| Revision as of 21:01, 21 September 2007 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →3RR warning: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:35, 18 September 2016 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,051 editsm Signing comment by Light2021 - "Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Medium (company). (TW)" | ||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==To verify== | |||
| Jinx, if that really is you, pm me on CU, and I will verify your identity. - ] 18:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *OK, I have verified that {{Userlinks|67.135.49.29}} is indeed ]. - ] 18:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ==Dear Jinx== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| I am a conservative, and I don't feel that Misplaced Pages is too liberal. Actually, I haven't noticed any liberal bias whatsoever. WI hgope to see you come back eventually, as it must have been that article. Give it another try! =) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| <span style="border: 2px solid #828282; padding: 0px;">]]</span> 00:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> Light21 13:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Conservapedia == | |||
| I noticed your entry on the Conservapedia main page talk. Unfortunately, I've left Conservapedia for good, so I couldn't welcome you there, but just thought I'd drop you a note here. | |||
| I more or less agree with most of your sentiments about Misplaced Pages, but I'm afraid you won't find things any better at Conservapedia. At least at Wiki, people pretend to follow the rules most of the time; on Conservapedia Sysops are pretty much free to do whatever they please as long as they toe the party line. If you feel like it, you might take a look at the counter-site or at for plenty of examples of what things are like there. | |||
| Also, Saurials rule! Damn, sometimes I miss the old 2nd Edition. --] 20:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey, you're back == | |||
| You should have been here ], you missed all the fun. - ] 16:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ooo! Sorry I missed all that. And yeah, I'm always open to giving things a second chance (even in the face of that old "fool me twice, shame on me" adage), so here I am officially back after making odd edits here and there under my IP (I actually got banned for a day recently because of factual and accurate information I added to the articles for Jean Auel's books). ] 16:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Our old buddy FAAFA was up to his tricks in the RfA, even though he is banned. Imagine that! - ] 17:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh, do tell. Where exactly did he get involved (there's a lot there to search through). ] 18:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::If you want it in a nutshell, look at the chart that is thumbnailed at the bottom, and then check question 15. The editor who posted that question has admitted to doing so in proxy for FAAFA. I am now known in some circles as the "Nazi, KKK, homophobic, racist, anti-semitic wiki editor who killed Andy". :) The RfA talk page has some good reading on it too. - ] 19:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Okay, that question is just plain stupid. Your wording in the statement about people with "bear" handles may not have been delicate, but it certainly wasn't homophobic and has basis in fact. Oh, and I like how they judged you based on other people's opinions in the "homophobic" CU thread. You said absolutely nothing controversial in that thread, but they condemned you for it anyway. Guilt by association. It's not like CU is akin to the KKK, though I suppose is some people's (DUers, mostly) tiny, intolerant, ignorant, irrational minds, it is. The graphic is quite telling, too. They based their entire opinion on extra-Wiki activity because they couldn't base it on your activity here (which has been exemplary). FAAFA must be smiling quite smugly somewhere that his little smear job worked. The Powers That Be should be asked to review that RfA. ] 20:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::: I think the only avenue for redress would be arbcom, which I haven't ruled out, but I'm not sure it would be worth the trouble. - ] 20:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::It's up to you. How much do you want to be an admin? ] 20:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::: Couldn't give a rat's ass, at this point. :) - ] 20:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::lol! I kinda figured you'd say something like that. ] 21:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (outdent) One thing you may not have noticed is that BenBurch supported me early on, and then reiterated his support after "the question" was asked. - ] 21:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I see that now. I also see that others dropped their support in light of that question. Nutty. ] 21:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please do not use talk pages {{#if:Talk:PZ Myers|such as ]}} for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See ] for more information. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> <b><font face="courier" color="#737CA1">]</font></b> <small><b><font color="#C11B17">(])</font></b></small> 02:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for continuing to verify my conclusion that the article is being whitewashed. ] 02:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages {{#if:Talk:PZ Myers|such as ]}} for inappropriate discussion, as described ], you may be '''blocked'''. <!-- Template:uw-chat3 --> <b><font face="courier" color="#737CA1">]</font></b> <small><b><font color="#C11B17">(])</font></b></small> 02:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Keep OWNing that article like a good, biased Wikipedian. ] 03:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ann Coulter quotes == | |||
| A quick perusal of quote usage on ] reveals almost all seem to be qualified, or primarily sourced from non self-published material. Most also use third-party sources. Though some might not be the best. | |||
| These sections seem good. | |||
| The only quote I found is in this section "''If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.''" This is self published, and tehrefore needs something to promote its notoriety.--] 05:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Gee. No surprise there. ] 06:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::??--] 10:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your message to SchuminWeb == | |||
| You said "If you can make a valid argument as to why to justify using female pronouns, then do so... I've made my arguments and no one's countered them for days." SchuminWeb IS countering them and offering a counter-argument, according to the Misplaced Pages Manual of Style. | |||
| Also, please be civil, which is a policy: ]. <font face="Trebuchet MS">]<small> (]) (]) (])</small></font> 03:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Upon further analysis of your edits: | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regard to your comments on ]: }}Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> <font face="Trebuchet MS">]<small> (]) (]) (])</small></font> 03:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thats basically the pot calling the kettle black, seeing as you have done so yourself, and have been blocked in the past for 3RR. <font face="Trebuchet MS">]<small> (]) (]) (])</small></font> 23:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:D. James Kennedy| on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing.<!-- {{uw-3rr3}} --> Just take a deep breath and slow down or else there might be consequences.--] 21:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:35, 18 September 2016
Nomination of Medium (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medium (company) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Medium (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 13:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)