| Revision as of 02:00, 20 November 2007 view sourceThe Hybrid (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,630 edits →RE:Issue: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:05, 17 November 2010 view source Courcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits Per e-mails with OTRS member. The | ||
| (206 intermediate revisions by 57 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Reply== | |||
| Read the edit summaries next time. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Did you read this edit summary? -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Uh yes it does. Check some other event articles. Its just standard WP:PW article format. Links are linked regardless of notability. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::No. Only when listing results in event articles. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::True but either way thats how the results are formatted. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tag Team Champs == | |||
| Actually, it has been announced by WWE. Please see Thanks, --]|<sup>]</sup> 00:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : That's unusual! They normally wait until the following week's TV. Thanks ] 06:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AWF== | |||
| Hey man, why is it you can use WWE.com as a canonical source. But I cant use the OFFICIAL site of the AWF in the same fashion??? ''] failed to sign this message'' | |||
| : Because WWE's notability has already been established. AWF's has not. <span style="background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 02:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Dude, Im from Sydney. I attend some of these shows. People travel from other states to see these shows. They are one of the top two promotions in this country. How can you question the notabilty? I dont see you questioning notability of other crap like ]...''] failed to sign this message'' | |||
| : Don't make statements like this without third party evidence. At this point I have no reason to believe you. Original opinion is not good enough for Misplaced Pages. Please PROVE your statements are true with sources outside the promotion. <span style="background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 03:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Can I get someone to verify my claims? How bout this website: http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/awf-au.html | |||
| ??? ''] failed to sign this message'' | |||
| : Results of shows is not an appropriate source. You need verifiable news reports to confirm everything that has been marked on the AWF article. I suggest again that you fully review the rules of notability at ] <span style="background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 08:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Well if your such a friggin expert on Misplaced Pages why dont you read ]. ] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ===Third opinion for ]=== | |||
| *First, this is not the proper page to be discussing this issue. You should instead be using the ]. | |||
| *210.193.228.114, you need to read ]. Misplaced Pages does not allow original research. In other words, the fact that you attended some of these shows is irrelevant. You need to cite ''credible'' sources, and statements need to be ]. Until then, you cannot include such information on the page. | |||
| *Justa Punk, I think you went a bit heavy with the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags. It's terribly distracting from the article. | |||
| You may also want to contact the people at the ]; they may be able to help you more on this article. — ] <span style="font-size: .7em;">] · ] ]</span> 02:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''This conversation is to be continued on the ]'' | |||
| ==Yo== | |||
| Hey Punk, this isnt in relation to the AWF. Just thought I'd say "no hard feelings" and that you are doing Misplaced Pages a service by sticking to its guidlines. ] 09:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply from Hybrid == | |||
| I think you're wrong. The show scripted the results, so clearly they would be ''the most'' reliable source for the results. '''<span style="border: 1px blue solid;background:#AFEEEE">] ]/]</span>''' 07:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| We should be talking about this on the AWF talk page. <span style="background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 07:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AWF== | |||
| While I agree that AWF is not notable, what you are suggesting is ] and is generally frowned on in Misplaced Pages. Also, I am coming at this article from an Australian perspective rather than a wrestling one. I know next to nothing about professional wrestling and would be unable to help. | |||
| Let the AfD take its course. The closing admin will look not just at the numbers for each side but the arguments put forward. If the decision is to keep the article, then we need to move on. If it hasn't improved in a month or two, then it can be listed again. I think you have done a good job of putting your case and there is little else you can do. Cheers, ]\<sup>]</sup> 09:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == hey == | |||
| Hi Im Truco9311, or in reality Kevin, and I proposed to split the ] article into the WWE Brand Extension and WWE Draft, and I need at least 7-10 signatures so I can start splitting them. If you may, join the discussion ]--''''']''''' 16:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WWE == | |||
| I thought I would explain why I reverted your revert. The previous user didn't delete anything, they just moved it down to the section about the Wellness Policy, which is probably where it should be since the investigation is about the Wellness Policy. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 22:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Oh! I thought he did! I checked through the diff tab and it looked like all he did was delete it. Thanks for the correction. <span style="background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 06:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Spoilers == | |||
| You may want to read ] and take into account that this trumps project "guidelines". –– ''']'''<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 10:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Indiscriminate collection of information does not apply here, in fact it's meaning is for articles that are about non-notable bands or your local KFC. Your argument that this is an encyclopedia and not a wrestling website is perfectly apt, and is why the information should be obstructed. –– ''']'''<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 10:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually no, I do not. Spoilers are not US-centric and neither is this website. If information has aired it can no longer be considered a spoiler. –– ''']'''<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 10:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::'''Note''': No policies seem to be being violated, certainly not PoV pushing or vandalism. I've replied at ], but in all honesty, we're not here to save US users from spoilers! ] (]) 22:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == PWInsider == | |||
| So what did WWE do that contridicted what PWInsider did anyway? ] (]) 15:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :And since you feel so strongly about it, would you please remove all those WrestleView sources from ]? Many of them are cited directly from PWInsider, and are therefore, in your opinion, unreliable. ] (]) 15:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RE:Issue == | |||
| I think that I can handle it. Don't cause disruptions, as that would damage my credibility my extension, and ]. If you want to bow out, then feel free. This wouldn't be the first time I've had to fight this battle on my own, and I'm fairly proud of my track record. I've only lost once, and that was because a family emergency pulled me away from the computer for a few days. This is nothing new. I've already thought up a few other points in my head, so if nothing else I can stonewall them, but I expect them to see the wisdom in our views before this dispute is out. Cheers, '''<span style="border: 1px blue solid;background:#AFEEEE">] ]/]</span>''' 02:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:05, 17 November 2010
Redirect to: