| Revision as of 17:33, 13 September 2007 editKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →Talk pages: oops, close brackets← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:46, 24 August 2023 edit undoShakespeareFan00 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users87,836 edits Notification: tagging for deletion of File:Ath Eagles Photo.jpg.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (142 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 19:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Logo-bibletrain.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:{{{art|}}}|, especially what you did for ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} ] ] 12:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:{{{1|}}}|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> --] (]/]) 17:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Research survey invitation== | |||
| == September 2007 == | |||
| Greetings Profg- | |||
| == A procedural note == | |||
| My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Misplaced Pages editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here: | |||
| When you AfDed ] you listed it as a second nomination. That should only be done if an article has had a previous AfD. Previous proposed deletion tags and speedy deletion tags do not make it necessary to list something as separate AfDs, although it may be helpful to note them in the AfD nomination. ] 11:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::My bad, I had done a "prod" previously, should have done an AfD. Thanks. --] 13:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss | |||
| == CO == | |||
| Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Misplaced Pages editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher. | |||
| You said ''I have not been "unreasonable and provoking"''. I disagree. The reason I removed CO's block was because I think you did provoke him unreasonably, to the extent that you (hereby) get a warning for it. Please don't repeatedly restore comments to peoples talk pages. | |||
| This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its . | |||
| Incidentally, your re-listing looks very dubious to me and probably ] ] 13:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Misplaced Pages User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research. | |||
| If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my or via . My faculty advisor is . If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the at the University of Oregon. | |||
| And this looks like a spurious warning. CO has only one revert in the past week. This looks like yet more provocation of CO; this is your last warning ] 14:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you very much. | |||
| ==NPOV== | |||
| You seem to be misunderstanding NPOV. Any POV may be allowed and even desirable in articles, ''when it is the stated position of a notable person or organization or the majority view or criticism.'' In other words, ''we'' must be NPOV. We may quote, cite, or give the position of individuals and organizations that are POV. You removed a clearly attributed and relevant statement , the second time you did so. Our NPOV policy requires that conflicting views be given weight according to their relative importance. In short, stop removing views which do not support the view of the subject of the article merely because they do not support the views of the subject of the article. To do so is to write a hagiography not an encyclopedia article. This is not to say that tiny minority views should ever be included, but that is not the case here. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| :KC, I removed that quote because its POV was irrelevant to the context of that paragraph, was was ''incredibly'' poorly written - sloppy, in fact. I've tried to clean it up now (and rearrange those two paragraphs) to make it a better read, so please don't undo it, or no one who speaks proper English will even understand what it says. | |||
| Randall Livingstone | |||
| :I also had to change the uncited paragraph below; I hate using those weasel words, but until that statement is cited (as you noted above), it's simply some editor's unreferenced POV, and probably should be deleted if no citation is forthcoming. --] 13:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| School of Journalism & Communication | |||
| University of Oregon | |||
| ] (]) 18:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==File source problem with File:Ath Eagles Photo.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
| If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| ::Thus far, three different editors have disagreed with you, and the content is indeed cited. Cease edit warring against consensus. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 16:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::Whoa there, big fella. What are you talking about? '''I left your quote in there''' when I edited for clarity this time. ALL I did was move a paragraph higher, so it could read better, and changed a word in the UNCITED paragraph in keeping with the rest of the paragraph. What's the deal here? | |||
| :::And I haven't seen ANYONE say anything about it on the page, so I don't see anyone "disagreeing" with me. If you'd like to actually do so, TAKE IT TO THE TALK PAGE. Thank you. | |||
| ::::You have it backwards. The onus is on you, as the one attempting to change the article, to discuss your rationale. It is clear you are editing against consensus; it is incumbent upon you to make your case for any edits which you wish to make. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No, '''you''' have it backwards. I made a valid edit, you came along and changed it without a valid reason, so it is incumbent upon '''you''' to make your case for changing it. --] 01:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I assure you that you are in error. I did not make a change, I rejected ''your'' change, as did three other editors. You are the one desiring a change, you must make your case or ] will remain against you. This is Misplaced Pages policy and it is common sense. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I think you should both quit the sematic quibbling. Adding text is a change. Removing someones added text is a change. There is a minor presumption that changes to a stable article require more justification that removing such changes, but its minor. Far more important is whether the changes are justified, and whether they have consensus. Continuing to make a change after several people have objected is disruptive and the correct procedure is to take it to the talk page ] 10:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Odd that you should chastise us both for "semantic quibbling" then proceed to echo precisely what I said. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Sorry but I partially disagree, and I'd hope my comment made that clear. TO be specific, I agreee that ''three different editors have disagreed with you, and the content is indeed cited. Cease edit warring against consensus'' is a reasonable agrument. But ''The onus is on you, as the one attempting to change the article, to discuss your rationale'' is weak. I think you should stick to the first ] 11:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::WMC, I don't get it. So anyone pushing a POV-agenda can made a POV, unsupported, and spurious edit, repeatedly make the same edit against consensus, and the other editors who revert that edit has a weak rationale? By your logic, POV-pushing now is easy--just keep making the POV edit, whine to certain admins that their edit is legitimate, and it's done and becomes a part of the article. I think you're dead wrong. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 11:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: No. Why not read what I say? I said editing against consensus isn't good. I said that asserting that the onus of explanation lies on the side of someone adding a change is weak. Since KC has a good arguemnt, switching to a weak one isn't a good idea ] 13:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::ah, in that case, I believe you may have misunderstood me. I was not "switching" I was suggesting that the only way for Profg to attempt to gain consensus for his desired edits is to "make a case" on the talk page. Without that effort, it seems not only unlikely but virtually certain that consensus will not change to support his desired edits. Thus, it was a natural extension of, and guidance for, my first point - not a different point at all. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would suggest on ]and other issues, that you try to learn, slow down, take a deep breath, and not be so combative with other editors. You and your edits will survive on WP longer that way. --] 13:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Talk pages == | |||
| Please read the ]. You have run afoul of them several times, and your frequent use of talk pages to attack other editors is disruptive. Talk pages are for discussing the article, edits to the article - not for waging a minor war on those with whom you disagree. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:46, 24 August 2023
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Profg for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ScienceApologist (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Logo-bibletrain.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo-bibletrain.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Research survey invitation
Greetings Profg-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Misplaced Pages editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:
https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss
Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Misplaced Pages editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.
This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Misplaced Pages User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.
If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Ath Eagles Photo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ath Eagles Photo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
