Misplaced Pages

Talk:American Family Association: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:01, 22 September 2007 editHal Cross (talk | contribs)1,042 edits restoring discussion that was dismissed by CMMK and Orpheus← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:28, 31 January 2024 edit undoAlwaysgonnaedit (talk | contribs)30 editsm fixed minor typo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1=
{{WikiProject Mississippi |nested=yes}}
{{ChristianityWikiProject|class=Start|importance=low|core-topics-work-group=no |nested=yes}}
{{WikiProject Organizations |nested=yes}}
{{LGBTProject |class=B |nested=yes}}}}
{{controversial}} {{controversial}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{archive box|
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=low}}
*]: ]—]
{{WikiProject Conservatism|auto=Inherit|importance=mid}}
*]: ]—]
{{WikiProject LGBT studies}}
*]: ]—]
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|MS=yes|MS-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Abortion}}
}} }}
{{Annual readership}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(10d)
|archive = Talk:American Family Association/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}

==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ].

{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 14:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== Paleoconservative how? ==

They just seem like an especially hard-line American Christian right group not particularly invested in foreign policy, immigration or trade. It doesn't seem like AFA has said anything critical of neoconservatives, their leadership probably supported Bush when he was president. I do not see how they would be classified as paleoconservative. What is the rationale? ] (]) 00:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

== Christian fundamentalist or Protestant fundamentalist? ==


The lead of this article calls them a "Protestant fundamentalist" group, but the ideology they push isn't specific to Protestantism. ] (]) 23:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


== SPLC ==
==Removal of AFA views from the article==


I realized I've now twice reverted removal from the lead of the SPLC designation of AFA as a hate group. {{yo|Sebastienostertag}} can you explain further why you think it should be removed? Anyone else care to weigh in? ] (] / ]) 03:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Orpheus, I refer to this link that was just archived by CMMK . You two have not been explaining over and over, you have been repeatedly dismissing sourced views. The "not a press release, detailed directory" objection simply doesn't hold. There is no policy on those points, and concisely presented sourced views do not apply. Summary style is WP style. I have explained that the important parts of what you keep deleting are simply deleted from the article. So the views are being suppressed. Two editors repeatedly deleting and dismissing reliable sources and discussion does not mean consensus. I am totally willing to apply for outside input on this matter and therefore I am totally willing to listen to Misplaced Pages community input. You can keep trying to dismiss my comments if you like, but its not going to stop me from applying Misplaced Pages policies to the article. ] 02:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
: The section Criticisms and Controversy already explains the SPlC designation in detail. Having it in the introduction makes it seem that the SPLC though is a credible organization. Theyve put Christian Jewish and Muslim groups in the same category as the KKK and Neo Nazis. They have been sued many times for defamation. ] (]) 03:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
: Citing the SPLC as credible is like citing Donald Trump on the Central Park 5 ] (]) 03:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
:: The independent, secondary sources that cite the SPLC do seem to view it as a credible organization. Unless that changes, I think it's reasonable for us to so as well. I disagree with your characterization of the SPLC's actions, and your analogy to DT, but I doubt it would be productive to debate those matters here. ] (] / ]) 03:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
::: Their designation of the Family Research Council as a hate group, which they aren't, led to an individual going and shooting the security guard. They have been sued and are still being sued. Having them in the introduction makes it seem as though they are unbiased. ] (]) 03:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
:::: Having been sued is not a factor here, and neither is the FRC attack. I don't think that placement in the intro makes them seem unbiased, and we've attributed their view specifically because SPLC is a biased source. ] (] / ]) 03:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
::::: Then I'll add a counter paragraph after that then. ] (]) 03:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::: Please make sure to cite reliable sources that are on-topic for this article. Also, please ] your talk page posts. ] (] / ]) 03:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::::{{yo| Sebastienostertag}} you added unsourced content to the article. Please self-revert. ] (] / ]) 04:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::::@] in any case, the editor is topic banned and should not be posting here. ] ] 18:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::::: The SPLC is a notable and respected organization and the SPLC’s designation of the AFA as a hate group is also notable. A mention in the lead is not undue.-] (]) 09:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
::::If the fact that the SPLC labelled the AFA as a hate group constitutes stochastic terrorism, as a terrorist attacked the AFA's headquarters afterwards, don't you think that the moral outrage against LGBT people sparked by organisations as AFA also constitutes stochastic terrorism, due to ]?
::::If you want to opine on this article that the SPLC is responsible for the attack against the AFA for this attack because they said the AFA was a hate group, then we would have to revise all US anti-LGBT groups' wiki articles to add all the anti-LGBT acts of violence and terrorism in the US that had ties with these groups.
::::Also note that we need ], and to maintain ] and ] on this article, to report on this, if you wish to further this endeavour. ] (]) 12:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:28, 31 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American Family Association article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 10 days 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconChristianity Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconOrganizations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPornography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Mississippi Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconDiscrimination Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconAbortion
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8



This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yurkot.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Paleoconservative how?

They just seem like an especially hard-line American Christian right group not particularly invested in foreign policy, immigration or trade. It doesn't seem like AFA has said anything critical of neoconservatives, their leadership probably supported Bush when he was president. I do not see how they would be classified as paleoconservative. What is the rationale? J390 (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Christian fundamentalist or Protestant fundamentalist?

The lead of this article calls them a "Protestant fundamentalist" group, but the ideology they push isn't specific to Protestantism. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

SPLC

I realized I've now twice reverted removal from the lead of the SPLC designation of AFA as a hate group. @Sebastienostertag: can you explain further why you think it should be removed? Anyone else care to weigh in? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

The section Criticisms and Controversy already explains the SPlC designation in detail. Having it in the introduction makes it seem that the SPLC though is a credible organization. Theyve put Christian Jewish and Muslim groups in the same category as the KKK and Neo Nazis. They have been sued many times for defamation. Sebastienostertag (talk) 03:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Citing the SPLC as credible is like citing Donald Trump on the Central Park 5 Sebastienostertag (talk) 03:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The independent, secondary sources that cite the SPLC do seem to view it as a credible organization. Unless that changes, I think it's reasonable for us to so as well. I disagree with your characterization of the SPLC's actions, and your analogy to DT, but I doubt it would be productive to debate those matters here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Their designation of the Family Research Council as a hate group, which they aren't, led to an individual going and shooting the security guard. They have been sued and are still being sued. Having them in the introduction makes it seem as though they are unbiased. Sebastienostertag (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Having been sued is not a factor here, and neither is the FRC attack. I don't think that placement in the intro makes them seem unbiased, and we've attributed their view specifically because SPLC is a biased source. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Then I'll add a counter paragraph after that then. Sebastienostertag (talk) 03:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Please make sure to cite reliable sources that are on-topic for this article. Also, please WP:INDENT your talk page posts. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
@Sebastienostertag: you added unsourced content to the article. Please self-revert. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
@Firefangledfeathers in any case, the editor is topic banned and should not be posting here. Doug Weller talk 18:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
The SPLC is a notable and respected organization and the SPLC’s designation of the AFA as a hate group is also notable. A mention in the lead is not undue.-TenorTwelve (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
If the fact that the SPLC labelled the AFA as a hate group constitutes stochastic terrorism, as a terrorist attacked the AFA's headquarters afterwards, don't you think that the moral outrage against LGBT people sparked by organisations as AFA also constitutes stochastic terrorism, due to the multitude of violent and terrorist acts committed against LGBT people in recent years?
If you want to opine on this article that the SPLC is responsible for the attack against the AFA for this attack because they said the AFA was a hate group, then we would have to revise all US anti-LGBT groups' wiki articles to add all the anti-LGBT acts of violence and terrorism in the US that had ties with these groups.
Also note that we need reliable sources, and to maintain with due weight and balance on this article, to report on this, if you wish to further this endeavour. Alwaysgonnaedit (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories: