| Revision as of 15:11, 16 December 2007 editDefender 911 (talk | contribs)1,376 edits →I support unblock← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:11, 5 February 2010 edit undoWJBscribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,293 editsm Unprotected User talk:Defender 911 | ||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I agree not to: 1. Recreate the Resource center 2. Pursue the identity of ]|decline=After reviewing your contributions, I see very little that are positive with much of your previous behavior consisting of significant disruption. Per the ] section of Misplaced Pages's ], I am of the opinion that an indef block was appropriate, and so am declining this request. — ] <sub>(] ] ])</sub> 23:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Is this a joke? == | |||
| I've introduced the Barnstar of Peace and devoted most of my time here to the help of otheer users. I ''was blocked'' for helping another user! Aside from the H case, what have I done wrong?!? --] <small><font color="orange">(])</font></small> 01:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You were blocked for disruption, not for helping another user. What user were you referring to? --] ] 14:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::H. And asking for contact info is NOT disruption. Even if it was, an indefinite block is WAY too strict. --] <small><font color="orange">(])</font></small> 20:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I said, "''Aside from'' the H case, what have I done wrong?" --] <small><font color="orange">(])</font></small> 20:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You interfered with a fellow user's ], and it went to the extent of severe harassment. You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages under any username because of this at the moment (see ]). However, see my thread below. ] <sup>(])</sup> 06:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I support unblock == | |||
| Look, guys, the disruption he caused was quite unwelcome, yes, and he did interfere with a users ], but I for one think that, after a six month site ban, this user probably learned his lesson. And after viewing his contributions, he was once a valued editor. So long as he promises not to continue to do what got him blocked before, I think we should give him one last chance. ] <sup>(])</sup> 05:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :A discussion is currently taking place at ]. No administrator should unblock without first consulting that discussion and ensuring a consensus exists to do so. I will leave this talk page unprotected in the meantime so that Defender 911 can add his comments, which can be copied from here to the noticeboard discussion by a not-banned editor. However, abuse of the talk page (including incivility, personal attacks, harassment and use of the {{t1|unblock}} template — an unblock will not/should not be executed without consensus at the discussion, so it will otherwise be ] which is not permissable) by Defender 911 will result in this page being protected from editing and severing the communication link between Defender 911 and the noticeboard. ''']''' 06:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. I'll look over the noticeboard. --] <small><font color="orange">(])</font></small> 12:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please post on ]:== | |||
| I understand that some of you might not want me unblocked, but all I wanted to do was help ]. I did not expect a four-month block and the deletion of most of my user page space. I understand now that my disruption was wrong, and I hope that I can be reaccepted into the community. --] <small><font color="orange">(])</font></small> 15:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 5 February 2010
Redirect to: