| Revision as of 02:43, 3 July 2005 editJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →Israeli Censorship?: POV pushing← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 December 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,175 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (Top), Politics (Rater) |
| (540 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
I think that the article “censor” should redirect to this censorship article. When most people use the word “censor,” they're using it as a verb, to describe the act of censorship. Such links should go directly to this article. The article about censors in ancient Rome should be renamed “Censor_Ancient_Rome” or whatever, with links provided for the small minority of people who are actually looking for that discussion when they type in or link to “censor.” -Blackcats 7 Feb, 2005, 04:30 GMT |
|
|
|
{{controversial}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech |importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Media |importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=low |ethics=yes |social=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|libertarianism=yes|libertarianism-importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Pornography |importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Copied |
|
|
| from = Internet censorship |
|
|
| from_oldid = 298795207 |
|
⚫ |
| to = Censorship |
|
|
| to_diff = 299045696 |
|
|
| date = 28 June 2009 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|
|counter = 3 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Censorship/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies - 1== |
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Rollins_College/Introduction_to_Communication_Studies_-_1_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ], ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-01-18 | end_date = 2023-05-09 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 12:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Inclusion of Censorship | Fandom as external reference == |
|
*] - May 10 2004 and earlier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to discuss if the website {{cite web |title=Censorship {{!}} Fandom |url=https://censorship.fandom.com/Index}} can be used as external source to view which content is censored and how. That website is a primary source of information, and it's user-driven. It has to be that way, since no official movie producer discloses (or has to) what is censored and why, not even less compare with other countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 09:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
That's why you don't look up verbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:No. We don't use self published sites and/or open wikis as sources, see ]. We also don't use reddit, and we don't use conduct ] to make points not present in cited sources. ] (]) 11:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
==Quotation== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2024 == |
|
I don't understand the quotation and it doesn't seem relevant to the article (although it is an interesting logical fallacy). I'm removing it. ] 04:39, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Censorship|answered=yes}} |
|
==Next== |
|
|
|
Would like to add for further reading: |
|
Question, is the edit policy of wikipedia a form of cenorship? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gosztonyi, Gergely (2023) . Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-031-46528-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 ] (]) 20:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
== History needed == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 06:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
This article currently covers censorship as it exists at the moment, but is lacking in any sense of history -- and this is a subject with a large history, in which current positions and actions are much influenced by that history. (Some UK content is also needed.) ] 07:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Censorship on wikipedia? == |
|
|
|
|
|
An admin is abusing her position to block content at ]. Check it out at ]. |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
== Israeli Censorship? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Why is Israeli censorship considered "POV pushing" when censorship by other governments is fair game in this article? I didn't write the deleted line but I don't agree with its deletion. What do others think? ( is the edit I mean) |
|
|
--] 1 July 2005 23:49 (UTC) |
|
|
:The article mentions almost no other countries, the entry was unsourced and not representative of the true situation of freedom in Israel, and the editor in question is obsessed with finding negative to say about Jews and Israel, and has attempted to do so in close to a dozen articles now - that's POV pushing. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 3 July 2005 02:43 (UTC) |
|
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 9 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rrodrigueznorat, Nick73102 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: MDWebb5.
Done