Misplaced Pages

Ouranosaurus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:20, 14 July 2005 editCrazyharp81602 (talk | contribs)2,467 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:47, 22 May 2024 edit undoPaleonerd12 (talk | contribs)11 editsm Very minor grammar edits to make the beginning of the second paragraph of the paleoecology section flow better. Also hyperlinked rebbachisaurid to Rebbachisauridae.Tag: Visual edit 
(363 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Extinct genus of dinosaurs}}
<!-- Please do not remove or change this VfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{speciesbox
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="vfd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #EDF1F1; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;">
| fossil_range = ], {{Fossil range|Aptian|Albian}}
'''This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]]'''<br />
| image = Ouranosaurus MSNVE 3714.png
Please vote on and discuss the matter. See ''']''' on the Votes for Deletion page.<br />
| image_caption = Mounted paratype skeleton, ] 3714
You are welcome to edit this article, but please do not blank, merge, or move this article, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the ].</div>]
| display_parents = 3
<!-- End of VfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
| genus = Ouranosaurus
{{npov}}
| parent_authority = Taquet, ]
| species = nigeriensis
| authority = Taquet, 1976
}}


'''''Ouranosaurus''''' is a ] of herbivorous basal ] ] that lived during the ] stage of the ] of modern-day ] and ]. ''Ouranosaurus'' measured about {{convert|7|-|8.3|m|ft}} long and weighed {{convert|2.2|MT|ST}}. Two rather complete fossils were found in the ], ] deposits, ], Niger, in 1965 and 1970, with a third indeterminate specimen known from the ] of Cameroon. The animal was named in 1976 by French paleontologist ]; the type species being '''''Ouranosaurus nigeriensis'''''. The ] is a combination of ''ourane,'' a word with multiple meanings ("an Arabic name that signifies valor, courage, recklessness"; the ] name of the ] given by the ] ] of Niger & Algeria), and ''sauros'', the Greek word for lizard. The ] ''nigeriensis'' alludes to '']'', its country of discovery (in Latin, the adjectival suffix ''-iensis'' means "originating from"). And so, ''Ouranosaurus nigeriensis'' could be interpreted as "brave lizard originating from Niger".<ref name="taquet76" />
'''Dinosaurs (Young Earth creationism)''' states that ] created the ] around 6,000 years ago (which is about 3995 BC) and that the dinosaurs were mostly wiped out in the great flood of ]. The belief is an offshoot of ].


==Discovery and naming==
== Introduction ==
]
Five French palaeontological expeditions were undertaken in the ] region of the ] in ] between ] and ] and led by French ] ].<ref name="taquet76"/> These deposits come from GAD 5, a layer in the upper ] of the ], which was deposited during the ] stage of the ].<ref name="taquet70">{{cite journal|last=Taquet|first=P.|year=1970|title=Sur le gisement de Dinosauriens et de Crocodiliens de Gadoufaoua (République du Niger)|journal=Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série D|volume=271|pages=38–40|url=https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/translated_publications/Taquet_76.pdf}}</ref> On the first expedition, lasting from January–February 1965, eight ]n specimens were discovered at the "niveau des Innocents" site, east of the Emechedoui wells. An additional two skeletons were discovered {{convert|7|km|mi|abbr=on}} southeast of ] in the "Camp des deux Arbres" locality, which were given the field numbers GDF 300 and GDI 381. Both were collected in the February–April 1966 expedition, the former including a nearly complete but scattered skeleton, and the latter a skeleton that was two-thirds preserved.<ref name="taquet76"/><ref name="bertozzo17"/> The skeletons then in ] were brought to the ] of Paris, where they were prepared. GDF 381 was recategorized with the number MNHN GDF 1700 and then later described in ] as the holotype of the new taxon '']''.<ref name="bertozzo17"/> While the third expedition did not turn up additional iguanodontian material, the fourth in January–March ] uncovered a nearly complete and partially articulated skeleton lacking the skull, {{convert|4|km|mi|abbr=on}} south of the "niveau des Innocents" site, and was also given the field number GDF 381. This specimen was collected and taken to the MNHN by the fifth expedition in ].<ref name="taquet76"/><ref name="bertozzo17"/> Following a subsequent Italian-French expedition led by Taquet and Italian palaeontologist ] that turned up a potential additional iguanodontian specimen, Ligabue offered to donate the nearly complete specimen and a skull of '']'' to the ], which accepted the offer and subsequently mounted the skeleton in ] at the ].<ref name="bertozzo17"/>


Taquet formally described the two mostly-complete specimens MNHN GDF 300 and MNHN GDF 381 from the first and fourth expeditions as ''Ouranosaurus nigeriensis'' in ], along with a referred ] and ] that bore the numbers MNHN GDF 301 and MNHN GDF 302 respectively. MNHN GDF 300 was made the ], and was the primary specimen described, including a semi-articulated skull lacking the left {{dinogloss|maxilla}}, right {{dinogloss|quadratojugal}} and the {{dinogloss|articular|articulars}}, almost the entire ], forelimbs lacking a few hand bones, and most of the right hindlimb and a few bones of the left.<ref name="taquet76">{{cite journal|last=Taquet|first=P.|year=1976|title=Géologie et Paléontologie du Gisement de Gadoufaoua (Aptien du Niger)|journal=Cahiers de Paléontologie|publisher=Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris|pages=1–191|isbn=2-222-02018-2|url=http://paleoglot.org/files/Taquet_76.pdf}}</ref> Additional description for bones unpreserved in the holotype was based on Taquet's MNHN GDF 381, which was not mentioned as having been sent to Venice and renumbered as MSNVE 3714, although this was confirmed by Italian palaeontologist Filippo Bertozzo and colleagues in ]. The holotype itself was returned to Niger after being described and having its bones cast and mounted, and is now on display at the ] in ].<ref name="bertozzo17">{{cite journal|last1=Bertozzo|first1=F.|last2=Dalla Vechia|first2=F.M.|last3=Fabbri|first3=M.|year=2017|title=The Venice specimen of ''Ouranosaurus nigeriensis'' (Dinosauria, Ornithopoda)|journal=PeerJ|volume=5|pages=e3403|doi=10.7717/peerj.3403|doi-access=free|pmid=28649466|pmc=5480399}}</ref> The generic name ''Ouranosaurus'' carries a double meaning, it is both taken from ] meaning "valour", "bravery
According to ], the earth is between 6,000 and 10,000 years old. As a result of this historic time frame, humans and dinosaurs lived together, there was a worldwide flood where the dinosaurs were all killed in the Flood leaving behind traces of their fossilized remains with the exception of those that are inside the Ark. The Flood supposedly occurred around 4,500 years ago, which is around 2495 BC at the time the Egyptians were building the pyramids for their beloved Pharoahs. The dinosaurs however that were in the ark left it when the flood is over and were eventually killed off by man and other "post-flood" extremes.
" or "recklessness" and also from the local ] of Niger where it is the name they call the ]. The ] refers to Niger, the country of discovery. Taquet had used the name "Ouranosaurus nigeriensis" previously, first in a public presentation of the skeleton MNHN GDF 300 in July 1972, then later in September 1972 in a news article and again in December 1972 in a book; only the book bore any images associated with the name, and none of the earlier mentions had a diagnosis to make the name valid.<ref name="taquet76"/>


==Description==
The reason YECs believe in what is mentioned above is because they believe the Bible tells them so. But critics of young earthism highly regard this belief as total and complete nonsense; a fallible opinion of theirs based on their interpretations of the Bible with no evidence to boot.
]
''Ouranosaurus'' was a relatively large iguanodontian, measuring {{convert|7|-|8.3|m|ft|abbr=off}} long and weighing {{convert|2.2|tonnes|ST}}.<ref name="taquet76"/><ref name="paul10">{{cite book|last=Paul|first=G.S.|year=2010|title=The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs|url=https://archive.org/details/princetonfieldgu00paul|url-access=registration|publisher=Princeton University Press|pages=|isbn=978-0-691-13720-9}}</ref> The holotype and paratype specimens were suggested to belong to subadults by Bertozzo ''et al.'' in 2017, although they would have been close to adult size. MSNVE 3714 is {{convert|6.5|m|ft|abbr=on}} long as mounted, although a few caudals are missing, and is roughly 90% the length of the holotype, which would be {{convert|7.22|m|ft|abbr=on}} long. The variation between the sizes fits within the range of variation between adult individuals of '']'', so there is a chance that the larger holotype and smaller paratype were same ontogenetic stage.<ref name="bertozzo17"/>


===Skull===
Here in this article are 8 known statements made by the YECs about their point of views on dinosaurs and the critics responses to those claims. They are seen here.
]
The skull of ''Ouranosaurus'' is {{convert|67.0|cm|in|abbr=on}} long. It was rather low, being {{convert|24.4|cm|in|abbr=on}} wide and only {{convert|26.0|cm|in|abbr=on}} tall. The top of the skull was flat, the highest point being just in front of the ] and sloping down towards both the rear of the skull and the tip of the snout.<ref name="taquet76"/> This makes ''Ouranosaurus'' have the most elongate skull of any non-], the length being 3.8 times the maximum height, although the skull is proportionally wider than related '']''.<ref name="bertozzo17"/>


Bones of the snout are more loosely articulated with each other than the bones of the posterior skull. The {{dinogloss|premaxilla|premaxillae}} are {{convert|46.0|cm|in|abbr=on}} long, with very deep {{dinogloss|external nares}} as in other iguanodontians. ], the premaxillae flare gently laterally into a rugose surface for a beak, like other iguanodontians, although dissimilar from '']'' and similar to hadrosaurids the nares are entirely visible from above. Neither premaxilla bears any teeth, although the very anterior tip has "pseudo-teeth" formed by multiple ] on the margin of the bone.<ref name="taquet76"/> Only the right maxilla of ''Ouranosaurus'' is known. although it is well preserved forming a triangle {{convert|28.0|cm|in|abbr=on}} long and {{convert|11.7|cm|in|abbr=on}} tall, much taller proportionally than ''Iguanodon''. The maxilla bears faces for articulation with the premaxilla in front, {{dinogloss|lacrimal}} above, {{dinogloss|ectopterygoid}}, {{dinogloss|vomer}}, {{dinogloss|palatine}} and possibly {{dinogloss|pterygoid}} internally, and {{dinogloss|jugal}} to the rear. The lacrimal process is the highest point of the maxilla, and behind this process is a smooth and curved margin for the {{dinogloss|antorbital fenestra}}, which is bounded by the maxilla in front and below, lacrimal above, and jugal behind. The jugal overlaps only the posterior end of the maxilla, which is unlike hadrosaurids where there is more overlap.<ref name="taquet76"/> The dental edge of the maxilla is slightly arced, and above the toothrow is a shallow depression bearing {{dinogloss|nutrient foramina}}, also known as the buccal emargination that is diagnostic of ].<ref name="taquet76"/><ref name="butler08">{{cite journal|last1=Butler|first1=R.J.|last2=Upchurch|first2=P.|last3=Norman|first3=D.B.|year=2008|title=The phylogeny of ornithischian dinosaurs|journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology|volume=6|issue=1|pages=1–40|doi=10.1017/S1477201907002271|bibcode=2008JSPal...6....1B |s2cid=86728076}}</ref> 20 teeth are preserved in the maxilla, although the anterior end of the toothrow is broken and Taquet (1976) predicted the total number to be 22.<ref name="taquet76"/>
YEC Statement #1 '''Dinosaurs, all other forms of animals extinct and living, and man one lived together.'''
]
Many of the central bones of the skull are the same form as those of hadrosaurids or related iguanodontians like ''Iguanodon'' and ''Mantellisaurus''. The jugal below and behind the orbit bears the same shape as in hadrosaurids, with a high rear process, and articulated with the quadratojugal and quadrate that are also very similar to more derived taxa. As in other ], the {{dinogloss|postorbital}} is a tri-radiate bone surrounding sides of the orbit, {{dinogloss|infratemporal fenestra}} and {{dinogloss|supratemporal fenestra}}. Contact between the postorbital and the {{dinogloss|parietal}} excludes the flattened and wide {{dinogloss|frontal|frontals}} from the supratemporal fenestra. In ''Ouranosaurus'' and related taxa the {{dinogloss|prefrontal|prefrontals}} are small, and articulates with the broadened and textured lacrimal. Only a single {{dinogloss|supraorbital}} was present in ''Ouranosaurus'', which projects into the orbit above the eye. The {{dinogloss|nasal|nasal bones}} of ''Ouranosaurus'' are unique among ornithischians. The bones are unfused suggesting mobility, and at their ends on the top of the skull are rounded domes, which were described by Taquet (1976) as distinct and rugose "nasal protuberances".<ref name="taquet76"/>


The snout was toothless and covered in a horny sheath during life, forming a very wide beak together with a comparable sheath on the short ] bone at the extreme front of the lower jaws. However, after a rather large ] with the beak, there were large batteries of cheek teeth on the sides of the jaws: the gaps between the teeth crowns were filled by the points of a second generation of replacement teeth, the whole forming a continuous surface. Contrary to the situation with some related species, a third generation of erupted teeth was lacking. There were twenty-two tooth positions in both lower and upper jaw, for a total of eighty-eight.
This critics say that this has all 100% failed miserably to explain how come there are no traces of remains of dinosaurs and all other extinct animals of prehistory found mixed alongside of remains of human and modern animals.


===Postcranial skeleton===
Reference: .
]]]
The most conspicuous feature of ''Ouranosaurus'' is a large "sail" on its back, supported by long, wide, ]s, that spanned its entire rump and tail, resembling that of '']'', a well-known ] also known from northern Africa<ref name=EoDP>{{cite book |editor=Palmer, D.|year=1999 |title= The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals|publisher= Marshall Editions|location=London|page= 144|isbn= 1-84028-152-9}}</ref> as well as those of the modern Crested chamaeleon ('']'') which has a moderate sail on its back, and to a lesser extent the sail-backed temnospondyl ''].'' These tall neural spines did not closely resemble those of sail-backed synapsids such as '']'' of the ] Period as the supporting spines in synapsids become thinner distally, whereas in ''Ouranosaurus'' (as well as the afformentioned sail-backed reptiles and amphibians) the spines actually become thicker distally and flatten. The posterior spines were also bound together by ossified tendons, which stiffened the back. Finally, the spine length peaks over the forelimbs.


The first four ]e are unknown; the fifth already bears a {{convert|32|cm|ft|adj=mid|-long spine}} that is pointed and slightly hooked; Taquet presumed it might have anchored a tendon to support the neck or skull. The tenth, eleventh and twelfth spines are the longest, at about {{cvt|63| cm}}. The last dorsal spine, the seventeenth, has a grooved posterior edge, in which the anterior corner of the lower spine of the first ] is locked. The spines over the six sacral vertebrae are markedly lower, but those of the tail base again longer; towards the end of the tail the spines gradually shorten.
YEC Statement #2 '''All animals, especially dinosaurs were all vegetarians before the Fall of Man.'''
]
The dorsal "sail" is usually explained as either functioning as a system for ] or a display structure. An alternative hypothesis is that the back might have carried a hump consisting of muscle tissue or fat, resembling that of a ] or ], rather than a sail. It could have been used for energy storage to survive a lean season.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Bailey|first=J.B.|year=1997|title=Neural spine elongation in dinosaurs: sailbacks or buffalo-backs?|journal=Journal of Paleontology|volume=71|issue=6|pages=1124–1146|doi=10.1017/S0022336000036076|bibcode=1997JPal...71.1124B }}</ref>


The ] consisted of eleven neck vertebrae, seventeen dorsal vertebrae, six sacral vertebrae and forty tail vertebrae. The tail was relatively short.
Creationists got this concept from where they interpret Genesis 1:29-30 where God told Adam that He has given him fruit to eat and the animals every green plant for food to mean that god commanded them to eat fruits and plants. Critics says that the passage is nothing more that just a provision God has made to Adam and the animals to help sustain themseves from hunger.


The front limbs were rather long with 55% of the length of the hind limbs. A quadrupedal stance would have been possible. The ] was very straight. The hand was lightly built, short and broad. On each hand ''Ouranosaurus'' bore a ] ] or spike that was much smaller than that of the earlier ''Iguanodon''. The second and third digits were broad and ]-like, and anatomically were good for walking. To support the walking hypothesis, the ] was large and its component bones fused together to prevent its ]. The last ] (number 5) was long. In related species the fifth finger is presumed to have been prehensile: used for picking food like leaves and twigs or to help lower the food by lowering branch to a manageable height. Taquet assumed that with ''Ouranosaurus'' this function had been lost because the fifth ], reduced to a spur, could no longer be directed sideways.
Creationists claim that all dinosaurs, even Tyrannosaurus Rex were all plant-eaters. Critics would point out the fact that animals like Tyrannosaurus Rex, tigers and leapords all have sharp teeth, sharp claws, eyes that see forward to help zero in on their prey, strong running legs, and a stomach for only red food. They also have poited out that plants have very tough, tough fibers that make it much difficult for any animals to digest them without giving them indigestion, making the carnivores very sick with indigestion. They also says that in order to have the animal eat plants, it must have a highly complex digestive system that has all of capabilities to digest plant matter, which includes special bacteria to break down and ferment the plants inside the stomach area. The animal must also have chewing teeth to chew up plants into a digestable pulp as well. When confronted with the fact that animals like Tyrannosaurs have sharp teeth capable for tearing up flesh, creationists would counter it by showing the teeth of a camel, a spider monkey, a gorilla, a panda, and a fruit bat, claiming they too have sharp teeth yet they eat plants. Critics respond by pointing out that these teeth of the animals mentioned above are all called canines. They are much different than the canines of the lions and other carnivores. For, they are all smooth, thin and blunt unlike the canine teeth of meat-eaters like lions and jaguars that are deep rooted, rigid, and sharp. They also have special chewing molars called carnassials, which are sharp, pointed molars that can have a solid grip on the flesh of their prey.
]
The hindlimbs were large and robust to accommodate the weight of the body and strong enough to allow a bipedal walk. The ] was slightly longer than the ]. This may indicate that the legs were used as pillars, and not for ]. Taquet concluded that ''Ouranosaurus'' was not a good runner because the fourth trochanter, the attachment point for the large retractor muscles connected to the tail base, was weakly developed. The foot was narrow with only three toes and relatively long.


In the ], the ] was very large, rounded and directed obliquely upwards.
References: are


==Classification==
When confronted with the true notion, given out by critics, that plants do die after they are eaten, YECs would counter this by claiming that plant does not die because they don't have what the Hebrew word is called 'Nephesh' which means 'spirit' or 'soul' inside of them just like animals and humans have when God created them.(This is what YECist Ken Ham believes. Reference .) This kind of claim is based on the Hebrew translation of Genesis 1:21-27 where God commands creatures with spirit in both land, air, and sea to be created. Critics regard this as a complete nonsense. They pointed out to the YECs that plants are alive. Just like animals and people, they eat, they breathe i.e. they take out oxygen and breathe in carbon dioxide, they drink, they grow, they are either male or female depending on gender, they reproduce, and they do die. Especially when they are eaten and decay in the stomach of both animals and man in a form of digestion. In nearly all cases it has been pointed by critics throughout the Bible that the word 'nephesh' is used to describe only the souls of human beings, not animals. Only in Genesis 1 does the word nephesh refers to animals as well as man. (4)(5)
Taquet originally assigned ''Ouranosaurus'' to the ], within the larger ]. However, although it shares some similarities with ''Iguanodon'' (such as a thumb spike), ''Ouranosaurus'' is no longer usually placed in the iguanodontid family, a grouping that is now generally considered ], a series of subsequent offshoots from the main stem-line of iguandontian evolution. It is instead placed in the ] ], closely related to the ], which contains the ] (also known as "duck-billed dinosaurs") and their closest relatives. ''Ouranosaurus'' appears to represent an early specialized branch in this group, showing in some traits independent convergence with the hadrosaurids. It is thus a ] hadrosauriform.


The simplified ] below follows an analysis by Andrew McDonald and colleagues, published in November 2010 with information from McDonald, 2011.<ref name=iguanacolossus>{{cite journal | last1 = McDonald | first1 = A.T. | last2 = Kirkland | first2 = J.I. | last3 = DeBlieux | first3 = D.D. | last4 = Madsen | first4 = S.K. | last5 = Cavin | first5 = J. | last6 = Milner | first6 = A.R.C. | last7 = Panzarin | first7 = L. | year = 2010 | title = New Basal Iguanodontians from the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and the Evolution of Thumb-Spiked Dinosaurs | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 5| issue = 11| page = e14075 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0014075 | pmid = 21124919 | pmc=2989904 | bibcode = 2010PLoSO...514075M | editor1-last = Farke | editor1-first = Andrew Allen| doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="McDonald">{{Cite journal|author=Andrew T. McDonald |year=2011 |title=The taxonomy of species assigned to ''Camptosaurus'' (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) |url=http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/z02783p068f.pdf |journal=Zootaxa |volume=2783 |pages=52–68 |doi= 10.11646/zootaxa.2783.1.4}}</ref>
Another claim that made by the YECs is the denial of death before the Fall of Man based on their interpretations of Romans 5:12 and other bible verses like them. Critics argue that the verse, when put together in context, actually describes death that's not a physical death, but a spiritual death. Critics stated that if Jesus died to take away only physical death and yet there is still physical death still there, then he wasn't such a worthy savior after all.
]
Reference:
{{clade| style=font-size:100%;line-height:80%
|label1=]
|1={{clade
|1=]
|2={{clade
|1='']''
|label2=]
|2={{clade
|1=]
|label2=]
|2={{clade
|1='']''
|label2=]
|2={{clade
|1='']''
|2='']''
|3={{clade
|1={{clade
|1='']''
|2='']'' }}
|2={{clade
|1='']''
|2='']''
|3='']''
|4='']''
|label5=]
|5={{clade
|1='']''
|2='']''
|3='''''Ouranosaurus'''''
|4=] }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}


==Paleobiology==
YEC Statement #3 '''Dinosaurs outside the ark were all wiped out in the flood. Those that were in the ark died off due to the same things that caused many animals to become extinct today.'''


===Diet===
Yecs believes that dinosaurs outside the ark were all drowned in the flood and have left behind traces of bodied remains that have curved necks and tails indicating that the dinosaurs were trying to swim through the Flood or have their bodies be broken apart. The many vast graveyards of dinosaurs and foottracks that are greatly overlapping, to them, also indecates that the dinosaurs are trying to escape the flood but were all swept away to a certain spot forming the mass graveyards we see today.
The jaws were apparently operated by relatively weak muscles. ''Ouranosaurus'' had only small ]s behind the eyes, from which the larger ] muscle was attached to the ] on the lower jaw bone. Small rounded horns in front of its eyes made ''Ouranosaurus'' the only known horned ]. The back of the skull was rather narrow and could not compensate for the lack of a greater area of attachment for the jaw muscle, that the openings normally would provide, allowing for more power and a stronger bite. A lesser muscle, the ], used to open the lower jaws, was located at the back of the skull and was connected to a strongly projecting, broad and anteriorly oblique ]. ''Ouranosaurus'' probably used its teeth to chew up tough plant food. A diet has been suggested of leaves, fruit, and seeds as the chewing would allow to free more energy from high quality food;<ref name=EoDP/> the wide beak on the other hand indicates a specialisation in eating large amounts of low quality fodder. ''Ouranosaurus'' lived in a ].


===Histology===
Critics says that this is all flawed because...
''Ouranosaurus'' bears more similarities to other derived iguanodonts than more basal ornithopods. Remodeling is present in the subadult paratype, and high vascular density and circumferential arrangement of the microstructure suggests fast growth. Faster growth occurs in the same phylogenetic groups as higher body size, although their relationship is unclear. ''Ouranosaurus'' is a similar size to more basal '']'' which has slow growth, so either faster growth is caused by body size or ''Tenontosaurus'' is the maximum size of an ornithopod with a slow growth rate.<ref name="bertozzo17"/>
]'' and '']'' in the environment of the Elrhaz Formation]]
==Paleoecology==
''Ouranosaurus'' is known from the Elrhaz Formation of the Tegama Group in an area called Gadoufaoua, located in Niger. Only two mostly complete skeletons and up to 3 additional individuals have been found.<ref name="bertozzo17"/> The Elrhaz Formation consists mainly of ] sandstones with low relief, much of which is obscured by sand dunes.<ref name="ecology"/> The ] are coarse- to medium-grained, with almost no fine-grained ].<ref name="serenoetal2007">{{Cite journal | last1 = Sereno | first1 = P. C. | last2 = Wilson | first2 = J. A. | last3 = Witmer | first3 = L. M. | last4 = Whitlock | first4 = J. A. | last5 = Maga | first5 = A. | last6 = Ide | first6 = O. | last7 = Rowe | first7 = T. A.| title = Structural extremes in a Cretaceous dinosaur | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0001230 | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 2 | issue = 11 | pages = e1230 | year = 2007 | pmid = 18030355| pmc =2077925 | bibcode = 2007PLoSO...2.1230S | doi-access = free }}</ref> ''Ouranosaurus'' is from the upper portion of the formation, probably Aptian in age.<ref name="taquet76"/> It likely lived in habitats dominated by inland ]s (a ]).<ref name="serenoetal2007"/>


It has been claimed that the ] ] and the ] '']'' were the most numerous ] in the Elrhaz formation,<ref name="serenoetal2007" /> however this runs counter to Taqet and Russel,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Taquet |first1=Philippe |last2=Russell |first2=Dale A. |date=January 1999 |title=A massively-constructed iguanodont from Gadoufaoua, lower Cretaceous of Niger |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/s0753-3969(99)80009-3 |journal=Annales de Paléontologie |volume=85 |issue=1 |pages=85–96 |doi=10.1016/s0753-3969(99)80009-3 |bibcode=1999AnPal..85...85T |issn=0753-3969}}</ref> who state that ''Ouranosaurus'' was the "dominant element in the assemblage." Other herbivores from the same formation include ''Ouranosaurus'', '']'', and an unnamed ]. It also lived alongside the ] '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. ] like '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' also lived there. In addition, remains of a ], ], fish, a ] shark, and freshwater bivalves have been found.<ref name="ecology">{{Cite journal | last1 = Sereno | first1 = P. C. | last2 = Brusatte | first2 = S. L. | doi = 10.4202/app.2008.0102 | title = Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger | journal = Acta Palaeontologica Polonica | volume = 53| issue= 1 | pages = 15–46 | year = 2008 | doi-access = free | hdl = 20.500.11820/5d55ed2e-52f2-4e4a-9ca1-fd1732f2f964 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> Grass did not evolve until the late Cretaceous.<ref name="serenoetal2007"/>
1. When studied closely, the fossil were all contorted and twisted as the result of the shriveling of their cartileges and tissues around the necks, backbone, and tail causing the bodies to curl up and undergo the process of rigor mortis. A flood is never needed to make the animals undergo the progress of rigor mortis when one can actually witness the process in a desert where many animals have died and their bodies shriveled up in the sun.


== References ==
2. Broken bodies and missing parts were all the result of either erosion or were torned up by predators hence evidences of teeth marks found along side of scattered parts.
{{Reflist}}


=== Bibliography ===
3. Mass graveyards of dinosaur bones were actually the result of failed attempts to cross a large raging river that are at it's flood stage in a similar fashon to that of wilderbeests, being swept away in a local flash flood, and of animals being killed in an ashfall made by an erupting volcano. none of these thing have to do with Noah's Flood.
{{Portal|Dinosaurs}}
* {{cite book|title=Dinosaurs and other Prehistoric Creatures|editor=Ingrid Cranfield |year=2000 |publisher=Salamander Books |pages=152–154}}
* {{cite book |first=Hazel |last=Richardson |date=2003 |title= Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals |publisher= Smithsonian Handbooks |page=108}}
* {{cite book|last=Dixon|first=Dougal|title=The Complete Book of Dinosaurs|url=https://archive.org/details/completebookofdi0000dixo|url-access=registration|publisher=Hermes House|year=2006}}
* {{cite book |first=Barry |last=Cox |author2= Colin Harrison |author3= R.J.G. Savage |author4= Brian Gardiner |year=1999 |title= The Simon & Schuster Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Creatures: A Visual Who's Who of Prehistoric Life |url=https://archive.org/details/simonschusterenc00coxb |url-access=registration |publisher= Simon & Schuster|isbn=9780684864112 }}


== External links ==
Reference:
*
* (with picture)


{{Ornithopoda|O.}}
Everyone who loves to study dinosaurs knowns that the extinction of the dinosaurs is one of earth's greatest mysteries. To help explain the extinction event, scientists have come up with a lot of theories based on fossil evidence to figure out why did the dinosaurs became extinct. The most dominering of the theories is the Meteorite theory that says a large meteorite crashed landed on earth causing a major drastic change to Earth's climate and environment, causing 60% of life on earth to vanished including all non-avian dinosaurs, 65 million years ago. This is highly likely the case due to an old ancient crator that is found in the Gulf of Mexico known as the Chicxulub crator dated back to the time of the dinosaurs's extinction. Reference:
{{Taxonbar|from=Q131124}}


]
However Paleontologist Gerta Keller, although she believes that a meteorite killed the dinosaurs, she believes that the Chicxulub is not the one that have killed the dinosaurs. She says that she found evidence that the meteor have impacted the earth 300,000 years before the K-T dinosaurs extinction when she found traces of marine animal burrows right in the crator dated to the supposed day of the impact. However, critics of her says that this is most likely became distorted upon impact leading Keller to read the layers wrong. If the Chicxulub was not the meteor that killed the dinosaurs, then the Shiva crater, another crater that is dated back 65 million years ago located near Southern Asia could that be the real culprit behind the dinosaurs extinction. Still, most if not all people who studied the Chicxulub crater are certain that when it comes to the dinosaur extinction, the verdict is still out in the Gulf of Mexico. (7)
]

]
YEC Statement #4 - '''Noah took up baby dinosaurs into the ark.'''
]

]
Critics disagree when YECs claimed that Noah took up young, baby, immature, basic non-avian dinosaurs up into the ark. Critices argued that there is no way can he ever fit them all 600 different kinds of dinosaurs into the ark along with all of the other 90 million plus animals, both prehistoric and modern. However, in an attempt to try to fit all of the dinosaurs into the ark, YECs would claimed that there were about only 50 different kinds of dinosaurs known (according to YECist Ken Ham in various books of his including ''Dinosaurs of Eden''(2000).) while in fact it is known that there are actually more than that; about 600 different kinds of them to be exact. YECs tried another attempt to fit the animals into a 450x75x45 ark by bringing up a hypocritical concept of Noah taking up only basic animals into the ark to reproduce and developed into the many varieties of animals we see today.
]

]
YECs also claimed that God created the animals to reproduce after their kind. YECs says that from the original animals of creation developed into a great number of species that has ever been known through either natural or artificial selection. Then Noah took up all of the basic animals including dinosaurs to reproduce into a great number of species we see today. On the other hand, critics pointed out that Believe it or not, what the YECs are advocating is ''Evolution!'' The very same thing they boldly declare for it to be a lie. This, critics say, is a perfect example of young earth hypocrisy. YECs counter this by saying that it is not evolution, but a kind of speciation that is limited and known present. But critics says it is, and YECs are not very willing to admit it. (2)
]

]
Critics pointed out that even if Noah did manage to fit all of the animals into the ark, there are major problems with dinosaurs growing up real, real fast, not staying about the size of sheep or ponies for long, feeding, cleaning up after them, ventilation, exercise, entertainment, keeping the animals stimulated (YECs claimed that all animals hibrinated throughout the voyage. Yet, critics object to this and provided a response to this claim, which it is shown right .), and keeping them healthy. Much of the problems with the YECs' version of the story of Noah's Ark are all listed and critiqued right on this webpage on the Talkorigins website.
YEC Statement #5 -- '''Dragons are actually dinosaurs that people saw in Ancient and Medieval Legends.'''

As before critics would say that this has all 100% failed miserably to explain how come there are no human remains found alongside mixed with dinosaur remains. Not even the alleged cave dinosaur drawings in Utah nor the alleged Ica Stones and other creation hoaxs could ever explain why are there no human remains found mixed with dinosaur remains either.

The word "dragon" comes from the Greek word "drakon" meaning "snake" or "serpent." In every ancient illustrations made of dragons, dragons all bear a striking resemblance to snakes, especially snakes that coil and twist with a fiery or poisonous breath, impenetrable scales with their soft underbelly and wing as their weak point, a poisonous bite, either bird like or bat like wings with many long fingers supporting a sheet of skin in contrast of Pterosaurs having a sheet of skin supporting only one long finger, an appetite for young wonmen, and a strong lust for gold. In some cases, dragons were worshipped as gods in many oriental countries like Japan and China. they are known to have a powerful ability to create storms as well as change themselves into different forms. Dinosaurs could do none of these things nor do they ever resembled snakes at all. Birds maybe, but never snakes.

There is a page on Dinosaurs and Bible DON'T MIX!!! website that contains a page in the essay that reviews and refutes the claims made up by Creationist Paul Taylor in his book ''The Great Dinosaur Mystery and the Bible'' where it features part 3 of the essay that examines and refutes the YECs own versions of the dragon stories that critics claimed that this entirely made up by the YECs who distorted and twisted the dragon tales up to made it to look as if they are accounts of people meeting dinosaurs, while in fact they are not. You can visit this webpage .
More Reference here.

YEC statement #6 - There are dinosaurs living recently in the remote areas of the world.

This does not explain how come there are no dinosaur remains found above the Mesozoic strata other than birds. Critics of Cryptozoology says that in order to confirm the existence of the alleged modern dinosaurs of the Congo Basin and elsewhere, one must have find a fully intact dinosaur and other prehistoric animals. Thus far, no such evidence has ever been found. Critics says that even if the living dinosaurs of the Congo Basin claim is confirm, this still does not make things an embarrassment for the evolutionists. Instead, it would just thrill them for this would be evolution in action. Land dinosaurs evolving into swamp dinosaurs as well as cold blooded plesiosaurs would evolved into warm blooded plesiosaurs to take on the cold lake of Loch Ness. This, according to critics, would be the case if there ever was such a thing as what it is claimed by wishful thinkers like the YECs, but no valid evidence has ever turned up.
References

YEC Statement #7 - '''There are Dinosaurs found in the Bible.'''

Critics would argue that the only dinosaurs to have ever found in the bible is not Behemoth and Leviathan, but birds such as doves, eagles, ostriches to name a few and nothing more. YECs, however firmly believes that Behemoth and Leviathan in Job 40 and 41 are dinosaurs. But critics say that this is flawed because unlike dinosaurs, Behemoth was a mammal, not a reptile, nor a dinosaur. In Job 40:17, the "tail" in the verse is actually a euphemism for penis, a male sex organ. (Mitchell, 1992) For example, Here below is the accurate translation of job 40:15-17 according to Steven Mitchell,

'''Look now: the Beast that I made: he eats grass like a bull. Look: the power in his thighs, the pulsing sinews of his belly. His penis stiffens like a pine; his testicles bulge with vigor.'''

In the passage, Behemoth is known to eat grass like a bull, a male cow. when cows chew their food, they moved their mouths up and down in a circular fashon. Studies shows that Sauropods like Brachiosaurus could do no such thing. They have no chewing teeth and can only move their jaws up and down like a crocodile. To help digest their food they have to swollow stones that traveled nto their gizzard areas of the stomach to help grind their food as gastroliths. There was also no grass around when dinosaurs were alive. Grass evolved around 40 million years ago which is about 20 million years after the dinosaurs became extinct. Behemoth is also protrayed as an amphibious animal. Traditionally it is most likely that this passage closely describes the hippopotamus, a dangerous vegetarian that lived a amphibious life in swamps, lakes, and rivers.

Critics also says that Leviathan could not be a dinosaur either because dinosaurs are all terrestral animals meaning they all lived on land unlike Leviathan who lived only in the sea. The word "Leviathan" comes from the Hebrew word meaning "twisted" or "coiled." No dinosaur could ever twist or coiled itself. YECs, in some cases believes that Leviathan was a pliosaur or a mosasaur but critics object to this. They pointed out that none of the marine reptiles have any armor plating on their bodies and none of them ever coiled up like a snake, either. According to the passage, Leviathan is known to have weapon resisted armor plating all over it's body like a crocodile, which traditionally this is what the passage of Job 41 most likely refers to. Other passages, however, has Leviathan be a seven headed monster that God killed and threw his body into the desert for animals to eat.

YECs believes that dinosaurs breathing fire. This is taken literally from a passage in Job 41 that involves Leviathan breathing fire like a dragon. Critics regard this as nonsense. No animal, not even a dinosaur, nor a marine reptile of the Meoszoic Age has ever breathe fire. There's no evidence for it. Even if they did breathe fire, critics argued, they would need to have something in their mouths and their throats that would protect the them from being burned, but no such attributes have ever existed. Critics declared that what YECs claim about fire breathing dinosaurs is just pretend based on their own interpretations of the passage of Job 41 they take way too literally. Quite possibly the passage is nothing more than a metaphor of "croc breath." (8)

YEC statement #8 - '''Birds are not descendants of dinosaurs.'''

The concept of Birds being descendents of dinosaurs was first invented by Thomas Huxley, Darwin's "Bulldog" when compairing dinosaur bones with chicken or turkey bones. That concept was rejected until the 1960's when it was revived by John Ostrom while studying Deinonychus that was just unearthed from the ground in 1964. Scientists over the years have known of dinosaurs having features that resembled birds in a lot of ways. Including Ornithschian hips, bones full of pleurocoels; holes that made the weight of the dinosaur lighter, beaks, legs and feet that resembled birds, and now it is known that some dinosaurs do have feathers. In recent years, scientists have unearthed many traces of dinosaurs with feathered imprints on them in the Yixian Formation in China. When cofronted with this fact, YECs would try to counter this by doing a non-sequitor argument by showing the Archaeoraptor fossil to the critics, saying that the fossil is fake and claims that since the fossil is fake, then is all of the other featherd fossils of dinosaurs is fake too. Critics however says that nothing can be further than the truth.

Critics counter this YEC claim by showing to them real story of the fake fossil that's ironicly real when it comes to using 2 valid fossils of dinosaurs and forged them into one.

The Archaeoraptor is really 2 dinosaurs forged into one by a Chinese farmer, a peasant who dug the fossils up and sold it in a black market where illegal fossils are being sold to fossil collectors to add to their private fossil collection. Paleo-artist, Stephen Czerkus, became the unfortunate one of buying the fossil and took it back to the US and began to study it and found that this could be a transitional form of all transitional forms and publishes an article about it in the National Geographic Magazine. The fossil however never appeared in the scientific peer review journals. Yet, it became a sensation a least for awhile. Finding dinosaur fossils with feathers was and still is a very new sensation amongst the dinosaur discoveries. More and more are thrilled and excited to see feathered fossils of dinosaurs and the Archaeoraptor adds to the excitement. But then Stephen made a discovery in the fossil that blew him away. He found that the fossil is nothing more than a forgery...sort of. He found that the fossil is really nothing more than a chimera, two animals that are forged into one. He was fooled. He could not believe he was fooled by that Chinese peasant who sold that fossil to him. Sold to him from a country that have a major problem with illegal selling of fossils. He had to tell the media of what he found and the National Geographic Magazine had to write an apology in a article confessing of how they were fooled by the Chinese peasant's fossil forgery. They never found the peasant who done it. But they did returned the fossil to China where the scientist examine the 2 fossils and found that the fossils were of a Dromaeosaur named Microraptor and a prehistoric loon named Yanornis. Both fossils are real; Both fossils are dinosaurs; Both fossils have feathers. Ironically, even though the Archaeoraptor is fake, the fossils that made up the forgery are definitely real and valid.

This Archaeoraptor story is referenced right .

There are other YEC claims and critiques of birds not being dinosaurs including the alleged skin frill on a Sinosauropteryx fossil claim and the cold-blooded lung claim to name a few of the claims made up by YECs to try to refute the notion of dinosaurs having feathers on their bodies only to be countered by the critics who object to all this. These can all be found on this

And there you have it. All of the known young earth dinosaur fallacies and the critic's responses to them. This is created to get people to be aware of the dinosaur claims that are all made by young earth creationists whom the critics claimed that this is all based on their own interpretations of the Bible and nothing else.

References:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

Latest revision as of 02:47, 22 May 2024

Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Ouranosaurus
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous, Aptian–Albian PreꞒ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Mounted paratype skeleton, Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia 3714
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Ornithischia
Clade: Neornithischia
Clade: Ornithopoda
Clade: Styracosterna
Clade: Hadrosauriformes
Genus: Ouranosaurus
Taquet, 1976
Species: O. nigeriensis
Binomial name
Ouranosaurus nigeriensis
Taquet, 1976

Ouranosaurus is a genus of herbivorous basal hadrosauriform dinosaur that lived during the Aptian stage of the Early Cretaceous of modern-day Niger and Cameroon. Ouranosaurus measured about 7–8.3 metres (23–27 ft) long and weighed 2.2 metric tons (2.4 short tons). Two rather complete fossils were found in the Elrhaz Formation, Gadoufaoua deposits, Agadez, Niger, in 1965 and 1970, with a third indeterminate specimen known from the Koum Formation of Cameroon. The animal was named in 1976 by French paleontologist Philippe Taquet; the type species being Ouranosaurus nigeriensis. The generic name is a combination of ourane, a word with multiple meanings ("an Arabic name that signifies valor, courage, recklessness"; the Tuareg name of the desert monitor given by the Tuareg Berbers of Niger & Algeria), and sauros, the Greek word for lizard. The specific epithet nigeriensis alludes to Niger, its country of discovery (in Latin, the adjectival suffix -iensis means "originating from"). And so, Ouranosaurus nigeriensis could be interpreted as "brave lizard originating from Niger".

Discovery and naming

Location of the Gadoufaoua within Niger

Five French palaeontological expeditions were undertaken in the Gadoufaoua region of the Sahara Desert in Niger between 1965 and 1972 and led by French palaeontologist Philippe Taquet. These deposits come from GAD 5, a layer in the upper Elrhaz Formation of the Tégama Group, which was deposited during the Aptian stage of the Early Cretaceous. On the first expedition, lasting from January–February 1965, eight iguanodontian specimens were discovered at the "niveau des Innocents" site, east of the Emechedoui wells. An additional two skeletons were discovered 7 km (4.3 mi) southeast of Elrhaz in the "Camp des deux Arbres" locality, which were given the field numbers GDF 300 and GDI 381. Both were collected in the February–April 1966 expedition, the former including a nearly complete but scattered skeleton, and the latter a skeleton that was two-thirds preserved. The skeletons then in 1967 were brought to the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle of Paris, where they were prepared. GDF 381 was recategorized with the number MNHN GDF 1700 and then later described in 1999 as the holotype of the new taxon Lurdusaurus arenatus. While the third expedition did not turn up additional iguanodontian material, the fourth in January–March 1970 uncovered a nearly complete and partially articulated skeleton lacking the skull, 4 km (2.5 mi) south of the "niveau des Innocents" site, and was also given the field number GDF 381. This specimen was collected and taken to the MNHN by the fifth expedition in 1972. Following a subsequent Italian-French expedition led by Taquet and Italian palaeontologist Giancarlo Ligabue that turned up a potential additional iguanodontian specimen, Ligabue offered to donate the nearly complete specimen and a skull of Sarcosuchus to the Municipality of Venice, which accepted the offer and subsequently mounted the skeleton in 1975 at the Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia.

Taquet formally described the two mostly-complete specimens MNHN GDF 300 and MNHN GDF 381 from the first and fourth expeditions as Ouranosaurus nigeriensis in 1976, along with a referred coracoid and femur that bore the numbers MNHN GDF 301 and MNHN GDF 302 respectively. MNHN GDF 300 was made the holotype, and was the primary specimen described, including a semi-articulated skull lacking the left maxilla, right quadratojugal and the articulars, almost the entire vertebral column, forelimbs lacking a few hand bones, and most of the right hindlimb and a few bones of the left. Additional description for bones unpreserved in the holotype was based on Taquet's MNHN GDF 381, which was not mentioned as having been sent to Venice and renumbered as MSNVE 3714, although this was confirmed by Italian palaeontologist Filippo Bertozzo and colleagues in 2017. The holotype itself was returned to Niger after being described and having its bones cast and mounted, and is now on display at the Musée National Boubou Hama in Niamey. The generic name Ouranosaurus carries a double meaning, it is both taken from Arabic meaning "valour", "bravery " or "recklessness" and also from the local Tuareg language of Niger where it is the name they call the desert monitor. The specific name refers to Niger, the country of discovery. Taquet had used the name "Ouranosaurus nigeriensis" previously, first in a public presentation of the skeleton MNHN GDF 300 in July 1972, then later in September 1972 in a news article and again in December 1972 in a book; only the book bore any images associated with the name, and none of the earlier mentions had a diagnosis to make the name valid.

Description

Size of Ouranosaurus compared to a human

Ouranosaurus was a relatively large iguanodontian, measuring 7–8.3 metres (23–27 feet) long and weighing 2.2 tonnes (2.4 short tons). The holotype and paratype specimens were suggested to belong to subadults by Bertozzo et al. in 2017, although they would have been close to adult size. MSNVE 3714 is 6.5 m (21 ft) long as mounted, although a few caudals are missing, and is roughly 90% the length of the holotype, which would be 7.22 m (23.7 ft) long. The variation between the sizes fits within the range of variation between adult individuals of Iguanodon, so there is a chance that the larger holotype and smaller paratype were same ontogenetic stage.

Skull

Skull

The skull of Ouranosaurus is 67.0 cm (26.4 in) long. It was rather low, being 24.4 cm (9.6 in) wide and only 26.0 cm (10.2 in) tall. The top of the skull was flat, the highest point being just in front of the orbits and sloping down towards both the rear of the skull and the tip of the snout. This makes Ouranosaurus have the most elongate skull of any non-hadrosaurid, the length being 3.8 times the maximum height, although the skull is proportionally wider than related Mantellisaurus.

Bones of the snout are more loosely articulated with each other than the bones of the posterior skull. The premaxillae are 46.0 cm (18.1 in) long, with very deep external nares as in other iguanodontians. Anteriorly, the premaxillae flare gently laterally into a rugose surface for a beak, like other iguanodontians, although dissimilar from Iguanodon and similar to hadrosaurids the nares are entirely visible from above. Neither premaxilla bears any teeth, although the very anterior tip has "pseudo-teeth" formed by multiple denticles on the margin of the bone. Only the right maxilla of Ouranosaurus is known. although it is well preserved forming a triangle 28.0 cm (11.0 in) long and 11.7 cm (4.6 in) tall, much taller proportionally than Iguanodon. The maxilla bears faces for articulation with the premaxilla in front, lacrimal above, ectopterygoid, vomer, palatine and possibly pterygoid internally, and jugal to the rear. The lacrimal process is the highest point of the maxilla, and behind this process is a smooth and curved margin for the antorbital fenestra, which is bounded by the maxilla in front and below, lacrimal above, and jugal behind. The jugal overlaps only the posterior end of the maxilla, which is unlike hadrosaurids where there is more overlap. The dental edge of the maxilla is slightly arced, and above the toothrow is a shallow depression bearing nutrient foramina, also known as the buccal emargination that is diagnostic of Ornithischia. 20 teeth are preserved in the maxilla, although the anterior end of the toothrow is broken and Taquet (1976) predicted the total number to be 22.

Restoration of the head displaying "nasal protuberances"

Many of the central bones of the skull are the same form as those of hadrosaurids or related iguanodontians like Iguanodon and Mantellisaurus. The jugal below and behind the orbit bears the same shape as in hadrosaurids, with a high rear process, and articulated with the quadratojugal and quadrate that are also very similar to more derived taxa. As in other ornithopods, the postorbital is a tri-radiate bone surrounding sides of the orbit, infratemporal fenestra and supratemporal fenestra. Contact between the postorbital and the parietal excludes the flattened and wide frontals from the supratemporal fenestra. In Ouranosaurus and related taxa the prefrontals are small, and articulates with the broadened and textured lacrimal. Only a single supraorbital was present in Ouranosaurus, which projects into the orbit above the eye. The nasal bones of Ouranosaurus are unique among ornithischians. The bones are unfused suggesting mobility, and at their ends on the top of the skull are rounded domes, which were described by Taquet (1976) as distinct and rugose "nasal protuberances".

The snout was toothless and covered in a horny sheath during life, forming a very wide beak together with a comparable sheath on the short predentary bone at the extreme front of the lower jaws. However, after a rather large diastema with the beak, there were large batteries of cheek teeth on the sides of the jaws: the gaps between the teeth crowns were filled by the points of a second generation of replacement teeth, the whole forming a continuous surface. Contrary to the situation with some related species, a third generation of erupted teeth was lacking. There were twenty-two tooth positions in both lower and upper jaw, for a total of eighty-eight.

Postcranial skeleton

Mounted skeleton cast, ROM

The most conspicuous feature of Ouranosaurus is a large "sail" on its back, supported by long, wide, neural spines, that spanned its entire rump and tail, resembling that of Spinosaurus, a well-known meat-eating dinosaur also known from northern Africa as well as those of the modern Crested chamaeleon (Trioceros cristatus) which has a moderate sail on its back, and to a lesser extent the sail-backed temnospondyl Platyhystrix rugosus. These tall neural spines did not closely resemble those of sail-backed synapsids such as Dimetrodon of the Permian Period as the supporting spines in synapsids become thinner distally, whereas in Ouranosaurus (as well as the afformentioned sail-backed reptiles and amphibians) the spines actually become thicker distally and flatten. The posterior spines were also bound together by ossified tendons, which stiffened the back. Finally, the spine length peaks over the forelimbs.

The first four dorsal vertebrae are unknown; the fifth already bears a 32-centimetre-long spine (1.05 ft) that is pointed and slightly hooked; Taquet presumed it might have anchored a tendon to support the neck or skull. The tenth, eleventh and twelfth spines are the longest, at about 63 cm (25 in). The last dorsal spine, the seventeenth, has a grooved posterior edge, in which the anterior corner of the lower spine of the first sacral vertebra is locked. The spines over the six sacral vertebrae are markedly lower, but those of the tail base again longer; towards the end of the tail the spines gradually shorten.

Dorsal vertebrae

The dorsal "sail" is usually explained as either functioning as a system for thermoregulation or a display structure. An alternative hypothesis is that the back might have carried a hump consisting of muscle tissue or fat, resembling that of a bison or camel, rather than a sail. It could have been used for energy storage to survive a lean season.

The axial column consisted of eleven neck vertebrae, seventeen dorsal vertebrae, six sacral vertebrae and forty tail vertebrae. The tail was relatively short.

The front limbs were rather long with 55% of the length of the hind limbs. A quadrupedal stance would have been possible. The humerus was very straight. The hand was lightly built, short and broad. On each hand Ouranosaurus bore a thumb claw or spike that was much smaller than that of the earlier Iguanodon. The second and third digits were broad and hoof-like, and anatomically were good for walking. To support the walking hypothesis, the wrist was large and its component bones fused together to prevent its dislocation. The last digit (number 5) was long. In related species the fifth finger is presumed to have been prehensile: used for picking food like leaves and twigs or to help lower the food by lowering branch to a manageable height. Taquet assumed that with Ouranosaurus this function had been lost because the fifth metacarpal, reduced to a spur, could no longer be directed sideways.

Restoration of Ouranosaurus nigeriensis based on skeletal diagrams and casts, fossils, and related species

The hindlimbs were large and robust to accommodate the weight of the body and strong enough to allow a bipedal walk. The femur was slightly longer than the tibia. This may indicate that the legs were used as pillars, and not for sprinting. Taquet concluded that Ouranosaurus was not a good runner because the fourth trochanter, the attachment point for the large retractor muscles connected to the tail base, was weakly developed. The foot was narrow with only three toes and relatively long.

In the pelvis, the prepubis was very large, rounded and directed obliquely upwards.

Classification

Taquet originally assigned Ouranosaurus to the Iguanodontidae, within the larger Iguanodontia. However, although it shares some similarities with Iguanodon (such as a thumb spike), Ouranosaurus is no longer usually placed in the iguanodontid family, a grouping that is now generally considered paraphyletic, a series of subsequent offshoots from the main stem-line of iguandontian evolution. It is instead placed in the clade Hadrosauriformes, closely related to the Hadrosauroidea, which contains the Hadrosauridae (also known as "duck-billed dinosaurs") and their closest relatives. Ouranosaurus appears to represent an early specialized branch in this group, showing in some traits independent convergence with the hadrosaurids. It is thus a basal hadrosauriform.

The simplified cladogram below follows an analysis by Andrew McDonald and colleagues, published in November 2010 with information from McDonald, 2011.

Paratype MSNVE 3714 in front view
Iguanodontia

Rhabdodontidae

Tenontosaurus

Dryomorpha

Dryosauridae

Ankylopollexia

Camptosaurus

Styracosterna

Cumnoria

Uteodon

Hippodraco

Theiophytalia

Cedrorestes

Dakotadon

Iguanacolossus

Lanzhousaurus

Hadrosauriformes

Iguanodon

Mantellisaurus

Ouranosaurus

Hadrosauroidea

Paleobiology

Diet

The jaws were apparently operated by relatively weak muscles. Ouranosaurus had only small temporal openings behind the eyes, from which the larger capiti-mandibularis muscle was attached to the coronoid process on the lower jaw bone. Small rounded horns in front of its eyes made Ouranosaurus the only known horned ornithopod. The back of the skull was rather narrow and could not compensate for the lack of a greater area of attachment for the jaw muscle, that the openings normally would provide, allowing for more power and a stronger bite. A lesser muscle, the musculus depressor mandibulae, used to open the lower jaws, was located at the back of the skull and was connected to a strongly projecting, broad and anteriorly oblique processus paroccipitalis. Ouranosaurus probably used its teeth to chew up tough plant food. A diet has been suggested of leaves, fruit, and seeds as the chewing would allow to free more energy from high quality food; the wide beak on the other hand indicates a specialisation in eating large amounts of low quality fodder. Ouranosaurus lived in a river delta.

Histology

Ouranosaurus bears more similarities to other derived iguanodonts than more basal ornithopods. Remodeling is present in the subadult paratype, and high vascular density and circumferential arrangement of the microstructure suggests fast growth. Faster growth occurs in the same phylogenetic groups as higher body size, although their relationship is unclear. Ouranosaurus is a similar size to more basal Tenontosaurus which has slow growth, so either faster growth is caused by body size or Tenontosaurus is the maximum size of an ornithopod with a slow growth rate.

Suchomimus and Nigersaurus in the environment of the Elrhaz Formation

Paleoecology

Ouranosaurus is known from the Elrhaz Formation of the Tegama Group in an area called Gadoufaoua, located in Niger. Only two mostly complete skeletons and up to 3 additional individuals have been found. The Elrhaz Formation consists mainly of fluvial sandstones with low relief, much of which is obscured by sand dunes. The sediments are coarse- to medium-grained, with almost no fine-grained horizons. Ouranosaurus is from the upper portion of the formation, probably Aptian in age. It likely lived in habitats dominated by inland floodplains (a riparian zone).

It has been claimed that the iguanodontian Lurdusaurus and the rebbachisaurid Nigersaurus were the most numerous megaherbivores in the Elrhaz formation, however this runs counter to Taqet and Russel, who state that Ouranosaurus was the "dominant element in the assemblage." Other herbivores from the same formation include Ouranosaurus, Elrhazosaurus, and an unnamed titanosaur. It also lived alongside the theropods Kryptops, Suchomimus, Eocarcharia, and Afromimus. Crocodylomorphs like Sarcosuchus, Anatosuchus, Araripesuchus, and Stolokrosuchus also lived there. In addition, remains of a pterosaur, chelonians, fish, a hybodont shark, and freshwater bivalves have been found. Grass did not evolve until the late Cretaceous.

References

  1. ^ Taquet, P. (1976). "Géologie et Paléontologie du Gisement de Gadoufaoua (Aptien du Niger)" (PDF). Cahiers de Paléontologie. Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris: 1–191. ISBN 2-222-02018-2.
  2. Taquet, P. (1970). "Sur le gisement de Dinosauriens et de Crocodiliens de Gadoufaoua (République du Niger)" (PDF). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série D. 271: 38–40.
  3. ^ Bertozzo, F.; Dalla Vechia, F.M.; Fabbri, M. (2017). "The Venice specimen of Ouranosaurus nigeriensis (Dinosauria, Ornithopoda)". PeerJ. 5: e3403. doi:10.7717/peerj.3403. PMC 5480399. PMID 28649466.
  4. Paul, G.S. (2010). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. pp. 292. ISBN 978-0-691-13720-9.
  5. Butler, R.J.; Upchurch, P.; Norman, D.B. (2008). "The phylogeny of ornithischian dinosaurs". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 6 (1): 1–40. Bibcode:2008JSPal...6....1B. doi:10.1017/S1477201907002271. S2CID 86728076.
  6. ^ Palmer, D., ed. (1999). The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals. London: Marshall Editions. p. 144. ISBN 1-84028-152-9.
  7. Bailey, J.B. (1997). "Neural spine elongation in dinosaurs: sailbacks or buffalo-backs?". Journal of Paleontology. 71 (6): 1124–1146. Bibcode:1997JPal...71.1124B. doi:10.1017/S0022336000036076.
  8. McDonald, A.T.; Kirkland, J.I.; DeBlieux, D.D.; Madsen, S.K.; Cavin, J.; Milner, A.R.C.; Panzarin, L. (2010). Farke, Andrew Allen (ed.). "New Basal Iguanodontians from the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and the Evolution of Thumb-Spiked Dinosaurs". PLOS ONE. 5 (11): e14075. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...514075M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014075. PMC 2989904. PMID 21124919.
  9. Andrew T. McDonald (2011). "The taxonomy of species assigned to Camptosaurus (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda)" (PDF). Zootaxa. 2783: 52–68. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2783.1.4.
  10. ^ Sereno, P. C.; Brusatte, S. L. (2008). "Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 53 (1): 15–46. doi:10.4202/app.2008.0102. hdl:20.500.11820/5d55ed2e-52f2-4e4a-9ca1-fd1732f2f964.
  11. ^ Sereno, P. C.; Wilson, J. A.; Witmer, L. M.; Whitlock, J. A.; Maga, A.; Ide, O.; Rowe, T. A. (2007). "Structural extremes in a Cretaceous dinosaur". PLOS ONE. 2 (11): e1230. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2.1230S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001230. PMC 2077925. PMID 18030355.
  12. Taquet, Philippe; Russell, Dale A. (January 1999). "A massively-constructed iguanodont from Gadoufaoua, lower Cretaceous of Niger". Annales de Paléontologie. 85 (1): 85–96. Bibcode:1999AnPal..85...85T. doi:10.1016/s0753-3969(99)80009-3. ISSN 0753-3969.

Bibliography

External links

Ornithopoda
Avemetatarsalia
Ornithischia
Ornithopoda
    • see below↓
Ornithopoda
Ornithopoda
Hypsilophodontidae?
Elasmaria
Rhabdodontomorpha
Tenontosauridae?
Rhabdodontidae
Dryomorpha
Dryosauridae
Ankylopollexia
Hadrosauriformes
Iguanodontidae
Hadrosauroidea
    • see below↓
Notohypsilodon comodorensis

Rhabdodon priscus

Ouranosaurus nigeriensis
Hadrosauroidea
Hadrosauroidea
Hadrosauridae
Lambeosaurinae
Parasaurolophini
Lambeosaurini
Saurolophinae
Brachylophosaurini
Austrokritosauria
Kritosaurini
Saurolophini
Edmontosaurini
Qianjiangsaurus changshengi

Tlatolophus galorum Lambeosaurus lambei Gryposaurus? alsatei

Shantungosaurus giganteus
Related articles
Ichnotaxa
Ootaxa
Nomina dubia
Other articles
Taxon identifiers
Ouranosaurus
Categories: