Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:45, 21 December 2007 editLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone to [[Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (3← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:22, 18 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top <!--Template:Afd top
Line 5: Line 6:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->


The result was '''speedy delete''' under ]. ] 20:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
The result was: ] is original research whether in its own article or in a larger one, but apart from Wikipediatrix no-one has really seemed to pay much attention to that, and we have '''no consensus''' for deletion. Outcome defaults to keep; AfD does not govern merges, anyone may do that if they feel like it. --]<sup>]</sup> 14:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone}}</ul></div>
With apologies to the large number of Harry Potter fans I fear will descend on this page to vote keep based on their fandom rather than policy, this page fails to be an encyclopedia article and is entirely original research created by a group of fans listing the differences major and minor between the book and its movie adaptation without any analysis. This would be okay on a Harry Potter fansite, but has no encyclopedic value and is merely an indescriminate collection of information in violation of ]. More specifically, this violates point 7 of ] by essentially placing two plot summaries side-by-side without meaningful analysis (which would really not be possible on such a topic). ] 04:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''', if this gets nominated for deletion, I suggest that the related articles (], ], ] and ]) should as well--]<small><font color="red">]</font></small> 04:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC) :{{la|Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone}} <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Unreferenced essay. Every movie differs from its book version, and unless there were major differences (like instead of Harry being a boy, he was played by a CGI raccoon instead), I can't see much point in keeping this around. ] 18:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
**I certainly second that. The reason I only nominated one is that I did not want to confuse the issue with an extended series of debates without seeing how the first one turned out. ] 15:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. It seems to have been deleted a few weeks ago under a different name: ] and this looks like a cut-and-paste recreation (see the <nowiki>""</nowiki> artifacts etc.) ] 19:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all''' as fancruft and as per nom. Fans encouraged to use ] instead ] 04:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom ] | ] 19:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not encyclopedic material. People can deduce this themselves, as ]. ] 04:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Avada Kedavra! Erm...delete''' Any major differences can be noticed in the book's article. ''''']<sup>(])</sup>''''' 19:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ], unless someone can find a reputable source that describes these differences. -- ] 04:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' Into the movie's article. Same for all of the other films.--] 04:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC) *'''Speedy delete'''; Repost of deleted article. Tagged as G4. ] 19:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete all.''' Cruft, cruft, cruft. A merge might be possible, if such can be done in a non-OR and NPOV way. ] 05:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'' unless extensive citations are provided. ] 07:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' with the individual film and/or book articles just like every other book/film conversion ] 10:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
*'''Merge''' into movie's article per ]. ] 12:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' (or expand with critical commentary). Needs context of broader article. Authors should work to add (third-party, sourced) critical commentary to explain significance of these differences. ] 15:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge or Keep, but no Delete.''' This belongs in the film's article. If it gets too long it may need its own article. Given the wide audience of the book and film, this information should not be deleted outright. ] 17:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' into the film's article per above. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Pottercruft. Inherently original research, and not important enough for a merge. There's not a movie in existence that doesn't differ from its book counterpart. ] 19:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ]. Interesting information, but not worth its own article. ] | ] 19:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to the film's article. We don't need a separate article on this. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 19:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''', should not be deleted as it is useful information. --] 22:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' into where relevant. ] 19:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 19:22, 18 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under WP:CSD#G4. GRBerry 20:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

AfDs for this article:
Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unreferenced essay. Every movie differs from its book version, and unless there were major differences (like instead of Harry being a boy, he was played by a CGI raccoon instead), I can't see much point in keeping this around. A 18:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.