Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jehochman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:47, 18 November 2007 editLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,615 edits →Disruptive blocks: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,380,797 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jehochman/Archives 25. (BOT) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image
<div class="usermessage"><div class="plainlinks" align="center">Leave a '''. Extra credit for politeness.'''</div></div>
|image = File:Naturhistorisk Privatundervisning.jpg
|size = 500px
|align = center
|alt = Placeholder alt text
|fullwidth = yes
|capcenter = yes
|caption = <br/>{{big|{{big|"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"}}}}{{small|]}}
}}
<!--my archives are messed up so I have removed the links. They might be fixed some day-->
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Jehochman/Archives
|format= %%i
|age=168
|minkeepthreads=1
|maxarchsize=350000
|numberstart=25
|header={{aan}}
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki>
}}
__TOC__


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
{| class="infobox" width="315px"
|-
! align="center" | ]<br />]
----
|-
|
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]
<br/>
This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
<!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Jehochman/Archive 4--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
|}<!--Template:Archivebox-->
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
==A clean talk page!==
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
]]]
(''edit conflict'') While it might not be my place to contribute to the discussion here, I apologize if my handling as a first-timer made matters difficult for either of you. I don't hate anyone, and this wasn't a wtichhunt, at least, not for me. it was just my first time preparing trying to create a reply, and I wasn't anywhere near succinct (I was also concerned that too much brevity might be perceived as glibness). i have endeavored to be more so as I learn more about how this works. My apologies if any ineptitude on my part complicated the relationship between you two. That would indeed upset me. - ] ] 08:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
: Don't worry over it. Lessons have been learned all around. - ] <sup>]</sup> 08:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== Biography of living persons policy ==


</div>
Hi, received your note on my page, but not sure to which article you're referring. The only recent edits I've made for living persons are , , and - all of which were simple typo corrections or removal of vandalism. In the future please include a reference to the article in question - otherwise it's difficult to learn from my mistakes. Thank you - ] 15:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
: Okee dokey, I removed the message because it looked like I may have left that on the wrong page. Sorry. - ] <sup>]</sup> 15:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

:: No problem! Thanks for the quick response ] 16:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

==]==
Someone else got it, which is ok under these circumstances, but thank you for asking me first! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;]|]|]&nbsp;</span>''' 18:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

: Yeah, it's always a good idea to keep people in the loop. - ] <sup>]</sup> 18:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

== TyrusThomas4lyf ==

Hi -- I've responded to your question at ]. Thanks for asking! ] 20:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

...For your help. Can you on my userpage explain my history please? ] 21:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

== approval for photo posted ==

dear Jenochman,
as an Admin,would be kind to have a look at the photo i posted of Alfred Rosenberg at http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Rosenberg.jpg??i actually spent good time on this with the help of a friend of mine who's a lawyer.thank you much sir :)] 06:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

: Hmm, I am not sure about the copyright status on that. - ] <sup>]</sup> 06:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
::can you please tell me why??please let me know if there is anything to correct.i just highly doubt that anyone can claim credit to it and thus make it illegal to be here] 07:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

== ANI and complaints ==

I noticed the Dbachmann thread you closed. You said "ANI is for complaints, not investigations", but at the top of the page it says "this is not the Misplaced Pages complaints department"... :-) I also noticed that you said "Participants are counseled to prepare a detailed report to support their complaints." That's Arbcom arbitrator/clerk language! :-) ] 11:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

: Sorry. :-D - ] <sup>]</sup> 12:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

== Sri Lanka Reconciliation barnstar ==
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Sri Lanka Reconciliation Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px green;" | For your merits in bringing about the ], the ] herewith presents you this Sri Lanka specific award, which is the ]. &mdash; ] 05:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
|}

Thank you very much. Please let me know whenever you need help. - ] <sup>]</sup> 05:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== Hi there ==

I hope you don't mind me bringing our conversation that was happening on AN/I here - I think it's probably a more suited venue for now (feel free to cross post, or move back, or move to my talk at your discretion).

I think your idea of a central repository of community resolutions could be very powerful and useful - and perhaps not just in the area of editor's restrictions (which is indeed a sensible application). What would you think about somehow structuring content or policy discussions into it in some way? - You may have become aware that ] has returned to being a somewhat combative atmosphere, after a period of calm for a few weeks. Could this idea be applied there somehow? Just a thought at this stage.

Regardless, it's nice to meet you, best - ] 05:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

: Nice to meet you. I am very interested in community restrictions that are less than blocks or bans. For instance, if an editor has a problem with civility, instead of blocking, we may be able to agree to civility patrol as a lesser alternative. That should be recorded on a list so that if future problems occur, the prior agreement can be found. Searching the ANI archives for stuff isn't practical.

: Can I give you a bit of unsolicited advice? You would probably catch less criticism if you spend a but more time in article space. Have you ever created a ], ] or ] article? Your interest in policy areas is fine, but to be most effective you should try to balance your participation with mainspace contributions. I hope this helps. - ] <sup>]</sup> 05:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

::Although I'm prone to being one of nature's cynics when it comes to badges like 'GA' and 'FA', I would indeed like to get an article up to meet that standard. Do you know anything about ]? It's a very important article, which I've been working a little on both off and on line (when not indef. blocked.) - I'll look for your proposal on the Village Pump, because i think it has merit. best, ] 06:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== Just a point ==

I was edit-conflicted with the archiving of the AN/I thread, so I just thought I'd post what I'd written here, since it responded mainly to you: That's a very good point; I've spent a lot of time recently looking for exactly why, where and what non-ArbCom restrictions have been placed on various editors. I urge you to propose something at the Village Pump.

Of course, I should point out that I having read the above discussion in its entirety and at one go, I can't see it being "supported by the consensus", but that is rendered moot by PM's suggestion.)"

Cheers! ] 06:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== Random compliment ==

Your skill with chipmunks is unparalleled (yes, I know that isn't you, but for the sake of this compliment we will pretend it is). :) Cheers, ] ] 06:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== Deletion Review of Latitude Group ==

I have taken ] to deletion review ], if successful I would like to have the content from ] (which you speedy deleted) restored so that it could be merged into the main article. ] 12:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)]]

== RfA ==

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 12:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

== An idea for consideration ==
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
|-
! style="background-color: #f2dfce;" | Seems like trolling by Privatemusings
|-
| Hi Jonathan (again),

I noticed this post of yours;

''An important question to ask, Privatemusings, is whether one's participation is helping the encyclopedia, or hurting it. I don't mean one's own opinion, no, I mean the consensus opinion of respectable Wikipedians. If an account is a net negative, sooner or later it will be blocked or deleted. If a person operating a set, or series, of accounts is a net negative, sooner or later that person will be banned. Policies and guidelines are written so we don't have to repeat ourselves, but they don't dictate what we do. One cannot point to rules and use them to justify a net negative. - Jehochman Talk 17:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)''

And it got me thinking (hopefully this isn't a bad thing!). My first thought was a bit defensive - to point out that according to your logic, the fact that I am unbanned currently reflects the fact that I am 'approved' by the community consensus (as indeed are you, and all active editors). My second thought was that you have consistently seemed to be a most approachable, reasonable and calm person, which led me to my third thought. Although I did need a cup of tea at that point.

I wonder if you might be prepared to enter an open and honest dialog - preferably 'on-wiki' - with the aim of me understanding a bit more where you're coming from - and you perhaps offering some advice, thoughts, feedback, conclusions etc. etc. I hope you'll find me polite and reasonable, even in disagreement, and personally, I hope to be able to calmly discuss my perspective with someone who's prepared to calmly give their opinion directly.

I'm hoping something personally quite useful (and possibly with valuable insight for application elsewhere on the wiki) may come of such a process - and I'm asking you because I think that if any of my points have any value, and you can see the value in them, then yours would be a very strong voice in spreading them (I speak here of bigger picture issues such as civility, ethical editing, pseduo anonymity, and most importantly, quality content development).

I've got some specfic questions off the bat - perhaps initialy concerning this post;

''(edit conflict) Good block. That set of accounts created too much noise and not enough signal. - Jehochman Talk 20:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)''

and if you're prepared to read and respond a few posts a week for a little while, then I'll create a subpage and we can try and get somewhere.

I will understand completely if it only takes you a couple of seconds to realise that you'd rather spend any spare time at all removing your toenails than involve yourself further with me - but I really would appreciate you considering it.

Thanks, and have a nice day. ] (]) 06:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

: Go ahead and create a subpage in your user space if you would like to discuss things. - ] <sup>]</sup> 01:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks very much Jonathan - here it is; ] ] (]) 02:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
|}
:::I see you've been blocked. This discussion is moot. - ] <sup>]</sup> 08:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

== My RfA ==

Hi; thanks for your support to ], which closed successfully at (51/1/2). I'll keep this brief since I don't like spamming anyone: I'll work hard to deserve the trust you placed in me. Thanks again. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 23:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi Jehochman; with regards to the speedy deletion of this article, I'm not sure how a job title classifies as a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content (or blatant advertising, as was previously tagged). I removed any references to specific hospitals. There seems to be on the subject, even if it eventually turns out to be unnotable, but that's a different matter. ] (]) 08:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

: The way it was written, and the totally irrelevant Google results I saw for the term seemed to support the tagging rationale, but if you would like to restore it, be my guest. Perhaps a better title would help. Happy editing. - ] <sup>]</sup> 08:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

==]==
Howdy, I noticed you had just deleted the ] from CSD. It seems reasonable, since the article said virtually nothing. However, I think the subject is fairly notable, and was just about to remove the speedy and add a sentence or two describing the subject. Would you mind terribly if I recreated it and added some notes about the notability (briefly, Shah was killed by Maoists in Nepal a week or two ago, seemingly related to his journalism ). Thanks, --] (]) 08:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

: When creating a new page, be sure to assert notability before you save it. That will avoid problems like this. I have recreated it for you and added the hangon tag. Please leave a note on the talk page soon, or it may be re-deleted again by somebody else. - ] <sup>]</sup> 08:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks, I would have recreated it myself but I didn't want to step on your toes (I was running through ] when I saw it). I replied to your note on the article talk page. Certainly, given what was on the page, your deletion was well justified. It just happened I googled the name as well and found "the rest of the story" as they say. Thanks again, --] (]) 10:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

== Disruptive blocks ==

I am concerned that you seem to have taken on a course of actions outside of consensus and and the processes of Misplaced Pages. You appear to have arbitrarily decided that certain contributors are problematic and are executing blocks without prior discussion or warning the "offender". I shall be reviewing the case of ] to see if any Misplaced Pages rules, policies or guidelines have been violated and will be seeking sanctions, supported by the community, regarding your use of admin tools if they have been. Please regard this as an official warning. ] (]) 11:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024

Placeholder alt text

"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"Source


ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)