| Revision as of 13:19, 11 June 2005 editCesarB (talk | contribs)Administrators14,429 edits Vandalizing user pages← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:22, 22 December 2011 edit undoEnviroknot (talk | contribs)335 edits ←Blanked the page | ||
| (81 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==RFAr== | |||
| I am opening a request for arbitration against you due to your persistent use of personal attacks and sockpuppets. ] 16:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :You should be advised that I have left my comments in the . | |||
| :You should also be advised that I have yet to be convinced that these two are actually sockpuppets. | |||
| :I further object to being named in this RFAr at all, as it is an obvious indication to me that the whole thing has been enacted in bad faith by a group of editors pushing a political agenda. That you did so without so much as sending me a message or an email is very bad form on your part. ] | |||
| == Personal attacks == | |||
| Personal attacks can be removed altogether; people have been polite so far in merely editing out the unacceptable parts. If you want your comments to remain (and to remain unedited), then keep the lid on your emotions. It's really that simple. ] (] 07:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sockpuppet Shenanigans== | |||
| Firebug and Mel Etitis keep trying to tag your user page with a sockpuppet notice. I have now removed it twice. ] for language and ] | |||
| You should know they'll probably continue, will do anything then can to try to attack anyone who doesn't share their POV-pushing ways. ] ] for language and ] | |||
| ::While I do not appreciate your language, I understand now why you are so upset. | |||
| ::To Mel Etitis: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED to edit either my User page or my Talk page. Period. ] | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| You have been reported for a 3RR violation at ] and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, please feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:43, May 28, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sockpuppets and edit wars== | |||
| I didn't say you were a sockpuppet, I said ElKabong was the same editor as KaintheScion; why would you imagine I was referring to you? As for ], yes, he does little but edit-war on Muslim/Arab related topics, but that's not relevant to my comment on the Talk: page. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 21:28, 30 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| I have reported you for violation of the 3RR.]<sup><small><font color="#FF8C00">]</font></small></sup> 21:32, 30 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR block== | |||
| You have been reported for a 3RR violation at ] and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, please feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 22:00, May 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration Committee case opening == | |||
| ] has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to ]. Thank you. -- ] ] 18:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Personal attacks == | |||
| What you wrote on Mel Etitis' talk page was, without shadow of a doubt, a personal attack. As per Misplaced Pages policy, please do not make them. Cheers, ] 20:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I suggest that you do not make assertions such as this. Much as it is easy to rise to such accusations, you will gain far more respect from the Misplaced Pages community if you protest your innocence while remaining within policy. Mel's behaviour, while perhaps a little inflammatory, is nonetheless within policy. Your personal attack isn't, whatever you may hope. Don't do it: convince the Misplaced Pages community of your good faith by acting in a suitable manner. ] 20:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I understand your upset. Misplaced Pages does tend to favour the people who accuse others of sockpuppetry. I can see no evidence for your being anything other than a good faith editor. Don't be downhearted about this, but you should really not rise to it. If the ArbComm are worth their salt, they will find no evidence that you are a sockpuppet. The sockpuppet template should be restricted to those who are clearly sockpuppets, not merely accused. I believe that Mel's actions probably constitute a personal attack, but I suggest that you try not to fight fire with fire. It will make Wikipedians far more amenable to your cause. ] 20:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Arbitration== | |||
| Thank you for your help. | |||
| I suggest you use Jayjg's message to you about Yuber being a revert warmonger in the arbcom page. | |||
| Thanks again, | |||
| ] 05:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==My comment== | |||
| Please note that I was not making a comment necessarily directed specifically at you, but to those users who've been revert warring on your page. ] ] 02:35, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalizing user pages == | |||
| Kindly refrain from vandalizing my user page. It is NOT appreciated.] 07:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, I thought I was doing the opposite; I saw an abusive anonymous user blank your user page, and reverted it. --] 13:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||