| Revision as of 14:06, 25 June 2005 editTdxiang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,540 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:59, 4 February 2024 edit undoUtopes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,556 edits Notification: listing of The Dark(film) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (283 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around}} | |||
| {{User:Sjorford/Bookmarks}} | {{User:Sjorford/Bookmarks}} | ||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Croupier DVD cover.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Did you move the article to plain <nowiki>]</nowiki> for a reason? The accepted ] has been to put the article at <nowiki>]</nowiki>, with the redirect or disambig at <nowiki>]</nowiki>. See the rest of ]. Cheers --] 14:13, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| No worries. ] is about the ], a bit like a county I think. For some of them like Port Augusta, there's not much difference between the town and the LGA. Others are quite a bit bigger, like ] or ]. --] 14:42, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == UK/GB edits == | |||
| On the issue of my edits, I understand your query. However, to the best of my knowledge, all of my edits are technically corrrect. Certainly, in the instances that you cite, they are. On the principle itself, the interchangeability of the terms (be it 'Britain', 'Great Britain', 'England', or anything else) is simply not acceptable. Would a Turkish user in Edirne consider it to be acceptable (or preferable) for ''every single'' page on Turkey to refer to 'Anatolia'? What about Malaysia/Malaya, Japan/Honshu, or Denmark/Jylland? I'm sure that you understand my irritation. ] 10:32, 15 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Marquess of Bute== | |||
| Having the link go straight to the article rather than through a redirect costs the server less effort and looks more professional to the reader. ] ] 16:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| That link could hardly be used in a naming dispute. All links to peers from articles on peerages were originally created using their full names, as they were created ''en masse''. ] ] 16:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why did you revert my change to a redirect? The title is wrongly capitalised, the correct form is an eistent article, and this was in any case up for copyvio — I don't see your reason, and you didn't have the courtesy to give one on the Talk page or even in the edit summary. ] (] 10:55, 18 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I notice that you say that you're a revert evangelist, which makes matters doubly puzzling. ] (] 10:57, 18 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :It's good of you to apologise for snappiness given my message — I'll be editing in a better mood after this week (when the examss, and I'm free of panicky finalists giving me extra work to mark and wanting extra tutorials, etc.). ] (] 12:57, 18 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == VFD closing == | |||
| OK, no problem. I'll admit that VFD really isn't my area, although I've gotten back into it more in the past week or so (listing things on it, anyway). I think I probably saw someone delete a subpage on VFD when they speedied something 6 months ago from known vandals. Cheers. ] 14:36, May 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Football portal == | |||
| Hi! You seem to share my interrest in ] so I thought that I'd inform you that I've started a football portal at ]. I chose to innclude "association" in the name to distinguish it from other possible types of football portals. Feel free to contribute to it! (Please answer here and not at my talk page as it makes dicussions easier to read for outsiders.) -- ] | ] 15:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like a good idea, although it'd be better to name it ], to fit with the name of the ] (a long-running compromise). I'll try and remember to contribute to the portal when I have a chance! ] ] 23:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought of that but didn't like using parantheses in the name, but it is probably better having it like that anyway. Is there any easy way to make the move? Or should we wait to the portal namespace is changed to Portal:? Contribute with anything, I'd say "news and events" and "did you know" are priority. Maybe also starting a wikiproject on football might be a good idea? Football seems to be the sport with the highest amount of articles and best cover (not very surprisingly, though), but there is almost no colaboration between contributors. -- ] | ] 23:38, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::There already is a ], although it's not really used at the moment. Hopefully the portal might act as a better meeting point for the community. ] ] 23:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Yes I know, but what I meant was a more overarching portal for everything related to the sport. National teams, competitions, articles on memorable matches, league systems, and so on. But I'll try to do something on the clubs portal some day also. :) -- ] | ] 12:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi Sjorford - I've put back the sections in "List of...". The divisions used may not be perfect, but the page is growing so rapidly some form of division is definitely going to be needed (it was only created 10 days ago!). BTW - isn't it time you updated the divisions in your Football subpage (especially since my old home town of Barnet is finally back in League Two! :) ]...<font color=green><small>''] 00:02, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for that - I wondered whether it was a case of seeing the talk page afterwards. BTW, your football page has prompted me to write about my country's major cup tournament - you might like to look at the just-written ] article! ]...<font color=green><small>''] 01:27, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This isn't a speedy candidate, but it certainly belongs on IfD if you want to take it there. ] (] 10:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :The criteria for images are much stricter than for articles (because images can't be undeleted). ] (] 10:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Disambiguation == | |||
| Please do not disambiguate pages that do not need disambiguating. ] ] 12:33, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I have read the discussion many times, and this is not what it means. The consensus was for ''starting'' the articles at the name with the full disambiguation suffix to save time before the election. That does not mean the pages need to stay with the full disambiguation suffix. The pages that have since been moved to a less complicated names are ones that we have checked definitely do not need the full suffix. ] ] 13:05, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Whoops; good catch! Thanks, ] ] 16:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Admins list== | |||
| Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. Since you've previously nominated yourself I added an '*' immediately before your name in ]. If for any reason you're NOT interested, my apologies and please remove the '*' (you could entirely remove yourself from the list also, if you'd like). I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- ] <small>(])</small> 18:44, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == NOEDITSECTION == | |||
| Thanks for helping solve the <nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki> problem on VfD. Your revert limited the number of subpages with the "contamination", and I think you got about 50% of them. I have fixed most of the rest (and other editors seem to have finished it). --] 22:26, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ''from ]:'' | |||
| Hey, Weyes, when you added NOEDITSECTION to the Vfd top template, it caused the removal of all section edit links to every link on the page that the template was added to. :) Nice try, but it didn't work. :) ]] 21:53, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I think I've fixed all of these. It was a good idea, though. :) ] ] 22:27, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh god yes, I hadn't thought of it working globally, I'm a pillock. Sorry about that, and thanks for cleaning up my mess. --](]) 23:21, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC) | |||
| ==Elizabeth II of Canada== | |||
| Sorry but given that the VFD is more than five days old and there's a 2:1 vote (the hurdle needed for wikiconsensus) to redirect there's no justification for your reactivating the VFD and reversing its implementation. ] 02:56, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| See ] "In day-to-day Misplaced Pages practice, e.g. on VfD, consensus means something closer to supermajority, usually a two-thirds majority". There's a 2/3 majority on the Elizabeth II of Canada VFD after five days so I'm afraid there *is* a consensus. You have no justification for "reopening" the VFD. ] 03:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, it's more than 2/3, about 70% in favour of merge/redirect. How long do you intend to carry this on for, I don't see how things will be any different a week from now?] 16:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| No problem! Apparently the discussion page used to redirect to the project page, but later it was changed so that there would be space do discuss the noticeboard itself. It's rather confusing, especially when looking for conversations later. — ] ] 17:13, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Elizabeth II == | |||
| My concern is that if left a few more days the VFD will fall through the cracks due to admin neglect and the consensus decision will not be implemented. If you agree to close the VFD and redirect the article if no other admin has done so, say, by the end of the week (assuming the ratio of votes remains the same) that's fine. Will you make that commitment? And if another admin in the mean time closes the discussion will you respect that?] 21:40, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I'm mystified how a 70% vote to redirect/merge be seen as "too close to call"?] 22:37, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| It is pretty bad in retrospect. I just made it up on the spot as there already was a ]. Your idea sounds better mind, and since not many teams are in it I'll prob. move things over to that. Cheers - ] 09:45, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == About copyright== | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| Hi,I'm ].Can we post just ONE company logo on an article?And will our account be terminated if we continue to post copyright violating articles? | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4#The Dark(film)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 04:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:59, 4 February 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Sjorford has not edited Misplaced Pages for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| Talk: Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 • WikiProjects: United Kingdom • UK geography • England • Cheshire • UK Roads • Football |
Orphaned non-free image File:Croupier DVD cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Croupier DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
"The Dark(film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect The Dark(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § The Dark(film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)