Misplaced Pages

User talk:Durova: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:43, 16 November 2007 editTonyTheTiger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers401,142 edits Featured List of the Day Experiment: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators30,065 edits I'm Just Wild About Harry listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not around|3=May 2017}}
<div id="talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE">
{{User:Durova/templates|pagetop}}
].]]


''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' at the end. I'll reply here if you post here. I have recently changed my volunteer commitment per ].<br >
''
] I've met a lot of Humans 1.0. ].]]
{{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}}
</div >
<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 495px;">'''Archived talk ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'''</div>


<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 495px;">'''Archived talk ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'''</div>
==Bluemarine==
----
Could you shed some light on ] <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 22:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:Is there something that needs to be said here? He isn't blocked anymore. I lifted that block because he explained through offsite communication that the statement was not a legal threat toward Misplaced Pages or any Wikipedian. The context had been unclear at the time when I originally acted. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXVIII, January 2016 ==
Just a clarification. The legal action was in no way directed toward Misplaced Pages, but toward MSNBC and Youtube.] 20:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
==User:Dbromage==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
Durova, out of courtesy I'm informing that I have mentioned you as part of evidence in action against user ]. The user is suspected of utilizing at least two sock puppets, and there is also evidence of meat puppetry. The user is also vainly awarded himself a barnstar. I was unsure were my complaint should go so I have put it and here ] 15:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
{|
:I haven't confirmed your conclusions, bear in mind. No prejudice either way; I just haven't given this a look in a while. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 17:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
* Timeline: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=701440818 -->


== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXIX, February 2016 ==
Suspected sock puppet of ], ] has responded to my allegations. Please see for his response. This user has also taken action against me here . ] 12:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
== need for endorsement of community sanction on Sadi ==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
The reason that action is there is because there currently is no block. Jehochman blocked, Phsychim62 unblocked, Sarah blocked, DragonflySixtyseven unblocked, and that's where it sits. If the conclusion is that Sadi should be blocked, it has to actively done at this point.] 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
{|
:Then there isn't any community ban and the Committee could impose its own. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 20:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
* Timeline: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=705057126 -->
:Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from ] so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


== POTD notification ==
==In Remembrance...==
]]]
<imagemap> Image:Lest We Forget.png|450px|left
Hi Lise,
rect 1 1 1027 747 ]
desc none </imagemap><br clear=all>
--] <sup>] <span class="plainlinks"></span> ]</sup> 01:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
:Thank you very much. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 01:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions!&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
== Hi ==
{{-}}


== Interest In Learning Restoration Practices ==
E-mail sent. ] ] 18:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
:Replied. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! ] (]) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
==The Null Device SSP==
The Null Device denying the ]. There is a new SSP case against The Null Device, ]. -- ]]/] 20:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks for the heads up. As my summary at that checkuser request explains, I considered several plausible scenarios at the time when I filed it, some of which might have cleared The Null Device of suspicion. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


== Triple Crown nomination == == POTD notification ==
]]]
Hi Lise,


Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions!&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
*]
{{-}}
**DYK: ] (and many more)
**GA: ] (and several more)
**FC: ] (FA)


== Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity ==
Aboutmovies is the champion of all things DYK/GA/FA for ] and deserves this award (with ] :)). Let me know if you need more/better proof. Thanks! ] 22:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
:Awesome, coming right up! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


Hello! There is currently a ] of a bot to manage the ] ] by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the ]. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be ''uncontroversially'' removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
== Another Oregon triple crown nom ==
<!-- Message sent by User:MusikAnimal@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:MusikBot_II/Inactive_MMS_targets&oldid=748573976 -->
==wikisleuths==
I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know ] (]) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
== ] listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note -->
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
*]
**DYK: ] (and several more)
**GA: ] (and several more)
**FC: '']'' (FA)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Durova. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
EngineerScotty whips up fully cited, lengthy articles and makes it look easy. As a mere WikiGnome, I stand in awe of his powers of article creation. ] 03:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:It's been a while! Glad to hear he's doing great work in article space. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 03:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== You're definitely an expert Wikipedian ==


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I've seen your name around, here and there. AfD, maybe, VP, possibly. I know you're dedicated to the project, and the five pillars, so I'd like your opinions on ] I'm trying to resurrect. I think we can give scientific experts some amount of due recognition, but not without first recognizing the true Misplaced Pages experts such as yourself and the people you give awards to (such as EngineerScotty, which is how I came to your page in the first place). TIA. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
:How about opening that for a content-related ] and listing it on the community bulletin board at the community portal? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 -->


== User group for Military Historians ==
::Now this is why I wouldn't call myself an expert editor, because I'm not familiar with the community bulletin board, or how to list things there. Though I'm sure I'll figure it out if I click around long enough. ;) ] <sup>]</sup> 00:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Here you go. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


Greetings,
== Thanks for the triple crown! ==


"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at ].


] (]) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Good to hear from you again. WRT adminship, I'll have to decline at this point--I've been busy editing articles and ignoring meta stuff, and after a wikispammer called my home phone number a while back to complain, my wife insists that I stay off RC patrol and such. :) (Such happens when you leave your real name on your homepage and your number is in the phone book...) At any rate, thanks! --] 05:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members&oldid=545621623 -->


== April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive ==
== RfA stuff ==


G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the ] is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
Ok - many thanks first. However there is sense in which I'd have preferred to see others with the rights helping out on the blacklist. ] is obvious (& I think weakening) however equally ] is a quality worker who I am trying to persuade... If you are interested then maybe comments might help? If I can help with anything let me know, cheers --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 09:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:If you see someone who looks like a good candidate for admin coaching, send them my way. I specialize, so people who want to do ] wouldn't be well placed with me. I'm particularly interested in sleuths and people who'll help run ] and ]. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 15:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


* tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
== Thanks ==
* adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
* updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
* creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.


As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
I appreciate the retraction. I understand where your coming from as the recent level of vandalism has taken a very different turn than the early vandalism the project experienced. It used to be someone posted "poopyface", some bad word, or changed a random fact and they left. Lately, the level of disruption includes sleepers, intricate long term plots, trust abusers, etc and the admin response has been ratcheted up. My concern is that innocents are being caught up and that puts a black mark on the whole project as there have been more and more "I got banned for editing X" posts growing on forums around the Internet. Sleepers are always a problem but they will be caught eventually as they will want to continue the behavior that caused their main account to be banned (the very definition of a sleeper). In the mean time, if they do contribute positively to the project, the project wins. <br />
<br />
I think your proposal is a decent one compared to the alternatives. I still don't like the secret evidence thing but it is the lesser of two evils. I am going to go back to vandal patrol now as I need to rethink my contributions to the admin side of this whole thing. I just put my ] created from scratch article out and want to keep improving the project's view of my little corner of the world. Cheers! <small style="background:#ccc;border:#000 1px solid;padding:0 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap;">] | ]</small> 20:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:Well, there's a fairly small but active cluster of people who cause most of the headaches in this regard. And it's never been uncommon for those disruptive people who get banned from Misplaced Pages to raise vocal complaints in other fora. Again, you have my apologies for the mistake. I'll do my best to learn from it. Regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of ], and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
==]==
Hello,


The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up ].
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ].


For the Milhist co-ordinators, ] and ] (]) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 22:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:AustralianRupert@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=831112019 -->


==Edit warring== == goat ==
I seem to be getting into an edit war over ] with with ]. I'm not sure if you are the right person to ask, but I would very much appreciate it if you would look at what is going on and give me some direction - ] 00:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
:Have you tried an article content request for comment? ] is the link. Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


]
== ANI dicussion ==
goat


] (]) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Durova: if you happen to have some time and interest, I'd love it if you'd pop over to ] about some edit warring users I'm trying to handle. I've been trying to work on a community sanction for these users, but I'm quickly finding that they aren't too willing to do this. The last recourse I can think of short of ArbCom is to ask another editor to have a look at it, so that's what I'm doing now. If you're not interested or can't, I understand, but I thought I'd at least try. Thanks. ] ] 18:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>
:The ] dilemma: one editor objects to identical sanctions as false equivalence. Stakes everything on the distinction. Might be too complex for the community to solve without their agreement. If it's been through formal DR already, could be a candidate for arbitration. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
::Well, thanks a lot for the input. That gives me an idea of where to go from here. I think I will let this sit for part of today. If no one's come up with any Solomon-like wisdom to solve this by evening PST, I'll make a request to the Committee. ] ] 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


== ] ==
==If you have a moment==
] has done a lot of spade work with regards to a possible sockpuppet account being used to get around not one, but two ArbCom remedies (The Troubles and the Great Irish Famine ArbCom cases). Would you look at the evidence ] and tell me if you agree with him (and of course, myself) ] 21:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
:Looks like someone got to that. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


], a featured picture ], has been proposed for replacement with ]. Your comments are welcome at ]. ] 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
== Ome Henk vandal ==


== ] nominated for replacement ==
Here are two IPs:


], a featured picture you nominated, has been ] with a ]. Your comments are welcome. ] 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
217.233.230.136, blocked for 'legal threats and general trolling'
*The same applies for ] - see ] and ]. ] 18:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


== Precious ==
and 217.233.221.43, blocked for vandalism ] 23:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
{{user precious|header=Nadezhda Durova images|thanks=for quality articles such as ], ] and ], for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago:}}
:Thanks. Maybe these will turn out to be throwaway addresses. If problems continue I'll apply longer blocks. Please keep me in the loop. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title = Awesome
| image = Cscr-featured.svg
| image_upright = 0.35
| bold = ]
}}
Miss you --] (]) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


] --] (]) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
The IPs all belong to a server farm owned by Deutsche Telekom, so I've requested that the semi-protection on ] be restored. ] 23:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


Thank you today for what you did for ]! --] (]) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
== IP block ==


A year ago, you were recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --] (]) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
is an open proxy (a specialist subject of mine!) according to ]. Cheers --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 16:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg==
==]==
]
Hello,
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.


If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice -->
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ].


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 20:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Callmebc oopsie ==
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
You said in WP:AN that ] protection was reduced to semi. I see a "source" tab there. I think you deprotected his User page instead, perhaps due to confusion involving his redirect to Talk. Thought you might want to give it another tap. (] 22:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC))
: Oh, you're offline. I'll ask someone else. (] 22:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC))


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== One more comment about Greg and you. ==


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
One more comment about Greg and you. Self-promotional half-truths that are at best misleading, and according to higher ethical standards constitute lies, are so common in the media as to be literally unremarkable; while at organizations with exacting standards of validity/truth such as what Misplaced Pages ''aspires'' to be it is a cause of great concern. Greg's self-promotional misleading statements at Misplaced Pages are cause to exile him from Misplaced Pages because his efforts here are incompatible with the aims and goals of a NPOV encyclopedia; but his similar efforts in talking to the media are par for the course in that venue. Greg has shown too little understanding that Misplaced Pages is not a part of "the media" as he understands it; while you seem not to distinguish between his self promotion on Misplaced Pages and off of it. "Well, that's just Greg promoting himself again" is better than "Greg is lying about Misplaced Pages!" Nuance and savoir-faire are always useful. ] 22:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
:Apologies I haven't followed up on specifics faster. I actually hadn't anticipated the discussion would go on this long and it's something I'd rather not dwell on, but as I have the chance I'll get to that. At the moment (to be candid) I'm finishing a handmade present for a little girl's birthday. I'll be baking peanut butter cookies for her soon. It's much more satisfying. :) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
::I understand. I like reading Douglas Adams' "Mostly Harmless" better than dwelling on Greg ...


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
<small>


== Precious anniversary ==
Tricia began to feel that the world was conspiring against her. She knew that this was a perfectly normal way to feel after an overnight flight going east, when you suddenly have a whole other mysteriously threatening day to deal with for which you are not the least bit prepared. But still.
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} --] (]) 10:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


== FAR for Joan of Arc ==
There were marks on her lawn.


I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
She didn't really care about marks on her lawn very much.


=== Featured Article Save Award for ] ===
Marks on her lawn could go and take a running jump as far as she was concerned. It was Saturday morning. She had just got home from New York feeling tired, crabby and paranoid, and all she wanted to do was go to bed with the radio on quietly and gradually fall asleep to the sound of Ned Sherrin being terribly clever about something.
There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
But Eric Bartlett was not going to let her get away with not making a thorough inspection of the marks. Eric was the old gardener who came in from the village on Saturday mornings to poke around at her garden with a stick. He didn't believe in people coming in from New York first thing in the morning. Didn't hold with it. Went against nature. He believed in virtually everything else, though.


==File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif==
'Probably them space aliens,' he said, bending over and prod-ding at the edges of the small indentations with his stick. 'Hear a lot about space aliens these days. I expect it's them.'
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].


If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
'Do you?' said Tricia, looking furtively at her watch. Ten minutes, she reckoned. Ten minutes she'd be able to stay standing up. Then she would simply keel over, whether she was in her bedroom or still out here in the garden. That was if she just had to stand. If she also had to nod intelligently and say 'Do you?' from time to time, it might cut it down to five.


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ]] 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
'Oh yes,' said Eric. 'They come down here, land on your lawn, and then buzz off again, sometimes with your cat. </small> ] 08:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Your block ==


I was wondering what was happening :D. Seems there is no longer an alert asking you if you are sure to be willing to block yourself. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 03:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
:Teehee...trying to multitask... ;) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 03:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


Hello {{u|Durova}},
==SEO==
I've read a lot of your SEO articles. I think you've done a great job explaining Misplaced Pages to the SEO world. I do think you have a conflict of interest with regard to conflict of interest policies (funny, that), but, it's all in the open, and that's sufficient for me. ] 04:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:How do you reason that I have a conflict of interest there? I don't make any money from the column and it cost me money to explain Misplaced Pages to the audience at the conference. When I started doing the column I acted pseudonymously in order to avoid any appearance of seeking personal gain, but Kohs and his buddies insisted on "outing" my actual identity. So I put it in the byline to reduce that hassle, and now he tries to insinuate that I'm on the make. I view this as outreach - a proactive effort to prevent COI, spam, and related problems before they occur. If the idea that this constitues a COI gains traction, then that would effectively exclude everyone who knows Misplaced Pages site standards and policies well enough to explain them from communicating to the public in other venues. That situation would serve the ends of a handful of banned users at the expense of everybody else. If there's some angle here I haven't considered then please explain it. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::I assumed you were paid to write those articles and that you are an SEO/marketing consultant. However, I'm more than happy to eat my words (it's an acquired taste, but I'm used to it). ] 04:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::I'd love to see more experienced Wikipedians publishing offsite, actually. The public is hungry for information about Misplaced Pages and most of them don't know how to navigate this site and learn about things that seem obvious to you and me. Last month I was in contact with a Harvard undergraduate who is planning to write her thesis about Misplaced Pages and the dialog was a real eye opener for both of us: obviously she's intelligent and she has no reason to conceal her level of understanding, yet she was finding it difficult to transition from a reader of this site to an analyst of its dynamics. A lot of this site's structure is counterintuitive. We're the experts on Misplaced Pages and most of use learn a thing or two about writing by the time we have a five digit edit count. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::::My first attempts at understanding Misplaced Pages comprised vandalizing an article one of my students cited in order to "prove" to her that Misplaced Pages was not reliable. I'm sure you can guess the subsequent chain of events. ] 05:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::Awesome, although ''please'' tell me you teach junior high school? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::::::Until I implemented an explicit ban on referencing Misplaced Pages, I had college juniors and seniors citing it in their papers. ] 05:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::::I taught MIS at Western Illinois University. It was a great lesson for the whole class, though. ] 05:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::::: (Sigh). In ninth grade my English teacher gave the class a stern lecture about the proper use of encyclopedias and forbade us from citing one ever again. More high school freshman classes ought to be like that. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
There is nothing wrong with being paid to write or lecture about wikipedia. Durova's activities ''whether paid or not'' do not constitue a COI. Her activities both in writing about Misplaced Pages and in fighting to help wikipedia at wikipedia (including editing our COI policy, if she has done so) are beneficial to wikipedia and there is no conflict of interest there. She ''should'' get paid for her efforts outside of wikipedia; and I hope she does. Note that 20,000 dollars are going to be paid to Wikipedians for creating copy-left copyrighted illustrations
for WikiMedia/WikiPedia. Money is not evil. ] 21:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
== Imperial triple crown and DYKs ==
*I'm not quite there yet, but I was wondering, can I submit a succesful DYK article that I expanded from a stub, but did not outright create? ] 05:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC).
::If you got the DYK from it, sure. Misplaced Pages has tiny little stubs on so many topics that I'll even encourage this, in order to get more substantive articles. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Okay, great, I had an idea for something but I wanted to check with you before submitting it, which is a bit of a way off anyways. ] 05:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC).
*On an unrelated note, I dropped you an email. ] 05:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC).


== Arbitration motion regarding Durova ==
==Help with Help==
I think the user help interface could use a serious makeover. We should accommodate the user's perspective. Here's a stab at the short list:
*I want to find information (anyone)
*I want to fix something I read (very basic markup)
*I want to write an article about Misplaced Pages (journalists)
*I want to write an article for Misplaced Pages (advanced markup, pillars, policies)
*I want my students to learn about Misplaced Pages (professors, teachers)
*I want to make money using Misplaced Pages (opportunists)
*I want to vandalize Misplaced Pages (vandals)


The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that:
Each link (whatever the final list) should send users along a path tailored to his or her particular type of interest. Thoughts? ] 05:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
{{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}}
:Interesting. Past the first two levels things get quite complicated. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
For the Arbitration Committee,
::Well, at that point it's more of a web of destinations. I'm just proposing perspective-oriented roadmap. To quote Donald Sutherland's character in ''Kelly's Heroes'' "I don't know what makes them go, baby. I just drive them." That is, I don't need to read about pillars when all I want to do is correct a fact (etc). Would it be useful for me to expand this draft into the 2nd level? ] 06:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
]&nbsp;] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:::In my experience a huge amount of self-selection occurs. Most people can't navigate on their own from there because they get overwhelmed. Wikipedians tend to think it's self-evident because we're the ones who passed through that natural filter. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}'''
::::Agreed. Hence the need for various roadmaps. Unless Misplaced Pages benefits from this self-selection. However, I don't think it does. ] 06:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::In my experience, most of them stall at the first link I show them and need to be led by the hand. These are bright people - maybe some brains are wired to get around over here and others aren't. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


== Best wishes ==
And some people wouldn't read instructions no matter how well written. I started reading directions when I took up skydiving as a sport. ] 14:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
: :) I went skydiving once. I had just walked away from a pretty good job with a bright future in order to move across the country and try a monkish existence as a graduate student. My one luxury was a Harley-Davidson Sportster (it got 50 miles to the gallon, I saved $1000 a year on insurance and $500 on parking fees by using it instead of a car, and Harleys seldom depreciate - so even that wasn't so much a luxury). The day after I bought the thing I rode it up the coast highway, taking hairpin turns through cliffside fog until I turned inland and stopped at Hollister. I figured jumping out of an airplane was the least risky decision I made that month. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. ] (]) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
== Bus stop ==


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
Hi.
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I propose reopening Bus stop's case, now at AN because the CSN has closed. I would like him to have one last chance. I would like to propose he is invited to return with a probation period of six months. Three months with no edits to any Judaism-related articles and a further three months of "open" editing.
Evidence of bad-faith edit-warring or gross incivility during that probationary period should result in a permanent site ban.
Before I posted at AN I wanted to discuss the idea with you, and if you approve the idea in principle (we need not go into the detail of the measures here, but leave that for AN discussion) I would also raise it with one or two others involved in the original CSN debate.
Yours as ever. --] 11:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:]. I did my best to bring him back under probationary agreements and he repaid that effort by sending nasty e-mails to me and about me for quite some time afterward. No good deed goes unpunished, and somebody might as well explain to him that the proper Yiddish slur for me is not ''putz'' but ''shiksa''. In spite of that, I'm still willing to extend the standard offer: six month waiting period from the date of his last troublemaking. If nothing happens in the interim, talk to me next March. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 17:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::Wait, you're saying he sent you an unpleasant email in the last couple of months? Sadly, that's not entirely a surprise. Are we talking incivility? I'd like to formally record this at WP:AN as a milestone. --] 21:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Mostly it was to other people, raising rude complaints about me. Once in a while some of them sent me a heads up. Let's ] recognition. If he minds his manners for six months I'll support his return, same as I'd do for most other community banned editors. Occasionally I change those terms for egregious behavior, but I'm really not all that offended. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::::OK. I'm going to make a post to AN tomorrow. Please keep an eye on it, as I'll namecheck you. Night night. --22:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

==]==

Don't understand why you blocked Newt. He is a second account of mine, but I don't think I've ever used him in a way that breaches ]. I'm not too worried: I can just stop using the account, but I'm curious what the reason for the block was since he hasn't edited at all in over a month, and even then I can't see any really bad edits. ] 18:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:It showed some characteristics similar to a series of disruptive sockpuppets I'd been investigating. Thanks for disclosing that the account is yours and coming to me. Sure, I'll unblock promptly. Apologies for the inconvenience. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks. Maybe I'll put a note on the User: page so that it's transparent. ] 19:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Thanks, I hope my note in the block log helps. As you may be aware from the ] and ] arbitration cases, we've had a rash of problems with sockpuppet accounts that try to do end runs around multiple policies. This cluster happens to be radical deletionists, and you have my apologies in advance if any other action to remedy that problem causes inconvenience for the site's legitimate deletionists. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::::Thanks. FWIW I consider myself more of an inclusionist. I think I was one of the commentators in the first (deleted) RfC for Eyrian. (Anyway, I'll take this conversation off my watchlist, now. Thanks again for your help.) ] 22:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

==Confirmed sockpuppetry & new incidents==
I was looking over the SSP page, and am unsure how to proceed. In ], user Sixstring1965 was indef banned as a sockpuppet. Since then, he's gone through a number of sockpuppets, all trying to edit the article and other Beatles-related articles. the list of his socks is .
In the article and discussion, three users are seeming to be further socks (], ], and ], a dig at admin ]). <br>
My question is this, I am unsure who to file the SSP report on, or if there is a special route to go with confirmed sockpuppeteers. I've learned that RfCU sometimes doesn't get processed inthe case of confirmed sockpuppets. I want to act fairly expeditiously, as the socks are agreeing with each other that the article should be deleted, which seems a salted earth form of vandalism. - ] ] 22:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
:Write it up on whichever version is the oldest or has the longest edit history. If there's active AFD disruption then raise at ] please: vote stacking is bannable. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

== How did this happen ==

] &ndash;&ndash; ''']'''<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 07:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
:'Grats! You know I rarely vote unless I've coached the candidate, right? I don't really watch RFA that closely or I would have chipped in. Now have a bucket and some Lysol. :) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 09:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

== Big spam issue ==

Some input would be appreciated. There has been a long tem issue with a publisher of several notable and not so notable magazines being spammed on the project. See . Its been added to the AntiSpamBot, but I fear the abuse of wikipedia will continue. A few others of interest, or not. As for the publisher, there are legitimate uses for these links, such as refs, however the spammers seem to be relentless. Any thoughts?--] 06:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
:Another excellent report! Was that more of your work? If so, kudos. What efforts have been made to contact this publisher and communicate site standards? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks. Caught this one back in , resurfaced in October when ] posted spam activity. Nothing was ever done with it. As a result of I resurected my old report, and got to work. Because of the extent of this problem, I don't know if i can go this one alone. Only contact has been on the talk pages. I'm of the mind to blacklist them all, but don't want to spend the next 2 months dealing with complaints.--] 07:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Rather than take that radical step, let's think about some formal outreach. Try e-mailing the Foundation your report and ask for office intervention. Sometimes businesses respond to a formal approach. This is likely part of their business plan with direction from management - too organized and persistent to be one of their employees. Tell the Foundation I referred you, and let me know if you have any trouble getting their attention. Keep up the great work, and don't be a stranger. :) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 08:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
==Advice==
Hi Durova, long time since I bothered you last. User TTN is actively wiping out TV episode articles because of an interpretation that he and a minority came to. The discussion was not a broad discussion and therefore the interpretation is held by only a handful of people. He is going around Misplaced Pages deleting and redirecting all articles ''he deems as unworthy'' of wikipedia. Many, and I also believe, this is in violation of POV, ], OWN, and possibly others. This has been balked at by the majority and even when consensus is sought on the article, that one editors overrules the consensus with his opinion and redirects the articles. I don't believe this is what wikipedia is about and I feel that he is alienating many. His user page gives a good example of those who disagree with him. When someone asks him why, he directs them to ] or something like that. I also believe that he is guilty of violating ] on many counts, but he states he is not and that I am misinterpreting it. What are your thoughts on this if you don't mind sharing. One of the many examples is ], but his talk page and talk history will have a plethora of examples. Thanks! --] (]) 19:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
:Raise this at ] with diffs and evidence, please. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
::Hello! Y'all may wish to consider the following: , , , and . I hope that helps. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
:::This whole thing is turning out to be a pain. The community is obviously against this craziness, but there is not enough impartial editors and not one central place to take this. WP is becoming too large a bureaucracy and there should be an easier way to deal with issues like this. I've been pretty laid back about this, but the more I research, the more I see that the community needs to step in and help with this issue. A MOS guideline is being used as a bat to force people to adhere to one editors opinion. --] (]) 16:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
::::]. (Any advice?) <small style="background:#ccc;border:#000 1px solid;padding:0 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap;">] | ]</small> 16:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
==Problems with ]==
Hello. ] has started edit warring on Marseille. He claims all the images have to be of a uniform size, but I am unaware of this
directive. He left a message on the talk page of Marseille for a short period and then went ahead with his vandalism. He has never edited this page before and seems to be wikistalking me. I introduced many of the images on this page as well as a fair amount of carefully researched content. He has already been tendentious and pedantic on my own page and seems to have a strange point of view of fr.wikipedia, which conflicts with wikiproject France. He apears to have no expertise on the content of the article and is simply reformatting the images because he wants to. I do not know why he started talking to me on WP. I suspect he is gaming the system. His own edits are mostly on trivia. --] 00:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== Featured List of the Day Experiment ==

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all ]'s in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at ]. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to ] and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 01:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Durova has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
The WikiCup.


Archived talk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from this page so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Ty Cobb sliding2-edit1.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-07-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Interest In Learning Restoration Practices

Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! Finktron (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:MonroeStreetBridgea.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-09-24. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

wikisleuths

I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know BernardZ (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Wappen Rdecraon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wappen Rdecraon.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Durova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Misplaced Pages Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

goat

goat

Programmer520 (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm

File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm, a featured picture you nominated, has been proposed for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/delist/Duck and Cover. MER-C 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg nominated for replacement

File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been nominated for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome. MER-C 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Precious

Nadezhda Durova images

Thank you for quality articles such as Nadezhda Durova, Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc and Congress of Arras, for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Awesome
Ten years!

Miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Ten years again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for what you did for State Route 74 (New York – Vermont)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2121 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jousting helmet.jpg

Notice

The file File:Jousting helmet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Joan of Arc

I have nominated Joan of Arc for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award for Joan of Arc

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Joan of Arc/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Amendment request: Durova

Hello Durova,

As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Durova

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova

Best wishes

I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for I'm Just Wild About Harry

I'm Just Wild About Harry has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: