| Revision as of 21:30, 7 October 2007 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,456 edits →Please respond here: since you asked.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,642 edits Notification: listing of Rvvv at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (687 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| {{Martinphi talkpage}} | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| For the Socratic barnstar! Just calling things as I see them ; ) --''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 05:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--] (]|]) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :And calling them ''well'' (: ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 06:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Chhh listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Chhh'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ::Damned well! ] <small>]</small> 05:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Dreadstar RfA == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| <div style="padding: 5px; background: #B0C4DE; border-style: solid; border-width: 10px; border-color: #00008B; font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 100%; "> | |||
| <center> | |||
| <div style="margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 9px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 250px; float: center;">]</div> | |||
| </center> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;"> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;"> | |||
| <div class="NavHead" style="background: white; text-align: center;"><small>Click there to open your card!</small> → → →</div> | |||
| <div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: center;"> | |||
| Martin,<br> | |||
| Thank you for your participation in ], which closed successfully with 55 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to vote in my nomination. I'm a new admin, so if you have any suggestions feel free to let me know. I would like to give a special shout out to ], ], and ], for their co-nominations. Thank you all! <br> | |||
| <center><font face="Comic Sans MS">]</font><center> | |||
| ====Credits==== | |||
| This RFA thanks was inspired by ] modification of ]. | |||
| </div></div></div></div> | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's thank you card design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! And what can I say besides a simple thank you...we've been through a lot, and you are one stubborn PsiBeeyatch..! ] <small>]</small> 05:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "ESPPP" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| == Improve EVP == | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| Format the references on the EVP article please. You can use to do it. Thanks. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ::Do you plan on doing it or should I just do it? ] <sup>]</sup> 00:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17#Rvvv}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I already started it , but if you want to do some that would be great. You can edit the sandbox. ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 00:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok. Let me show you an example of what I mean. Here's the process: | |||
| :::1. Get tool. | |||
| :::2. Depending on the type of link, pick which one it is. | |||
| :::3. I'm going to use ref #64 as an example. | |||
| :::4.Put the info in the tool including authors name, publication, date, etc. | |||
| :::5 This is the result. (ignoring the fixes). | |||
| :::Any questions? ] <sup>]</sup> 14:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==EVP article== | |||
| Hi, got your comment on my talk page. I'll look the article over. I see the two of you, at least, have been working on the article. Just from a cursory view: The TOC, needs reformating for presentation. Like to see you make it to good article status. Keep up the good work. --] 00:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi again. Made some changes to the article for readability. However, your free to change anything back if you like. The article needs some improvement in my opinion. Mainly in format and layout for the above concern; and some of the wording and paragraghs. The history section is good. The 'popular' section, in my opinion needs work however. I'm not a fan of to many subsections of subsections. Maybe something better can be done here. I'll work with you two to address my concerns and to help you out with this process. Good work thus far. --] 01:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] article == | |||
| The lead in the psychic article needs to throughly summarize the article itself. The article has an entire paragraph explaining the James Randi challenge and thus at least two sentences in the lead need to be dedicated to it. 2 sentences per paragraph seems about right per ]. The amount dedicated to the skepticism in the article is I agree not proportionate to that in the lead. This doesn't mean we need to remove valuable info from the lead, only expand the info in the lead discussing psychics. I can easily fix this. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :According to WP:LEAD, the lead should be in proportion to the article. Skepticism is only a small section of the article, and should be represented in the lead in the same proportion. If you like I can go do a word count, and we can work from that. ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 21:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == What OS and Browser do you use? == | |||
| What OS and Browser do you use? ] <sup>]</sup> 20:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Win XP Home, Mozilla 1.7.13 ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 20:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Try this:]. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == EVP == | |||
| I included computers as a tool not as a media (see my original text) The source and page I cite is about computers used for analysis or comparison of EVP records as well as real time analysis. <font color="00A813">]</font><sup><font color="00551BB3">]</font></sup>☤ 20:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Martin you've done a fine job with the article and with addressing concerns as far as I can see. Let's see what we can do with LuckyLouie's observations and put whatever occured in the past at rest for now. Project Paranormal might be a good place to solicit help regarding the article from editors who have worked on paranormal related topics before. --] 03:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == What's this? == | |||
| What is ? Why are you collecting links on comments of mine? ] <sup>]</sup> 14:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You won't answer me? Also, Why only collecting links to instances of where you disagree with me? ] <sup>]</sup> 23:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I answered you last time, I thought. I said I'd vote for you if you remained NPOV for a year. It was stupid to get myself into this, but if I don't know where things stand at that time, how will I know what to do? ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 23:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| RFA isn't a vote. And from my prespective it seems like you're just collecting random links of instances you disagree with me in the event that I do have an RFA again just so you can oppose me. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please read ] and the banner at the top of ]. Thank you. ] (]) 02:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You didn't look far enough down the tree. Ghosts is a subcat of Deities, spirits, and mythic beings which is a subcat of spirituality. ] (]) 03:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought paranormal was a subcat of occult, but I see it is the reverse. I've added ], which has to do with external spirits. Spirituality has to do with one's own spirit. ] (]) 03:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::No problem. I'm trying to diffuse ]. I've had to create several new categories in the process... ] (]) 05:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Errr.... == | |||
| On the ] by ] and stated that "Rv to consensus version. Don't edit till consensus happens." in the revert summary. However then the you made edits to the article yourself. I think that it would be important to follow your own advice. If you're going to tell other editors not to edit an article until mediations continue then you need not edit the article yourself until mediations continue. Does this make any sense? ] <sup>]</sup> 00:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sort of, sort of not. We aren't in mediation. My edits were technical edits, and , so far as I can tell. SA's did. Perhaps I should have been more clear in my edit summary, but I was talking directly to SA, who usually only cares about issues of viewpoint. So most any edit he wants to do is going to require consensus. ——''']'''</span><sub> (] Ψ ])</sub> 00:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::The informal mediation isn't just attempting to resolve POV issues but all other issues. Making any changes to the article after warning another user not to isn't helping, even if you don't deem your edits to be POV but the other editors as being POV. Even if your edits were simply edits that would never be opposed for content, the edits themselves regardless of content could spark an edit war because your note to ] said nothing of "POV" edits but simply said "don't edit till consensus happens". ] <sup>]</sup> 00:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Faith Healing - New Thought== | |||
| Take a look at the New Thought page, Religious Science,Divine Science or Unity page. | |||
| ==Prods== | |||
| Yup, any editor can remove a prod warning, ''"You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason."'' The only possible route to go would be to put it up for ], but with the article in the NY Times and the various other references, I doubt it would fail ]. ] <small>]</small> 05:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please respond here== | |||
| ]. Thank you. ] 21:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Since you asked: ]. ] 21:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023
File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Astral projection
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--dchmelik (t|c) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Chhh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chhh. Since you had some involvement with the Chhh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Socratic barnstar.jpg
The file File:Socratic barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
"ESPPP" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ESPPP. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#ESPPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
"Rvvv" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Rvvv has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17 § Rvvv until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)