel in the main article which is about the province.

: Paraphrase: There was no city named Beylaqan in the province of Paytakaran. To present Beylaqan as a synonym misleads the reader to believe it was called Beylaqan way back then.

: Since the scale involved here is much smaller than Constantinople, and since Grandmaster's details are relevant to the geographical region and may help the reader put history into perspective in relation to the present, would it be okay with you if the existence of Beylaqan was explained in the body text of the article?

Anyway, you are corrupting me :) I am supposed to contribute in science related articles for those 72 hours, the was the promess I mad to the administrator who blocked me. ] ] 19:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

: I believe that the administrator wishes to see peaceful cooperation. I also believe that the administrator did not intend to disrupt cooperation on the Paytakaran article by disallowing one of the key participants from cooperating. Be courteous, and try to accomodate to the best of your ability. Help me find a common solution that both you and Grandmaster can live with. Rather than merely objecting, you could go one step further and provide alternatives which you would be happy to support. That will help the other side generate new ideas on how to solve this problem too.

: I believe that Grandmaster wants to present the facts. He just doesn't see the same ramifications that you do. Once they are presented to him in an understandable way (I had trouble understanding them too), he has shown himself to be accomodating. So please, let's continue moving forward toward a common solution. ''''']'''''12:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

== Arbitration ==

I have opened an arbitration case regarding the current editing dispute you've been involved in. Please make a statement at ] concerning the conflict with the other parties listed. Thanks. ]·] 10:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

== Undeleting your user page and talkpage ==

Your talk page was already restored, now I've done the same to your userpage. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 19:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

== Re: ==

I don't have the patience to deal with this BS we know who starts it if I get blamed or anyone else related I'm going to be pissed, since we know Adil and the rest start all of this. ] 19:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:Not sure what other message you mean, Okay but that story about the sock is over the admin Daniel.Bryant warned me and I only used it once and please don't listen to them HayasaArmen is an old account so forget about that, its my first time here so I don't shit about attribution, so obviously i don't know. Hopefully we will do good, everyone knows this its them not us, i will be upset if they get credit for doing bad they caused all the problems. ] 19:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
::Yeah I don't see them as opponents personally I like Turks, I just don't like nationalists who mislead there people. ] 19:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:::I just found this, Dacy is using Ips, ] 20:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
::Yeah but Adil reverted 3 times on that day, later the 4th one was him. ] 03:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
:::I'm just going to gather info here, and let you guys go first. ] 07:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
:Also this, it shows evidence. ] 18:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
::Okay but please be more specific wait for me to reply? or they go first. ] 18:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
:::All this users are ganging up on this, we should include this in the ArbCom, ] 20:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

== Armenia - Azerbaijan Arbitration ==

Thank you for your interest in my comments on the Armenia - Azerbaijan Arbitration ]. The comments were made in a general way about national-conflict editing disputes. I did not claim special knowledge of the current case. My only real point was to remind the arbitrators that national disputes are different from other articles, and ask them if they really think that something positive can come out of opening an arbitration. They did the same thing in "Occupation of Latvia" and all that will come out of it is a reminder to each editor to be nice to each other.

I find it interesting, though, that one point you raised was about tangential disputes: ''When others appear in a short interval and start editing those same specific articles and participate in the edit war, then this has nothing to do with Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. One such example is the article on Urartu, Tabib was fighting on it because he had a specific problem with it, not involved with the Armenian-Azerbaijani stuff'',...

In a longer version that I did not bring to ArbCom I wrote: ''Often disputes between North Dakotans and South Dakotans over one article lead editors from North Dakota to find other articles involving South Dakotans where the South Dakotans can be made to look bad.''

I think this is what you are talking about, and I recognize that it happens in these sorts of articles. To be clear, I am not offering any opinions on the conduct of either Azeri or Armenian editors. ] 18:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

==]==
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ].

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 18:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

===Checkuser Tabib===
There are other edits from the ip that Tabib used and they are from Azerbaijan; however the edits by the other accounts are childish, not concerning the issues Tabib was concerned with. So essentially, nothing significant was found. ] 18:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
::Only one edit by Tabib in the time frame. ] 19:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
:::It is not possible to compare the location of edits by Tabib because there are no other edits to compare it to. ] 20:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

==Notice of Arbitration Committee injunction==

The ] has adopted a temporary injunction in the case of ], in which you have been named as a party. The injunction provides: ''Until the conclusion of this case, all parties are restricted to one content revert per article per day, and each content revert must be accompanied by a justification on the relevant talk page.'' Violators may be blocked for up to 24 hours. The case remains open for the submission of evidence or proposals. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. ] 00:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

== Re: ==

I know but that guy Gegman is new he is not a sock. ] 09:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

== Barev Fadix ==

Hi Fadix whats up. I just wanted to drop by and ask you one question. Do you speak Armenian also? ] 20:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

== Evidence at ArbCom ==

Fadix, unfortunately I have no time to prepare the evidence for ArbCom due to various work related issues so please do so in my name. This is my official request/permission. If you have any questions just ask me.--<big>''' ] '''</font></big><sup><small>]</sup></small> 00:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

==Thanks==
Hey Fadix, I'd like to award you this:
{{Armenian Barnstar|I just wanted to thank you for being so supportive of me and other Armenian editors here on Misplaced Pages during this past week. All the best, ] 16:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)}}

==About evidences==
I was wondering how days more do I have to add them. As you noticied, the last days I more writen text than direct diff. sor of evidence because the last few days I didn't have much time and diff. time are much more time consuming. So, how much time do I have left? ] ] 16:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
:Briefly set forth your contentions and the diffs that support them. Then quit. ] 16:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

== Robert599 ==

I have no idea how to block IP ranges, and even if I did, what reason would I give in the block log? "No more Armenians and Azeris please"? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

== Your arbitration evidence ==

Thank you for taking the time to present detailed evidence in the arbitration case. However, your statement right now is very long and the arbitrators have indicated they prefer shorter presentations. I would request that you try to reduce your statement to an overall length of about 1000 words. Thank you. ] 23:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

== re:Paytakaran ==

See ].

''''']''''' 11:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)



== Category:Armenian terrorism ==

I think there is enough material to start a category for Armenian terrorism. It starts with the ], then there is the ], assassination of Talat Pasha, then diplomats and civilians murdered by ASALA and other Armenian organizations. I want to know what you think about the category.--<tt class="plainlinks">] ]</tt> 14:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

==Arbitration==
{{notice|The arbitration committee has asked that evidence presentations be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is way over. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence. You should be able to present evidence of disruptive editing, personal attacks, or other matters for arbitration with a few representative diffs of the best (or worst) examples. It is also important to keep in mind that Arbitration is meant to solve disputes, or failing that, to remove disputing editors. Arbitration is not simply another page to continue your battles. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, ] 02:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC) }}
:You can take my space. ] 04:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

::I'm passing on the request of the Arbitration Committee. It is their expectation that they will read all the evidence and comments on a case, so they have asked that evidence be kept to a manageable length. It would be good advice to follow this as closely as you can, but in the end it is your decision. ] 11:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

==Armenia, etc.==
I do not think in the long run it helps to delete an article where there is an editing impasse and start another on the same subject. It just occurs all over again. Perhaps it is usually best to try for compromise , keep the article, and then work on a different topic in the same general area of interest. Some will balance at little to one side, and some the other. Just meant to explain the way I think about it. ''']''' 04:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

== Re ==

Well, I figured that most people already said everything that needs to be said. There's hardly anything constructive that I can add without making it repetitive. Is there anything you wanted me to say? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

==Barnstar==

Thank you. -- ] 22:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

== Re: ==
It's been deleted. ] 02:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks for reminding me I will indeed, but there additions get me nervous atabeks and adils I'll unwatch list them if it helps and keep track of them after ArbCom just incase, the Azeri-Armenian related articles. ] 02:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
::I'll try my best bro. ] 02:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:I'm thinking about getting myself blocked for 24 hours if possible. ] 02:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
::Okay I'll try maybe basketball or something. ] 02:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

== AMA ==

I am back on the case. I hope I will be able to help. Have a nice week and god bless:) --] 22:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

As mediator on the dispute over the Paytakaran article, I've made some suggestions to resolve the various matters, and have requested further information on one of the issues. Your participation is welcome. ''''']'''''19:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

== Re: Am I supposed to assume good faith? ==

Yeah, you always are supposed to. And besides, it wasn't even an article, it was more like a document, which is why it belongs at Wikisource, not here. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 03:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

== Re: Where have you been? ==
Hey dude, been kind of busy these last couple of months plus i get the feeling my contributions go to waste. Your last remarks on THOTH really cracked me up, the structure of his sentences make me wonder if he is actually outsourcing his long paragraphs to a bunch of students in China. LOL. Anyways, keep well. ] 06:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

== Millet system in "the Status of Ottoman Armenians" sub-article ==

Hello Fadix. I replied your message about this subtitled subject in the talk page. It was a very late response, sorry for that. Pls check the subtitle in the talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Armenian_Genocide#Millet_system_in_.22the_Status_of_Ottoman_Armenians.22_sub-article.

:I'm sorry for that, Fadix. Take care of yourself. --] 01:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

== Requesting you to remove ==
What I wrote was not provocative at all and it is not '''only''' my thought. ] in his article says that "It is at least time that Americans ceased to be deceived by propaganda ". See: However, I am not going to try to persuade you on this issue. What I wrote in my page will stay there because there is nothing wrong with it.--] 08:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

== Hi ==

Hi, how are you? I just saw the ArbCom case, I had no idea that the things had gotten out of hand so much - I was quite surprised. I knew something was up because there were all these articles popping up on my watchlist, but never got into it and followed it really.. Well, take care.. ] 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

==Re:Atabek==
Thanks! Actually, I was already thinking along those lines. That's why I didn't respond to Atabek's second statement regarding the Genocide under the "Inappropriate use of user space" section on the administrators' noticeboard. I figured that it wasn't worth it and that it was just a waste of energy. I told Artaxiad to ignore him as well, though, obviously it doesn't look like he followed my advice. -- ] 17:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

==]==

The arbitration case involving you has closed. The Arbitration Committee has banned you from editing Misplaced Pages for a year. You may see the full decision at ].

For the Arbitration Committee,
- ] &#124; <sup>] / ]</sup> 01:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

] '''Blocked:''' Your account has been blocked for one year to implement the ban. Editing with sockpuppets is prohibited and will cause the ban length to be reset. Thank you. ] 01:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

It's a mistake, but that's fine. ] ] 01:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

== And my first barnstars go to... ==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | As a final act of gratefulness to the '''legendary''' Wikipedian-Armenian Fadix, I award him the Defender's barnstar for his dedication and service to Armenians and Misplaced Pages, by preventing the latter from being used for fraudulent purposes such as the spread of lies and the supression of truth. I thank you. ] 01:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|}


{{Armenian Barnstar|I would also like to posthumously award Fadix with the Armenian national barnstar, for his exceptionnal and kick ass work on the ] article. His work on that article has prevented biased users from surpressing truthful information. Of course, not to mention all his work in other Armenian related articles that ultimately led him to being dragged in a conflict he did not want to be apart of. Կէնացդ՜, դուն ես Ֆէտային: ] 01:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC) }}

== ] ==
Hello, Fadix. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under ] that was in your userspace. The image (]) was found at the following location: ]. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our ]. The image or media was replaced with ] , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. ]] 04:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==
Hello, Fadix. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under ] that was in your userspace. The image (]) was found at the following location: ]. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our ]. The image or media was replaced with ] , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. ]] 04:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==
Hello Fadix, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as ]. The image (]) was found at the following location: ]. This image or media will be removed per ]. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the ] or ] license or released to the ]. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. ]] 09:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

==I confirm==
] ] 21:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:55, 27 February 2015

Soft redirect to:User:Fadix
This page is a soft redirect.

Proposed deletion of Armenian Genocide/resources

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Armenian Genocide/resources, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Is linked from Talk: in archive box, but I assume someone was planning to make it but didn't. Shouldn't be cluttering up the archive box.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Zeus- 19:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

fyi

See this edit which placed s:Martyred Armenia on the Wikisource main page as a new text. I've completed the proofing and formatting of it. See Fâ’iz El-Ghusein, too. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

yea, I've seen... three interesting and juicy arbitration cases going on too, it's like watching a soccer match. ;) Fad (ix) 02:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Category: