| Revision as of 14:32, 3 August 2007 editRodentofDeath (talk | contribs)1,007 edits →August 2007← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:10, 24 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,025 edits not around since Sept 2009 | ||
| (70 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=1 September 2009}} | |||
| ==Welcome!== | |||
| Hello, RodentofDeath, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits {{#if:{{{1|}}}|to the page ]}} have not conformed to ''']''', and have been reverted. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| There's a page about the ] that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the ''']''', where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{{tl|helpme}}</code>''' on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out ] or ask me on my talk page. <!-- Template:Welcomenpov --> Again, welcome! ] 23:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The above Arbitration case has closed and the full decision can be viewed at the link above. You are now banned from Misplaced Pages for one year, and Susanbryce is reminded of the prohibition on using Misplaced Pages as a platform for advocacy. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Could I suggest that editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following: | |||
| * Remain polite per WP:Civility. | |||
| * Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties. | |||
| * Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors. | |||
| *Use {{tl|fact}} and {{tl|check}} tags to highlight sections that either lack sources or have questionable sources. | |||
| *] only when necessary. | |||
| Thanks! ] 23:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee,<br>] 00:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Killing fields of angeles hoax === | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=not actually requesting unblock. need to appeal a block reset.|decline=Please contact a member of ]. It may be that you are entirely unrelated to that IP address but regular admins have no way to determine this. A member of ARBCOM will be able to make this determination. — ] (]) 16:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}With regards to your recent actions, it would be appreciated if you would not remove ] notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Killing fields of angeles hoax|, as it appears you did with ]}}. The information boxes are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them without a valid reason is considered ]. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please ] at the respective page instead. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-afd1 --> / ] 16:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| apparently somebody reset the date of my block for block evasion. i have not edited wikipedia since i was banned. i'm not sure exactly what happened here i just know i didnt edit anything. i am allowed to look at articles, correct? thats all i have done. by the way, susanbryce, who was reminded by the arbitration committee in the case that produced my ban, is now removing well cited info that doesnt conform to her POV inserting blatantly false info into the human trafficking in angeles article. i'm not sure why this is allowed to continue. if you need examples i would be happy to provide them but i am sure just checking the references will give you all the info you need. for instance, she says 2005 crime statistics are incomplete by using an article from 2004. she also anonymously edits to insert that the tourist police keep out the PNP (false, they are part of the PNP and share an office and patrols with them on fields) and are paid by the bars (they arent paid at all. they are volunteers). i'll let the deviant sex acts comment speak for itself. ] (]) 06:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| If someone has been accused of a crime and later all the charges were dismissed, it isn't acceptable to merely say they were charged or accused, we must give balanced coverage in accordance with our policies on ] and ]. ] 09:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Philippine WikiCon == | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| Your recent edits have introduced ] and ] concerns, accordingly I have reverted them. I'm not saying the current version is perfect, however changes of this nature require ]. Also, describing other good faith editors as vandals is obviously ]. ] 11:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this should you signify interest. --] (]) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ===May 2007=== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to ] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did here: ]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> ] 13:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}With regards to your comments on and . Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> / ] 21:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: RodentofDeath Insults == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> | |||
| == 2019 US Banknote Contest == | |||
| can u please tell me where i can complain about people making unfounded abuse claims?] 02:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border-spacing: 2px; border: 1px solid darkgray; width: 100%;" | |||
| :], but consider using the ] first. Good luck. / ] 03:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center;" width="1%" |] | |||
| ! style="text-align: center; font-family: Tw Cen MT; font-size: 40px;" |US Banknote Contest | |||
| ! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center;" width="1%" |] | |||
| |- | |||
| ! style="text-align: center; font-family: Tw Cen MT; font-size: 20px;" |November-December 2019 | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan="3"| | |||
| ---- | |||
| There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of ], yet only a fraction of these are represented on ] in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, ], the ], the ], multiple ], communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. | |||
| ::i was joking :P ] 04:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| In the months of November and December, ] will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the ]. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on ]. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive ]. Whether you want to claim the ] or you just want to have fun, all are invited to ]. | |||
| :::Consider ]. Humor may be misinterpreted by readers. / ] 04:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Refactoring talk page comments== | |||
| Sorry to pile on the Talk page warnings here, but I just wanted to let you know refactoring other editors' Talk page comments (as you did here) is generally a bad idea, and contrary to Misplaced Pages accepted practice. Even if more than half your comments were not variations of "wrong" and "I disagree", it would still not be considered helpful. | |||
| <span style="font-size:85%;">If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions ]</span> | |||
| '']''. | |||
| |} | |||
| <span style="font-size:85%;">Sent by ] at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via ] (])</span> | |||
| I'm not using the standard User warning template for this because technically that's a vandalism warning, and obviously your intentions were good. But it makes the original comments harder to read in context, annoys the other editor (in this case, in an already contentious discussion), and is just generally a bad idea. / ] 01:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:ZLEA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:US_Banknote_Contest/2019/invite_list&oldid=922099028 --> | |||
| ok, i thought it was better than copying each sentence she said (thus its in the article twice) and then replying to it. if you wish to revert its ok and then i can just copy what i have done into the discussion again. or we can go back and copy her original post from the archive and put it above it. i wasnt trying to silence her or alter her statement. it just seemed the easiest way to do it since practically every sentence was in error. ] 02:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please ] other editors, which you did here: ]. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ] 13:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::what other editor? who am i attacking? i never mentioned anyone with anything to do with wikipedia. ] 23:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === June 2007 === | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please do not delete content from articles on Misplaced Pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Angeles City|, as you did to ]}}. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use ] for test edits. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Specious reasoning aside, it should be clear by now that repeated blanking of this section is not justified.|Specious reasoning aside, it should be clear by now that repeated blanking of this section is not justified.|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> / ] 02:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| what blanking? i removed a sentence that was clearly in conflict with a different sentence in the same article. you apparently have personal issues with me that are clouding your judgement. ] 02:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You removed a well-sourced sentence that is not in contraction with the culinary sentence. This does not seem like a serious argument; it seems like a specious rationale to edit war. / ] 02:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::may i remind you that it is only YOUR OPINION that it is well sourced. as discussed before, citations such as the juvida citation have serious errors. in order for the "75% of the prostitutes in angeles are children" statement to be correct then she would need to consider everyone under the age of 35 a child. ] 03:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I am not the only person who believes this. There are five (5) reliable sources on this article. You deleted them all. You are continuing an edit war, using the flimiest imaginable excuses. Please stop. / ] 03:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::you have now reverted an edit that would cover all points of view in this discussion to one that conflicts with other parts of this same article. i would suggest that you stop your revert war as it is unproductive to the article and you have already shown that your knowledge and research of angeles is very limited. yes, there are 5 sources. most even conflict with eachother. if you believe that 75% of the prostitutes in angeles are children then yes, i guess they are reliable!!! ] 03:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::No. I reverted an edit that was misleading (per the references). Introducing a biased interpretation does not ''cover all points of view''. Your repetition of specious arguments suggests the misleading nature of this edit may have been deliberate. / ] 03:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| the edit states angeles has prostitutes. also cities of this size have prostitutes. are you saying that this information is incorrect? how can something as obvious as this statement is be misleading? ] 03:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==You are invited to comment in ]== | |||
| I'm sure you have plenty to say ]. / ] 04:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please do not delete content from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ]. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use ] for test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''Please discuss changes of this magnitude on the talk page first... thanks!'' ] 13:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :you are joking, right? read the references. it is NOT a problem. it has been discussed before on the human trafficking page. the law is posted there. sex tourism is NOT human trafficking. there is no evidence of child prostitution in angeles despite ONE PERSON's claims to the contrary. i am here in angeles. it isnt a problem. do some research instead of listening to this mentally ill lady editing the encyclopedia. | |||
| :if you are going to REVERT then you better have a good reason other than my edits "do not appear to be constuctive" when in fact THEY ARE CORRECT!!! | |||
| ::You seem to be the only person arguing your side, and both of your refs have to do with the government's claims about it, which is hardly an outside observer without a stake in this. You can say that the government claims it, but you can't say that because it claims it, it is true. ] 14:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :ok, now you are really getting funny. you have an activist that receives compensation to for herself and her organization by making these outrageous claims and you are claiming she is the one that is correct and not the elected government??!!! | |||
| :go back through the history. go back through the discussion. i am far from being the only person that claims this. you have one whining bitch that claims this and then she claims she is "attacked" when people insert correct information. look at her personal page. she claims she went up to a screaming child and tried pulling that child away from an adult... in all likelyhood the actual parent... resulting in her being stabbed by the person protecting their child from her kidnap attempt. she is completely nuts. she is racist. she thinks all men in angeles city that are white are pedophiles. | |||
| :go back over her claims that were actually taken out. claims such as 150,000 prostitutes are in Angeles. this despite the population of Angeles being 280,000. she claims children are prostitutes in bars. her proof for this is 3 arrests in the last 25 years. interestingly enough two of the people she makes these claims about are still walking around town and WERE CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES. | |||
| :you can back any side of the argument you like. i dont care. all i am interesdted in is displaying the facts and the facts are that there is NOT a problem here in Angeles. please read this http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008018256 and this http://www.petitiononline.com/44441212/petition.html before deciding what the facts are. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:10, 24 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. RodentofDeath has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 September 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/RodentofDeath
The above Arbitration case has closed and the full decision can be viewed at the link above. You are now banned from Misplaced Pages for one year, and Susanbryce is reminded of the prohibition on using Misplaced Pages as a platform for advocacy.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Anthøny 00:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
RodentofDeath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
not actually requesting unblock. need to appeal a block reset.
Decline reason:
Please contact a member of WP:ARBCOM. It may be that you are entirely unrelated to that IP address but regular admins have no way to determine this. A member of ARBCOM will be able to make this determination. — Yamla (talk) 16:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
apparently somebody reset the date of my block for block evasion. i have not edited wikipedia since i was banned. i'm not sure exactly what happened here i just know i didnt edit anything. i am allowed to look at articles, correct? thats all i have done. by the way, susanbryce, who was reminded by the arbitration committee in the case that produced my ban, is now removing well cited info that doesnt conform to her POV inserting blatantly false info into the human trafficking in angeles article. i'm not sure why this is allowed to continue. if you need examples i would be happy to provide them but i am sure just checking the references will give you all the info you need. for instance, she says 2005 crime statistics are incomplete by using an article from 2004. she also anonymously edits to insert that the tourist police keep out the PNP (false, they are part of the PNP and share an office and patrols with them on fields) and are paid by the bars (they arent paid at all. they are volunteers). i'll let the deviant sex acts comment speak for itself. RodentofDeath (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Philippine WikiCon
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest | 
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Categories: