Revision as of 04:56, 14 September 2007 edit199.125.109.35 (talk) extend one week← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:35, 1 October 2024 edit undoMacaddct1984 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,624 edits →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2024: Edit request not done at this time. (Edit Request Tool) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{move|Kyiv}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|
{{FAQ}} |
|
|
{{American English}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|
| action1 = PR |
|
|
| action1date = 17:45, 21 August 2005 |
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Kiev/archive1 |
|
|
| action1result = reviewed |
|
|
| action1oldid = 21231490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2 =FAC |
|
'''Discuss move at''' ]. Request will remain open at least until September 21, 2007. ] 04:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action2date = 17:42, 23 May 2006 |
|
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Kiev/archive1 |
|
|
| action2result = failed |
|
|
| action2oldid = 54754068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action3 = GAN |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
| action1 = PR |
|
| action3date = 25 September 2007 |
|
| action1date = September 4, 2005 |
|
| action3link = Talk:Kiev#GA Review |
|
|
| action3result = failed |
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Kiev |
|
|
| action1result = reviewed |
|
| action3oldid = 160406080 |
|
|
| currentstatus = FGAN |
|
| |
|
|
| action2 = FAC |
|
| topic = Geography |
|
| action2date = May 24, 2006 |
|
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Kiev |
|
|
| action2result = failed |
|
|
| action2oldid = |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Cities|capital=y}} |
|
{{WPCities|class=B|importance=Top|nested=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ukraine|class=B|importance=Top|nested=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ukraine| importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Russian History|nested=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Former countries}} |
|
{{WikiProject Russia|class=B|importance=Mid|nested=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=Low|hist=yes}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Press|collapsed=yes |
|
{{V0.5|class=A|category=Geography}} |
|
|
|
| subject=article| title=#KyivnotKiev:#kyivfourrome Misplaced Pages changes spelling of Ukrainian capital| org=]| url=https://www.unian.info/kyiv/kyivnotkiev-wikipedia-changes-spelling-of-ukrainian-capital-news-kyiv-11150921.html| date=2020-09-18| quote=The press service suggested that the moderators decided to "rename" the article because of the growing use of "Kyiv" in English-language sources.| accessdate=2020-09-19 |
|
|
| subject2=article| author2=Daryna Antoniuk| title2=Kyiv not Kiev: Misplaced Pages changes spelling of Ukrainian capital| org2=]| url2=https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/kyiv-not-kiev-wikipedia-changes-spelling-of-ukrainian-capital.html?cn-reloaded=1&cn-reloaded=1| date2=2020-09-18| quote2=Misplaced Pages couldn’t change the mistake earlier because it just displayed the spelling that is most popular among prestigious international media outlets, the Ukrainian representative office of Misplaced Pages said.| accessdate2=2020-09-19 |
|
|
| subject3 = article |
|
|
| author3 = Stephen Harrison |
|
|
| title3 = How the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Is Playing Out on English, Ukrainian, and Russian Misplaced Pages |
|
|
| org3 = ] |
|
|
| url3 = https://slate.com/technology/2022/03/wikipedia-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-edits-kyiv-kiev.html |
|
|
| date3 = 1 March 2022 |
|
|
| quote3 = But before covering the latest developments, it’s worth revisiting one of the most brutal edit wars in Misplaced Pages’s history, which also says something about the Ukrainian spirit. The issue was whether the web encyclopedia should spell Ukraine’s capital as “Kyiv” or “Kiev.” |
|
|
| accessdate3 = 1 March 2022 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=b}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Talk:Kyiv/naming/old discussion list}} |
|
<font color = "red"><big><big>''Note:'' A special subpage has been created for discussing the '''name''' of the article, ], an issue for which there is already consensus. Please take all naming discussion there!</big></big></font> |
|
|
<br> |
|
|
<br> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
==Talk Archives== |
|
|
|
| algo = old(90d) |
|
;DO READ ARCHIVES BELOW BEFORE PLAYING WITH KIEV/KYIV/KIJÓW/etc THINGS |
|
|
|
| archive = Talk:Kyiv/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
|
|
|
| counter = 11 |
|
*] |
|
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
*] |
|
|
|
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
*] |
|
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
*] |
|
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
*] |
|
|
|
}} |
|
*] |
|
|
|
{{annual readership|scale=log}} |
|
*] |
|
|
|
{{top 25 report|Feb 20 2022}} |
|
*] (April 2006 to January 2007) |
|
|
|
{{Archives|title=Naming archives (])|root=Talk:Kyiv/naming|search=yes}} |
|
*] Naming issue mostly July 2007 |
|
|
*] Naming issue mostly August 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
==New principles for editing this talkpage. All read, please.== |
|
|
This page has become less than useful for discussing the article itself, as it is flooded with discussion of the ''name'' of the article, an issue '''for which there is already consensus.''' |
|
|
If you nevertheless feel further arguing for a name change to be useful, please take it to the new subpage ]. It is hoped that this division will be beneficial for the naming discussion, as well as make it easier to deal with other kinds of issues here. Until further notice, I'm afraid any further discussion of naming on '''this''' page will be reverted, until the point has sunk in. I'm serious. |
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, there must be no more editing of the functional archive links at the top of this page into non-functional redlinks by changing "Kiev" to "Kyiv" in them. That is plain vandalism and violation of ], and any more of it will lead to '''blocks'''. I hope these new principles will improve the useability of this page. Good luck and happy editing. ] | ] 19:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Please do not archive this post, it needs to stay up. I have moved all sections from "Changes by User:hkdd" and later, which includes the "Requested move" naming poll, to the new page, and archived older sections, from Feb 2006 to June 2007, in the new Archive 7. At least that's what I tried to do... the chronology of this page was frankly a bit of a mess. I left the "Summary of older discussions over names in the articles" near the top of the page. I see people are already using the new ] page, thank you ! ] | ] 20:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
:As per above, the Kyivization discussion that still was added to this page is moved to ] and responded there. Please use this page to discuss other aspects of the article's content. Any takers to improve the city economy or transportation section? Thanks. --] 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::But please note - '''the inevitable future surveys re proposals to rename the article must be notified here''' not just conducted on the subpage. ] 02:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 January 2024 == |
|
== English or Latin maps? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Kyiv|answered=yes}} |
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
|
Replace 'also written as Kiev' with 'outdated place-name Kiev' in the title block: as it misleadingly enable a russian promoted writing to continue being used. If clarification is needed, i propose to add 'formerly' into the statement as to emphasize its outdated nature. ] (]) 23:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
In the ] the city was mentioned in published sources as ''Kiou'', ''Kiow'', ''Kiew'', ''Kiovia''. On one of the oldest English maps of the region ''Russiae, Moscoviae et Tartariae'' published by ] (London, 1570) the city is spelled as ''Kiou''. On the map by Guillaume de Beauplan (1650) the name of the city was given as ''Kiiow'', and the region was named as ''Kÿowia''. In English traveller Joseph Marshall's book ''Travels'' (London, 1772) the city is referred as ''Kiovia''. |
|
|
|
:{{not done}} The reality is that sources use Kiev, it is not misleading. See ] for more.<span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // ] :: ] </b></span> 00:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
|
::Replace 'also written as Kiev' with 'outdated place-name Kiev' in the title block: as it misleadingly enable a russian promoted writing to continue being used. ] (]) 02:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::It's neither Russian nor Ukrainian. It is the longstanding ENGLISH name that readers will still encounter. --] (]) (]) 03:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::"Kyiv" spelling/pronunciation is the newspeak. It has not been used historically. ] (]) 04:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Right where it says in brackets of the article “(also spelled Kiev)”, can that tiny bit (at least) be updated to “(also spelled '''as''' Kiev)”? 🙂 (It only makes better sense that way). ] (]) 20:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== claimed 100k population - not one of the largest in the world == |
|
The pictured map and its title appear to be in Latin, not English. In what language were the other mentioned maps written? This should be clarified. Obviously, these would have been used as sources in the English-speaking world, but the current text implies that they were written in English, and that doesn't appear to be completely true. ''—] ] <small>2007-08-05 21:07 Z</small>'' |
|
|
:Those are English maps, yes. Please look at their source at the image page. --] 21:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Before Bogolyubsky's pillaging, Kyiv had had a reputation as one of the largest cities in the world, with a population exceeding 100,000 at the beginning of the 12th century" - |
|
:: Well, on the detail of ''Russiae, Moscoviae et Tartariae Descriptio'' it says "Publisher: Abraham Ortelius (London, 1570)", but on the full map page I see "Auctore Antonio Jenkensono Anglo edita Londini anno 1562... Publisher: Abraham Ortelius, Antwerp, (1570) 1592", so something's mixed up. On the actual scan, I see something like "Auctore Antonio Ienkensono Anglo, edita Londini anno 1562 & dedicata istriss: D. Henrico Sÿdneo Wallis presidi." |
|
|
|
this strikes my as wildly overblown, from looking at the ] list. 100,000 might have been large, for the region (although still considerably smaller than Constantinopole), but nowhere close to "one of the largest cities in the world", as that would have to compete with the likes of Baghdad and large cities in China. ] (]) 07:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Spelling error in lead section - "ninenteenth" == |
|
:: But regardless, the map must have been aimed at an international market, because its titles and legends are exclusively in the Latin language: ''Lituania'', ''Borysthenes fl.'', ''Mare Caspium'', ''Crimea''. Obviously this could have influenced the English language, but it is not in English. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Coming under Lithuania, then Poland and then Russia, the city would grow from a frontier market into an important center of Orthodox learning in the sixteenth century, and later of industry, commerce, and administration by the '''ninenteenth'''." ] (]) 23:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:: I wonder what language was used for Beauplan's and the other maps mentioned. ''—] ] <small>2007-08-05 21:31 Z</small>'' |
|
|
|
:{{ping|Forvana}} Fixed. Thanks. ] (]) 23:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2024 == |
|
Well, there is no doubt about the second (1804) map that it is English. As for the earlier times, were there other than Latin maps common at all? If not, the Latin maps were the only ones used by the Anglophone travellers similar to any others. --] 21:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit extended-protected|Kyiv|answered=yes}} |
|
:::No, nothing is really mixed up here: as our article on ] expressly says, his atlas also gives sources. The version you have there is obviously in Latin. There were later versions in Dutch, French and German. These versions were slightly different. E.g. the French version was the first atlas to give the correct shape of Southern America. Kiovia may be an Ortelian translation of English (and primarily Polish) Kiov. Kÿowia looks like a Dutch spelling. FWIW, that Dutch diphthong, now usually spelled "ij" (both letters being capitalized at the beginning of a sentence or a place name, so Iceland is IJsland and not Ijsland) is pronounced like English "ay". BTW, I am sure that Ortelius's atlas was more influential in shaping British geography mores than the English source he was using. --] 10:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Change demographics GDP title from |
|
|
| demographics1_title1 = Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To |
|
==Culture section== |
|
|
This section is in such a pity shape. I on expansion. Please join. --] 17:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| demographics1_title1 = ] and ] |
|
:While the Culture section, as well as some other sections could benefit from expanded content, I would not say that it is in pitiful shape. However, I would be happy to take a look at your suggestions in time, and if I don't have too many problems navigating the rather arcane editing protocols of WP, offer my suggestions. How will consensus be determined with regards to your hoped for edits? - --] 16:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] (]) 02:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Request for Comment== |
|
|
|
:] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> It's not clear why that's an improvement over the current formatting, especially in a narrow infobox. – ] <sup>(] | ])</sup> 16:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{RFChist | section=Request for Comment !! reason=Should the page be moved to a new page called Kyiv? !! time=19:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)}} |
|
|
Do not discuss here. Discuss at ]. |
|
Replace 'also written as Kiev' with 'outdated place-name Kiev' in the title block: as it misleadingly enable a russian promoted writing to continue being used. If clarification is needed, i propose to add 'formerly' into the statement as to emphasize its outdated nature. 204.48.92.168 (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
"Before Bogolyubsky's pillaging, Kyiv had had a reputation as one of the largest cities in the world, with a population exceeding 100,000 at the beginning of the 12th century" -
this strikes my as wildly overblown, from looking at the 11th-12th century city sizes list. 100,000 might have been large, for the region (although still considerably smaller than Constantinopole), but nowhere close to "one of the largest cities in the world", as that would have to compete with the likes of Baghdad and large cities in China. 2001:9E8:A344:B700:5070:174:C4AA:ACF4 (talk) 07:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
"Coming under Lithuania, then Poland and then Russia, the city would grow from a frontier market into an important center of Orthodox learning in the sixteenth century, and later of industry, commerce, and administration by the ninenteenth." Forvana (talk) 23:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)