| Revision as of 19:29, 10 October 2007 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits →Jean-Paul Ney: please work with us on this issue← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:32, 16 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 17:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 17:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| {| class="notice" style="margin:0.5em auto;" | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| | Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding {{{reason|an issue that you may be involved with}}}. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|The discussion can be found under the topic ].}} You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the ] and "]" policies. Thank you. | |||
| ⚫ | |}<!--Template:ANI-notice-->---<span style="font-family:Celtic;">]<sub>'']''</sub></span> 18:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| I've decided to take a slightly different approach to this article than usual. The edit warring is not that severe and the article needs work. I don't think locking it down is the best approach. Instead I am going to institute a state of 1RR. Anything more than 1 revert by any user will result in a short block. Any type of threat, personal attack, or harassment will also result in a block. I have also blocked ] for the legal threat on the talk page. Anything disputed should be discussed on the talk page, but the dispute and a slow edit war should not stop needed improvement. I will copy this comment to user talk pages of those involved in the dispute and the article talk page, so there will be no "I didn't know" excuse for edit warring. < |
I've decided to take a slightly different approach to this article than usual. The edit warring is not that severe and the article needs work. I don't think locking it down is the best approach. Instead I am going to institute a state of 1RR. Anything more than 1 revert by any user will result in a short block. Any type of threat, personal attack, or harassment will also result in a block. I have also blocked ] for the legal threat on the talk page. Anything disputed should be discussed on the talk page, but the dispute and a slow edit war should not stop needed improvement. I will copy this comment to user talk pages of those involved in the dispute and the article talk page, so there will be no "I didn't know" excuse for edit warring. <span style="font-family:Broadway;">]'']''</span> 19:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Please work with us== | ==Please work with us== | ||
| I want to make certain that the ] article is accurate according to ], ] and ] and contains no violations of ]. I'm here to work with you to make sure the article meets Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, but you must stop making ], and ] such as . | I want to make certain that the ] article is accurate according to ], ] and ] and contains no violations of ]. I'm here to work with you to make sure the article meets Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, but you must stop making ], and ] such as . | ||
| Please work through the ] process. I'll be more than happy to help you remove any unsourced content per ], but you must abide by Misplaced Pages rules - I would hate to see you blocked due to ], ], ] or ]. Thank you. ] <small>]</small> 19:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | Please work through the ] process. I'll be more than happy to help you remove any unsourced content per ], but you must abide by Misplaced Pages rules - I would hate to see you blocked due to ], ], ] or ]. Thank you. ] <small>]</small> 19:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Jean-Paul Ney | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 01:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 16 February 2023
Image tagging for Image:Jpney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jpney.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
| Hello CastroSUX. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you. |
---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Jean-Paul Ney
I've decided to take a slightly different approach to this article than usual. The edit warring is not that severe and the article needs work. I don't think locking it down is the best approach. Instead I am going to institute a state of 1RR. Anything more than 1 revert by any user will result in a short block. Any type of threat, personal attack, or harassment will also result in a block. I have also blocked User:82.67.185.164 for the legal threat on the talk page. Anything disputed should be discussed on the talk page, but the dispute and a slow edit war should not stop needed improvement. I will copy this comment to user talk pages of those involved in the dispute and the article talk page, so there will be no "I didn't know" excuse for edit warring. Mr.Z-man 19:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Please work with us
I want to make certain that the Jean-Paul Ney article is accurate according to Verifiability, Neutral point of view and No original research and contains no violations of biographies of living persons. I'm here to work with you to make sure the article meets Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, but you must stop making legal threats, and personal attacks such as this one.
Please work through the WP:Resolving disputes process. I'll be more than happy to help you remove any unsourced content per WP:BLP, but you must abide by Misplaced Pages rules - I would hate to see you blocked due to personal attacks, legal threats, civility or 3RR violations. Thank you. Dreadstar † 19:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jean-Paul Ney
An editor has nominated Jean-Paul Ney, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jean-Paul Ney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)