| Revision as of 07:27, 29 January 2008 edit144.131.176.126 (talk) →Redlinked Winners← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
| |counter = 3 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Smashville/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User talk}} | |||
| {{Archive box| | {{Archive box| | ||
| ] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007 | *] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007<br> | ||
| *] - Dec 2007 to August 2009<br> | |||
| *] - August 2009 to Present | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ] | |||
| == Christian Martial Art == | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Thanks for going through his other pages and reviewing them for CSD criteria. I didnt even think of doing that for some reason. <font color="navy">]</font><i><sub><font color="forestgreen" >]</font></sub></i> 19:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That's why I'm here! --]] 19:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| At ] you wrote <blockquote>''I'm having an issue with the nominator's accusations of bad faith against admins for doing their duties as admins. And with the essay length responses. Be concise, please. --SmashvilleBONK! 23:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)''</blockquote>I would appreciate it if you would kindly explain | |||
| ] | |||
| *Why do you believe that Misplaced Pages Administrators should be immune from legitimate criticism? Do you have any sources to support this point of view? | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->–]] 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *Why do you believe that a cogent set of arguments must, ''a priori,'' be <b>concise</b>? While ''brevity is the soul of wit,'' should not Misplaced Pages emphasize accuracy at its expense? | |||
| *Since you entered into this discussion of your own accord, I do not think it out-of-line to ask the origin of your UserID "SmashvilleBONK!" which seems to connote a violence act. Do you believe that there is a place for violence among Administrators on Misplaced Pages, perhaps figuratively? Do the ends justify the means? | |||
| ] (]) 14:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :*Response at . --]] 16:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Thanks for the explanation... at ]; you have to admit it sounds edgy. | |||
| ] (]) 21:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
| == Deaths in 2007 == | |||
| Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
| * i don't think reversion of vandalism is covered by ], actually. cheers, ''']''' 18:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **No, but I don't think alphabetical order constitutes "obvious" vandalism...although the edit summary kinda does show there's no intent of stopping. I'm only reporting ]. --]] 18:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *** i see your point. thanks for your judgement, and i will take more care of it in future. ''']''' 18:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ****There's never a problem if you're working in good faith, which you obviously were. It's also obvious he's making bad faith reverts... --]] 18:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Wednesday Night Drinking Crew == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello i was curious about the SpD set on the WNDC Article | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The reason below is why I personally think it should be included, It truly is all that I say. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 --> | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| I am a representative of the MBAHA. Though this is my first entry and I'm not sure if im even doing it correctly or what needs to be done to establish this group in world history. Like I state below it is a huge part of the Myrtle Beach economy and many notable persons in the area are members, and they also start and coordinate fund raisers for High Schools and County affairs. Also it's 854+ members strong, their meetings usually involve around 175-200 members in attendance. | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| Please respond and let me know how i can improve the page. | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| * This page should not be deleted because enough though it does not have a notable effect of the entire history of the world, it does for the population and economy of the Myrtle Beach area. It supports family, social, and personal affairs. You even must be apart of the hospitality industry. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| **Well, for starters, it didn't even remotely explain how it was notable. Honestly, though, I highly doubt this page would survive any Misplaced Pages deletion process no matter how well written. --]] 06:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| **Also, recreating it immediately like you just did is probably going to end up getting the page ]. --]] 06:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| --] (]) 17:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ***Not trying to doubt your knowledge of Misplaced Pages and it's procedures but seriously there is not one single organization or group that is localy operated listed on WP?? Also i really didn't try to recreate it but when i was editing it, there was a notice saying it didn't exist. I thought i was suspposed to click the recreate to enable my editing <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ****There are tons, but you haven't even asserted that it's notable. --]] 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ****Well there is alot that I'm not really able to put in at one sitting, especially since it keeps being deleted, can you at least post-pone deletion for a week or so? | |||
| But as stated how is being a '''"huge part of the Myrtle Beach economy and many notable people in the area are members, and they also start and coordinate fund raisers for High Schools and County affairs."''' not notable? | |||
| What do the other organizations have listed? They certainly contribute loads to the city and the people who live in it. By the way i do appreciate the speedy response and help. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *Misplaced Pages has over two million entries, but they all have to pass the ]. --]] 20:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| FCC licensing is not mentioned ]. What else makes it notable? - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 18:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *] says that licensed stations are seen as notable if they have original programming...] has several debates over the notability of LP stations. CSD A7 says it doesn't apply to controversial deletions. --]] 20:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| **Agreed. I won't push for speedy; and I'll wait until notability criteria can be presented by the author. - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 20:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Landaluce== | |||
| Why thank you! I don't often receive compliments...much the reverse. But I agree, when I saw her missing, I got to work. As a horse lover, Landaluce should not be forgotten.] (]) 18:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Wenonah Article == | |||
| Thanks for fixing it up. Try to keep me posted on the article. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *I can't guarantee it will get kept, but I think I gave it enough context so it won't be speedy deleted. --]] 00:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Heh, Smashville, just before I got your message I was thinking "I better take this to AFD." Beat me there! ] (]) (]) 01:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == A7 and schools == | |||
| Thanks for stating that schools aren't part of A7 - I've been trying to go over all the policies really carefully and I guess there's still a lot that I've missed. ] (]) 01:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *It was actually a recent change...so you can't really be blamed for missing it. --]] 01:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Powercore == | |||
| In response to me not being the original author and such, please see edit, where the original author indeed did request the article's deletion. ≈ ] 00:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I see you reverted your edit - sorry for the slow response! ≈ ] 00:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ha...yeah...I felt kinda dumb when I saw that... --]] 02:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry == | |||
| I Am Sorry, I Thought That Victoria Planned to release the album and i will quit now sorry. thanks x <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :*Considering how many times you've been told to stop, I'm sorry if I have a hard time believing that. --]] 05:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == I Know, But I Just Want To Create Sourced Articles == | |||
| I Don't Mean To Be A Pain, but I Try to source my article like i sourced all my ] Articles , but I Don't Understand Why People Delete It. Also I Want To Be A Journalist, so your lucky to be one :P. So I'm Sorry if i've been doing something wrong x. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| : If you want to create sourced articles, then you need to abide by the rules laid down for notability and verification. You have been told why they are being deleted - they are not verifiable! And this is hardly journalism... ~~ ]]<sup>]]</sup> 05:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Seen as i am only ], I think that it helps me improve my journalism :P <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:47, 9 January 2008</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> | |||
| :*Creating hoaxes isn't going to help you with anything. Also - I'm sure you didn't mean to, but your signature should absolutely not link to another user's talk page. --]] 05:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :* By relying on some blog written by some completely random person with no verifiable credentials? I'm afraid this isn't going to help your journalism at all, and neither does your persistent re-creation of previously deleted articles or the vandalism and removal of tags on those pages. ~~ ]]<sup>]]</sup> 05:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == roller skating ninjas == | |||
| why are my "roller-skating ninja" posts being deleted? this one you have tagged now is a link to ''another'' wiki article! if i can't use your own site to verify something that what can i use?! you guys are being ridiculous. "Shat" has its own wikipedia page... why are you deleting all of the time i am putting in to setting up one for "roller-skating ninjas"?!?!?! ] (]) 05:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :*You created a blank page. It's still blank right now. --]] 05:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==help, pls with something important == | |||
| There really is the Pinsky Phenomenon in mathematics. I am not making it up. Refererences provided. So many researchers use it. Help me keep this. It is mathematically imprortant. AmeliaElizabeth (talk) | |||
| :I'm not sure what the problem is. It's not under deletion consideration at the moment. I'd help...but math isn't my strong suit. --]] 00:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==James Barnett== | |||
| Hey! Why do you keep deleting Ryan Davis' name from the article? He did break the story before anyone else. He even wrote the article in the Houston Voice about it. I'm not sure how you consider that not relevant to the story. Do you think Bob Woodward is not relevant to Watergate? ] (]) 22:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :That's not even close to Watergate. It's an article about a person that you keep putting your own name into. --]] 23:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ryan wrote the very first article on James... http://www.houstonvoice.com/2004/12-17/news/localnews/school.cfm. Please explain how that isn't relevent? ] (]) 00:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Because the article isn't about him. Adding the reference is fine...adding the credentials and the name of the reporter is not. The reporter has nothing to do with the story. He reported the facts of something that happened...it wasn't investigative journalism and the reporter is not part of the story. --]] 00:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::How can you say it wasn't investigative journalism? I actually sorta feel that is was... ] (]) 00:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The point is...the story is the kid getting kicked out of school. Not the reporter reporting that the kid got kicked out of school. The kid sought out the press - he even contacted the ACLU - the reporter didn't discover anything. It's not appropriate to add his name to the article. Especially when it was continuously added by the reporter himself last week while he was trying to create a page about himself. --]] 00:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Smashville - Actually, James didn't seak out the press. Davis contacted him before he even considered going public. It was the notgeniuses article, reprinted the next week in the houston voice, that lead to further media coverage. In addition, Davis asked his readers to contact James' school and local media to force them to cover the story. I'm not the one trying to rewrite history here. | |||
| I updated the Ryan Davis page to show more notability. I'm not quite sure what else you're looking for not to delete it. Please advise. | |||
| ] (]) 19:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :If you can find a reliable secondary source in which he is the primary subject. I mean, if he's notable, then by all means, he's notable...he just doesn't look notable per Misplaced Pages standards. See ]. I'll help you look for sources, but since you have more knowledge of the subject, you are going to be more likely to find them. Please don't mistake my removals as point of view or rudeness or anything of that nature. Just - to me - it doesn't seem to meet ]. --]] 22:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Smashville - Thanks for your help on this. I do appreciate it. I've already referenced a feature on Davis from The Washington Post. Also, I've linked to two of his appearances on CNN, MSNBC, Good Morning America, and Primetime Live. I've also linked to interviews from Radar Magazine (Print), The Advocate (Print), Fox News, and Broadway World (highest ranked theatre news site). I've also linked to a front page feature he received from Gay City News (Print), the most read gay newspaper in the country. That's quite a few sources and I'd hope some of them are considered reliable. If you need more, I can find additional mentions in the NY Times, or whatever. But, I feel like you still won't be impressed. | |||
| Mr. Davis has received these media mentions not from one project, but from several. So, he's not just "known for one event." The odd thing is that there are people listed in Wiki whose best credits are writing a song for Mr. Davis' White Noise. How can he not be notable, but someone who wrote a song for him (http://en.wikipedia.org/Pasek_and_paul) somehow have this magical notability even with zero references or no real credits? ] (]) 22:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The above is me, sorry - forgot to sign in. ] (]) 22:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I am withdrawing the deletion nomination for the time being. You've at least cast enough doubt for me to give you some time to see what you can do. --]] 22:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Smashville - Thanks for your fairness. I'll be adding a little more to the entry tomorrow. I am curious, how do I make the reference list in 2 columns instead of one super long one? Is there a special tag? Thanks again! - ] (]) 23:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == A mini-meetup in Nashville == | |||
| ]. Good times are to be had. :) ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 06:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Silky Sullivan== | |||
| This article was almost the first I ever contributed to wikipedia and I'll admit I was more than a bit enthusiastic. I still am. It does need dampening down for wiki purposes, and I've occasionally looked at it with a mind to doing just that. But I can't. I'm too involved with the subject. Therefore to have someone else do it is a relief and I thank you. ] (]) 19:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Redlinked Winners== | |||
| I read your comments at ]. Have you finished doing the stubs on whatever ones you changed? ] (]) 15:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Speedy deleted all the redirects instead. --]] 18:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Get a life you animal fucker== | |||
| Shut up you fucking nigger. Fuck off and shit your pants full of all the shit you can fill them with. ] (]) 07:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022
Hello, welcome to my talk page!
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Churchill Downs 6-16-07 - Patten 025.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|