| Revision as of 00:56, 9 July 2005 editWin777 (talk | contribs)3,005 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:13, 15 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,606 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:New York Yankees/Archive 6) (bot |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
Someone commented "What happened to NPOV?" I've read this and the other revisions, and can't decide whether its too pro or too anti Yankees (and I know which side the authors loyalties lie.) Whats up with it, exactly? |
|
|
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
|
{{article history |
|
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|
|action1date=09:21, 19 July 2006 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Yankees1 |
|
|
|action1result=failed |
|
|
|action1oldid=64631011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=FAC |
|
There were several points where there was plenty of opinion, e.g. "... well-paid asses ..." "... a team with heart, ... no heritage ... " |
|
|
|
|action2date=17:17, 8 August 2006 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/New York Yankees/archive1 |
|
|
|action2result=failed |
|
|
|action2oldid=68431736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=PR |
|
|
|action3date=13:19, 16 August 2006 |
|
|
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/New York Yankees/archive1 |
|
|
|action3result=reviewed |
|
|
|action3oldid=70007319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=GAN |
|
:Good call on those. You're right. ] |
|
|
|
|action4date=25 October 2006 |
|
|
|action4link=Talk:New York Yankees/Archive 3#GA stuff |
|
|
|action4result=failed |
|
|
|action4oldid=83678236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=GAN |
|
"... restored that team to brilliance ..." Also, the word "dominance" seemed to me to be awfully strong. |
|
|
|
|action5date=19:11, 3 March 2007 |
|
Feel free to edit that back if you feel otherwise. -- ] |
|
|
|
|action5link=Talk:New York Yankees/Archive 2#Good article failure |
|
|
|action5result=failed |
|
|
|action5oldid=112256300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=GAN |
|
: Much as it pains me, I think "brilliance" and "dominance" does fairly describe some periods of their existence... ] |
|
|
|
|action6date=16:43, 4 June 2007 |
|
|
|action6link=Talk:New York Yankees/Archive 4#Another GA-nom |
|
|
|action6result=failed |
|
|
|action6oldid=135815574 |
|
|
<!--Quick failed after nom at 07:04, 4 June 2007--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action7=GAN |
|
Excuse me...what's the source for their having started in MINNEAPOLIS? |
|
|
|
|action7date=18:41, 4 June 2007 |
|
As I understand it,the Yanks were originally the Indianapolis farm team of the Cincinnati Reds,and moved from there to Baltimore. |
|
|
|
|action7link=Talk:New York Yankees/Archive 4#Another GA-nom |
|
Louis Epstein/le@put.com/12.144.5.2 |
|
|
|
|action7result=passed |
|
|
|action7oldid=135840788 |
|
|
<!--nomed at 18:41, 4 June 2007 seems like an unofficial pass--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action8=PR |
|
:Trying to track down anything about possible origins Minneapolis, I haven't found anything. Yes the Western League had a team there, but I've seen no evidence so far that that team was moved to Baltimore. -- rbs, 2004-02-09 01:32 UTC |
|
|
|
|action8date=2007-07-05, 10:11:05 |
|
|
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/New York Yankees/archive2 |
|
|
|action8result=reviewed |
|
|
|action8oldid=142578597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action9=GAR |
|
:: After more reading today, I can't see that the Western League's Minneapolis team became the Orioles/Yankees. A check of the player roster for the 1901 Baltimore Orioles (baseball-reference.com) shows no overlap with the Minneapolis Millers of 1900. Most of the Orioles seemed to have been raided from National League teams (no surprise). Also, a biography of Ban Johnson in the Journal of Sports History simply indicates that the five-year Western League Agreement expired at the end of 1900 and the league simply re-organized, dropping three teams and adding three. Then again (opening a new can of worms) it may be fair to say that the Highlanders of 1903 were not the Orioles of 1901-1902; I could see some sense in arguing that one team simply ceased to exist at the same time as another was established. - ] 00:12, 2004 Mar 6 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action9date=12:37, August 6, 2007 |
|
|
|action9link=Misplaced Pages:Good article review/Archive 26#New York Yankees |
|
|
|action9result=delisted |
|
|
|action9oldid=149548831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action10=GAN |
|
== removal of hyperbole == |
|
|
|
|action10date=01:20, March 12, 2009 |
|
|
|action10link=Talk:New York Yankees/GA1 |
|
|
|action10result=failed |
|
|
|action10oldid=276646809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action11=GAN |
|
The article claimed that 26 Championships in 80 years was unchallenged in U.S. sports. Well, the Celtics won 16 championships in 30 years. That is a better rate. Rather than leave the issue up for debate, I removed the claim from the artlce. ] 09:05, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action11date=00:47, 22 April 2009 |
|
|
|action11link=Talk:New York Yankees/GA2 |
|
|
|action11result=failed |
|
|
|action11oldid=285152459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action12=GAN |
|
== Andy's Hawkin's Losing No-Hitter == |
|
|
|
|action12date=07:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|action12link=Talk:New York Yankees/GA3 |
|
|
|action12result=passed |
|
|
|action12oldid=1136022108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
More information is available at the following Retrosheet URL: http://retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B07010CHA1990.htm. The runs were scored in the top of the 8th on three errors and a walk. ] 01:00, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|otddate=2013-01-03 |
|
|
|otdoldid=531024098 |
|
|
|otd2date=2014-01-03 |
|
|
|otd2oldid=588929026 |
|
|
|dykdate=13 March 2023 |
|
|
|dykentry=... that the ''']''' were first named after ]? |
|
|
|dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/New York Yankees |
|
|
|topic=Everydaylife |
|
|
|otd3date=2023-01-03|otd3oldid=1131111031 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Baseball|importance=top|yankees=yes|yankees-importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Maryland|importance=Mid|Baltimore=yes|Baltimore-importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=top}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{page views}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Archive box |
|
== Apiece == |
|
|
|
| archivelist = /archivelist |
|
Are people incapable of using a dictionary? |
|
|
|
| auto = short |
|
apiece |
|
|
|
}} |
|
adv : to or from every one of two or more (considered |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
individually); "they received $10 each" [syn: {each}, {to |
|
|
|
|algo = old(31d) |
|
each one}, {for each one}, {from each one}] |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:New York Yankees/Archive %(counter)d |
|
FFS . . . ] 19:22, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|counter = 6 |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{tan}} |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Anti-Yankees == |
|
== Away JerseyUpdate == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the picture of their away jersey, there is blue trim on the sleeves, i believe that has been dropped in the 2024 season |
|
It is amazing how many hate the Yankees that are not Red Sox fans.<br> |
|
|
|
https://nypost.com/2024/01/23/sports/yankees-making-changes-to-road-jerseys-for-2024-season/ ] (]) 17:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=New_York_Yankees&diff=6765453&oldid=6763472.<br> |
|
|
Have we forgotten the team of Ruth and Gehrig? ] 15:48, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "Rivalries" section redundancy == |
|
i hate yankees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The section describing NYY rivalry with the Dodgers mentions a "fatal on-field death," which should be changed. "Fatal death" is stupidly redundant- when’s the last time there was a non-fatal death? ] (]) 13:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
'''I HATE THE YANKEES''' |
|
|
please don;t take this personally, I'm a die-hard red sox fan!!! WE WON IN 2004!!!!- bostonbabe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::I changed the wording. ] (]) 23:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
'''I hate the yakees too''' but then I'm just a Mets fan who's tired of yankee fans going after the mets, EVERYTIME THE YANKEES LOSE, which happens quite a lot these days |
|
|
|
|
|
== Curse of Clay Bellinger == |
|
|
According to the ] for ] that article should be merged somewhere here. Here is the complete text, I have redirected that page to this one for the time being, an someone please do the merge in the appropriate place? Many thanks. -- ] | ] 12:51, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Added a discussion of theories for the Yankees' lack of world series titles since 2000 to 21st century section, including the "Curse". Will move biographical details for Bellinger to his page ] 08:28, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
The '''Curse of ]''' is a tongue-in-cheek explanation proposed by sportswriter ] for the ]' failure to win the ] since 2000. By analogy with the ], Mahnken points to the departure of ] Clay Bellinger from the Yankee roster following the ] ] and asserts that the Yankees will never again win the World Series until either they make amends to Bellinger or they win the ] anyway. The ] is part of the ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bellinger, meanwhile, played for the Greek baseball team in the 2004 Olympics. Bellinger is an American born with Greek grandparents, like most of the rest of the team. |
|
|
|
|
|
== External Link == |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
== ALS == |
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have information about ALS (Lou Gherig's Disease???) |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
See ], or http://www.als-ma.org/curtspitch/ for Curt (Schilling)'s Pitch For ALS.. (this explains the silver "K ALS" on his boot during the Literal Red Sock games in the ALCS/WS, for those who may have wondered) -] 04:28, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Retired numbers and Mariano Rivera == |
|
|
|
|
|
I know that ] is the last major leaguer to wear number 42, because of the ] that allows him to continue to wear it even though it is retired on all teams to honor ], but what if, in the future the Yankees decide that Mariano's career was distinguished enough that he deserves to have his number retired? Would we have a situation like ] and ] where 2 players have the same number retired? ] 17:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Current Lineups == |
|
|
|
|
|
Are you kidding me? Current lineups complete with 15-day dl? How about we just link to an external source instead? |
|
|
*If people want to keep it up to date, there's nothing wrong with it. ] 23:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
*Some of these team sites are nurtured and fed by their fans like they were newborn chicks: not just with the rosters, but with current won-lost record, a running commentary on the flow of the current season, etc. Since it's only baseball, not brain surgery, I don't see any harm. But if it gets to the point where fans start posting the pitch-by-pitch of today's game, you might want to draw the line. I'm sure the wikipedia folks have ''some'' upper bound on disk space. ] 17:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "Sucky" etc. == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've been skeptical of these entries I've seen seeing, that various American League teams derived from obscure teams in the Western League. The White Sox entry says they originated in St. Paul, which squares with my understanding, but I'm not so sure about others, like the Red Sox and the Orioles-Yankees. More research is needed. It's like saying the Boston-Milwaukee-Atlanta Braves began as the Cincinnati Red Stockings: somewhat yes, somewhat no. However, there is no question that the Yankees began as the 1901-02 Orioles. |
|
|
|
|
|
The problem I have with embittered Yankees fans describing their team as "sucky" is that there is a lack of a standard for what constitutes "sucky". The Yanks are just a few games below .500, which may be "sucky" for them, but would be pretty good if you were a fan of a team that other teams feast upon, such as the Kansas City Royales With Cheese or the Tampa Bay Devils Food Cakes. So a specific won-lost record can't be described as "sucky" by itself, but only in relation to expectations. It sounds like some ] needs to come up with a "suckiness index" to objectively determine whether a given team at a given time is "sucky" or is merely playing at its natural level. |
|
|
|
|
|
d:) ] 17:40, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Main Rivals? == |
|
|
Do we even need to list "main rivals"? I've never seen listings anywhere on MLB.com about teams and having main rivals. Rivalries are mainly for the fans. Some of the rivals listed in Misplaced Pages are not even in the same league (AL/NL) as the Yankees. Since there are no "official" listings, the main rivals in the article are from a person's/fan's point of view and opinion. The section was started by a guest. |
|
|
|
|
|
"Main Rivals: Boston Red Sox, Baltimore Orioles, Los Angeles Dodgers, and the New York Mets mostly, and every other team in baseball in general." |
|
The section describing NYY rivalry with the Dodgers mentions a "fatal on-field death," which should be changed. "Fatal death" is stupidly redundant- when’s the last time there was a non-fatal death? 69.94.56.84 (talk) 13:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
