| Revision as of 16:04, 4 December 2007 view source84.220.68.146 (talk) Nobody can be sentenced without a defence← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:06, 23 August 2008 view source Thatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:Thatcher/Alpha": possibly not needed |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 125K |
|
|
|counter = 16 |
|
|
|algo = old(2d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Thatcher131/Archive%(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard" style=background:{{{bgcol|#FFFF99}}} |
|
|
|- style=text-align:center |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| I am currently busy in real life. I will check here and respond to questions about my own actions and edits, but I may or may not respond to requests for assistance on other matters. Please see the appropriate noticeboard for assistance. Thank you for your understanding. |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{editabuselinks}} |
|
{{editabuselinks}} |
|
|
{{User:Thatcher/Links}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== History archive == |
|
{{User:Thatcher131/Piggybank}} |
|
|
|
This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. ] 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Good call == |
|
|
|
|
|
.... I was getting ready to do that. ] 20:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks. I was waiting for one more post to WT:RFAR but then I checked and saw he was trolling Giano too. Unacceptable. ] 20:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Could you please have a look at this: |
|
|
] Thank you in advance. --] 06:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== beh-nam == |
|
|
|
|
|
beh-nam is evading indef ban by using several annon IPs to vandalise pages... ] and ] and ].--] 00:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 17:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
== Clerk status == |
|
|
|
|
|
] and the ] show you as no longer a clerk (NYB indicated you retired in August), yet I see you doing clerk functions. What is your status? If you previously retired, when did you return? Or were you really just inactive for a while? Cheers, ] 12:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I'm not sure that I fit into any particular pigeon hole. I retired, rather than list myself as inactive, for several reasons, one of which is that I do not intend to open or close or babysit any more cases. However, I still sometimes chat with the other clerks on IRC, and if I see something that needs doing, I may occasionally do it. Feel free to categorize me in any way you prefer. ] 14:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Ah, ] :) ] 15:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::So long as we do not refer to the rule of 80. ] 16:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== I claim the right to defend me == |
|
|
I was preparing a comment on my talk page, to show why my ban is uncorrect and excessive. I had not the right to reply to my last block, and to defend my self. As a consequence one week block was changed into a permanent block and ban. My request is based on the following therms (see the link. |
|
|
) I was judged as a consequence of several violations that I *never* did and about a supposed "general incivility" based on few minor accidents: I never inserted insults in my edits, despite the kbyte of insults I've received. So, I simply refuse the label of "uncivil", and I can provide several arguments for this claim. I do not ask my unblocking for now, but just the right to edit in my talk page to show my good faith. Nevertheless and administrator has blocked my page. See . Not only I am a good contributor, but I was sentenced on the base of false evidences, and I can provide sources for my claim (and I was working for this). Most of all, the claim I reverted the edits "I did not like", is false: I've reverted just the edits offensive edits, as (I thought) it was my right, perhaps because nobody defended me. Regards. ] |
|
This page contains the entire history of my previous talk page. As it has become a vandal target, but has over 5000 edits, making deletion a problem, I moved the history to a history-only archive, to start a fresh new talk page. For most purposes, my traditional archives will be more useful. Thatcher 11:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)