| Revision as of 15:10, 16 November 2007 editDtobias (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,883 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:15, 27 November 2024 edit undoPrivatemusings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,995 edits cleanup (thanks for msgs tho)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| that'll do :) ] (]) 15:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Feel free to leave a comment or start a discussion below - thanks for dropping by; | |||
| :Sounds good to me, this user account is expressive but not disruptive. Thanks, ] 02:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks Squeak, we've not been around each other too much, but yours is a voice I respect - ] 02:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Welcome back... don't do anything I wouldn't do! :-) ] 02:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| It's doing things you would do that got me into this mess! - thanks for the note though... ] 02:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have seen trusted admins screw-up and say as a penalty they will do such and such that everyone agrees is good for creating an encyclopedia. You would prove a lot if you would undertake to unambiguously act to improve the encyclopedia. Ask others for what such acts might be if you have doubts. Hint: red links. ] 06:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::For every typo... I try and correct two via ]. :) ] 15:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I do that on occasion, when I realize my recent activity here has been almost entirely debate-related rather than actually improving the encyclopedia; hitting "Random" a few times usually finds articles that can be copyedited. Any other suggestions of productive things to do to get out of a rut? ] 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:15, 27 November 2024
that'll do :) Privatemusings (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)