Misplaced Pages

User talk:JzG: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:21, 20 October 2007 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 edits →WR link purge tonight: that surprises you?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:48, 5 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,118 edits →Administrators' newsletter – January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
<center><br><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;">
{{User:MiszaBot/config
<span style="color:white;font-weight:bold"><s>R&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;E</s>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;T&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;R&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;E&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; D</font>'''</div><br></center>
| archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}
| algo = old(7d)
| archive = User talk:JzG/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 218
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
| maxarchivesize = 32K
}}
{{Misplaced Pages:TPS/banner}}
{{collapse top|Discretionary sanctions}}
{{Ds/aware|9/11|a-a|a-i|ab|acu|aerc|ap|at|os|b|blp|cam|cc|cid|e|ecig|fg|gc|gg|ggtf|gap|gmo|ipa|lr|lw|muh-im|old|pa|pr|ps|r-i|saq|sen|sci|tm|tpm|tt|we}}
{{collapse bottom}}
]
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=User talk:JzG/Archive index|mask=User talk:JzG/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
}}
{{Centralized discussion|width=30%}}
{{Archive box
| archivelist = <!-- /archivelist -->
| auto = yes
| index = Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:JzG/Archive
| search = yes
| collapsible = yes
| collapsed = yes
| root = user talk:JzG
| bot = MiszaBot
| age = 7
}}
__TOC__


----
<center>'''This user is tired of silly drama on Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{date|}}}|&nbsp;as of {{{date}}}|}}.'''</center>
;Smelling pistakes
:In addition to bone-deep burn scars on my left hand I now also have ], so my typing is particularly erratic right now. I have a spellcheck plugin but it can't handle larger text blocks. You're welcome to fix spelling errors without pinging me, but please don't change British to American spelling or indeed vice-versa.
----
{{wikibreak}}
== God Jul och Gott Nytt År! ==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">
]
]
] is wishing you ]<br />Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ]<br />], ], ], ], ],<br />or the ],<br /> this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.
<br />
{{clear}}
</div>


== ]! Are you still out there? ==
I am here for some very limited purposes, because some people have asked me to help in some specific cases. I am prepared to do this. I am not intending to be here much, at present. I have not yet decided whether to start using this account actively again. No, I don't want to talk about any of the foregoing, thanks, the people concerned know who they are and how to get hold of me. This is about some ongoing unresolved issues being discussed on one or more mailing lists, when that debate comes to fruition I will take a view. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 12:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
<!-- ] 09:57, 15 January 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1957773473}}
Hi ]! I was going through some old ArbCom cases and ran into one where you had added some statements. I realized that I haven't spoken to you in quite some time, and I see that you haven't made any edits since May... That sucks! I don't want to see someone like you go! If anything, I hope that you're doing well and that you're happy and that you'll someday return here. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I was thinking about you... Keep in touch. :-) ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 23:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


:I hope it goes without saying, despite the fact that I'm saying it, that many of us feel the same way. Happy new year ]] 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
== Good motion ==


::We didn't cross paths very often lately, JzG, but we could really use you back. If you get the urge to return, please say "Yes!" <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop a note to let you know that your motion on the ArbCom page was well thought out, exceptionally well reasoned and appears on its face to be carefully and thoughtfully considered. I'm extremely impressed. ] ] ] 14:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:::October JzG sighting at ]. Does my heart good. --] (]) 20:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
::::Lovely to hear from you! I have spent the past two-and-a-bit years working at incredibly high stress for a hospital. In that time I have retired around 80% of their legacy application and server estate, instituted architectural guidelines and piloted the process for demand review, reduced the measured risk burden by around 80%, instituted objective risk monitoring using ], and I've just proposed (and had accepted) a plan to remediate or mitigate most of the rest. I have, in short, been busy in that there real life of which you read, and that really wasn't going to fit in with having to be nice to people who sincerely believe that Ashlii Babbit was the real victim of the "legitimate political discourse" on Jan 6 2020.
::::I have a week's leave. I have 28 days to take before year end, having managed I think three days off this year so far (including weekends). And because I have an offshore team and an onshore customer, my working day can be 8am to 3am.
::::I thought I'd drop in :-) ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Yikes, sounds like, umm..., a lot of responsibility. There will be plenty for you to do here when you are free! ] (]) 22:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Glad you dropped by! ] (]) 02:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Glad to hear you're OK - and busy, by the sounds of things! Hope you enjoy your break. ]] 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
::::::If Guy doesn't look at ] real soon now, where Eddy is being accused of plagiarism, I may be forced to contact him on bookfarce. That would mean giving Guy my real name. He always forgets me. - ]the ] 16:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I try never to remember people's RW names unless they are "out" on Misplaced Pages. Even when they out themselves, this has led to huge problems, e.g. with a user whose identity was revealed by accident off-wiki, showing him to be the source of fact-washing his own side in Misplaced Pages disputes via a journalist. That ended badly for everyone. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 16:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
::::::::Very happy see the little JzG! ] ] ] 19:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC).
:::::Hah! Good to see you're still around! ] 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
::::::This is a few months late, but welcome back! Wishing you well. ''']] (])''' 09:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
:Welcome indeed! Just came across your signature ]. It's always great to run in to another 'old-timer'. Hope you're well, ]&nbsp;<sup><b>(])</b></sup> 11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


`
:There is no provision for "motions" in ArbCom cases. ] 18:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
:: It is a request to clarify. Thus far you have clarified that you have complete contempt for my good faith effort to resolve a long-running issue that was always a prime motivation for both BADSITES and the attack sites arbitration. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 18:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


] from the past month (December 2024).
:::It is not unreasonable to request that you produce a query for clarification on the area of the page provided for that. If all it comes to is: "is there no finding of fact on WR?", the answer, as you can see, is that there isn't. With no finding of fact, there can be no specific remedy. Now, we have dealt with the case in question. The matter of policy is open, since the AC doesn't make policy. ] 18:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:::: That's not what I'm asking. As far as I can see, there ''is'' a prohibition on WR, because the behaviour that WordBomb / Bagley engages in on ASM< which resulted in ASM being banned, he also engages in on WR, which means that the exact same finding applies to WR, especially since there are multiple other instances of similar harassment. To me, it's perfectly clear. The problem is, that there are one or two people (some of whom are active on WR, but this is, perplexingly, not seen as a relevant conflict of interest) who will read it the other way. So: we need a clarification. And the clarification we need is that legitimate criticism does not include harassment, where sites engage in significant harassment, as per the finding, then they are not appropriate, and the issue of good-faith concerns over ability to highlight genuine abuse has ''other outlets'' which mean that removing such links need not have any negative impact on the project; also, WR being a harassment site, as it presently is, is not a permanent and unfixable issue. It can be fixed by reining in the harassers.
:::: Alternatively you can continue to send mixed messages, or you can send the message that links to WR are welcome, in which case the problem of harassment - identified by several individuals - will continue unabated until the next blowup. Your call, I guess. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 18:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:::::We have defined harassment, and we have used the word "substantially". It is, frankly, absurd to say that we ''send the message that links to WR are welcome''. That site is a forum like thousands of others, not a reliable source. Anyone using links to WR as harassment will find out how welcome that is. Otherwise the point would be to ignore the site, not to put it on a list of public enemies. ] 18:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::::: Yes, you have done just that. And on that basis, I would feel entirely comfortable removing any new link to WR. But WR is not mentioned in the finding, despite being prominent in the Evidence section, so clarification would be helpful. We would not want another series of edit wars, after all. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 18:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::Just so. The focus of the case is defined, and it is not WR. Where would be the point in running around after any site where Bagley could get a toehold? We are clear on Bagley's site, ED and harassment by linking. ] 18:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::: The focus in the case is sites which engage in harassment and outing. Which WR does. In fact the exact same individual whose actions are the primary focus of the case is using WR for the exact same purpose. This is not just a site where Bagley can get a toehold, it is a site which is a serial enabler of Bagleys great and small. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::::Give me strength. The focus of the case is defined in the FoF. Why argue the toss on that? ] 19:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::::: Indeed. "AntiSocialMedia.net, a creation of the banned user WordBomb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log), is part of an extended campaign of harassment directed at several users." And he's now carrying out the same campaign at WR. So we know what to do, but there will be kickback, because Dtobias (who is right now pretty much a SPA, dedicated to pretty much nothing but supporting links to WR) will fight back. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
Well, there are a few mistakes that can be made here. Some of them are quite clearly dealt with in the case. I would suggest to everyone who intends to start warring about this again that they save time by looking at what is said. ] 07:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
* Indeed. Edit warring to reinsert links to a site containing significant harassment and outing, when you are connected wiht that site, is unlikely to have any good result. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 10:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
* Edit warring to remove links, after failing to get an ArbCom ruling or policy demanding such removal, is not a really good thing either. ] 01:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


] '''Administrator changes'''
For good measure, I'll chime in here to remind you to not remove links appear to have been added in good faith. I think we can safely say it's okay to remove those links that were intentionally added for the purposes of harassment, but none of the links you removed today seem to fit that description. Remember to ] and please do not ] again. --] 03:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:] ]
:Alecmconroy, for good measure, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you to also ] and please do not ] again....surely you should know that linking policies to a long established editor is ridiculous. Stop harassing those that are trying to make this website a better place.--] 09:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
: Edit-warring? Where did I edit-war? I saw Dan Tobias edit-warring to re-insert links to a site of which he is an active contributor, and I saw some somewhat pointy reversions of my removal of selected links for considered and stated reasons, but I don't see any edit-warring on my part. It's all about the encyclopaedia, and making it a place where people can contribute to contentious topics. See the LaRouchites' latest kick at the can on ]. It is time for the community to remember what we are here for - and facilitating harassment and campaigning by banned former editors is not what we are here for. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 11:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
== Cypri ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
We may have another problem related to that issue, and articles that link there. Next time we're both on IRC, remind me, and I'll explain. ] 00:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


</div>
== Have you returned? ==
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
Just wondering. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 01:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
:Pending JzG's answering the question himself, you might be interested in the note he put on the top of this page. ] 03:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
::Uh huh, I missed the strike through. That's subtle, but good :) So that means he's back. Hopefully, he kicks some butt of various POV-warriors. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 04:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
] '''Technical news'''
:::The text under the large print is also of relevance. ] 04:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
== WR link purge tonight ==
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
Me, I'd say that was very, very ]y. —] (]) 04:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]
:I don't think so. WR is unreliable...it's a blog that is dominated by banned wikipedia editors, and their goal is to harass our editors and this website.--] 09:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
::Did you actually look to see where the link removal was from? Talk pages and the wikipedia criticism article. Reliability doesn't come into it. ]] 09:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:::Don't you contribute to that website? COI.--] 09:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
::::Don't you and JzG claim to be harrassed by it? COI... ]] 09:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
::::Furthermore, by that argument the article ] should never have been written, because everyone who contributes to it has a conflict of interest. ]] 09:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
:::::No, I don't think I have complained that they harass ME...in fact, I wish they would make ME their primary mission and at least leave everyone else alone. Your second comment doesn't make any sense.--] 09:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


----
: No, not in any way at all. Not only was is not a purge (not many links at all, in fact), ] is doing something you don't want in order to make the point that something you do want should happen. I was very careful and assessed each link ''in context''. I am going to continue to review these links ''in context'' and see if they are supportive of or damaging to the process of building an encyclopaedia. For example, links to WR in mainspace talk, suggestive that it may be a potential source, are inappropriate, especially if the topic is a contentious one. Some discussions on user talk do not pose a pressing problem. Alerting a user to a debate about them on WR, especially one of the older debates which were markedly more moderate than the current tone, may well not be a problem, especially if the user themself is content to keep the link. It's all about the encyclopaedia, and keeping the encyclopaedia safe for people to contribute, especially to contentious topics. And the same will apply to any other site that is credibly identified as containing significant harassment. We are being far too accommodating to those who attack and harass, and keep attacking and harassing after they are banned for it.
{{center|{{flatlist|

* ]
: An example: one of the pages was a rather vitriolic essay by a banned user, which was distinctly personalised in respect of some current Wikipedians. If that individual made such comments on their Talk page, it would be blanked and locked. The individual concerned is well aware of the channels that exist for debating his position, he has posted to the mailing lists where his views have been extensively discussed, and he has also corresponded with the arbitrators. The end result is that the ban stands. There is no discernible difference between linking to this banned user's aggression on or off Misplaced Pages; in neither case does it advance the process of building an encyclopaedia.
* ]

* ]
: I encourage anybody looking at links to off-wiki opinion posted in debate to consider exactly that question. Does the link show evidence of a sincere commitment to improve the encyclopaedia, or is it just sour grapes by someone who has tried and failed to promote the same sour grapes on Misplaced Pages? It beggars belief that people will go to such lengths to defend external links to material which would in many cases be utterly unacceptable if posted directly on Misplaced Pages. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
}}}}

<!--
: Seriously, is Viridae a contributor to the troll site? --] 12:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
::That surprises you? ] 12:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->

Latest revision as of 15:48, 5 January 2025

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
Discretionary sanctions
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: He should not be given alerts for those areas.
Centralized discussion
Village pumps
policy
tech
proposals
idea lab
WMF
misc
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170
171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180
181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190
191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200
201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210
211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.
Smelling pistakes
In addition to bone-deep burn scars on my left hand I now also have C7 radiculopathy, so my typing is particularly erratic right now. I have a spellcheck plugin but it can't handle larger text blocks. You're welcome to fix spelling errors without pinging me, but please don't change British to American spelling or indeed vice-versa.
JzG is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.

God Jul och Gott Nytt År!

Gråbergs Gråa Sång is wishing you the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas,
Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus,
or the Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.

JzG! Are you still out there?

Hi JzG! I was going through some old ArbCom cases and ran into one where you had added some statements. I realized that I haven't spoken to you in quite some time, and I see that you haven't made any edits since May... That sucks! I don't want to see someone like you go! If anything, I hope that you're doing well and that you're happy and that you'll someday return here. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I was thinking about you... Keep in touch. :-) ~Oshwah~ 23:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I hope it goes without saying, despite the fact that I'm saying it, that many of us feel the same way. Happy new year Girth Summit (blether) 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
We didn't cross paths very often lately, JzG, but we could really use you back. If you get the urge to return, please say "Yes!" Liz 01:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
October JzG sighting at WP:RSN. Does my heart good. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Lovely to hear from you! I have spent the past two-and-a-bit years working at incredibly high stress for a hospital. In that time I have retired around 80% of their legacy application and server estate, instituted architectural guidelines and piloted the process for demand review, reduced the measured risk burden by around 80%, instituted objective risk monitoring using Tenable, and I've just proposed (and had accepted) a plan to remediate or mitigate most of the rest. I have, in short, been busy in that there real life of which you read, and that really wasn't going to fit in with having to be nice to people who sincerely believe that Ashlii Babbit was the real victim of the "legitimate political discourse" on Jan 6 2020.
I have a week's leave. I have 28 days to take before year end, having managed I think three days off this year so far (including weekends). And because I have an offshore team and an onshore customer, my working day can be 8am to 3am.
I thought I'd drop in :-) Guy (help! - typo?) 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Yikes, sounds like, umm..., a lot of responsibility. There will be plenty for you to do here when you are free! Johnuniq (talk) 22:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Glad you dropped by! Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Glad to hear you're OK - and busy, by the sounds of things! Hope you enjoy your break. Girth Summit (blether) 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
If Guy doesn't look at Talk:Alexander technique real soon now, where Eddy is being accused of plagiarism, I may be forced to contact him on bookfarce. That would mean giving Guy my real name. He always forgets me. - Roxy the dog 16:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I try never to remember people's RW names unless they are "out" on Misplaced Pages. Even when they out themselves, this has led to huge problems, e.g. with a user whose identity was revealed by accident off-wiki, showing him to be the source of fact-washing his own side in Misplaced Pages disputes via a journalist. That ended badly for everyone. Guy (help! - typo?) 16:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Very happy see the little JzG! bishzilla ROARR!! pocket 19:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC).
Hah! Good to see you're still around!  RasputinAXP  20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a few months late, but welcome back! Wishing you well. starship.paint (exalt) 09:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Welcome indeed! Just came across your signature here. It's always great to run in to another 'old-timer'. Hope you're well, Arbitrarily0  11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

`

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC) Category: