Misplaced Pages

User talk:EliasAlucard: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:16, 27 February 2008 editCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 editsm Protected User talk:EliasAlucard: pp to prevent further racist venom and {{unblock}} abuse ← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:01, 13 September 2024 edit undoFastilyBot (talk | contribs)Bots239,264 edits BOT: Some of your contributions may require attention 
(81 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Untitled==
'''''Please note:''' Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please ] if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.''
{{unblock reviewed|I was banned for political reasons, because I wrote "holohoax". Is it specified in the rules that one must adhere to prevailing Holocaust dogma in order to be allowed to edit Misplaced Pages? I'm absolutely serious in asking this question. I'm not trolling or anything. You can't ban someone over a reason like that, it's censorship. A lot of members protested against my ban but I wasn't even given a fair chance to defend myself. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be neutral, it's not neutral to block someone because he doesn't support the Holocaust Industry; this is political censorship. I've been banned for over two years now, completely ignoring the fact that I contributed with a lot of sources and articles. Look, I can easily register a sockpuppet account and successfully edit as much as I want to without ever getting detected. It's not difficult for me to do that. I haven't done this however, and I'm not going to either because I don't believe in such methods. I just want to edit a few articles that badly need sources, under my current username. I don't want to do this from my IP address or under a new account. ] banned me without asking for permission or discussing it with other administrators. And he did it because of political censorship, he didn't act neutrally. ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 03:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)|decline=Of course we can ban Holocaust deniers. Misplaced Pages is dedicated to propagating the truth; holocaust denial is all about propagating lies and hatred. There's a natural incompatibility. Stick with your natural allies, such as Stormfront; you'll be much happier there, as we will never tolerate your particular intellectual aberration here. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 05:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)}}
I was just about to deny this request myself, but Jpgordon beat me to it. You've been community banned--meaning that not just one user, but the entire community, has decided you can't be allowed to edit. Even without that to consider, your history shows you're not capable of interacting in a civil manner with others, so I wouldn't be willing to unblock even without the community ban. ]] 05:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
:The reason given to ban me is anti-intellectual, censorship, and against the ] policy. Turkish members who deny the ] don't get banned here last I checked&mdash;why this double standard? And I can damn well interact in a civil manner with other members, I only don't do that with trolls like ] who was himself banned for a year because of his stupid revert wars. You haven't given a justified reason to ban me. Banning someone because he doesn't believe in the Holocaust is censorship and you're banning me because you're acting on your emotions. Members here don't get banned if they believe the flat or they oppose the recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Misplaced Pages is not about truth, it's about conforming to ad populum beliefs. The Holocaust is only going to get more questioned and examined sooner or later when people are allowed to question it without repercussions, and people like me who get banned and censored over it will be proven right sooner or later, which will make this ban look ridiculous in retrospect. My ban should be taken up to arbitration, it was not done right, and it's clearly one-sided when fanatic Turkish nationalists are given a free reign to edit the Armenian Genocide article. That you fail to realise how politicised Misplaced Pages is, and without shame pretend that Misplaced Pages is about truth, says a lot about the corruption on Misplaced Pages. You have no honour. ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 12:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
::You've just proven the main reason why you were banned. Talk page disabled. ]] 19:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
''Turkish members who deny the Armenian Genocide don't get banned here last I checked—why this double standard?'' This question stays unanswered. Why is one thing allowed but the other not?


Because The United Nations DOES NOT recognize "armenian genocide" as a genocide.
'''Please leave''' messages by using
Most of the Armenian genocide supporters are usually fanatic Germans or extreme right wing nationalists who are ashamed of their past and try to find a Genocide Partner which is totally Disgusting . that’s why nobody trusts people like you or your followers.
EliasAlucard , instead of crying here , be a man and stop pointing fingers at others . <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:56, 4 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Reversion ==


Really bad for many Misplaced Pages-articles. Many Assyrian-related articles have stood still since this block. Elias contributed so much to these articles! ] (]) 13:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Recently you reverted an edit I made with this summary:
<blockquote>''(Revert bloodofox: the Nazis rejected Christianity (see Alfred Rosenberg) and some Nazis also advocated a return to germanic paganism)''</blockquote>


Whilst I find his views abhorrent, this is a flagrant and loathsome usurping of free speech. Misplaced Pages may not be a "government", as someone remarked, but the rules do NOT stipulate that specific beliefs are unwelcome or must not be admitted/spoken of. If this is regarded as suitable justification for a ban... well, as far as I'm concerned this typifies the appalling behaviour of CERTAIN (in other words, not all) "cowboy" admins who appear to possess indemnity from any kind of serious scrutiny or indictment and are seldom questioned for their actions. And - yes, I have actually *seen* this, this isn't some fanciful interpretation, although I'm sure those with an agenda would disagree - if you *do* question them, as I have seen some doing, you are likely setting yourself up for a ban - indefinite or otherwise. I suppose someone will delete this paragraph - no doubt an admin, ha! Thereby proving my point. I have no real involvement in Misplaced Pages, nevertheless, as I am eccentric person (or so others claim), I squander hours trawling through old arbitrations, talk pages (users and articles), ban logs, AfDs, and such, for an insight into the politics of the website. Scintillating stuff. I however did watch this case closely when it occurred. Peace. ] (]) 10:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
This is not true. I'd like to know who you're referring to regarding "Germanic paganism". No Nazi figure advocated a return to Germanic paganism but instead the introduction of a certain form of Germanic Christianity, which goes to the very deepest regions of the SS, the only area where this stuff was even happening in the Third Reich - take a look at ] and his ''Krist''. None of this stuff has anything to do with historical ] and is instead warped Christianity dressed in Wagnerian trappings combined with poor research. ] (]) 12:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:It's true that the Nazis advocated a Germanic form of Christianity (], which was largely de-Judaized and anti-Jewish, see also ]). However, ], a leading Nazi ideologue, rejected Christianity. The same is true for Hitler, when he said: &ldquo;The old beliefs will be brought back to honor again. The whole secret knowledge of nature, of the divine, the demonic. We will wash off the Christian veneer and bring out a religion peculiar to our race.&rdquo; (see also ]). Read It covers aspects of neo-Pagan ideas that circulated in the Nazi German regime. There never was any successful attempt to replace Christianity in the Third Reich, but surely, they idea crossed their mind. Oh and by the way, many neo-Nazis today also reject Christianity because of its Judaic origins, and this is largely due to Hitler himself and his constant likening of Christianity with Bolshevism (in his Table Talk). By the way, you removed sourced content. Have you checked the source? &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 12:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
I'm well familiar with the Third Reich's varied interests in paganism and turn of the century occult ideas, which is no news. What this comes down to is proper wording, the source requires a direct quote. Does it ''say'' that? If so, it needs to be stated that the source states this. ] (]) 12:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:Oh okay. Well, here's the source. I don't have access to the entire article, but if you can read it all, let me know. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 13:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
Unfortunately I can't. I would have solved the problem by just saying that the source claims it however I can't be sure it states it since I don't have access to it. As you probably know, it's easy to warp sources and so I tend to be very critical of poor sourcing. ] (]) 13:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:I agree. That is also why I'm very fond of using the cite web/journal/news/book template, and its very useful quote function, in order to avoid confusion and alleviate collaboration with other Wikipedians. But it might be useful to check out that source, and if the source doesn't corroborate the claim made in the article, it might be good to check up who added this content into the article and perhaps give him a warning for misrepresenting sources. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 13:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
Thank you for your understanding attitude. If I do come across the source at some point, I will correct the impression but in the mean time I don't know what would be the proper tag to note that it cannot be confirmed if that is being stated by the reference or what the deal is with it. I have a personal policy that I do not add any information to Misplaced Pages that is not directly sourced - and sourced solidly - perhaps I ought to look at this template you're talking about. ] (]) 13:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:No problem. Some templates you should look into: {{tl|cite web}} {{tl|cite journal}} {{tl|cite book}} {{tl|cite news}} and some other useful templates: {{tl|verify credibility}} {{tl|specify}} and {{tl|citequote}}. I agree with your personal policy, and that's why I tend to only cite sources that are readily accessible to most people (such as Google Books with preview), or I simply use the quote function when it is books I've checked up in a library. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 13:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
Thanks for that. I will probably get some use out of those. You are, of course, welcome to restore the content if you think there's an appropriate tag for the issue source. ] (]) 13:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


I should add, however, that I may or may not be missing something apropos this particular user. I am familiar with some of their antics, but not others, evidently. Still, the assertion in the unblock request above appears to be that said user was permanently community-banned for his views on the Holocaust, which, whilst totally misguided, should be respected as any other opinion. This whole notion of "community" banning is ridiculous, as it often only involves a miniscule proportion of users, most or all of whom have enmity towards the user in question. Ah well, that's life. ] (]) 10:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
== Assyrian-stub ==


==GRBerry==
I am not as you put it waging war on Assyrian-stub. I am however, holding it to the same standards as other stub types. In the case of historians, such as ], they do not get stub tags based on their field of study. Even if they did, given that he covered a broader topic area than just Assyrian culture and history in his studies, he would get {{tl|MEast-stub}} instead. <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 19:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
At the request of GRBerry, posting this here; can anyone looking at this user also read ]. Thanks!&nbsp;–&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting, Segoe Script;">]]</span><small>&nbsp;16:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
:Yeah yeah, look, I know this is part of your delete the Assyrian stub campaign. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:Any admin considering unblocking this user should first review the user's history and consult with me, the blocking admin. ]] ] 09:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
::Actually, I'm not in favor of deleting Assyrian-stub. While it has been used for POV pushing, and thus unfortunately needs close watching, it is a useful stub for the same reasons as {{tl|Romani-stub}} as the Assyrians are a stateless ethnic group. But that doesn't mean that it becomes a grab bag to glean every remotely related stub article. The situation is similar to that for {{tl|SouthCarolina-stub}}. I'm a proud South Carolinian, but that stub template does not belong on every stub article of a South Carolinian, only those who are notable for things specific to South Carolina. <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 20:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I can finally see your arguement. But it still doesn't make any sense of you nominating it for deletion. Remove it from pages where you don't think it belongs, but why would you want the stub to be deleted as a whole? ] (]) 03:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC) ::So, Will, don't you think it's time for me to get unblocked? I noticed the discussion on GRBerry's ]. Since you blocked me, I think it should be your task to mentor me, because it's pretty much you alone requesting this. ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 00:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
:::How has you behavior changed since you were blocked? For what reason should you be unblocked? ]] ] 00:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
::::So, in your point of view, Caerwine, on what kind of articles do we have legal permission to use this stub before it's considered a felony? John Joseph has written several books on modern Assyrians, he has been involved in the ] controversy, he is an Assyrian (from the ]). If anyone, he should be categorised with this stub. There's also no limit to my knowledge on what sort of stub categories we are allowed and not allowed to use on articles. Stubs are frequently categorised with multiple stubs, and no one complains, unless of course, it's the "CONTROVERSIAL" Assyrian stub. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 08:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::::I won't be discussing much on talk pages from now on. From now on, it'll be 90% pure edits, and that's all. The reason I should be unblocked is because I feel like improving some genetics section (e.g., ], but some other ones too). I can't stand the poor quality (often barely cited too) some sections are in, and it frustrates me not being able to edit them. ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
:::::I didn't nominate this stub for deletion, though I did comment on the debate. As for John Joseph and other stub articles, I'm judging what stub templates are appropriate by what is in the article. The details you mention were not mentioned in the article at the time I deleted the stub template from it. I judge what templates belong on a stub article based on what is already mentioned in the article about the subject. While some of those details you mention do argue for his article being stubbed with that stub, that he is an Assyrian (from the ]) is irrelevant unless he's actually involved in the religious hierarchy. Otherwise, we'd be applying {{tl|RC-bio-stub}} to every stub biography about a Roman Catholic even if all they do is attend mass twice a year. <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 00:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


:::::Please comment on the behavior that caused problems before. What did you do wrong then that you won't do again? ]] ] 01:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
==Eh!==
*Yo right back at ya, my semi-Semitic brotha! Heh, well, it's a cliché, but things are becoming a bit complicated in real life, girl-trouble, education stuff, I don't have the energy for real creative Wiki-nerding right at the moment, but that's temporary, for sure. What articles do you think we're missing? And how's it going? ] (]) 14:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
**Oh I see. Good luck with all that. Well, how about ]? I think the current article could need to be spruced up somewhat. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 11:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


::::::Dear Admin, are you expecting the user you blocked to explain in length the mistakes he made in ''that'' tone? ]] 23:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
==Nokia N96==
:::::::Yes, I am. Can you suggest a better way of asking? ]] ] 23:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
]
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add <code>{{tl|db-author}}</code> to the top of ]. <!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] <sup>] ]</sup> 08:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
==Barsum==
Couldn't find nothing expect this peace of his work ] (]) 16:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
:There are quite a few articles here about him: http://www.bethsuryoyo.com/Code/Articles/Nationalism.html (follow the links) and this source too: http://www.bethsuryoyo.com/images/Articles/Perley/ArDocsDP6.html Could easily make an interesting article out of ] from these sources. I'm just too lazy at the moment. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 17:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::BTW, check out this forum - great place to duke it out with Turks, Kurds, Arabs lol ] (]) 17:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Already checked it out. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 17:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


::::::::"What did you do wrong then that you won't do again" is rubbing it in the face a little - Elias knows well why he was blocked, he has implicitly promised not to do the same mistake again. ]] 00:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
== Chaldean Catholic Category ==
:::::::::I'm looking for an explicit promise. If he doesn't know why he was blocked then he can't easily avoid making he same mistakes again. ]] ] 00:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


::::::::::What "implicit promise"? Not even the slightest acknowledgment from him or apologies for having authored the vicious commentary , replete with Holocaust denials and other garbage. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 04:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Some son of a gun has added a deletion template. I removed it, because there was no discussion regarding it but we should keep an eye on it. Add it to our increasing list of articles attacked by people with nothing better to do. ] (]) 23:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
:lol, that's for all religious categories though. See for instance ]. Don't take it too personal :) ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 11:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


:::::::::::''I won't be discussing much on talk pages from now on'' - Implies that he will not be speaking with "vicious commentary" that you mentioned. He has also shown his intentions on what to edit, which is the Assyrian Genetics section. He has expressed self-control in asking the person who blocked him to mentor him. ]] 04:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
:: ], I've already began sacking towns and deporting people from Lebanon to Iraq. ] (]) 22:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


::::::::::::''Please comment on the behavior that caused problems before. What did you do wrong then that you won't do again?'' &mdash; I got blocked for writing "]" during a heated discussion in which ] was involved (who, probably, will be blocked soon, for being a trouble user fishing for problems: ). During my almost one year block, I've had time to cool off, and reflect on my blocking incident. I've come to understand that, Misplaced Pages is, to some extent, fiercely opposed to free speech. In the words of ] on my talk page: '''“Misplaced Pages isn't a government, you do not have a right to free speech here”'''.<sup></sup> (as if questioning and/or doubting the Holocaust was allowed by some governments). There is of course a double standard in all this. Wikipedians (mostly of Turkish descent) who question the ] and ], don't get blocked (and neither should they be blocked, either, because it shouldn't be a ] to be of a different opinion on any historical event). This indicates that Misplaced Pages is fairly politicised as an Encyclopedia and in no way allows neutral editors on the ] article. But I can't recall ever having edited the Holocaust article, and I'm not about to start any time soon, because it simply doesn't interest me enough. Looking back, at my so called "behavior", I think it was obvious that I needed a break from Wiki, and that I perhaps had gotten too emotional on the discussion pages. I've had my break, and it's been almost an entire year. Aside from that, in all my ], I think you owe me an apology for blocking me indefinitely. I also think it's your responsibility Will, to mentor me, if you can't find anyone else who wants to mentor me. You being the one who blocked me indefinitely, it's only fair the task should be up to you, because you seem to be the only one who is requesting this. What I won't do again is to raise any critical thought, opinion or dissidence against the Holocaust. This is apparently forbidden here on Misplaced Pages, and chances are you will get blocked indefinitely for it. I really ought to boycott Misplaced Pages on general principle for this, and many established Wikipedians who understand the importance of free speech in this day and age, very rightly so, protested against my block. Now, all that being said, I promise to behave this time around, because I'm interested in contributing with high quality edits on several ] entries here on Misplaced Pages (I've been reading lots of genetics related articles on ] as a good waste of time, and frankly it's annoying me that I can't improve some sections that are lacking in quality). ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 08:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
==Your recent edits==
:::::::::::::Thank you for your response. I have posted this question for community input. ] It should be resolved within a couple of days. ]] ] 09:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the ], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 10:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::::::::::''I am not inclined to mentor him and in light of this response I am no longer sure that unblocking, even with mentoring, is a good idea. Is there a consensus for unblocking? If so, should there be a mentorship or other constraints?'' &mdash; Why do you want to keep me blocked? ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 09:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
As your block log indicates, I blocked the account for "racist rants, incivility, POV pushing, edit warring, disruption". My concern is that there would be more of the same. Let's see what others think. ]] ] 09:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
:Your concern is a snap judgement. I've told you, I want to get unblocked because some articles are in a poor condition and need improvement. I have no interest in wasting time on talk page discussions more than I have to. I wasn't causing any disruption either, ] was the sole driving force behind all that disruption (as his block log shows, since I've been gone; ). And racism? How can you be concerned "that there would be more of the same", when you haven't even given me a chance to actually edit? ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 10:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
::''Your first act of mentoring should be showing him how to better fake sincerity.''<sup></sup> &mdash; ]. I can't believe this. "Fake sincerity". Fake and sincerity in the same sentence, as if such an oxymoron would somehow not be contradictful, and these guys are telling me I don't get it? ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 13:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
*Nine editors agreed unanimously that the block should not be lifted, and the thread is now marked as resolved. You may be interested in working on other project or wikis instead. Conservapedia, for example, may be a better match. ]] ] 20:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
**Then you take this to ArbCom, which is standard procedure. You don't take this to WP:ANI, because ANI isn't supposed to decide on such issues without thorough discussion. ]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 21:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
***You can submit an appeal by sending it to any ArbCom member via email. (arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org) ]] ] 21:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


''Conservapedia, for example, may be a better match'' - please, stop the sniping. It is quite ironic that this is being said against Elias, a user who has contributed a lot of verifiable information during his time on Misplaced Pages. Its also funny that you mention Conservapedia, considering how obsessive they are with blocking users who try to correct articles. ]] 07:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
== Template:Assyrian-stub ==


== TfD nomination of ] ==
I separated my last edit into two separate edits. The first dealt with cleaning up the wikicode in the template, while the second dealt with the flag, since unfortunately you are likely to revert it again. If you wish this taken to mediation, please do so. It's not a major enough problem to me that I feel the need to do so. Stub templates do not require icons, and when they are potentially controversial, they are discouraged. Non-state flags generally encounter controversy. The available information I have indicates that while the Assyrian Universal Alliance is the largest and most wide spread Assyrian organization, it is not the sole one, nor one that all Assyrian organizations associate themselves with. As such, using the flag of the AUA to represent all Assyrian people makes a POV statement. That is my concern with using the AUA flag as the icon for this stub template, not an anti-Assyrian agenda as you have alleged that I have. My concerns over this stub have been solely those that I apply to all stub types. <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 19:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> &nbsp;—&nbsp;]<sub>&nbsp;(]/])</sub> 15:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
:The controversy regarding the Assyrian flag has nothing to do with AUA. AUA designed the flag, yes. It is today accepted as the national Assyrian flag. The "controversy," which you keep referring to, and picked up from ], has to do with the fact that the ], aspire a national homeland currently occupied, by among other, Turkey. That is the entire reason ] wants to delete the stub because it uses the Assyrian flag. He's probably Turkish and wants it deleted because of that. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 22:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:: Accepted by whom? What of non-Christians of the region who also claim the heritage of the Ancient Assyrians? That's one reason I was in favor of splitting out Ancient Assyria to a separate stub type. If Assyrian-stub dealt with only the modern Assyrian people, it would be far less problematic in any number of ways, including the flag icon. As for the usage of the flag by ], dealing with ] is more than WikiProjecting for me and stub templates are within the purview of that project moreso than other Wikiprojects that make use of the stub types developed for them. (You may wish to also take note of my reply to the previous discussion on Assyrian-stub above.) <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 00:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:::''Accepted by whom?'' &mdash; By the modern ]. ''What of non-Christians of the region who also claim the heritage of the Ancient Assyrians?'' &mdash; They don't count, because their numbers are very few and insignificant. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 22:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::::That opinion is precisely what makes the use of the AUA flag for a stub with the current scope of Assyrian-stub controversial. As for the map icon you finally chose, it's a little bland at stub icon size, but other than that, not a problem. Hopefully, when the *.png map is turned into an *.svg map as suggested, the map maker will chose colors that have greater contrast. <span style="font-family:cursive">]</span> ] 01:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


==] nomination of ]==
==Join us==
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ].
Hi Elias


If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 19:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
There is something much different i.e. more serious than Misplaced Pages - http://en.citizendium.org/Main_Page. All we here are serious professionals - with known personal names, biographies, and with serious and sincere wish to build a true online encyclopedia. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hello. Thanks for the invite. I've actually been contemplating on joining Citizendium, but I don't know if I have enough credentials to be allowed to edit. From what I understand, Citizendium is more or less an elite encyclopaedia. I would really like to edit Citizendium though. My rationale for why Citizendium is the next best thing is because it's less ] than Misplaced Pages, which means, in the long run, higher quality; in other words, quality over quantity, and I like that about Citizendium. I especially like that they don't allow anonymous IPs to edit, which means less vandalism and similar nonsense. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 15:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


== File:Helen Slater Supergirl.png listed for deletion ==
== "Cultural nationalism" ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 12:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


==] nomination of ]==
I've posted a question at ] that you may be able to answer. It concerns an edit of yours. Thanks. ] (]) 22:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ].


If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 06:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
== Re: Jewish title ==


==] nomination of ]==
Please speak with the deleting admin: <span class="plainlinks">] (] <small>•</small> ] <small>•</small> <font color="002bb8"></font> <small>•</small> <font color="002bb8"></font> <small>•</small> <font color="002bb8"></font> <small>•</small> <font color="002bb8"></font>)</span><!-- {{admin}} -->. Cheers. --] (]) 22:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ].


If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 07:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
== Yay drama ==


== Unites States of America listed at ] ==
]. Who knew that the BLP policy is racist... ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 00:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Unites States of America'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
:What? How is ] racist? &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 00:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::Well, the user's saying that you're anti-Semetic. The link I followed took me straight to you quoting the second paragraph from BLP. (and I'm being a bit sarcastic in my original post to you). ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 00:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Oh okay. Well, it's no big deal really. I even removed it as off topic, but ] restored it and just kept asking for it. It's his own fault really. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 00:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
:::: I hate to involve myself, but to be fair, you really shouldn't use comments like "If you feel offended every single time someone is critical of Jews, such as Kevin MacDonald, you have a serious emotional problem, ''or, you're probably Jewish''." That should be considered uncivil, and you don't need to attack him in that way. If you read your paragraph, you'll see that you could have made the same point without it. -- ] (]) 06:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
:::::Yeah sure, BUT, he made a lot more uncivil comments afterwards. Besides, he's not getting offended, only pretending to be. He was even laughing around afterwards. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 13:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== The Socratic barnstar ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <sup>'']''</sup> 21:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
{| style="border: 1px solid #999999; background-color: #FFFFFF}; width:100%;"
== Accadian listed at ] ==
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
]
|rowspan="2" |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 05:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#9D741A; font-family:Comic Sans MS, Arial, Helvetica;" | '''The Socratic Barnstar'''
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
|-
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article ''']''' is being considered for ]. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at ] until a ] is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the ] which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of ].
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Good job for your contributions at ] while keeping cool. It takes exceptional courage and integrity to stand up against accusations of hate. Keep up the good work. ] (]) 03:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
|}
Thanks man. Thumbs up! &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 03:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, ''please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article''— doing so may be considered an act of ] and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you!<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 11:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
== Stay off my talk page ==
== Legendary Dark Knight listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 22:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
== The Legendary Dark Knight Sparda listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
== Legendary Dark Knight Sparda listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
== The Legendary Dark Knight listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
== PLAYSTATION®3 listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''PLAYSTATION®3'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 06:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
I do not want anti-Semites posting on my talk page. Post on the relevant pages, or other users pages. I do not want you on my talk page. Your posts will be removed immediately. ] (]) 15:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
<blockquote>No evidence of notability. Possibly could be included in ]</blockquote>
:If you don't want me defending myself on your talk page, then quit talking shit about me behind my back. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 15:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:: ...as a note, users are allowed to remove discussions from their own talk pages, per ]. <font color="#CC0000" size="-2">] | ] | ]</font> 15:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
:::What part of are you having difficulty comprehending?! I'll "talk shit" about you anywhere I please. Do not get belligerent with me. ] (]) 15:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
::::Note to ]: I think it's time to block ] here in order to cool him off. Despite several warnings, he's been calling me a lot of stuff (among others, "antisemitic loser"), and now he's saying that he'll continue doing this everywhere he wants. He definitely needs a 72 hours block (and some anger management). &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 15:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::::: Taking no sides here, there are rampant issues with ] on both sides. I suggest both users cool down, edit other articles, and come back with a cleared head. <font color="#CC0000" size="-2">] | ] | ]</font> 18:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
:I don't know that I'm taking his ''side'' - I advised him on how to do what he wants to do in an effective manner, rather than the way he was doing it - and told him, also, not to call you a Nazi. You can be sure, though, that I won't be taking your side. I'm Jewish and Zionist, after all, so why would you want me on your side? ]] 16:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
::''I'm Jewish and Zionist, after all, so why would you want me on your side?'' &mdash; That's the exact reason I told you not to take his side. I want you to be impartial in this dispute (and so far, you have been too, and you deserve credit for that). There's a political agenda going on here on Misplaced Pages to slander and misrepresent anyone who is critical of anything, and academics critical of Jews are not excluded. I don't hate you for being Zionist and Jewish (in fact, I have always believed that Israel deserves to exist as a Jewish state because Arabs have more land than they can handle). That doesn't mean that I think Jews should be exempt from valid criticism whenever there exists a need for it. I hope you get what I'm saying and realise that this is not "hatred", and that we can act like adults here in this matter. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 16:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:::Your comment directly above, taken in complete isolation, is reasonable. No fact of background or circumstances exempts a person, group of people or government from valid criticism (except infants!). The point where we depart company is on the issue of what constitutes "valid criticism" - along with the habit of lumping "Jews and Zionists" together as a monolith, as if we all had exactly the same views and supported everything all the others did. In any event, I haven't done an in depth review of your history here. I suggested to Bloodlesthecat that he do so if he finds it necessary, and post his findings at AN/I for review. Hopefully, for your sake (and not "your" as in "you on Misplaced Pages"), there is nothing requiring further attention. ]] 16:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
::::No of course not all Jews should be viewed as a monolithic. There are many good, reasonable and decent Jews out there. But, many Jews, and especially the politically organised Jews &ndash; often Zionists in nature &ndash; abuse their political influence and get away with it. And they get away with it, by slandering people like ], and that's where I react. I don't think MacDonald hates Jews and he does bring up some healthy criticism on Jewish power, which I recommend Jews to read because they might learn a thing or two about it. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 17:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:::::Also, I should point out - if you expect to be taken seriously on any issue of any sort at any point in the future, you should leave Stormfront and disavow your participation there. Take it as a lesson learned - in order to maintain your credibility, you shouldn't associate with a cadre composed mostly of bigots and Nazi-wannabes. ]] 16:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::As I said, I registered spontaneously on Stormfront for the sake of replying to (I'm Assyrian) which is negative propaganda by Megalommatis. I couldn't post anything though for at least three days, so I didn't bother. After a while I participated in some discussions and that's about it. I am not affiliated with those guys and I consider most of them to be hypocritical immature dipshits (even though, they are capable of making a few good points every now and then). I have, however, intended to start a few threads later on and criticise some of their hypocrisy about Social Darwinism and stuff like that, and see if they can put up with an honest debate without banning me for being Assyrian. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 17:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
==Reverting talk page discussion relevant to Wikiquette complaint==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> — ] ] 19:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
See . I am reverting per admin's instructions: "Archive: take out of archive if you wish." Stop deleting it. ] (]) 23:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
== Human Face Fish listed at ] ==
:He said clearly, that you should revert if you feel there's anything to discuss. Obviously, you're not discussing. You just want other Wikipedians to see what a nasty "Nazi supporter" I am, like anyone seriously cares. Stop restoring it if you're not going to discuss anything. It was archived by admin because he felt it didn't lead anywhere. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 23:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
]
::I've discussed it extensively, and it's posted for others to review and discuss. Stop suppressing it--not my fault you filled a talk page with anti-Semitic rants. ] (]) 02:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Human Face Fish'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> '''&thinsp;&mdash;'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;(])&nbsp;(])&thinsp; 04:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
:::And it's not my fault either that I posted some very needed truth on the talk page. I'm not trying to "hide" it. It's just not relevant and it was archived by an admin. He told you to unarchive it if you had anything to discuss. You don't have anything to discuss and there's no point in unarchiving it because no one is interested in discussing it anyway. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 02:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Battle of Hattin ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> &ndash;&nbsp;] (]) 21:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey, someone before you vandalized this article to state that saladin had only 3,000 men whilst the crusaders had about 15,000. I know that you don't endorseull shit dude, so heads up!
== Religion of Peace™ listed at ] ==
:What? I've never edited the ] article. You sure you haven't mistaken me for somebody else? &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 02:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Religion of Peace™'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as ], to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered to be ] and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Under ], the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the ''']'''.
:: Oh wait... forgive me, but your name is not in the history page. Wierd. I thought I saw it. Pah-khal-ta my friend.] (]) 06:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 22:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
==]==
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Please note: '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Please do not make them. It is your responsibility to foster and maintain a positive online community in Misplaced Pages.'''


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Some suggestions:
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 02:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
== "Azerbadzjan" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <b>]</b><i>]</i><small><sub>]</sub></small> 08:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
== "Dzjugasjvili" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="display:inline-block;text-align:center;vertical-align:bottom;line-height:0.5em;">~~<nowiki/>~~<br/><span style="font-size:0.7em;">] (])</span></span> 10:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
== "DUALSHOCK®3" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
* Discuss the article, not the subject;
* Discuss the edit, not the editor;
* Never suggest a view is invalid simply because of who its proponent is;
* If you feel attacked, do not attack back. ] <small>]</small> 04:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== ] ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family: Bahnschrift SemiBold; background-color: #7B9274; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">]</span><sup>]</sup> 17:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
] You have recently recreated or reposted material {{ #if: Category:Wagnerites | at ]}} which previously was deleted in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an ] or '''you may be ]''' from editing. We ask that you respect ]. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent ]. <!-- Template:Recreated --> ]&nbsp;]&brvbar;] 04:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
== Blocked ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> - ] ] 02:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


==] has been nominated for discussion==
<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72h|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72h'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:racist rants|'''racist rants'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 21:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
This is your ''final'' warning. Racist ] and ] have no place on Misplaced Pages. You are setting yourself up for an indefinite block, I strongly suggest you reconsider. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 05:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
: ]. ] (]) 06:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
::Aye. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 16:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
==Unblock==
{{unblock reviewed|1=This block is ridiculous, one-sided, and done in the name of political correctness. Kevin B. MacDonald has stated that he is completely agnostic on the Holocaust, which means he might very well consider it to be Holohoax and he also testified on behalf of David Irving (a convicted "Holocast denier"). Just because I wrote that on his article's talk page, it doesn't mean that I should get a block for it. Also, why isn't User:Boodlesthecat blocked too for at least 72 hours? He's been WP:STALKing me on and off Wiki, he's been calling me all sorts of names instead of focusing on working and improving the article. This certainly is against Misplaced Pages's WP:CIVIL policy. He's been calling me Nazi several times despite that I'm not a Nazi. I called User:White Cat a Nazi once in a heated discussion and got a block instantly. Admins here have been very lenient on User:Boodlesthecat since they tacitly agree with him, and they've chosen side because they just can't stay neutral on the matter. And it's not a "racist rant" to write "Holohoax". That's not about race. The entire Holocaust, though certainly Jews did get killed in World War 2, is gravely abused now 70 years later. Benyamin Netanyahu, instead of taking responsibility for Israel's warmongering, accuses ethnic Europeans of trying to remove their "guilt" over the Holocaust when they criticise Israel over what the Jews are doing against the Palestinians and the Lebanese people. Blatant mind-insulting racist (racism against Europeans) nonsense like that coming from a politically influential Jew like Netanyahu, deserves ridicule. Bottom line is, this block is politically motivated. I did not vandalise any article, and I've been cool all the time when being insulted with heavily loaded charges and personal attacks from a user who should have been blocked. But it's all okay and justified by User:Boodlesthecat being on the "good side". This is ridiculous. I should be unblocked and given an apology for mistreatment. Also, I got blocked without discussion despite that User:Haemo protested against my block. Also, I didn't even get a fair chance to defend myself.|decline=It is clear you make too many political judgements, holohoax being an example. Learn from this, if you can't quote it don't say it. — ] ] 16:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)}}
==Second Unblock request==
{{unblock reviewed|1=This block is ridiculous, one-sided, and done in the name of political correctness. Kevin B. MacDonald has stated that he is completely agnostic on the Holocaust, which means he might very well consider it to be Holohoax and he also testified on behalf of David Irving (a convicted "Holocast denier"). Just because I wrote that on his article's talk page, it doesn't mean that I should get a block for it. Also, why isn't User:Boodlesthecat blocked too for at least 72 hours? He's been WP:STALKing me on and off Wiki, he's been calling me all sorts of names instead of focusing on working and improving the article. This certainly is against Misplaced Pages's WP:CIVIL policy. He's been calling me Nazi several times despite that I'm not a Nazi. I called User:White Cat a Nazi once in a heated discussion and got a block instantly. Admins here have been very lenient on User:Boodlesthecat since they tacitly agree with him, and they've chosen side because they just can't stay neutral on the matter. And it's not a "racist rant" to write "Holohoax". That's not about race. The entire Holocaust, though certainly Jews did get killed in World War 2, is gravely abused now 70 years later. Benyamin Netanyahu, instead of taking responsibility for Israel's warmongering, accuses ethnic Europeans of trying to remove their "guilt" over the Holocaust when they criticise Israel over what the Jews are doing against the Palestinians and the Lebanese people. Blatant mind-insulting racist (racism against Europeans) nonsense like that coming from a politically influential Jew like Netanyahu, deserves ridicule. Bottom line is, this block is politically motivated. I did not vandalise any article, and I've been cool all the time when being insulted with heavily loaded charges and personal attacks from a user who should have been blocked. But it's all okay and justified by User:Boodlesthecat being on the "good side". This is ridiculous. I should be unblocked and given an apology for mistreatment. Also, I got blocked without discussion despite that User:Haemo protested against my block. Also, I didn't even get a fair chance to defend myself.|decline=You must see the irony of posting a rant about race when that is the exact reason you were blocked. Take the time to cool off and think about this kind of behavior. Additionally, ] ''has'' . — <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 16:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)}}
* I endorse this continued block. ] (]) 17:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
::I can't endorse a block this short for someone who has such a long block log and has already been warned about this type of behavior. <font color="green">]</font> 23:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
*Normally racist rants questioning an unquestionable fact aren't the best way to contest a block. In fact, it might (and perhaps should) get your block extended. Just my $0.02. ] ]] 23:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
*I agree. Based on the numerous blocks this user has already received, this block should have been longer. The user's unblock requests don't show any recognition of error or intent to change. ]] ] 23:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
]
*I'm not the one being "racist" here. Misplaced Pages has a serious problem with free speech. I'm not posting "racist rants". I was discussing a forbidden topic on ]. No one gets blocked here for "Islamophobia", why the double standards? &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 23:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Indef block ==
<blockquote>'''The article hasn't seen any major edits to it since its initial creation in the late 2000's, and information on the subject is scarce online leading to a lack of sources.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
{{indefblock}} ]] ] 00:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Strongly support''' this action, though I would recommend AN/I-ing this one, just to be sure. ] ]] 00:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
**I've re-opened the thread at ]. ]] ] 00:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Also strongly suport'''. However, I fear AN/I might widen the drama, but it's up to Will. <font color="green">]</font> 00:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Amen''' ''']''' <sub>(])</sub> 00:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' why an indefinite block all of a sudden? At the very least, block him for the time that was previously established, and see what happens afterwards. Elias has contributed a lot to Misplaced Pages, expressing his own POV on a talk page, whatever it is, shouldn't be enough to get him banned forever. ] (]) 01:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
**Thanks man. Finally someone with some honesty. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 01:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== Unblock this lame block ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
{{unblock reviewed|1=I've been blocked indefinitely by Will here above. I think this is an unfair block. I've been a member on Misplaced Pages for over three years. During these years, I've created MANY articles which have grown into good articles. I've provided a lot of scholarly sources in many articles, and I've generally speaking, had a good flow in the articles I've worked with. At the very least, I deserve some credit. This indefinite block is due to politically incorrect opinions. Arguably, it's a thought control thing. Look, I can easily come back here with new accounts, at any given day of the week. But I don't want to do that because I don't believe in sockpuppetry. To justify this indefinite block, Will gave an example of me discussing the Holocaust on Talk:David Duke, where I disregarded the Zyclon B gassing as nonsense, and gave a parallel of the debunked myth that "the Nazis made soap out of Jews". So what? Big deal. Are you not allowed to have opinions here on Misplaced Pages? Politically incorrect as they may be, you can't shut out members with this rationale, because it really makes an example out of yourselves and how much you advocate a thought control encyclopaedia. And look, "Holocaust denial" or whatever you want to call it, is the future anyway. People are eventually going to realise and wake up that much of the so called Holocaust is a complete fraud. Of course Jews were murdered in the second world war, but I hate to break it down to you, it's simply not the truth we've been indoctrinated with at school, and it's about time people wake up from this poor joke. Norman Finkelstein has been leading in criticism of the Holocaust, and more and more people are disregarding Holocaust dogma nowadays. You block me over writing "Holohoax" on a talk page, you only make an example out of yourselves what kind of pathetic intolerant dipshits you are. This block, is unacceptable and it's politically motivated. Where does it stop though? Because this clearly says a lot about Misplaced Pages and how unreliable Misplaced Pages actually is. When you block me over having "unpopular opinions", you are really just showing Misplaced Pages's own POV problems. Misplaced Pages simply won't tell the truth in politically controversial articles because only one-sided editors are allowed to work on them and the ones who have unfavourable views get blocked indefinitely. Welcome to the new totalitarian 1984, in which Misplaced Pages serves as the propaganda machine.|decline=As amusing as that rant was....this "pathetic intolerant dipshit" is unable to see a valid unblock request in that mass of text. Denied. — <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 01:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)}}
Well it's good that you at the very least realise that you are a dipshit. By the way, what's going to happen with my talk pages and archives? Are they going to get deleted? &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 01:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
:It's uncommon to delete a talk page. More likely the pages might be blanked or just left as is. ]] ] 01:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::I've seen both user pages and talk pages get deleted (as in their history). I'd like mine to stay untouched. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 01:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>


'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Endorse this block as well - if Misplaced Pages is considered unreliable by someone who believes the Holocaust is a fraud, then so be it and I can't say it doesn't make me happy. Misplaced Pages isn't a government, you do not have a right to free speech here, your presence has become disruptive and it has become evident that you insist on expressing "opinions" which, while your opinions, have no place here. We block racists, pedophiles, and now Holocaust deniers. Tell your friends. ]] 01:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*I was just preparing to write something very similar. Instead, I'll just say, "Ditto that." ] ]] 01:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Avruch, you should add Jews to that category. I hear they're racists too. Arguably also genocide deniers since they've covered up the genocide of the ]. But of course, you as a Jew are going to endorse this block. I didn't expect otherwise. Your vote shouldn't count because you are biased in this matter. Thanks for bunching me together with racists and pedophiles. I think that's a flattering insult, but compared to Zionists they're good company. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 01:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
*Again, it's just his own POV, as expressed on a talk page, not in an article. Also, he's not denying the Holocaust took place as far as I could see, but details of it. People can deny for example the Armenian genocide all they want on talk pages here, but they can't question the details of the Jewish genocide. That's a double standard, and I'm kind of sad to see Misplaced Pages take the side of a specific POV through its admins.

If denial of genocide is a bannable offense, it should apply to any genocide. ] (]) 01:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
**Well what do you expect, Funky? These are all pathetic Judaized admins. They have no honour anyway and the sad part is that they think they're the good guys. By the way funky, I highly recommend you to read the ]. Don't worry though, in time, this Holocaust disease will disappear from peoples minds. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 01:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>r
***Note the anti-semitism and Holocaust denial. These types need indef-ed with the pedophiles. ] ]] 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:::It is not the Holocaust denial that you are being blocked for. Rather, it is the disruptive behavior in which you are editing - ie personal attacks and uncivil commentary.. --] (]) 02:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::::Nonsense, my edits haven't been disruptive. Surely, there has been some content disputes, but they've all been in good faith from my part. I keep my personal POV out as best as I can in articles. On talk pages, I'm honest about where I stand on the subject. And again, it's not antisemitism. I don't hate Jews. I just think many of them are hypocrites in politics. That's all. My block here however is because of the Holycaust. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 02:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
::::*As I said, Holocaust deniers are one (short, very short) step above pedophiles. ] ]] 02:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
*I myself don't have an issue with the traditional Holocaust narrative, only how it has been exploited subsequently, so I won't take sides in the actual debate, but I do believe in free speech (which would apply on talk pages here on Misplaced Pages), and that's why I don't think people should be banned for their views alone.

By the way, it doesn't seem like Elias has been indefinitely blocked for his style of editing alone, he was accused of making "racist rants". ] (]) 02:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

:Actually, the block log states ''racist rants, incivility, POV pushing, edit warring, disruption''. A quick glance over this talk page illustrates that the log is correct. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 02:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::Define "racist"? It's not racism to speak the truth on how Jews are (i.e., that they are the biggest racists). It's popularly called racism however, but that's a fallacy. As far as incivility goes, what the hell? You've blocked me indefinitely. Don't expect me to turn the other cheek when I get treated like shit over nothing. &mdash; <small><small>]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] 02:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
*Didn't check that, simply read what was stated on this page. Again, Elias has contributed a lot to articles here, unrelated to the Holocaust and similar, shouldn't his high level of positive contributions be taken into account? ] (]) 02:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:*No. When you reveal yourself as a blatant, POV-pushing, incivil racist, it's over. ] ]] 02:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:01, 13 September 2024

Untitled

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EliasAlucard (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was banned for political reasons, because I wrote "holohoax". Is it specified in the rules that one must adhere to prevailing Holocaust dogma in order to be allowed to edit Misplaced Pages? I'm absolutely serious in asking this question. I'm not trolling or anything. You can't ban someone over a reason like that, it's censorship. A lot of members protested against my ban but I wasn't even given a fair chance to defend myself. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be neutral, it's not neutral to block someone because he doesn't support the Holocaust Industry; this is political censorship. I've been banned for over two years now, completely ignoring the fact that I contributed with a lot of sources and articles. Look, I can easily register a sockpuppet account and successfully edit as much as I want to without ever getting detected. It's not difficult for me to do that. I haven't done this however, and I'm not going to either because I don't believe in such methods. I just want to edit a few articles that badly need sources, under my current username. I don't want to do this from my IP address or under a new account. Will Beback banned me without asking for permission or discussing it with other administrators. And he did it because of political censorship, he didn't act neutrally. EliasAlucard / Discussion 03:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Of course we can ban Holocaust deniers. Misplaced Pages is dedicated to propagating the truth; holocaust denial is all about propagating lies and hatred. There's a natural incompatibility. Stick with your natural allies, such as Stormfront; you'll be much happier there, as we will never tolerate your particular intellectual aberration here. --jpgordon 05:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was just about to deny this request myself, but Jpgordon beat me to it. You've been community banned--meaning that not just one user, but the entire community, has decided you can't be allowed to edit. Even without that to consider, your history shows you're not capable of interacting in a civil manner with others, so I wouldn't be willing to unblock even without the community ban. Blueboy96 05:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The reason given to ban me is anti-intellectual, censorship, and against the WP:NPOV policy. Turkish members who deny the Armenian Genocide don't get banned here last I checked—why this double standard? And I can damn well interact in a civil manner with other members, I only don't do that with trolls like Boodlesthecat who was himself banned for a year because of his stupid revert wars. You haven't given a justified reason to ban me. Banning someone because he doesn't believe in the Holocaust is censorship and you're banning me because you're acting on your emotions. Members here don't get banned if they believe the flat or they oppose the recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Misplaced Pages is not about truth, it's about conforming to ad populum beliefs. The Holocaust is only going to get more questioned and examined sooner or later when people are allowed to question it without repercussions, and people like me who get banned and censored over it will be proven right sooner or later, which will make this ban look ridiculous in retrospect. My ban should be taken up to arbitration, it was not done right, and it's clearly one-sided when fanatic Turkish nationalists are given a free reign to edit the Armenian Genocide article. That you fail to realise how politicised Misplaced Pages is, and without shame pretend that Misplaced Pages is about truth, says a lot about the corruption on Misplaced Pages. You have no honour. EliasAlucard / Discussion 12:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
You've just proven the main reason why you were banned. Talk page disabled. Blueboy96 19:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Turkish members who deny the Armenian Genocide don't get banned here last I checked—why this double standard? This question stays unanswered. Why is one thing allowed but the other not?

Because The United Nations DOES NOT recognize "armenian genocide" as a genocide. Most of the Armenian genocide supporters are usually fanatic Germans or extreme right wing nationalists who are ashamed of their past and try to find a Genocide Partner which is totally Disgusting . that’s why nobody trusts people like you or your followers. EliasAlucard , instead of crying here , be a man and stop pointing fingers at others . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.30.210 (talk) 00:56, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


Really bad for many Misplaced Pages-articles. Many Assyrian-related articles have stood still since this block. Elias contributed so much to these articles! Shmayo (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Whilst I find his views abhorrent, this is a flagrant and loathsome usurping of free speech. Misplaced Pages may not be a "government", as someone remarked, but the rules do NOT stipulate that specific beliefs are unwelcome or must not be admitted/spoken of. If this is regarded as suitable justification for a ban... well, as far as I'm concerned this typifies the appalling behaviour of CERTAIN (in other words, not all) "cowboy" admins who appear to possess indemnity from any kind of serious scrutiny or indictment and are seldom questioned for their actions. And - yes, I have actually *seen* this, this isn't some fanciful interpretation, although I'm sure those with an agenda would disagree - if you *do* question them, as I have seen some doing, you are likely setting yourself up for a ban - indefinite or otherwise. I suppose someone will delete this paragraph - no doubt an admin, ha! Thereby proving my point. I have no real involvement in Misplaced Pages, nevertheless, as I am eccentric person (or so others claim), I squander hours trawling through old arbitrations, talk pages (users and articles), ban logs, AfDs, and such, for an insight into the politics of the website. Scintillating stuff. I however did watch this case closely when it occurred. Peace. 124.168.214.118 (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

I should add, however, that I may or may not be missing something apropos this particular user. I am familiar with some of their antics, but not others, evidently. Still, the assertion in the unblock request above appears to be that said user was permanently community-banned for his views on the Holocaust, which, whilst totally misguided, should be respected as any other opinion. This whole notion of "community" banning is ridiculous, as it often only involves a miniscule proportion of users, most or all of whom have enmity towards the user in question. Ah well, that's life. 124.168.214.118 (talk) 10:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

GRBerry

At the request of GRBerry, posting this here; can anyone looking at this user also read User talk:GRBerry/Archive 10#SELF NOTE. Thanks! – iridescent 16:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Any admin considering unblocking this user should first review the user's history and consult with me, the blocking admin. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
So, Will, don't you think it's time for me to get unblocked? I noticed the discussion on GRBerry's talk page. Since you blocked me, I think it should be your task to mentor me, because it's pretty much you alone requesting this. EliasAlucard / Discussion 00:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
How has you behavior changed since you were blocked? For what reason should you be unblocked? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I won't be discussing much on talk pages from now on. From now on, it'll be 90% pure edits, and that's all. The reason I should be unblocked is because I feel like improving some genetics section (e.g., this one, but some other ones too). I can't stand the poor quality (often barely cited too) some sections are in, and it frustrates me not being able to edit them. EliasAlucard / Discussion 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Please comment on the behavior that caused problems before. What did you do wrong then that you won't do again? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear Admin, are you expecting the user you blocked to explain in length the mistakes he made in that tone? Gabr-el 23:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I am. Can you suggest a better way of asking? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
"What did you do wrong then that you won't do again" is rubbing it in the face a little - Elias knows well why he was blocked, he has implicitly promised not to do the same mistake again. Gabr-el 00:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking for an explicit promise. If he doesn't know why he was blocked then he can't easily avoid making he same mistakes again. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
What "implicit promise"? Not even the slightest acknowledgment from him or apologies for having authored the vicious commentary here, replete with Holocaust denials and other garbage. Boodlesthecat 04:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
I won't be discussing much on talk pages from now on - Implies that he will not be speaking with "vicious commentary" that you mentioned. He has also shown his intentions on what to edit, which is the Assyrian Genetics section. He has expressed self-control in asking the person who blocked him to mentor him. Gabr-el 04:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Please comment on the behavior that caused problems before. What did you do wrong then that you won't do again? — I got blocked for writing "Holohoax" during a heated discussion in which User:Boodlesthecat was involved (who, probably, will be blocked soon, for being a trouble user fishing for problems: Proposed mentorship for Boodlesthecat). During my almost one year block, I've had time to cool off, and reflect on my blocking incident. I've come to understand that, Misplaced Pages is, to some extent, fiercely opposed to free speech. In the words of User:Avruch on my talk page: “Misplaced Pages isn't a government, you do not have a right to free speech here”. (as if questioning and/or doubting the Holocaust was allowed by some governments). There is of course a double standard in all this. Wikipedians (mostly of Turkish descent) who question the Armenian Genocide and Assyrian Genocide, don't get blocked (and neither should they be blocked, either, because it shouldn't be a thoughtcrime to be of a different opinion on any historical event). This indicates that Misplaced Pages is fairly politicised as an Encyclopedia and in no way allows neutral editors on the Holocaust article. But I can't recall ever having edited the Holocaust article, and I'm not about to start any time soon, because it simply doesn't interest me enough. Looking back, at my so called "behavior", I think it was obvious that I needed a break from Wiki, and that I perhaps had gotten too emotional on the discussion pages. I've had my break, and it's been almost an entire year. Aside from that, in all my chutzpah, I think you owe me an apology for blocking me indefinitely. I also think it's your responsibility Will, to mentor me, if you can't find anyone else who wants to mentor me. You being the one who blocked me indefinitely, it's only fair the task should be up to you, because you seem to be the only one who is requesting this. What I won't do again is to raise any critical thought, opinion or dissidence against the Holocaust. This is apparently forbidden here on Misplaced Pages, and chances are you will get blocked indefinitely for it. I really ought to boycott Misplaced Pages on general principle for this, and many established Wikipedians who understand the importance of free speech in this day and age, very rightly so, protested against my block. Now, all that being said, I promise to behave this time around, because I'm interested in contributing with high quality edits on several population genetics entries here on Misplaced Pages (I've been reading lots of genetics related articles on PubMed Central as a good waste of time, and frankly it's annoying me that I can't improve some sections that are lacking in quality). EliasAlucard / Discussion 08:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. I have posted this question for community input. WP:ANI#Unblock EliasAlucard? It should be resolved within a couple of days. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
I am not inclined to mentor him and in light of this response I am no longer sure that unblocking, even with mentoring, is a good idea. Is there a consensus for unblocking? If so, should there be a mentorship or other constraints? — Why do you want to keep me blocked? EliasAlucard / Discussion 09:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

As your block log indicates, I blocked the account for "racist rants, incivility, POV pushing, edit warring, disruption". My concern is that there would be more of the same. Let's see what others think. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Your concern is a snap judgement. I've told you, I want to get unblocked because some articles are in a poor condition and need improvement. I have no interest in wasting time on talk page discussions more than I have to. I wasn't causing any disruption either, User:Boodlesthecat was the sole driving force behind all that disruption (as his block log shows, since I've been gone; case in point). And racism? How can you be concerned "that there would be more of the same", when you haven't even given me a chance to actually edit? EliasAlucard / Discussion 10:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Your first act of mentoring should be showing him how to better fake sincerity. — User:Kuru. I can't believe this. "Fake sincerity". Fake and sincerity in the same sentence, as if such an oxymoron would somehow not be contradictful, and these guys are telling me I don't get it? EliasAlucard / Discussion 13:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Conservapedia, for example, may be a better match - please, stop the sniping. It is quite ironic that this is being said against Elias, a user who has contributed a lot of verifiable information during his time on Misplaced Pages. Its also funny that you mention Conservapedia, considering how obsessive they are with blocking users who try to correct articles. Gabr-el 07:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Translated

Template:Translated has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 15:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chaldoassyrians

A tag has been placed on Chaldoassyrians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Helen Slater Supergirl.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Helen Slater Supergirl.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 12:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Assyrian Progressive Nationalist Party

A tag has been placed on Assyrian Progressive Nationalist Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sami (talk) 06:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Assyrian Democratic Organization

A tag has been placed on Assyrian Democratic Organization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sami (talk) 07:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Unites States of America listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unites States of America. Since you had some involvement with the Unites States of America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kumioko (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alicia Rhodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Rhodes is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Alicia Rhodes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz 21:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Accadian listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Accadian. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Shyheim for deletion

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article Shyheim is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shyheim until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! Magnolia677 (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Legendary Dark Knight listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legendary Dark Knight. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

The Legendary Dark Knight Sparda listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Legendary Dark Knight Sparda. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Legendary Dark Knight Sparda listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legendary Dark Knight Sparda. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

The Legendary Dark Knight listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Legendary Dark Knight. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

PLAYSTATION®3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PLAYSTATION®3. Since you had some involvement with the PLAYSTATION®3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Wayne Smith

The article Daniel Wayne Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Possibly could be included in Anna Nicole Smith

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Human Face Fish listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Human Face Fish. Since you had some involvement with the Human Face Fish redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Human Face Fish for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human Face Fish is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Human Face Fish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Religion of Peace™ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Religion of Peace™. Since you had some involvement with the Religion of Peace™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christianophobe

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Christianophobe, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Ixocactus (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

"Azerbadzjan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Azerbadzjan. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#Azerbadzjan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. dudhhrContribs 08:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

"Dzjugasjvili" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dzjugasjvili. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 5#Dzjugasjvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

"DUALSHOCK®3" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect DUALSHOCK®3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 2#DUALSHOCK®3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Louis de Pointe du Lac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis de Pointe du Lac is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Louis de Pointe du Lac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Roniius 17:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Wayne Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Wayne Smith is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wayne Smith (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Who is John Galt? ✉ 02:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Assyrian ethnic groups has been nominated for discussion

Category:Assyrian ethnic groups has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cultural nationalism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural nationalism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cultural nationalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yr Enw (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Francis (Assyrian)

Notice

The article George Francis (Assyrian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article hasn't seen any major edits to it since its initial creation in the late 2000's, and information on the subject is scarce online leading to a lack of sources.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)